Skip to main content
American Journal of Translational Research logoLink to American Journal of Translational Research
. 2024 Dec 15;16(12):7688–7697. doi: 10.62347/CVWT8813

Urinary calculi composition and its correlation with sex, age, calculi site, urine pH and underlying diseases: a retrospective study

Hanrong Li 1, Shansen Peng 3, Huiming Jiang 2, Guozhong Wu 2, Nanhui Chen 2,3
PMCID: PMC11733361  PMID: 39822493

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the composition of urinary calculi and its correlation with sex, age, calculi site, urine pH, and underlying diseases. Methods: The clinical data of 300 patients with urinary calculi admitted to Meizhou People’s Hospital from January 2022 to October 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The composition of urinary calculi and its correlation with sex, age, calculi site, urine pH, and underlying diseases were examined. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors influencing calculi composition. Results: Significant differences in calculi composition were observed across sex, age, calculi site, and urine pH (all P<0.05). Gender was an independent risk factor for the formation of dahllite (Dah) calculi (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 3.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.10-6.51, P<0.01). Age, calculi site, and urine pH were independent risk factors for the formation of uric acid (UA) calculi (adjusted OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.06, P<0.01; adjusted OR = 3.03, 95% CI: 1.81-7.38, P = 0.01; adjusted OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.17-2.09, P<0.01). Urine pH was also an independent risk factor for the formation of six ammonium magnesium phosphate calculi (adjusted OR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.42-3.80, P = 0.01). Conclusion: Sex, age, calculi site, and urine pH are significantly associated with the composition of urinary calculi.

Keywords: Urinary calculi, composition, sex, age, urine pH

Introduction

Urinary calculi are among the most common diseases seen in urology, characterized by a high incidence and recurrence rate [1]. These calculi can occur in the kidneys, ureters, bladder, or urethra [2] and may lead to urinary tract obstruction, infection, tissue damage, kidney function decline, or even systemic complications, which in severe cases can be life-threatening [3,4]. The composition of urinary calculi is diverse, including calcium oxalate (CaOx), calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM), calcium oxalate dihydrate (COD), calcium phosphate (CaP), dahllite (Dah), dicalcium phosphate dihydrate (DCPD), calcite (Cal), uric acid (UA), uricite (Ur), sodium urate monohydrate (SUM), ammonium urate (AUU), ammonium magnesium phosphate (AMP), magnesium ammonium phosphate monohydrate (AMPM), six ammonium magnesium phosphate (SAMP) and cystine (Cys) [5]. CaOx calculi are the most prevalent type, accounting for 68.7%-90% of all urinary calculi [6]. Reduced urinary output and excessive renal excretion of calcium, oxalates, or urates increase the risk of CaOx calculi formation [7]. Citrate and other organic substances (e.g., nephrocalcin and osteopontin) inhibit calculi formation by forming complexes with oxalates [8].

Dah calculi are primarily associated with excessive solute intake and external environmental factors that disturb urine pH [9]. UA calculi account for 10%-20% of urinary calculi and are the second most common type in developed countries, following CaOx calculi. Insulin resistance, metabolic syndrome, low urine pH, and low urine volume are significant contributors to UA calculi formation [10]. SAMP, which comprise 10%-15% of urinary calculi, are infection-related calculi caused by recurrent or persistent urinary tract infections. These calculi can form antler-like structures within 4-6 weeks, and are a primary component of staghorn calculi [11].

The chemical composition and structural complexity of urinary calculi present significant challenges in understanding their formation mechanisms and developing prevention strategies [12]. Analyzing calculi composition provides clinicians with essential insights into the underlying causes of calculi formation, enabling tailored treatment plans [13]. Urinary calculi formation is a multifactorial process with mechanisms that remain incompletely understood [14]. Studies suggest a strong association between calculi formation and metabolic disturbances, as abnormal metabolism is a risk factor [15]. The incidence and metabolic characteristics of urinary calculi vary by race, diet, and lifestyle [16]. In addition, patient-specific factors such as age, sex, calculi location, and urine pH play critical roles in calculi formation [17].

