ABSTRACT
Remnant populations of endangered species often have complex demographic histories associated with human impact. This can present challenges for conservation as populations modified by human activity may require bespoke management. The Eurasian red squirrel, Sciurus vulgaris (L., 1758), is endangered in the UK. Scotland represents a key stronghold, but Scottish populations have been subjected to intense anthropogenic influence, including widespread extirpations, reintroductions and competition from an invasive species. This study examined the genetic legacy of these events through low coverage whole‐genome resequencing of 106 red squirrels. Previously undetected patterns of population structure and gene flow were uncovered. One offshore island, four mainland Scottish populations, and a key east‐coast migration corridor were observed. An abrupt historical population bottleneck, related to extreme founder effects, has led to a severe and prolonged depression in genome‐wide heterozygosity, which is amongst the lowest reported for any species. Current designated red squirrel conservation stronghold locations do not encompass all existing diversity. These findings highlight the genetic legacies of past anthropogenic influence on long‐term diversity in endangered taxa. Continuing management interventions and regular genetic monitoring are recommended to safeguard and improve future diversity.
Keywords: conservation genomics, founder effects, heterozygosity, inbreeding, population management, red squirrel
1. Introduction
Contemporary populations of endangered mammals often have complex demographic histories that present challenges for conservation management. The last 500 years has seen unprecedented and accelerating biodiversity loss (Barnosky 2008; Dirzo et al. 2014) coupled with widespread destruction and fragmentation of habitats (Haddad et al. 2015; Maxwell et al. 2016; Püttker et al. 2020). This has reduced many populations to remnant, disjunct, habitat patches, placing them at greater risk of local and global extinction (Crooks et al. 2017; Haddad et al. 2015; Hanski 2015). This situation is further exacerbated in some regions by the accidental or deliberate release of species that become invasive, one of the leading drivers of extinctions via resource competition and introduction of novel diseases (Clavero and Garciaberthou 2005; Crowl et al. 2008; Gallien and Carboni 2017).
Human‐mediated movement of fauna has occurred for millennia (Hofman and Rick 2018) and contemporary reintroductions and other forms of translocation are now commonplace tools in the conservation of threatened taxa (Frankham 1996; Seddon, Armstrong, and Maloney 2007; Taylor et al. 2017). As a result, populations of some endangered species have experienced inter‐ and intraspecific admixture in addition to other long‐term demographic changes, which may include population declines and/or fluctuations, local extirpations and increased isolation (e.g., Florida panther Puma concolor coryi (Johnson et al. 2010), red wolf Canis rufus (Sacks et al. 2021) and alpine marmots Marmota spp. (Kerhoulas, Gunderson, and Olson 2015)).
Populations with such complex demographic pasts may represent (artificially) admixed assemblages and exhibit atypical genetic histories compared to large, unmixed, populations unaffected by anthropogenic effects. They are often associated with poor genetic health, exhibiting high levels of inbreeding and low genetic diversity due to past population bottlenecks and small numbers of founding individuals (Frankham, Ballou, and Briscoe 2010; Keller 2002). This can lead to genetic erosion, loss of adaptive potential and increased extinction risk (Leroy et al. 2018; Mathur and DeWoody 2021; Willi, Van Buskirk, and Hoffmann 2006). Despite this, such populations can have huge conservation importance, especially when they represent the sole remnants of that species in a particular region (e.g., Iberian lynx Lynx pardinus (IUCN 2014)), Ethiopian wolf Canis simensis (Mooney et al. 2023) and Pacific pocket mouse Perognathus longimembris pacificus (Wilder et al. 2022). As biodiversity and habitat losses continue apace, it is essential that fragmented and genetically depauperate populations are managed effectively in the face of increased threats to their long‐term survival.
In Britain, the Eurasian red squirrel ( Sciurus vulgaris L., 1758) exemplifies a species with a complex demographic history related to changes in land use and cultural attitudes (Harvie‐Brown 1881a, 1881b; Holmes 2015). Furthermore, it has become a text‐book icon of conservation science due to its 20th century (and continuing) replacement by the introduced North American grey squirrel Sciurus carolinensis G., 1788 (Gurnell et al. 2004; Gurnell and Pepper 1993; Rushton et al. 2006), which has arguably become one of the best‐known examples of a native species being supplanted by an invasive competitor (Gurnell et al. 2004; Wauters et al. 2023). While habitat loss and fragmentation contribute to current population declines, the major driver of contemporary replacement is ecological and disease‐mediated competition with the introduced grey squirrel, which can asymptomatically carry a virus novel to red squirrels, squirrelpox virus SQPV (Rushton et al. 2006; Sainsbury et al. 2000; Tompkins, White, and Boots 2003).
Red squirrels are now almost entirely absent from mainland England and Wales. Scotland represents a stronghold for the species in Britain, harbouring over 80% of the remnant population (c. 239,000 individuals (Mathews et al. 2018)). However, historical Scottish populations experienced dramatic range contractions and local extirpations prior to the introduction of S. carolinensis (Harvie‐Brown 1881a, 1881b). Some authors suggest the occurrence of a near‐extinction event around the 18th century linked to low forest cover (Harvie‐Brown 1881a, 1881b; Kitchener 1998; Ritchie 1920). This was followed by a period of unofficial and unmanaged restocking across Scotland via introductions from populations in Central/NW Europe and England from the late 1700s (Harvie‐Brown 1881a, 1880; Ritchie 1920). Numbers of introduced individuals are unknown, but this likely involved introduction of small numbers of animals from disparate origins into several Scottish locations, over a number of decades (Harvie‐Brown 1881a, 1881b; Ritchie 1920). It is probable that modern populations represent admixed composites of the remnant Scottish population with English and European additions.
Red squirrels are a conservation priority in Scotland with protection under the Nature Conservation (Scotland) Act 2004 and are listed in the Scottish Biodiversity List (https://www.nature.scot/doc/scottish‐biodiversity‐list). A suite of conservation measures are currently in place for red squirrels in Scotland under the Species Action Framework, including forestry management and grey squirrel control (Gaywood 2016). Chief among these is the creation by the Forestry Commission (now Scottish Forestry and Forestry and Land Scotland) of 19 ‘stronghold’ woodlands, where management is focused on creating an ecological advantage for red squirrels through habitat management that favours this species (Forestry Commission Scotland 2012). Translocations of red squirrels are also taking place ad hoc in the north of the country, with red squirrels from Moray and Inverness being moved to areas in the north‐west Highlands to restock this area after a long interval of absence (Dennis 2012). Movement of red squirrels to re‐establish extirpated populations in Britain has been a widely used approach in red squirrel conservation, with notable successes (e.g., Anglesey, Wales (Shuttleworth and Halliwell 2016)) and failures (Sainsbury et al. 2020). Disease, particularly squirrelpox, has been linked to poor translocation outcomes (Sainsbury et al. 2020), but the role of genetic information to promote translocation success has not yet been fully explored due to the lack of informative data.
Despite the importance of Scottish populations to the survival of red squirrels in Britain, little is known about their genetic status and population structure. Analysis of English and Welsh populations, using mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and microsatellite markers, has uncovered patterns of low within‐population diversity and high among‐population differentiation, but with relatively little phylogeographical structure, indicative of serial translocations, severe historical population bottlenecks and little contemporary gene flow (Barratt et al. 1999; Hale, Lurz, and Wolff 2004; Ogden et al. 2006). Under a scenario where effective population size is small and immigration rates low, deleterious and recessive alleles will tend to accumulate as genome‐wide heterozygosity (including loci affecting fitness) decreases under strong drift and weak selection (Frankham 1996; Frankham, Ballou, and Briscoe 2010; Keller 2002). Such scenarios can also be precipitated by small numbers of founding individuals, i.e. founder effects (Szűcs et al. 2017), and confounded when dispersal is limited, either by natural or artificial landscape barriers or when populations are supressed by competitors. Long‐term connectivity is key for the maintenance of gene flow and avoidance of genetic drift between fragmented populations (Frankham 1996; Lowe and Allendorf 2010).
Low diversity, high inbreeding and population fragmentation could reduce the ability of Scottish red squirrel populations to cope with stochastic events and disease outbreaks. Moreover, it could impede the expansion of existing Scottish populations and reduce their utility to act as founders for new populations, thereby jeopardising red squirrel recovery in Britain.
To address these key conservation concerns, our study undertook the first genome‐wide assessment of red squirrels across Scotland in order to address the specific questions, (i) how are populations genetically structured? and, (ii) what are the levels of inbreeding and genome‐wide diversity, and how are these partitioned among populations and landscapes? Our results are discussed both within the context of applied red squirrel‐specific management and their wider applicability to the conservation of endangered species facing these common threats.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sample Collection
Specimens were sourced from frozen red squirrel carcasses that had been collected as part of a long‐running disease surveillance program at the Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies (R(D)SVS), University of Edinburgh, as well as from National Museums Scotland (NMS). The opportunity arose to include samples from a remnant English population in Formby (Sefton). Scottish and English populations may have different demographic histories, but very few English mainland populations remain (Mathews et al. 2018). Therefore, the inclusion of samples from Formby provided a means to include a comparative English outgroup (Figure 1 and Table S1).
