Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 16;35(12):2357–2365. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05893-2

Table 2.

Urinary incontinence findings from the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-UI Short Form (ICIQ-UI-SF) questionnaire

Descriptive All players with UI (n = 98) Camogie players with UI (n = 47) Ladies Gaelic football players with UI (n = 51) p value*, **
Prevalence of SUI only, % (n) 52% (51) 55.3 % (26) 49.0 % (25) p = 0.533**
Prevalence of UUI only, % (n) 7.1 % (7) 10.6 % (5) 3.9 % (2) p = 0.255***
Prevalence of MUI, % (n) 31.6 % (31) 29.8 % (14) 33.3 % (17) p = 0.657**
Leaks for no obvious reason, % (n) 9.2 % (9) 4.2 % (2) 13.7 % (7) p = 0.163***
EDL score, mean ± SD 2.3 ± 2.3 2.2 ± 2.2 2.3 ± 2.4 p = 0.862*
ICIQ-UI-SF sum score (mean ± SD) 6.1 ± 3.4 6.2 ± 3.7 6.0 ± 3.1 p = 0.732*

ICIQ-UI-SF, sum score indicated the severity of UI

To determine differences between sports, data were analyzed by *Mann–Whitney U test, **Chi-squared tests, or ***Fisher’s exact test

EDL Everyday Life Score, SUI stress urinary incontinence, UUI urge urinary incontinence, MUI mixed urinary incontinence