Liu et al. demonstrated through Mendelian randomization that sedentary lifestyles, obesity, smoking, and type 2 diabetes mediate the causal relationship between educational level and kidney calculi [18]. Zhang et al. identified diabetes and hypertension as predictive factors for upper urinary tract calculi [19]. Despite these findings, the relationship between urinary calculi composition and sex, age, calculi site, urine pH and underlying diseases remains unclear. This study aims to analyze urinary calculi composition and its correlations with sex, age, calculi site, urine pH, and underlying diseases, providing a foundation for improved prevention and treatment strategies.

Materials and methods

Patients

This study was approved by the ethics committee of Meizhou People’s Hospital (approval number: 2024-C-180; approval date: October 28, 2024) and employed a retrospective cohort study design. The clinical data of 300 patients with urinary calculi, admitted to Meizhou People’s Hospital from January 2022 to October 2024, were retrospectively analyzed. After excluding 2 cases with a history of urinary diseases, 1 case with systemic infectious diseases, and 197 cases with incomplete data, a total of 300 patients were included in the final analysis. The screening flowchart is presented in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Flow diagram detailing the selection of patients included in the retrospective analysis.

The average age of the patients was 55.90 ± 25.43 years. The average diameter of the calculi was 2.23 ± 0.21 cm. Urolithiasis specimens were collected via percutaneous nephrolithotomy or ureteroscopic lithotripsy. Patient medical records were retrieved using a predefined data collection sheet.

Inclusion criteria: (1) Diagnosis of urinary calculi based on imaging examinations (e.g., lumbar acid levels, hematuria, renal colic, and B-ultrasound findings of calculi ≥0.3 mm in the upper or lower urinary tract). (2) Treated at Meizhou People’s Hospital. (3) No history of urinary diseases or surgeries. (4) Age ≥ 18 years. (5) Complete medical records. (6) Underwent urinary calculi composition analysis.

Exclusion criteria: (1) Inability to cooperate with the study. (2) Presence of mental disorders. (3) Systemic infectious diseases. (4) Withdrawal from the study for personal reasons. (5) Use of medications affecting urine pH.

Data collection

The composition analysis of urinary calculi from 300 patients was performed using the LIIR20 automatic infrared spectrum analysis system (Lambda Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China), as previously described [20]. The procedure was as follows: 1. The calculi samples were cleaned with water. 2. The specimens were dried in a drying oven for 20 minutes, placed in sterile containers, and stored at 20-22°C. 3. Before composition analysis, the calculi specimens were finely ground into particles smaller than 2 μm. The ground powder was then compressed. 4. The prepared sample was analyzed using the LIIR20 system to determine the calculi composition.

Based on the results of the composition analysis [21], the calculi were classified into the following groups: 1. Simple CaOx calculi group: Calculi containing only CaOx (including COM and COD. 2. Mixed CaOx calculi group: Mixed calculi with CaOx as the main component. 3. Dah calculi group: Dah as the primary component. 4. UA calculi group: Calculi primarily composed of UA or AUU. 5. SAMP calculi group: Calculi primarily composed of SAMP. 6. Other calculi group: Calculi composed of components not included in the above groups.

On the morning following admission, clean midstream urine samples were collected from patients and analyzed. Urine with a pH <5.5 was classified as acidic, while urine with a pH ≥5.5 was considered neutral or alkaline.

Outcome measures

The differences in calculi composition based on sex, age, calculi site, urine pH, and underlying diseases (e.g., hypertension, diabetes) were analyzed.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 10 software. Measurement data (e.g., age, calculi diameter, body mass index [BMI], weight, and disease duration) were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Categorical data were presented as n (%), and comparisons were performed using the χ2 test. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing calculi composition. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

General data

Among the 300 patients included in the study, the mean age was 55.90 ± 14.36 years (range: 20-84 years). The cohort comprised 161 males and 139 females. Additional patient details are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