FIGURE 1.

Sample distribution of red squirrels included in the study. Sample localities are the locations where dead red squirrels were found. Official stronghold areas are shown in pink with 15 km buffer inclusion zones. Note the absence of specimens from the Central Belt, where there is a discontinuity in red squirrel distribution separating populations in the south of Scotland from those in the north. Most strongholds are located on mainland Scotland, aside from one on the Isle of Arran.
Tissues from R(D)SVS were sampled from whole organs (kidney, liver, heart), dating between 2010 and 2021, while museum tissue samples were from uterine and genital tissues dating from 1997 to 2011 (Table S1). All tissue sampling was performed either from thawed carcases (R(D)SVS) or thawed tissues (NMS), with all surfaces and instruments cleaned with a 10% bleach solution between individuals to avoid contamination. Data were filtered to select squirrels that had at least a six‐digit OS grid reference to give a location to within 100 m. Specimens were added as point data to a UK basemap using ESRI ArcGIS Pro v2.8, with layers added to show official red squirrel strongholds and grey squirrel cull/buffer zones (Figure 1). The final database consisted of 94 specimens from Scotland and 12 individuals from Formby, giving a total of 106 individuals (Figure 1 and Table 1). Specimens were grouped into six putative populations based on geographical location for a‐priori hypothesis testing as follows: HIG—Highlands and Moray, NE—north‐east Scotland inc. Aberdeen City and Shire, CEN—central Scotland inc. Fife, Perthshire and Argyll, ARR—Isle of Arran, SW Scotland—inc. Dumfries and Galloway and south Strathclyde, SE—Scottish Borders, FOR—Formby (Figure 1 and Table 1). These areas have unique and disparate population histories, with varying numbers of founders from a variety of (often undocumented) origins (Harvie‐Brown 1881b, 1881a, 1880; Ritchie 1920), as well as variations in habitat availability and presence of grey squirrels. To compare diversity inside and outside stronghold areas, squirrels were also subdivided by stronghold grouping.
TABLE 1.
Sample numbers in putative populations and stronghold distribution.
| Abb. | n samples | n stronghold samples | n strongholds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Highlands & Morayshire | HIG | 23 | 18 | 6 |
| North‐east Scotland | NE | 9 | 2 | 2 |
| Central Scotland | CEN | 22 | 4 | 2 |
| South‐west Scotland | SW | 31 | 8 | 2 |
| South‐east (Scottish Borders) | SE | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Isle of Arran | ARR | 4 | 4 | 1 |
| Formby | FOR | 12 | 0 | NA |
| Total | 106 | 36 | 14 | |
| South Scotland (SW & SE) | SOU | 36 | 8 | 2 |
Note: Fourteen of the nineteen designated red squirrel Scottish stronghold areas are represented in the study, with a clear geographical bias. Most stronghold areas are located in the Highlands and NW regions. The Isle of Arran represents one stronghold. The English population Formby is not part of the Scottish stronghold initiative.
2.2. DNA Extraction and Sequencing
DNA was extracted from c. 50 mg of tissue using the automated Promega Maxwell RSC instrument in conjunction with the Maxwell RSC PureFood and GMO Authentication Kit. Double‐stranded, single‐index, libraries were constructed by Azenta using the NEB Ultra II DNA Library Preparation Kit. Paired‐end (PE) 150 bp sequencing was then conducted on an Illumina Novaseq for a desired c. 5× sequence coverage per sample.
2.3. Whole Genome Bioinformatic Processing
2.3.1. Read Alignment
The S. vulgaris reference assembly (Mead et al. 2020) version mSciVul1.2, GCA_902686455.2, was downloaded from the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/home/download/), before being modified to include only the nineteen autosomes. Reference genome indexing was performed with the Burrows‐Wheeler aligner (BWA v.2.1.0 (Li and Durbin 2009)). Raw, paired‐end, Illumina reads were quality and adapter trimmed with Trim Galore v.0.6.4 (https://github.com/FelixKrueger/TrimGalore) and reads were aligned to the reference genome using the BWA‐MEM algorithm within BWA‐Kit (Li and Durbin 2009), which additionally marks duplicates and adds read‐group information. Alignments were sorted and filtered with SAMtools v.1.10 (Danecek et al. 2021) to remove unmapped reads (flag –F 4) and reads with mapping quality < Q30. PCR duplicates were removed with Picard ‐MarkDuplicates (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard).
2.3.2. Calling SNPs and Genotype Likelihoods
Read coverage distribution was quantified in ANGSD v.0.941‐6‐g67b6b3b‐dirty (Korneliussen, Albrechtsen, and Nielsen 2014), using the ‐doDepth function with ‐minMapQ 30, ‐doQsdist 1, ‐doCounts 1 and ‐maxDepth set to 800. The ngsTools R script, plotQC.R (Fumagalli et al. 2014), was used visualise depth distributions and calculate the upper and lower 5th percentiles. These were removed from SNP and genotype likelihood (GL) calculations. SNP calling and GL estimation runs were performed in ANGSD, using the GATK (Poplin et al. 2017) model for genotype calling (‐GL 2) and the beagle likelihood model (‐doGLF 2). The reference allele was set as the major allele (‐doMajorMinor 4) and minimum mapping quality was set to 30 (‐minMapQ 30), minimum base score quality to 30 (‐minQ 30) and the p‐value cut‐off for SNPS set to .
Two further ANGSD runs were undertaken to call subsets of higher quality SNPs. Minimum and max depth per site required for a call were ≥ 4 ≤ 7.5, and only sites with no missing data were considered. The first set of called genotypes were called against mSciVul1.2 and the second dataset of SNPs were called from data mapped to the hard‐masked version of this genome (Table S2; downloaded from Ensembl Rapid Release: Index of /pub/rapid‐release/species/Sciurus_vulgaris/GCA_902686455.2/ensembl/genome). This allowed an exploration of the effect of removing problematic SNPs called from repeat and/or low complexity regions of the genome However, this approach can create coverage gaps and reduce the number of called genotypes and marker density.
After read alignment to the nineteen autosomes of the Sciurus vulgaris reference genome (GCA_902686455.2 (Mead et al. 2020)), mean coverage ranged from 3.7× to 7.5× (Table S1). Two samples, R232.98 (NMS.Z.2000.195.46) and R235.98 (NMS.Z.2000.195.49), generated unexpectedly large amounts of data and had 10× and 22.5× coverage, respectively, due to sequencing facility error. Mean X‐fold coverage after read alignment to the reference mitogenome resulted in a minimum of 60× coverage. The low coverage ANGSD run produced 9,324,158 SNPs and GLs. A density plot of the 9,324,158 SNPs showed a largely uniform distribution, but with some minor high‐density areas and two notable SNP hotspots on chromosomes 13 and 16 (Figure S1). The effect of removing these areas on the site frequency spectrum was explored, but found to be minimal (Figure S2). The second run, with calls from sites between 4 and 7.5 read depth, and with no missing data, produced 123,052 SNPs, with 97,827 SNPs called in the hard‐masked dataset ((Table S2); stored in Harvard Dataverse repository https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/CK1ILL).
2.3.3. Estimating the Folded Site‐Frequency Spectrum (SFS)
Folded site frequency spectra (SFS, ‐fold 1) were estimated for each genetically‐defined population and for all pairs of populations (joint, 2D, SFS), using winsfs (Rasmussen et al. 2022), based on the per‐population site allele frequencies (SAFs, ‐doSAF 1). The reference genome was specified as the ancestral genome, which is required for SAF calculations.
2.4. Data Analysis
2.4.1. Population Structure
Genotype likelihoods (GLs) were pruned for sites in linkage disequilibrium (LD), to ensure that population structure was not driven by highly correlated loci. Data were first down‐sampled to 1 in every 20 SNPs for computational efficiency. The ngsLD v.1.1.0 package (Fox et al. 2019) was used to calculate pairwise measures of LD, assuming a max distance of 1 Mb between SNPs, before pruning with the prune_graph.pl. script (max distance 5 kb, minimum weight 0.5). Pruned, unlinked, GLs were used to generate a covariance matrix with PCAngsd (Meisner and Albrechtsen 2018), with a minor allele frequency filter (MAF) of 0.05 (Table S3). PCA was repeated with groups subsampled for even sample sizes (n = 4 to n = 5 per group, Table S4). The same dataset was then used to examine admixture proportions per individual using NGSadmix (Skotte, Korneliussen, and Albrechtsen 2013). K was set to range between 1 and 20, with 10 replicates per value of K. Assessment of the plateau of the likelihood curve and the deltaK method (Evanno, Regnaut, and Goudet 2005) were used to determine the most likely value of K. PCA and admixture outputs were plotted using custom scripts in R v.4.2.2 (R Core Team 2021).
