Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 15;16(12):7501–7510. doi: 10.62347/SSUF8455

Table 1.

Comparison of general information between the two groups [Mean ± SD, n (%)]

Group Observation group (n = 61) Control group (n = 61) χ2/t value P value
Gender Male 41 (67.21) 38 (62.30) 0.323 0.570
Female 20 (32.79) 23 (37.70)
Age (years) 52.67 ± 8.48 53.15 ± 8.63 0.310 0.757
BMI (kg/m2) 23.15 ± 2.95 23.20 ± 2.77 0.097 0.923
ASA classification I level 23 (37.70) 26 (42.62) 0.307 0.580
II level 38 (62.30) 35 (57.38)
RUSS scores 4.02 ± 0.56 3.99 ± 0.67 0.268 0.789
CT values of stones (Hu) 986.69 ± 136.07 992.74 ± 105.38 0.275 0.784
Maximum diameter of stones (cm) 3.95 ± 0.40 3.97 ± 0.43 0.266 0.791
Number of stones Single 24 (39.34) 25 (40.98) 0.034 0.853
Multiple 37 (60.66) 36 (59.02)
Location of stones Upper and middle calices 38 (62.30) 40 (65.57) 0.142 0.706
Lower calices 23 (37.70) 21 (34.43)

Note: BMI: body mass index; RUSS: Resurlu-Unsal Stone Score; ASA: American Standards Association; CT: computerized tomography.