General data of patients

Index Number/(x±s) Percentage (%)
Gender
    Male 161 53.67
    Female 139 46.33
Age (years)
    20-44 57 19.00
    45-59 133 44.33
    ≥60 110 36.67
Calculi site
    Upper urinary tract 271 90.33
    Lower urinary tract 29 9.67
Urine pH value
    <5.5 51 17.00
    ≥5.5 249 83.00
Hypertension
    Yes 97 32.33
    No 203 67.67
Diabetes
    Yes 51 17.00
    No 249 83.00
BMI (kg/m2) 22.56 ± 2.24
Weight (kg) 62.65 ± 7.95
Duration of the disease (years) 3.82 ± 0.41
Treatment history
    Percutaneous nephrolithotomy 158 52.67
    Ureteroscopic lithotripsy 142 47.33

Note: BMI: body mass index.

Distribution of calculi components

As shown in Figure 2, the distribution of calculi components among the 300 patients was as follows: Simple CaOx calculi: 53.00% (159/300); Mixed CaOx calculi: 22.00% (66/300); Dah calculi: 5.00% (15/300); UA calculi: 12.67% (38/300); SAMP calculi: 6.67% (20/300); Other calculi: 0.66% (2/300).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Distribution of calculi components. CaOx: calcium oxalate; Dah: dahllite; UA: uric acid; SAMP: six ammonium magnesium phosphate.

Comparison of sex in patients with different types of calculi

The proportion of simple CaOx calculi was significantly lower in female patients compared to male patients, whereas the proportion of Dah calculi was higher in female patients than in male patients (P<0.05, Table 2).

Table 2.

Gender distribution of patients with different types of calculi

Variable Cases Calculi components

Simple CaOx calculi Mixed CaOx calculi Dah calculi UA calculi SAMP calculi Other calculi






Case % Case % Case % Case % Case % Case %
Gender Male 161 98 60.87 30 18.63 4 2.48 22 13.66 7 4.36 0 0.00
Female 139 61 43.88 36 25.90 11 7.91 16 11.51 13 9.35 2 1.45
χ2 8.64 2.30 4.63 0.31 3.00 2.33
P 0.00 0.13 0.03 0.58 0.08 0.13

Note: CaOx: calcium oxalate; Dah: dahllite; UA: uric acid; SAMP: six ammonium magnesium phosphate.

Age distribution of patients with different types of calculi

As shown in Table 3, patients were categorized into three age groups: young (20-44 years), middle-aged (45-59 years), and elderly (≥60 years). The young group included 57 cases, the middle-aged group 133 cases, and the elderly group 110 cases. The proportion of simple CaOx calculi was higher in the young and middle-aged groups compared to the elderly group (P<0.05). Conversely, the proportion of UA calculi was lower in the young and middle-aged groups than in the elderly group (P<0.05).

Table 3.

Age distribution of patients with different types of calculi

Groups Cases Young group Middle-aged group Old-aged group χ2 P



Case % Case % Case %
Simple CaOx calculi 159 39 68.42 71 53.38 49 44.55 8.61 0.01
Mixed CaOx calculi 66 7 12.28 36 27.07 23 20.91 5.21 0.07
Dah calculi 15 3 5.26 5 3.76 7 6.36 0.87 0.65
UA calculi 38 1 1.75 10 7.52 27 24.54 23.35 <0.01
SAMP calculi 20 5 8.77 11 8.27 4 3.64 2.58 0.28
Other calculi 2 2 3.52 0 0.00 0 0.00 8.58 0.01

Note: CaOx: calcium oxalate; Dah: dahllite; UA: uric acid; SAMP: six ammonium magnesium phosphate.

Comparison of calculi site in patients with different types of calculi

As shown in Table 4, the proportion of simple CaOx calculi was significantly higher in the upper urinary tract compared to the lower urinary tract (P<0.05). Conversely, the proportion of UA calculi was lower in the upper urinary tract than in the lower urinary tract (P<0.05).

Table 4.