2.4.2. Fast Estimation of Effective Migration Surfaces (FEEMS)
Spatial analysis of gene flow was explored using FEEMS v. 1.0. (Marcus et al. 2021), using the SNP dataset with minimum coverage of 4 reads per site and no missing data, with both unmasked and hard‐masked datasets. PLINK v.1.90 was used to apply a MAF filter of 0.05 and to prune SNPs in high LD (win 50, step 10, threshold 0.1, Table S3). The resulting matrix of unlinked, biallelic SNPs was used as FEEMS input. Populations were then assigned to vertices of a customised 5 km triangular discrete global grid (DGG) before estimation of effective migration via a penalised‐likelihood λ framework. The estimated migration surface can vary substantially with respect to the value of the tuning parameter (λ), and lower values can be vulnerable to overfitting of the model (Marcus et al. 2021). To avoid this, the FEEMS ‘leave‐one‐out’ cross‐validation procedure was run for λ values between 10−6 to 102, with 20 values tested, choosing the model with a λ value that minimised L2 error (Marcus et al. 2021).
2.4.3. Population Divergence—Fixation Index F ST
Population differentiation was investigated by estimating the pairwise fixation index, F ST, for all population pairs, where populations were defined on the basis of the PCA, admixture and migration results. Per‐site pairwise estimates of weighted F ST were then calculated by the realSFS program in ANGSD v.0.941‐6‐g67b6b3b‐dirty (Korneliussen, Albrechtsen, and Nielsen 2014) using the folded 2D SFS. Weighted per‐site F ST estimates were calculated using the Hudson estimation (Bhatia et al. 2013), specified using the ‐whichFST 1 option (recommended for low coverage data), and the sliding‐window approach with window sizes of 50‐ and 10‐kb intervals. Global weighted F ST was calculated using the realSFS F ST function for all population pairs.
2.4.4. Neutrality and Diversity
Thetas and Tajima's D neutrality statistics were calculated from the population‐level folded 1D SFS using a sliding‐window approach. The thetaStat function was used with the –do_stat option with a window size of 50 kbp (‐win 5000) and a step size of 10 kbp (‐step 10,000). Final values for both statistics were calculated by dividing the output by the effective number of sites in the pestPG file. Estimates of individual genome‐wide heterozygosity were calculated from the individual SFS using the ‐realSFS function. To examine the effect of read depth on heterozygosity, correlations were performed between mean x‐fold coverage per individual and heterozygosity with sample R232‐98 at 22.5× and 5×. Deeper coverage for this sample also presented an opportunity to examine the (hypothetical) effects of read depth on the heterozygosity calculation for the whole dataset. The percent increase in heterozygosity at 5× and 22.5× for sample R232‐98 was calculated and this increase applied to heterozygosity for all samples.
2.4.5. Runs of Homozygosity (ROH)
Inbreeding was investigated by calculating runs of homozygosity (ROH) using the 9,324,158 Genotype Likelihoods (GLs) in BCFtools v.1.20 (Danecek et al. 2021). As no estimate for alternate allele frequency (‐‐AF) was available, and sample sizes were too small to reliably estimate this from the data, the default value of 0.4 (‐‐AF‐dflt) was used. An additional run using a low AF (‐‐AF 0.1) was carried out to examine the effect of changing this parameter, but was found to have no influence on results. For samples where additional sequence data was available, individual ROH was calculated at different X‐fold coverages; for sample R232‐98, X‐fold coverage of 22.5×, 10× and 5× were investigated, while for sample R235‐98, X‐fold coverage of 10× and 5× were compared. Data was filtered for tracts > 0.5 Mb and quality (Q) of > 30. Individual inbreeding coefficients (F ROH) were calculated as the sum of ROH lengths divided by the length of the autosomal genome (2.53 Gb), with bin lengths of 0.5–1 Mb, 1–1.5 Mb, 1.5–2 Mb and > 2.5 Mb.
2.4.6. Recent Demographic History, N e
Changes in recent demography were estimated for each genetic population, using changes in effective population size, N e , up to 200 generations. N e estimations were performed with GONE (Santiago et al. 2020), based on patterns of linkage disequilibrium (LD). This was directly estimated from both unmasked and masked SNPs (Section 2.3.2), for all individuals, with the default recombination rate of 1 centimorgan per megabase. Data were converted to PLINK format and the programme was run 5 times per population, with the average values plotted using a custom R script. To convert generations to calendar years, we estimated the average squirrel generation time as three years. This is based on life history information (Lurz, Gurnell, and Magris 2005), interpreted from the ecology of the species.
2.4.7. Stronghold Diversity
To compare genetic diversity (measured by individual heterozygosity) within and outwith stronghold areas, data were partitioned by population and then grouped as within or outside a stronghold area (Table 1). There are eighteen official mainland strongholds and one offshore‐island stronghold on the Isle of Arran (Figure 1, (Slade et al. 2021)). Individuals within the designated borders of the strongholds are under‐represented in the dataset due to geographical remoteness. Therefore, we decided to include 15 km ‘buffer zones’ to expand the inclusion criteria. Juvenile red squirrels have been observed to disperse up to 16 km in similar habitats in Finland (Hämäläinen, Fey, and Selonen 2019) and contiguous/neighbouring areas likely benefit from the stronghold management effect (Figure 1). This effectively led to the merger of neighbouring strongholds in some areas. For groups that had adequate sample sizes, a Shapiro–Wilks test was performed to assess departures from a normal distribution in the data. This was followed by a series of two‐tailed, independent, t‐tests to test for significant differences in heterozygosity between groups. This was repeated for pooled population data.
2.4.8. Mitochondrial Genome Assembly and Analysis
Trimmed reads were mapped against the S. vulgaris reference mitogenome (accession LR822068.1), using the same methods and post processing as for the nuclear genome. Consensus sequences were constructed using MUSCLE (Edgar 2004) in the Geneious Platform v.8 (Kearse et al. 2012), with a minimum of 5 reads coverage per site for a call. Consensus sequences of the mitogenome were between 16,511 to 16,516 bp in length, consistent with published sequences for this species. The two rRNAs, 22 tRNAs, 13 protein‐coding genes and the D‐Loop were extracted and concatenated. A median‐joining (MJ) phylogenetic network (Bandelt, Forster, and Rohl 1999) was generated in PopART (Leigh and Bryant 2015). Estimation of mitochondrial diversity was estimated via haplotype (Hd) and nucleotide diversity (π) in DNAsp v6. (Rozas et al. 2017).
3. Results
3.1. Mitochondrial Genome
The final trimmed alignment was 16,454 bp. Mean x‐fold coverage in the dataset varied considerably, from 60× to > 7000×; the majority of samples were > 200× (Table S1). There were 145 polymorphic (informative) sites. Haplotype diversity was moderate (Hd: 0.89), but nucleotide diversity was low (π = 0.00016). Out of 106 sequences, 23 haplotypes were detected (svm01‐svm23, Figure 2 and Table S1). The most common haplotype was svm10 (n = 25), which was associated almost exclusively with the Highlands and NE Scotland region (one occurrence in the Central population), followed by svm06 (n = 14) found predominantly (but not solely) in the central region, and svm09 (n = 14) found only in areas south of the Central Belt (Figure 2 and Table S1).
FIGURE 2.

Population structure. (A) Mitochondrial genome haplotype network: Medium‐joining (MJ) network for Scottish and Formby red squirrels. Branch lengths are drawn to scale and nodes are proportional to haplotype frequencies. 23 haplotypes were present in the dataset of 106 red squirrels with Hd = 0.89, π = 0.00016. (B) Principal components analysis (PCA); PC1 v 2 (left), PC2 v 3 (right). (C) Admixture analysis. Admixture and PCA were performed on 775,219 genotype likelihoods (GLs). Both analyses suggest broad population divisions into three mainland populations (HIG + NE, CEN, SW + SE), and one population composed of ARR + FOR. Arran and Formby do not constitute a single population due to geographical separation, and the NE is considered separate in this study due to high levels of admixture. Green dashed circles in the PCA indicate the Argyll and Bute individuals that are geographically within the CEN population but which appear genetically more similar to the SW squirrels.
Despite the geographical trends in haplotype frequencies, the overall pattern showed a distinct lack of phylogeographical structure, with highly divergent haplotypes observed at all localities. Eight haplotypes were unique and nine were present only in low frequencies (≥ 2 ≤ 5), with these low‐frequency haplotypes distributed throughout the study region and associated mainly with the Scottish mainland populations (Figure 2). Most regions shared haplotypes with other areas, except the Isle of Arran. This population had two haplotypes, svm12 and svm15, which were unique to the island, but were highly divergent from each other, with 27 mutations between them. Formby, an English mainland ‘island’, had three haplotypes, which were not shared by any of the Scottish populations. The most common of which was smv13 (n = 8). This haplotype was highly divergent from the other Formby haplotypes svm07 (n = 3), and svm19 (n = 1), that were most similar to those found in the Central region (Figure 2).
3.2. Autosomal Population Structure, Admixture, and Gene‐Flow
In contrast to mitochondrial DNA, autosomal genotype likelihoods (GLs) showed clear patterns of population subdivision, admixture and migration that were highly consistent across analyses (Figure 2). After MAF filtering (0.05; Table S3) and pruning for sites in high LD, the PCA and admixture dataset consisted of 775,219 GLs. The PCA showed population groupings concordant with geographical structure (Figure 2 and Figure S3). Principal component (PC) 1 (8.75%) separates Arran (ARR) and Formby (FOR) from the mainland Scottish populations. Along PC2 (7.74%), three geographical groups are apparent in the mainland Scottish populations: a northern group consisting of the Highlands (HIG) and NE Scotland (NE; with internal substructure), a Central Scotland group (CEN) and a South Scotland group (SOU), consisting of the SW plus the Scottish Borders (also with internal substructure). These patterns remained after subsampling groups for equal sample sizes (Figure S4 and Table S4).
The likelihood curve and deltaK indicated K = 4 as the most likely number of populations in the NGSadmix analyses (Figure S5). These corresponded with the PCA groupings, suggesting a Highlands (HIG) + North‐East (NE) group, a Central Scotland (CEN) group, a Southern group (SW + SE) and a population consisting of the Isle of Arran (ARR) + Formby (FOR). The majority of individuals in the NE group were admixed between the northern HIG group and the CEN group to the south, suggesting that the NE is a contact zone with a unique genetic composition compared to the HIG group. Three individuals from Argyll and Bute showed a genetic profile more typical of the southern population despite being geographically located within the CEN group (Figures 1 and 2). At higher values of K, the SE (Scottish Borders, south‐east) population appear separate from the SW population, and at K = 6, ARR and FOR are distinguished.
After pruning the higher quality SNP datasets (≥ 4 ≤ 7.5 read depth, no missing data) for LD, the remaining number of SNPs for FEEMS analysis was 10,962 and 8075 in the hard‐masked dataset (Figure S6). Results were identical, so only the unmasked data are reported here. The model with lambda = 2.0691 had the lowest cross‐validation error in L2 (Figure S6 and Figure 3). Spatial visualisation of red squirrel migration highlighted the lack of gene flow between populations north and south of the Scottish urban Central Belt (Figure 3 and Figure S6). Red squirrels are absent from this area, but the lack of Central Belt samples should not affect migration patterns as FEEMs can detect gene flow across this (relatively) small geographic area, if present. North‐east Scotland, and the east coast, emerges as a key area for red squirrel gene flow between the Central and Highland populations. The three individuals, which fit the genetic profile of the southern population while being located in the Central region, are shown here as an isolated group on a peninsula in Argyll and Bute. There is a complete lack of migration along the west coast and indications that gene‐flow is somewhat reduced between the south‐west and south‐east regions.
FIGURE 3.

Migration and population differentiation (F ST). (A) Fast estimation of effective migration surfaces (FEEMS) shows areas of low migration (brown) amongst corridors of higher migration (blue). Populations north and south of the Central Belt show no gene flow and migration is also absent along the west coast and across tree‐less areas. (B) Weighted Fixation Index (F ST). Pairwise point‐estimates and genome‐wide density plot of pairwise F ST. Population differentiation supports these migration patterns. Most populations show moderate to high differentiation, which is higher in the ARR and FOR pairwise comparisons. Log10(w) = relative effective migration. ARR, Arran; CEN, Central; FOR, Formby; HIG, Highland; NE, North‐east; SOU, South.
The fixation index (F ST), calculated as weighted pairwise point‐estimates and genome‐wide pairwise comparisons in 50 kb windows (Figure 3), showed moderate to moderate‐high differentiation between regions. The spread and shape of the F ST distribution among populations pairs show clear patterns; mainland comparisons have less spread and a distribution skewed towards the lower F ST values while island comparisons have a broader distribution that covers higher values of F ST. Point estimates of differentiation are higher in comparisons between the offshore Isle of Arran and isolated Formby populations and the mainland populations, being highest between Arran and the Highlands (F ST = 0.322) and lowest between the Highlands and the neighbouring north‐east corridor (F ST = 0.107; Figure 3).
Based on these findings, we conclude that the most likely number of populations in the dataset is six and data were partitioned into six groups for further analysis—the Highlands (HIG), northeast (NE), central (CEN), southern (SOU), Arran (ARR), and Formby (FOR). The Highlands and NE were partitioned due to the unique admixture profile of the NE region, while Arran and Formby clearly do not constitute a single population. The SW and SE populations were combined into one southern (SOU) group as the most likely admixture scenario, but some geographical subdivision may be present. The three individuals from Argyll were removed from further population‐level analyses due to ambiguous population status.
3.3. Genetic Diversity and Inbreeding
Genetic diversity, measured both by Watterson's estimator (Figure S7) and individual genome‐wide heterozygosity (Figures 4 and 5), was exceptionally low in all individuals and across populations. Mean Watterson's theta per‐population ranged from 2.57 × 10−4 (HIG) to 3.49 × 10−4 (SOU), although there were also numerous highly diverse genomic outlier regions associated with high‐density SNP hotspots (Figure S7), showing islands of high heterozygosity against a backdrop of low diversity. The mean for the dataset was 2 × 10−4 with a range for individuals of 1.34 × 10−4 (individual from HIG) to 3.25 × 10−4 (individual from FOR; Figure 5 and Table S1). While direct comparison of WGS heterozygosity datasets is complicated by confounding factors of depth, sample size and bioinformatics pipelines, this suggests that mean genome‐wide heterozygosity for Scotland's red squirrels is some of the lowest reported amongst mammals and birds (Figure 4 and Table S5).
FIGURE 4.

Comparison of genome‐wide heterozygosity. Diversity measured by individual genome‐wide heterozygosity for Scottish and Formby (England) red squirrels (*) and other mammal and bird species. Red Squirrel heterozygosity is also shown for a hypothetical dataset with a 25% increase in heterozygosity to explore the effect that greater depth may have on this calculation. IUCN Status (IUCN, 2023): CR, Critically Endangered; EN, Endangered; LC, Least Concern; NT, Near Threatened; VU, Vulnerable. Genome‐wide X‐fold coverage: H = high (> 20×), M = mid (10–20×), L = Low (< 10×). Note that red squirrels are Endangered on the British Red List (Mathews et al. 2018). Data modified from (Robinson et al. 2016) and references therein (Table S5) Note that these comparisons are approximations due to differences in datasets and variant calling.
FIGURE 5.

Individual genome‐wide heterozygosity and runs of homozygosity. (A) Boxplots of genome‐wide heterozygosity for individuals and by population, where population means are indicated by a black diamond. Heterozygosity is exceptionally and uniformly low across all populations, although highest in Formby. Individual heterozygosity was calculated twice for the high coverage individual from Formby at both high coverage (22.5×—top arrow) and down‐sampled (5×—bottom arrow). (B) Percent of the autosomal genome in ROH and, (C) Percent of the autosomal genome in ROH by size category, 0.5–1, 1–1.5, 1.5–2.5 and > 2.5 Mb.
The individual with high coverage (22.5×) showed a 25% increase in heterozygosity (3.25 × 10−4) compared to the same individual down‐sampled to 5× (2.42 × 10−4; Figure 5a). While this suggests an effect of depth on heterozygosity, the difference in heterozygosity was 8.3 × 10−5, which remains at the extreme low end of heterozygosity. Pearson's correlations between individual heterozygosity and depth showed a significant and slightly positive relationship when R232‐98 was included at 22.5× (R = 0.33, p < 0.005) and a non‐significant and slightly negative relationship when this sample was included at 5× (R = −0.15, p = > 0.01) (Figure S8). When heterozygosity for all samples was increased by 25% (to explore the hypothetical effect of depth on heterozygosity), the mean for the dataset increased from 2 × 10−4 to 2.5 × 10−4, but did not change the overall scenario of low heterozygosity in this dataset (Figure 4).
Comparison of genetic diversity inside and outside designated red squirrel strongholds was confounded by unequal sample sizes, and an uneven distribution of strongholds among squirrel populations (Figure 1; Tables 1 and 2). Most strongholds are located in the Highlands and the west of Scotland, with few in the east, central and south‐east regions (Figure 1). For populations with adequate samples sizes (HIG, CEN and SOU), and for pooled data, a Shapiro–Wilks test showed that all data were normally distributed (Table S6). Two‐tailed T‐tests comparing mean individual heterozygosity within and outwith stronghold areas detected no significant differences (Table 2), suggesting that heterozygosity is uniformly distributed across these areas.