Calculi site distribution of patients with different types of calculi

Variable Cases Calculi components

Simple CaOx calculi Mixed CaOx calculi Dah calculi UA calculi SAMP calculi Other calculi






Case % Case % Case % Case % Case % Case %
Calculi site Upper urinary tract 271 149 54.98 61 22.51 14 5.17 28 10.33 17 6.27 2 0.74
Lower urinary tract 29 10 34.48 5 17.24 1 3.45 10 34.48 3 10.35 0 0.00
χ2 4.42 0.42 0.16 13.81 0.70 0.22
P 0.04 0.52 0.69 <0.01 0.40 0.64

Note: CaOx: calcium oxalate; Dah: dahllite; UA: uric acid; SAMP: six ammonium magnesium phosphate.

Comparison of urine pH in patients with different types of calculi

As shown in Table 5, the proportion of simple CaOx calculi and SAMP calculi in acidic urine was significantly lower than in neutral or alkaline urine. In contrast, the proportion of UA calculi in acidic urine was significantly higher than in neutral or alkaline urine (P<0.05).

Table 5.

Urine pH distribution of patients with different types of calculi

Variable Cases Calculi components

Simple CaOx calculi Mixed CaOx calculi Dah calculi UA calculi SAMP calculi Other calculi






Case % Case % Case % Case % Case % Case %
Urine pH Acid urine 51 14 27.45 14 27.45 3 5.88 20 39.22 0 0.00 0 0.00
Neutral or alkaline urine 249 145 58.23 52 20.88 12 4.82 18 7.23 20 8.03 2 0.81
χ2 16.10 1.06 0.10 39.15 4.39 0.41
P <0.01 0.30 0.75 <0.01 0.04 0.52

Note: CaOx: calcium oxalate; Dah: dahllite; UA: uric acid; SAMP: six ammonium magnesium phosphate.

Comparison of underlying diseases in patients with different types of calculi

As shown in Table 6, there was no significant difference in calculi composition between patients with and without hypertension (P>0.05). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in calculi composition between patients with and without diabetes (P>0.05, Table 7).

Table 6.

Distribution of hypertension in patients with different types of calculi

Variable Cases Calculi components

Simple CaOx calculi Mixed CaOx calculi Dah calculi UA calculi SAMP calculi Other calculi






Case % Case % Case % Case % Case % Case %
Hypertension Yes 97 53 54.64 25 25.77 2 2.06 10 10.31 7 7.22 0 0.00
No 203 106 52.22 41 20.20 13 6.40 28 13.79 13 6.40 2 0.99
χ2 0.15 1.19 2.61 0.72 0.07 0.96
P 0.69 0.28 0.11 0.40 0.79 0.33

Note: CaOx: calcium oxalate; Dah: dahllite; UA: uric acid; SAMP: six ammonium magnesium phosphate.

Table 7.

Distribution of diabetes in patients with different types of calculi

Variable Cases Calculi components

Simple CaOx calculi Mixed CaOx calculi Dah calculi UA calculi SAMP calculi Other calculi






Case % Case % Case % Case % Case % Case %
Diabetes Yes 51 31 60.78 11 21.57 1 1.96 6 11.76 2 3.93 0 0.00
No 249 128 51.41 55 22.09 14 5.62 32 12.85 18 7.23 2 0.80
χ2 1.50 0.01 1.20 0.05 0.74 0.41
P 0.22 0.93 0.27 0.83 0.39 0.52

Note: CaOx: calcium oxalate; Dah: dahllite; UA: uric acid; SAMP: six ammonium magnesium phosphate.

Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of factors influencing calculi composition

In this study, simple CaOx calculi were used as the reference group. Variables with statistical significance in univariate analysis (sex, age, calculi site, and urine pH) were included in the logistic regression analysis (all P<0.05). The results (Table 8) indicated the following: 1. Sex was an independent risk factor for the formation of Dah calculi (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 3.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.10-6.51, P<0.01). 2. Age, calculi site, and urine pH were independent risk factors for the formation of UA calculi (adjusted OR = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.06, P<0.01; adjusted OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.81-7.38, P = 0.01; adjusted OR = 1.56, 95% CI: 1.17-2.09, P<0.01). 3. Urine pH was an independent risk factor for the formation of SAMP calculi (adjusted OR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.42-3.80, P = 0.01).