TABLE 2.
Two‐tailed student's T‐test, stronghold heterozygosity.
| n stronghold | n non‐stronghold | t stats | t critical | p two‐tail | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIG | 18 | 5 | 1.743 | 2.45 | 0.132 |
| CEN | 4 | 15 | −2.234 | 2.306 | 0.056 |
| SOU | 8 | 28 | 2.402 | 2.776 | 0.074 |
| All data | 38 | 68 | −1.235 | 0.221 | 0.968 |
Note: T‐tests, assuming unequal variances, were carried out within populations where there were sufficient sample sizes and for all data combined. No significant differences were observed.
The total number of ROH > 0.5 Mb in the dataset was 35, 298 and the average percentage of the genome covered by ROH (F ROH) was 9.77% (min 2.76%, max 31.56%; Table S7 and Figure 5). The ARR population showed highest mean % ROH genome in F ROH (11.96%), while the lowest was in FOR (7.86%). The CEN population had the highest max % genome in FROH (31.56%), followed by HIG (29.45%). Other populations had means between 8% and 13%, but there were many outlying individuals within all populations; in particular the HIG, CEN and SOU groups all had individuals with %F ROH > 20% (Figure 5). Runs of homozygosity were characterised with an abundance of short tracts in the 0.5 Mb to 1 Mb size range, while longer ROH lengths (> 2.5 Mb) were rare (Table S7 and Figure 5). Comparison of two squirrels at a range of coverage depths showed %F ROH remained consistent between different datasets: the percentage of the genome in F ROH for R232‐98 at 22.5× = 2.7%, at 10× = 2.3% and at 5× = 2.8% while % genome in F ROH for R235‐9 at 10× = 2.3 and at 5× = 2.6% (Table S8).
3.4. Tajima's D and Demographic History
The Scottish mainland populations all showed moderately negative mean Tajima's D (HIG = −0.878, NE = −0.447, CEN = −1.107, SOU = −0.980), while the isolated populations showed a negative, but less pronounced, departure from neutrality (ARR = −0.091, FOR = −0.098; Figure 6). Negative Tajima's D is generally indicative of an excess of rare variants associated with expansion and/or purifying selection, suggesting that some modest, recent, expansion may have occurred in the larger mainland populations, but not in the isolated populations of Arran and Formby. Interestingly, all populations showed large variations in Tajima's D across genomic windows from strongly positive to strongly negative (Tajima's D = ≥ 3 ≤ −3), potentially indicating differential effects of selection across the genome. However, low coverage data may also affect calculation of this statistic. Miscalling of rare variants, in particular, heterozygotes, can affect allele frequency estimates and change the shape of the SFS. Calculating Tajima's D from sliding windows based on the SFS should make these calculations more robust to the effects of low coverage re‐sequence data.
FIGURE 6.

Genome‐wide departures from neutrality and estimates of historical effective population size (N e ). (A) Tajima's D. Scottish mainland populations show a mean negative, moderate, departure from zero indicating possible recent expansion, while the isolated populations of Arran and Formby are close to zero. Tajima's D was calculated in 50 kb windows across the genome and outlying windows with strongly positive departures from zero can be seen in the larger populations of HIG, CEN and SOU. All populations showed a large range in positive to negative values across the genome. (B) Historical N e . Estimates were performed on 123,052 SNPs on a per‐population basis. The analyses are accurate up to 200 generations, with N e shown on a log scale. The temporal trajectory of N e is more informative than N e values, due to small sample sizes in some populations. All populations show a huge drop in N e at different time scales, with the SOU population decrease beginning c. 100 generations ago, followed by FOR and mainland Scotland populations c. 64 gens and ARR c. 25 gens.
Estimates of historical effective population size (N e ) were performed in GONE (Santiago et al. 2020) over the last 200 generations using both unmasked (123,052 SNPs) and masked (97,827 SNPs) datasets (Figure 6 and Figure S9). In some cases, sample sizes are smaller than is recommended for GONE, and the pattern and trajectory of N e over time should be regarded as more informative than absolute N e values. Within‐population iterations were highly congruent with each other. Both analyses show a dramatic drop in N e for all mainland populations, the timing of which is c. 64 generations in the unmasked data, although the SOU population begins to decline earlier, c. 100 generations ago (Figure 6). The Isle of Arran population also experiences this phenomenon, although at a later date, with the commencement of the decrease c. 25 generations ago. All populations then spend c. 40 generations at very low N e , with a small recovery observed c. 16 generations ago. Assuming a red squirrel generation time of three years, the declines for the mainland populations began c. 200–300 years ago (18th to early 19th centuries), with the Isle of Arran decline c. 75 years go (early to mid‐20th century).
The masked dataset is largely concordant with these results, although the timing of the bottleneck varies by population from immediately preceding, or directly following, 64 generations ago (Figure S9). While this dataset identifies similar timing for the drop in N e in the ARR population, it differs in the N e estimation; this may be due to the small sample size (n = 4). GONE relies on estimation of LD (Santiago et al. 2020). SNPs called against a hard‐masked genome, while resolving some issues associated with reads mapped to repeat regions, may break‐up patterns of LD and affect N e calculations.
4. Discussion
This study reports the first whole‐genome analysis of the red squirrel, revealing the genetic legacy of past anthropogenic influences on remnant populations in a key region of conservation importance. Alarming and unexpected loss of diversity was observed across the genome and Scottish landscape, following an abrupt historic bottleneck. Previously undetected patterns of population structure and migration were highlighted, providing critical new information on spatial gene flow and habitat use. This is one of the most comprehensive genome‐wide assessments performed to date of a population subjected to serial translocations and population fluctuations. The findings highlight the genetic risks associated with both anthropogenic threats and conservation efforts, which should be considered across species conservation management plans.
4.1. Genetic Structure of Red Squirrel Populations
Scottish red squirrel populations are composites of remnant indigenous Scottish populations with historical English and European additions. These populations have naturalised to the region over several centuries and now show geographically structured patterns of gene flow and population subdivision, which contrast with historic genetic lineages (Figures 1, 2, 3). Contemporary structure is strongly influenced by natural and artificial landscape features, founder composition, and the presence/absence of grey squirrel competitors (Figures 2 and 3). Spatial landscape modelling has previously suggested that the Cairngorms act as a barrier to squirrel movement (Slade et al. 2021), and this is clearly reflected in the genetic data (Figure 3). The north‐east (Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire) is a key contact zone for red squirrel populations and the east coast is the main corridor for latitudinal dispersal (Figure 3). Artificial barriers to gene flow due to urban development and grey squirrel presence across the Scottish Central Belt has essentially isolated northern and southern Scottish red squirrel populations (Figures 1 and 3). This may, in fact, help to prevent intraspecies transmission of squirrelpox virus (SQPV), in which outbreaks have largely been recorded in southern populations (McInnes et al. 2009); although the first case of squirrelpox north of the Central Belt has recently been identified (Wilson et al. 2024). The three individuals on the peninsula of Argyll and Bute that are genetically similar to the southern red squirrels (Figures 1 and 2) may have once been part of a population continuous with the southern population or, alternatively, could have been the result of unrecorded/unofficial translocations from the south into Argyll.
Red squirrel populations have disparate histories. Multiple historical introduction sites are recorded, but the origins of these animals are poorly documented, although England and Scandinavia have been identified as potential source areas (Harvie‐Brown 1881b, 1881a, 1880; Ritchie 1920). The Formby population (NW England, Figure 1) has been separated from other populations for many decades. It is reported to be founded by introductions from Europe in the early 20th century (Gurnell and Pepper 1993). The Arran population is undocumented in historical texts, and continental European haplotypes have been observed there (Ballingall et al. 2016; Barratt et al. 1999). This population is therefore also likely to be a 20th century introduction from Europe rather than founded by natural colonisation. If Formby and Arran have genetic input from squirrels with common origins, this may explain their similarities in genetic admixture (Figure 2). The inclusion of Formby as a comparative population highlighted a distinction between this population and the mainland Scotland groups. However, these results suggest that Formby may have a unique demographic history and not be representative of the now‐extirpated English populations as a whole.
Notably, analyses of mitochondrial DNA did not detect any geographical structure (Figure 2), as also found for British squirrels (Barratt et al. 1999). The mtDNA network may be reflecting historic lineage diversity that carries little phylogenetic signal in Scotland due to the disparate founder history. The mtDNA patterns observed here deviate from those typically observed in natural populations for other species, where networks tend to show haplotype frequencies that covary with geography (Dobigny et al. 2013; Vega et al. 2023). This lack of structuring is a strong indicator that human‐mediated movement and translocations of individuals have occurred throughout the recent history of red squirrels in Scotland, and that the observed autosomal spatial structure has likely developed through (relatively) recent processes.
4.2. Genomic Consequences of Extreme Founder Effects
The timing and severity of the drop in effective population size (N e , Figure 6), is remarkably consistent with historical records (Harvie‐Brown 1881a, 1881b; Ritchie 1920). The initial high N e values are likely signals of ancestry from larger English and European populations, with the abrupt drop representing a severe bottleneck precipitated by founder effects (Figure 6). The later founder effect, observed in the N e plot for Arran (Figure 6), reflects the later (20th century) introduction date for the island compared to the mainland populations (18th century). The Isle of Arran shows the lowest minimum N e , but all populations have low N e for extended periods, post‐bottleneck (Figure 6). Some recovery has occurred, most notably in the Highlands. The subsequent 20th century introduction of grey squirrels has almost certainly suppressed any recovery process, and may be why N e is now highest in the Highlands, where grey squirrels remain absent.
Red squirrel populations in Scotland exhibit some of the lowest heterozygosity reported for wild mammals and birds (Figure 4), and are comparable to species noted for extreme genetic impoverishment such as the Channel Island fox Urocyon littoralis (Adams and Edmands 2023; Robinson et al. 2016), Iberian lynx Lynx pardinus (Abascal et al. 2016) and cheetah Acinonyx jubatus (Dobrynin et al. 2015) (Figure 4). However, the red squirrel in Scotland does not have a comparably small population size; current estimates are c. 239,000 individuals (Matthews et al. 2018, although this may be an over‐estimate) and historical records suggest significant expansion after restocking (Harvie‐Brown 1881a, 1880; Ritchie 1920). Some evidence of minimal post‐bottleneck recovery is suggested by the negative Tajima's D (Figure 6) and slight improvement in N e (Figure 6). This clearly has not improved heterozygosity, which has likely persisted at very low levels over many generations after the historic bottleneck, despite a substantial population size. This points to extreme founder effects with later expansions reversed and/or suppressed after the 20th century introduction of the grey squirrel, coupled with habitat loss and fragmentation. Levels of diversity and population structure in Scotland's red squirrels prior to the genetic bottleneck and historic translocations cannot be established with this dataset; this would require analyses of squirrels that pre‐date this event.
Interestingly, ROH did not indicate excessive recent inbreeding (Figure 5). ROH represent stretches of the genome, where two alleles/haplotypes are identical by descent (IDB), indicating ancestry from the same ancestral haplotype and inferring levels of parental relatedness (Crow 1954). Recombination and mutation break ROH so, in general, larger stretches are more characteristic of recent inbreeding than shorter lengths (Thompson 2013). While there was large variability in FROH, and the length of ROH (Figure 5), these were characterised by many short tracts of ROH. This suggests that if there was an initial accumulation of inbreeding tracts, post‐bottleneck, they have subsequently been fragmented through local outbreeding (mating between less‐related individuals), enabled by rapid demographic recovery typical of rodent species with short generation times.
4.3. Genomics Informed Management
Given that little increase in heterozygosity has been observed over the past three centuries, it seems unlikely that diversity will improve through natural processes, such as population expansion. Low genetic diversity is linked to a suite of fitness effecting traits, such as reduced disease resistance, decreased reproductive success and loss of resilience to changing environments (Frankham, Ballou, and Briscoe 2010; Reed and Frankham 2003). The effects of long‐term low diversity on the fitness of red squirrel populations in Scotland is currently unclear. While populations have historically expanded successfully after bottlenecks, no substantive resistance to SQPV has been observed since its introduction several decades ago. While speculative at present, lack of diversity may have played a role in the (in)ability of red squirrels to mount an adaptive response to the virus.
Long‐term management interventions, such as conservation translocations among populations, or reinforcement from outside the region, may be required to improve the genetic diversity of red squirrels in Scotland. Enhancing physical population connectivity to increase gene flow is a recognised approach (Frankham, Ballou, and Briscoe 2010; Gagnaire 2020), and may prove beneficial to connect fragmented red squirrel populations. However, this should only be attempted in areas free of grey squirrels, as it risks facilitating the further dispersal of grey squirrels and, consequently, disease. Translocations of genetically selected, disease‐free red squirrels between populations should be considered to increase diversity and promote gene flow. While these measures may come at the cost of dissolving population structure, they will promote a country‐wide metapopulation with improved genetic health.
Official strongholds are not evenly distributed throughout Scotland, as a primary criterion for their placement is protection from grey squirrels (Slade et al. 2021). This species is present in south, central, and east of Scotland; therefore, strongholds tend to be located in the northwest (Figure 1). Genetic diversity was uniform within and outside official stronghold areas (Table 2), but the distribution of strongholds means that they only fully capture genetic diversity from the Highlands (Table 2, Figure 1). Given the importance of the northeast and the east coast for red squirrel gene flow, the creation of more strongholds in this area is desirable. Owing to the geography of the NE terrain, the north‐east dispersal corridor is located at a physical bottleneck (Figures 1 and 3), which has facilitated successful grey squirrel control in Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire (Tonkin, Hatcher, and Tipple 2023). If grey squirrel suppression can be maintained, red squirrel strongholds in this region would help maintain one of the few natural red squirrel contact zones. From a genetic perspective, increased stronghold presence in the central and southern parts of Scotland would capture more country‐wide variation. However, the viability of strongholds is unclear in areas densely populated with grey squirrels and with high SQPV prevalence. Considering the resource implications of maintaining multiple squirrel strongholds, further analysis of this dataset is warranted to gain a deeper understanding of the genetic diversity represented in each one and help inform future forest management. As an offshore island, the Arran stronghold (Figure 1) has the advantage of being free from grey squirrels, but at the cost of increased genetic isolation. Periodic additions of red squirrels from the disease‐free mainland populations could ameliorate these issues.
5. Conclusions and Wider Implications
Red squirrels in Scotland exhibit extraordinarily low heterozygosity due to the genetic consequences of extreme historical founder effects, exacerbated by population subdivision, historical persecution, and competition with an invasive species. Despite their poor genetic status, these represent the last substantial red squirrel populations remaining in Britain and should be regarded as a conservation priority. While the risk of outbreeding should always be considered when planning a conservation translocation (IUCN/SSC 2013), the success of historically translocated squirrels into Scotland suggests that outbreeding does not pose a significant threat. In the case of the Scottish populations, where their history makes local genetic adaptation unlikely, the genetic benefits of translocating squirrels among populations (essentially creating a Scottish metapopulation) provide a strong argument for such an approach.
Interventions of this type are becoming ever more common as wild populations become increasingly fragmented and disjunct. Founder effects, exacerbated by population fragmentation, have been observed across species (Adams and Edmands 2023; Colpitts, McLoughlin, and Poissant 2022; Kumar et al. 2023; Wilder et al. 2022), and many genetically depauperate species are now successfully managed using a metapopulation strategy. For example, Kenyan populations of the eastern black rhinoceros, Diceros bicornus micheali, are now wholly managed as a country‐wide metapopulation (Amin et al. 2017), and notable success has also been recorded with the global management and subsequent reintroduction of the scimitar‐horned oryx, Oryx dammah (Humble et al. 2020; Ogden et al. 2020).
Future genomics‐informed management of the red squirrel in Scotland would benefit from research that examines (i) evidence for harmful effects of low diversity, (ii) post‐translocation and post‐bottleneck selection across the genome, (iii) development of genetic tools for routine monitoring, and (iv) generation of, and comparative research with, genomic data from other UK and European populations. Until future management measures have impacted population genetic diversity, the use of any single Scottish population to provide all of the founders for introductions to other areas is strongly cautioned against. Many threatened species contain a genetic legacy of past anthropogenic influence, and the case of Scottish red squirrels illustrates that there is a need to take account of this, determine current surviving diversity, and assess if intervention may be required.
Ethics Statement
This manuscript has not been submitted to another journal. All tissues used as part of this research originated from squirrels that died from natural causes or road traffic accidents; no live sampling was performed. Ethical approval for this project was gained on 05/08/2020 via the R(D)SVS veterinary ethical research committee (VERC) with approval reference 96.20.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Figure S1. SNP densities across the red squirrel genome.
Figure S2. Folded site frequency spectra (SFS).
Figure S3. PCA variance in the first 15 PC’s.
Figure S4. PCA plot for pruned sample dataset.
Figure S5. NGSadmix likelihood curve and DeltaK for the admixture analysis.
Figure S6. Fast estimation of effective migration surfaces (FEEMS).
Figure S7. Watterson’s estimator.
Figure S8. Pearson’s correlations between individual heterozygosity and read depth.