Table 8.

Multivariate Logistic regression analysis of factors influencing calculi composition

Calculi components β value Wald χ2 value Adjusted OR value (95% CI) P value
Dah calculi Gender (male vs female) 1.30 20.80 3.70 (2.10-6.51) <0.01
UA calculi Age (years) 0.04 9.22 1.04 (1.01-1.06) <0.01
Calculi site (upper urinary tract vs lower urinary tract) 0.03 6.36 1.03 (1.81-7.38) 0.01
Urine pH 0.45 8.96 1.56 (1.17-2.09) <0.01
SAMP calculi Urine pH 0.82 11.72 2.31 (1.42-3.80) 0.01

Note: Dah: dahllite; UA: uric acid; SAMP: six ammonium magnesium phosphate.

Discussion

The incidence of urinary calculi varies significantly by sex, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.16:1 in this study, consistent with previous reports [22]. Male patients are more prone to urinary calculi, potentially due to factors such as greater engagement in physical labor and higher alcohol consumption, which can lead to excessive fluid loss, reduced urine output, and an increased risk of calculi formation [23]. In contrast, female patients benefit from higher estrogen levels, which promote citrate excretion. Increased urinary citrate reduces calcium salt saturation, thereby inhibiting calculi formation [21].

Our study also found that the proportion of simple CaOx calculi was lower in female patients than in males, while the proportion of Dah calculi was higher in females, consistent with prior findings [24,25]. The main reasons for these sex-related differences in calculi composition include: 1. Elevated androgen levels in males, which increase serum oxalate levels and promote CaOx calculi formation [26]. 2. Higher estrogen levels in females, which enhance citrate excretion and inhibit CaOx calculi formation [27]. 3. The anatomical characteristics of the female urethra, which is shorter and straighter with an opening near the vagina, increase the risk of local and retrograde infections. This can elevate urinary pH and support the growth of urease-producing microorganisms, ultimately contributing to Dah calculi formation [28]. Moreover, our study identified sex as an independent risk factor for Dah calculi formation.

Age is another important factor influencing urinary calculi formation. Studies suggest that endogenous α-insulin trimolecular condensation inhibitors, which significantly inhibit calculi formation, decrease with age. This reduction leads to an increased incidence of calculi in older populations [23]. The highest calculi detection rate in this study occurred in the 45-59 age group, aligning with findings from a national survey in 2020 [25].

The proportion of UA calculi in the elderly group was higher than in the young and middle-aged groups, consistent with previous studies [29]. This may be due to decreased renal ammonia production and increased urine acidification in older individuals, which promote the supersaturation of UA in urine [30]. Additionally, metabolic disorders such as obesity, insulin resistance, and diabetes, which increase with age, contribute to reduced urine pH and a higher risk of UA calculi formation [31]. Conversely, the proportion of simple CaOx calculi was higher in the young and middle-aged groups compared to the elderly group. This is likely related to reduced urinary calcium excretion in younger individuals. Our findings also indicated that age is an independent risk factor for the formation of UA calculi.

The incidence of urinary calculi is significantly higher in the upper urinary tract compared to the lower urinary tract [32]. Upper urinary tract calculi primarily occur in the kidneys, while lower urinary tract calculi mainly form in the bladder [33]. Upper urinary tract calculi are usually caused by Randall’s plaque formation in the kidneys, whereas lower urinary tract calculi often result from retrograde urinary tract infections and urethral obstruction [34]. In our study, 271 patients had upper urinary tract calculi, and 29 had lower urinary tract calculi, consistent with epidemiological trends [35]. We found that the proportion of simple CaOx calculi was higher in the upper urinary tract than in the lower urinary tract, while the proportion of UA calculi was lower in the upper urinary tract compared to the lower urinary tract. Bladder calculi are mainly caused by nutrient deficiency, lower urinary tract obstruction, and infection; thus, UA calculi are more common in the bladder [36]. Furthermore, our study demonstrated that the calculi site is an influential factor in the formation of UA calculi.

Urine pH significantly influences the formation of urinary calculi [37]. Studies have shown that urine pH affects the formation of UA calculi, CaOx calculi and SAMP calculi [38]. When urine pH is <5.5, the solubility of uric acid decreases markedly, increasing the likelihood of supersaturation and crystallization, which elevates the risk of uric acid calculi [39]. Our results indicated that the proportion of simple CaOx calculi and SAMP calculi in acidic urine was lower than in neutral or alkaline urine, while the proportion of UA calculi in acidic urine was higher. Additionally, our study confirmed that urine pH is an influential factor in the formation of UA and SAMP calculi.

Common metabolic diseases such as essential hypertension and diabetes can lead to increased levels of calcium, oxalic acid, and uric acid in the urine, thereby increasing urine acidity and reducing citrate content, which increases the risk of urinary calculi [40]. However, our study found no significant difference in calculi composition between patients with and without hypertension. Similarly, no difference was observed between diabetic and non-diabetic patients.

Dietary adjustment is crucial for preventing calculi formation [41]. Strict control of calcium, oxalate, fructose, salt, and protein intake, along with ensuring adequate fluid intake to produce at least 2-2.5 liters of urine per day, can effectively reduce the concentration of calcium, magnesium, uric acid, and other calculi-promoting substances in the urine [42]. Therefore, patients can prevent calculi formation by adjusting their diet and increasing water intake.

Our study has some limitations. First, as a retrospective single-center study, we did not perform 24-hour urine electrolyte analysis in patients with calculi, limiting our understanding of their urinary electrolyte status. Additionally, we did not follow up with patients for postoperative recurrence of calculi. Moreover, we did not conduct a detailed analysis of factors closely related to calculi formation, such as metabolic syndrome. Since all calculi samples were surgically removed, there may have been patients with asymptomatic calculi or spontaneous passage of calculi who were not included, potentially introducing bias. Furthermore, in the analysis of calculi composition, only some calculi were randomly selected for analysis, which may have caused deviations in the results. In conclusion, sex, age, calculi site, and urine pH are closely associated with the composition of urinary calculi. Analysis of calculi components can guide etiological investigation, treatment, and prevention strategies for urinary calculi.

Disclosure of conflict of interest

None.