Figure S9. Estimates of historical effective population size (N e ) from hard‐masked SNPs.
Table S1. Metadata for red squirrels sampled for this study.
Table S2. Depth and marker numbers for ANGSD runs.
Table S3. Filters applied for each analysis.
Table S4. Individuals randomly subsampled for PCA with even sample sizes.
Table S5. Data used to compare genome‐wide heterozygosity.
Table S6. Shapiro–Wilks test for depature form normality on heterozygosity.
Table S7. Percentage and mean length (Mb) of FROH in red squirrel populations.
Table S8. ROH for samples R232‐98 and R235‐98 at differing coverage depths.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded by a Daphne Jackson Trust fellowship awarded to MMM and sponsored by the National Environment Research Council (NERC) and The University of Edinburgh. Additional contributions came from The University of Edinburgh Moray Endowment Fund, CryoArks, Forestry and Land Scotland, and a Biotechnology & Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Institute Strategic Programme Grant BBS/E/D/30002276 to JS.
ACK acknowledges the support of the late Hon. Vincent Weir in supporting the preservation of the red squirrels in the NMS collection that were used in this study. ACK thanks the Negaunee Foundation for its support of a curatorial preparator who prepared some of the squirrels used in this study. We wish to extend our appreciation to the many members of the public, charities, volunteers, and employed members that have submitted red squirrel carcasses to the R(D)SVS disease surveillance program over the last decade, without whom this research would not have been possible. The support and encouragement of the Daphne Jackson Trust to MMM is also gratefully acknowledged.
Funding: This study was supported by Daphne Jackson Trust fellowship awarded to MMM and sponsored by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and The University of Edinburgh. Additional contributions came from The University of Edinburgh Moray Endowment Fund, CryoArks, Forestry and Land Scotland, and a Biotechnology & Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) Institute Strategic Programme Grant BBS/E/D/30002276 to JS.
Data Availability Statement
Genotype likelihoods, SNP genotypes, and metadata can be assessed and downloaded from the Harvard Dataverse https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/CK1ILL and will be made available 12 months from the date of publication. Code and scripts can be accessed at https://github.com/space‐beaver/Red‐squirrel‐genomics‐.git.
References
- Abascal, F. , Corvelo A., Cruz F., et al. 2016. “Extreme Genomic Erosion After Recurrent Demographic Bottlenecks in the Highly Endangered Iberian Lynx.” Genome Biology 17: 251. 10.1186/s13059-016-1090-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Adams, N. E. , and Edmands S.. 2023. “Genomic Recovery Lags Behind Demographic Recovery in Bottlenecked Populations of the Channel Island Fox, Urocyon littoralis .” Molecular Ecology 32: 4151–4164. 10.1111/mec.17025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amin, R. , Kariuki L., Okita‐Ouma B., Chege G., Khayale C., and Mulama M.. 2017. Kenya Black Rhino, Diceros Bicornus Michaeli, Action Plan (2017–2021). 6th ed. Nairobi, Kenya: Kenya Wildlife Service. [Google Scholar]
- Ballingall, K. T. , McIntyre A., Lin Z., et al. 2016. “Limited Diversity Associated With Duplicated Class II MHC‐DRB Genes in the Red Squirrel Population in the United Kingdom Compared With Continental Europe.” Conservation Genetics 17: 1171–1182. 10.1007/s10592-016-0852-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bandelt, H. J. , Forster P., and Rohl A.. 1999. “Median‐Joining Networks for Inferring Intraspecific Phylogenies.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 37–48. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Barnosky, A. D. 2008. “Climatic Change, Refugia, and Biodiversity: Where Do We Go From Here? An Editorial Comment.” Climatic Change 86: 29–32. 10.1007/s10584-007-9333-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Barratt, E. M. , Gurnell J., Malarky G., Deaville R., and Bruford M. W.. 1999. “Genetic Structure of Fragmented Populations of Red Squirrel ( Sciurus vulgaris ) in the UK.” Molecular Ecology 8. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.1999.00771.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bhatia, G. , Patterson N., Sankararaman S., and Price A. L.. 2013. “Estimating and Interpreting F ST: The Impact of Rare Variants.” Genome Research 23: 1514–1521. 10.1101/gr.154831.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clavero, M. , and Garciaberthou E.. 2005. “Invasive Species Are a Leading Cause of Animal Extinctions.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20: 110. 10.1016/j.tree.2005.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Colpitts, J. , McLoughlin P. D., and Poissant J.. 2022. “Runs of Homozygosity in Sable Island Feral Horses Reveal the Genomic Consequences of Inbreeding and Divergence From Domestic Breeds.” BMC Genomics 23: 501. 10.1186/s12864-022-08729-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crooks, K. R. , Burdett C. L., Theobald D. M., et al. 2017. “Quantification of Habitat Fragmentation Reveals Extinction Risk in Terrestrial Mammals.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114: 7635–7640. 10.1073/pnas.1705769114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Crow, J. F. 1954. “Breeding Structure of Populations. II. Effective Population Number.” In Statistics and Mathematics in Biology, 543–556. Ames, IA: Iowa State COIL Press. [Google Scholar]
- Crowl, T. A. , Crist T. O., Parmenter R. R., Belovsky G., and Lugo A. E.. 2008. “The Spread of Invasive Species and Infectious Disease as Drivers of Ecosystem Change.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 238–246. 10.1890/070151. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Danecek, P. , Bonfield J. K., Liddle J., et al. 2021. “Twelve Years of SAMtools and BCFtools.” GigaScience 10: giab008. 10.1093/gigascience/giab008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dennis . 2012. “Dundonnell Red Squirrel Translocations: Results 2008–2011.”
- Dirzo, R. , Young H. S., Galetti M., Ceballos G., Isaac N. J. B., and Collen B.. 2014. “Defaunation in the Anthropocene.” Science 345: 401–406. 10.1126/science.1251817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dobigny, G. , Tatard C., Gauthier P., et al. 2013. “Correction: Mitochondrial and Nuclear Genes‐Based Phylogeography of Arvicanthis niloticus (Murinae) and Sub‐Saharan Open Habitats Pleistocene History.” PLoS One 8. 10.1371/annotation/a34daea8-8922-4eb0-8b4e-b0f9dbfd28ca. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dobrynin, P. , Liu S., Tamazian G., et al. 2015. “Genomic Legacy of the African Cheetah, Acinonyx jubatus .” Genome Biology 16: 277. 10.1186/s13059-015-0837-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Edgar, R. C. 2004. “MUSCLE: Multiple Sequence Alignment With High Accuracy and High Throughput.” Nucleic Acids Research 32: 1792–1797. 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evanno, G. , Regnaut S., and Goudet J.. 2005. “Detecting the Number of Clusters of Individuals Using the Software Structure: A Simulation Study.” Molecular Ecology 14: 2611–2620. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Forestry Commission Scotland . 2012. “Managing Forests as Reds Squirrel Strongholds.” https://www.forestry.gov.scot/publications/22‐managing‐forests‐as‐red‐squirrel‐strongholds/viewdocument/22. Accessed 01/1/2023.