References

  • 1.Pietrow PK, Karellas ME. Medical management of common urinary calculi. Am Fam Physician. 2006;74:86–94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McCoombe K, Dobeli K, Meikle S, Llewellyn S, Kench P. Sensitivity of virtual non-contrast dual-energy CT urogram for detection of urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2022;32:8588–8596. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08939-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cao Y, Han X, Wang X, Zhang Y, Xiao H, Zeng X. Risk factors of urinary calculi in men with gout. Clin Rheumatol. 2022;41:3143–3150. doi: 10.1007/s10067-022-06246-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Raja A, Hekmati Z, Joshi HB. How do urinary calculi influence health-related quality of life and patient treatment preference: a systematic review. J Endourol. 2016;30:727–43. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tamborino F, Cicchetti R, Mascitti M, Litterio G, Orsini A, Ferretti S, Basconi M, De Palma A, Ferro M, Marchioni M, Schips L. Pathophysiology and main molecular mechanisms of urinary stone formation and recurrence. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25:3075. doi: 10.3390/ijms25053075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Khan SR, Canales BK, Dominguez-Gutierrez PR. Randall’s plaque and calcium oxalate stone formation: role for immunity and inflammation. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021;17:417–433. doi: 10.1038/s41581-020-00392-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wu F, Cheng Y, Zhou J, Liu X, Lin R, Xiang S, Liu Z, Wang C. Zn(2+) regulates human oxalate metabolism by manipulating oxalate decarboxylase to treat calcium oxalate stones. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;234:123320. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lan Y, Zhu W, Duan X, Deng T, Li S, Liu Y, Yang Z, Wen Y, Luo L, Zhao S, Wang J, Zhao Z, Wu W, Zeng G. Glycine suppresses kidney calcium oxalate crystal depositions via regulating urinary excretions of oxalate and citrate. J Cell Physiol. 2021;236:6824–6835. doi: 10.1002/jcp.30370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Abdel-Gawad M, Ali-El-Dein B, Mehta S, Al-Kohlany KM, Elsobky E. A correlation study between macro- and micro-analysis of pediatric urinary calculi. J Pediatr Urol. 2014;10:1267–72. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ma Q, Fang L, Su R, Ma L, Xie G, Cheng Y. Uric acid stones, clinical manifestations and therapeutic considerations. Postgrad Med J. 2018;94:458–462. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-135332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.El Beze J, Mazeaud C, Daul C, Ochoa-Ruiz G, Daudon M, Eschwège P, Hubert J. Evaluation and understanding of automated urinary stone recognition methods. BJU Int. 2022;130:786–798. doi: 10.1111/bju.15767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Viprakasit DP, Sawyer MD, Herrell SD, Miller NL. Changing composition of staghorn calculi. J Urol. 2011;186:2285–90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Miao C, Liang C, Wang Y, Song Z, Xu A, Liu B, Li J, Song N, Wang Z. The management and composition of symptomatic seminal vesicle calculi: aetiological analysis and current research. BJU Int. 2020;125:314–321. doi: 10.1111/bju.14758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Evans K, Costabile RA. Time to development of symptomatic urinary calculi in a high risk environment. J Urol. 2005;173:858–61. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000152578.07262.1c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Miller AW, Penniston KL, Fitzpatrick K, Agudelo J, Tasian G, Lange D. Mechanisms of the intestinal and urinary microbiome in kidney stone disease. Nat Rev Urol. 2022;19:695–707. doi: 10.1038/s41585-022-00647-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Siener R, Löhr P, Hesse A. Urinary risk profile, impact of diet, and risk of calcium oxalate urolithiasis in idiopathic uric acid stone disease. Nutrients. 2023;15:572. doi: 10.3390/nu15030572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kim JY, Yu JH, Kang SH, Lee JG, Cheon J, Kang SG. The effect of metabolic risk factors on urinary stone composition: an observational study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022;101:e29622. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu M, Wu J, Gao M, Li Y, Xia W, Zhang Y, Chen J, Chen Z, Zhu Z, Chen H. Lifestyle factors, serum parameters, metabolic comorbidities, and the risk of kidney stones: a Mendelian randomization study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023;14:1240171. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1240171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhang B, Xie H, Liu C. Risk factors of calculi in upper urinary tract after radical cystectomy with urinary diversion. Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) 2019;43:568–572. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2019.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Miernik A, Eilers Y, Bolwien C, Lambrecht A, Hauschke D, Rebentisch G, Lossin PS, Hesse A, Rassweiler JJ, Wetterauer U, Schoenthaler M. Automated analysis of urinary stone composition using Raman spectroscopy: pilot study for the development of a compact portable system for immediate postoperative ex vivo application. J Urol. 2013;190:1895–900. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang P, Zhang H, Zhou J, Jin S, Liu C, Yang B, Cui L. Study of risk factor of urinary calculi according to the association between stone composition with urine component. Sci Rep. 2021;11:8723. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87733-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tu X, Zhuang XY, Bai XX, Huang CY. Composition analysis of 1,495 cases of upper urinary tract calculi: the role of age and gender. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2024;28:3447–3454. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202405_36190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang S, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Tang Y, Li J. Upper urinary tract stone compositions: the role of age and gender. Int Braz J Urol. 2020;46:70–80. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Grant C, Guzman G, Stainback RP, Amdur RL, Mufarrij P. Variation in kidney stone composition within the United States. J Endourol. 2023;32:973–977. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ye Z, Zeng G, Yang H, Li J, Tang K, Wang G, Wang S, Yu Y, Wang Y, Zhang T, Long Y, Li W, Wang C, Wang W, Gao S, Shan Y, Huang X, Bai Z, Lin X, Cheng Y, Wang Q, Xu Z, Xie L, Yuan J, Ren S, Fan Y, Pan T, Wang J, Li X, Chen X, Gu X, Sun Z, Xiao K, Jia J, Zhang Q, Wang G, Sun T, Li X, Xu C, Xu C, Shi G, He J, Song L, Sun G, Wang D, Liu Y, Wang C, Han Y, Liang P, Wang Z, He W, Chen Z, Xing J, Xu H. The status and characteristics of urinary stone composition in China. BJU Int. 2020;125:801–809. doi: 10.1111/bju.14765. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fuster DG, Morard GA, Schneider L, Mattmann C, Lüthi D, Vogt B, Dhayat NA. Association of urinary sex steroid hormones with urinary calcium, oxalate and citrate excretion in kidney stone formers. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022;37:335–348. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfaa360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dey J, Creighton A, Lindberg JS, Fuselier HA, Kok DJ, Cole FE, Hamm L. Estrogen replacement increased the citrate and calcium excretion rates in postmenopausal women with recurrent urolithiasis. J Urol. 2002;167:169–71. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Aierken Y, Ye E, Abudureyimu A, Li SX, Kadier A, Keyoumu H, Liu D. Analysis of the components of 236 cases of urinary stones in Xinjiang Uyghur children. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2023;33:293–298. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1757187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Costa-Bauzá A, Ramis M, Montesinos V, Grases F, Conte A, Pizá P, Pieras E, Grases F. Type of renal calculi: variation with age and sex. World J Urol. 2007;25:415–21. doi: 10.1007/s00345-007-0177-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Srinivasan S, Kalaiselvi P, Sakthivel R, Pragasam V, Muthu V, Varalakshmi P. Uric acid: an abettor or protector in calcium oxalate urolithiasis? Biochemical study in stone formers. Clin Chim Acta. 2005;353:45–51. doi: 10.1016/j.cccn.2004.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Daudon M, Lacour B, Jungers P. High prevalence of uric acid calculi in diabetic stone formers. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20:468–9. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yang B, Zhu Y, Zhou Q, Shu C. Correlation of the degree of hydronephrosis and computed tomography value of calculi with efficacy of ureteroscopic lithotripsy in patients with upper urinary tract infectious calculi. Arch Esp Urol. 2023;76:377–382. doi: 10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20237606.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang X, Zhao X, Zheng J, Hao C. Bilateral simultaneous percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus staged approach for bilateral upper urinary tract calculi: a meta-analysis. Asian J Surg. 2023;46:553–555. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.06.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dimarco DS, Chow GK, Gettman MT, Segura JW. Ureteroscopic treatment of upper tract urinary calculi. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2025;57:17–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ramello A, Vitale C, Marangella M. Epidemiology of nephrolithiasis. J Nephrol. 2000;13(Suppl 3):S45–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shah A, Keir M, Ducas R, Crean AM. Uric acid bladder stones in congenital cyanotic heart disease. Lancet. 2016;388:1921. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00347-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Menezes CJ, Worcester EM, Coe FL, Asplin J, Bergsland KJ, Ko B. Mechanisms for falling urine pH with age in stone formers. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2019;317:F65–F72. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00066.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wagner CA, Mohebbi N. Urinary pH and stone formation. J Nephrol. 2010;23(Suppl 16):S165–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kamel KS, Cheema-Dhadli S, Shafiee MA, Davids MR, Halperin ML. Recurrent uric acid stones. QJM. 2005;98:57–68. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hci008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Qin Z, Zhao J, Geng J, Chang K, Liao R, Su B. Higher triglyceride-glucose index is associated with increased likelihood of kidney stones. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021;12:774567. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.774567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ferraro PM, Curhan GC, Gambaro G, Taylor EN. Total, dietary, and supplemental vitamin c intake and risk of incident kidney stones. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;67:400–7. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Nirumand MC, Hajialyani M, Rahimi R, Farzaei MH, Zingue S, Nabavi SM, Bishayee A. Dietary plants for the prevention and management of kidney stones: preclinical and clinical evidence and molecular mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:765. doi: 10.3390/ijms19030765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Translational Research are provided here courtesy of e-Century Publishing Corporation

RESOURCES