- Fox, E. A. , Wright A. E., Fumagalli M., and Vieira F. G.. 2019. “ngsLD: Evaluating Linkage Disequilibrium Using Genotype Likelihoods.” Bioinformatics 35: 3855–3856. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frankham, R. 1996. “Relationship of Genetic Variation to Population Size in Wildlife.” Conservation Biology 10: 1500–1508. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10061500.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Frankham, R. , Ballou J. D., and Briscoe D. A.. 2010. Introduction to Conservation Genetics. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Fumagalli, M. , Vieira F. G., Linderoth T., and Nielsen R.. 2014. “ngsTools: Methods for Population Genetics Analyses From Next‐Generation Sequencing Data.” Bioinformatics 30: 1486–1487. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gagnaire, P. 2020. “Comparative Genomics Approach to Evolutionary Process Connectivity.” Evolutionary Applications 13: 1320–1334. 10.1111/eva.12978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gallien, L. , and Carboni M.. 2017. “The Community Ecology of Invasive Species: Where Are We and What's Next?” Ecography 40: 335–352. 10.1111/ecog.02446. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gaywood, M. 2016. Species Action Framework Handbook: Species Management in Scotland. Battleby, Perth: Scottish Natural Heritage. [Google Scholar]
- Gurnell, J. , and Pepper H.. 1993. “A Critical Look at Conserving the British Red Squirrel Sciurus vulgaris .” Mammal Review 23: 127–137. 10.1111/j.1365-2907.1993.tb00424.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gurnell, J. , Wauters L. A., Lurz P. W. W., and Tosi G.. 2004. “Alien Species and Interspecific Competition: Effects of Introduced Eastern Grey Squirrels on Red Squirrel Population Dynamics.” Journal of Animal Ecology 73: 26–35. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2004.00791.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Haddad, N. M. , Brudvig L. A., Clobert J., et al. 2015. “Habitat Fragmentation and Its Lasting Impact on Earth's Ecosystems.” Science Advances 1: e1500052. 10.1126/sciadv.1500052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hale, M. L. , Lurz P. W. W., and Wolff K.. 2004. “Patterns of Genetic Diversity in the Red Squirrel ( Sciurus vulgaris L.): Footprints of Biogeographic History and Artificial Introductions.” Conservation Genetics 5: 167–179. 10.1023/B:COGE.0000030001.86288.12. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hämäläinen, S. , Fey K., and Selonen V.. 2019. “The Effect of Landscape Structure on Dispersal Distances of the Eurasian Red Squirrel.” Ecology and Evolution 9: 1173–1181. 10.1002/ece3.4806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hanski, I. 2015. “Habitat Fragmentation and Species Richness.” Journal of Biogeography 42: 989–993. 10.1111/jbi.12478. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Harvie‐Brown, J. A. 1880. “Early Chapters in the History of the Squirrel in Great Britain.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 5: 343–348. [Google Scholar]
- Harvie‐Brown, J. A. 1881a. “Late Chapters in the History of the Squirrel in Great Britain.” Proceedings of the Royal Physical Society of Edinburgh 6: 115–182. [Google Scholar]
- Harvie‐Brown, J. A. 1881b. “Early Chapters in the History of the Squirrel in Great Britain.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 6: 31–63. [Google Scholar]
- Hofman, C. A. , and Rick T. C.. 2018. “Ancient Biological Invasions and Island Ecosystems: Tracking Translocations of Wild Plants and Animals.” Journal of Archaeological Research 26: 65–115. 10.1007/s10814-017-9105-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Holmes, M. 2015. “The Perfect Pest: Natural History and the Red Squirrel in Nineteenth‐Century Scotland (William T. Stearn Prize 2014).” Archives of Natural History 42: 113–125. 10.3366/anh.2015.0284. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Humble, E. , Dobrynin P., Senn H., et al. 2020. “Chromosomal‐Level Genome Assembly of the Scimitar‐Horned Oryx: Insights Into Diversity and Demography of a Species Extinct in the Wild.” Molecular Ecology Resources 20: 1668–1681. 10.1111/1755-0998.13181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- IUCN . 2014. “Lynx pardinus: Rodríguez, A. & Calzada, J.: The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T12520A50655794.” 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-2.RLTS.T12520A50655794.en. [DOI]
- IUCN/SSC . 2013. “Guidelines for Reintroductions and Other Conservation Translocations. Version 1.0.”
- Johnson, W. E. , Onorato D. P., Roelke M. E., et al. 2010. “Genetic Restoration of the Florida Panther.” Science 329: 1641–1645. 10.1126/science.1192891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kearse, M. , Moir R., Wilson A., et al. 2012. “Geneious Basic: An Integrated and Extendable Desktop Software Platform for the Organization and Analysis of Sequence Data.” Bioinformatics 28: 1647–1649. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keller, L. 2002. “Inbreeding Effects in Wild Populations.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17: 230–241. 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02489-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kerhoulas, N. J. , Gunderson A. M., and Olson L. E.. 2015. “Complex History of Isolation and Gene Flow in Hoary, Olympic, and Endangered Vancouver Island Marmots.” Journal of Mammalogy 96: 810–826. 10.1093/jmammal/gyv089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kitchener, A. C. 1998. “Extinctions, Introductions and Colonisations of Scottish Mammals and Birds Since the Last Ice Age.” In Species History in Scotland, edited by Lambert R. A., 63–92. Edinburgh, UK: Scottish Cultural Press. [Google Scholar]
- Korneliussen, T. S. , Albrechtsen A., and Nielsen R.. 2014. “ANGSD: Analysis of Next Generation Sequencing Data.” BMC Bioinformatics 15: 356. 10.1186/s12859-014-0356-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, M. , Conroy G., Ogbourne S., Cairns K., Borburgh L., and Subramanian S.. 2023. “Genomic Signatures of Bottleneck and Founder Effects in Dingoes.” Evolutionary Biology 13, no. 9: e10525. 10.1101/2023.02.05.527211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leigh, J. W. , and Bryant D.. 2015. “Popart: Full‐Feature Software for Haplotype Network Construction.” Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6: 1110–1116. 10.1111/2041-210X.12410. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Leroy, G. , Carroll E. L., Bruford M. W., et al. 2018. “Next‐Generation Metrics for Monitoring Genetic Erosion Within Populations of Conservation Concern.” Evolutionary Applications 11: 1066–1083. 10.1111/eva.12564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li, H. , and Durbin R.. 2009. “Fast and Accurate Short Read Alignment With Burrows‐Wheeler Transform.” Bioinformatics 25: 1754–1760. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowe, W. H. , and Allendorf F. W.. 2010. “What Can Genetics Tell Us About Population Connectivity?: Genetic and Demographic Connectivity.” Molecular Ecology 19: 3038–3051. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04688.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lurz, P. W. W. , Gurnell J., and Magris L.. 2005. “Sciurus vulgaris. Mamm. Species.” 10.2307/3504523. [DOI]
- Marcus, J. , Ha W., Barber R. F., and Novembre J.. 2021. “Fast and Flexible Estimation of Effective Migration Surfaces.” eLife 10: e61927. 10.7554/eLife.61927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mathews, F. , Kubasiewicz L. M., Gurnell J., Harrower C. A., McDonald R. A., and Shore R. F.. 2018. “A Review of the Population and Conservation Status of British Mammals: Techincal Summary.” A Report by the Mammal Society Under Cintract to Natural England, Natural Resources Wales and Scottish Natural Heritage.
- Mathur, S. , and DeWoody J. A.. 2021. “Genetic Load has Potential in Large Populations but Is Realized in Small Inbred Populations.” Evolutionary Applications 14: 1540–1557. 10.1111/eva.13216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matthews, F. , Kubasiewicz L. M., Gurnell J., Harrower C. A., McDonald R. A., and Shore R. F.. 2018. A Review of the Population and Conservation Status of British Mammals. Peterborough, UK: Natural England. [Google Scholar]
- Maxwell, S. L. , Fuller R. A., Brooks T. M., and Watson J. E. M.. 2016. “Biodiversity: The Ravages of Guns, Nets and Bulldozers.” Nature 536: 143–145. 10.1038/536143a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McInnes, C. J. , Coulter L., Dagleish M. P., et al. 2009. “First Cases of Squirrelpox in Red Squirrels ( Sciurus vulgaris ) in Scotland.” Veterinary Record 164: 528–531. 10.1136/vr.164.17.528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mead, D. , Fingland K., Cripps R., et al. 2020. “The Genome Sequence of the Eurasian Red Squirrel, Sciurus vulgaris Linnaeus 1758.” Wellcome Open Research 5: 18. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15679.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meisner, J. , and Albrechtsen A.. 2018. “Inferring Population Structure and Admixture Proportions in Low‐Depth NGS Data.” Genetics 210: 719–731. 10.1534/genetics.118.301336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mooney, J. A. , Marsden C. D., Yohannes A., Wayne R. K., and Lohmueller K. E.. 2023. “Long‐Term Small Population Size, Deleterious Variation, and Altitude Adaptation in the Ethiopian Wolf, a Severely Endangered Canid.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 40: msac277. 10.1093/molbev/msac277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ogden, R. , Chuven J., Gilbert T., et al. 2020. “Benefits and Pitfalls of Captive Conservation Genetic Management: Evaluating Diversity in Scimitar‐Horned Oryx to Support Reintroduction Planning.” Biological Conservation 241: 108244. 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108244. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ogden, R. , Shuttleworth C., McEwing R., and Cesarini S.. 2006. “Genetic Management of the Red Squirrel, Sciurus vulgaris : A Practical Approach to Regional Conservation.” Conservation Genetics 6: 511–525. 10.1007/s10592-005-9006-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Poplin, R. , Ruano‐Rubio V., DePristo M. A., et al. 2017. “Scaling Accurate Genetic Variant Discovery to Tens of Thousands of Samples (Preprint).” Genomics. 10.1101/201178. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Püttker, T. , Crouzeilles R., Almeida‐Gomes M., et al. 2020. “Indirect Effects of Habitat Loss via Habitat Fragmentation: A Cross‐Taxa Analysis of Forest‐Dependent Species.” Biological Conservation 241: 108368. 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108368. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- R Core Team . 2021. “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.” R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R‐project.org/.
- Rasmussen, M. S. , Garcia‐Erill G., Korneliussen T. S., Wiuf C., and Albrechtsen A.. 2022. “Estimation of Site Frequency Spectra From Low‐Coverage Sequencing Data Using Stochastic EM Reduces Overfitting, Runtime, and Memory Usage.” Genetics 222: iyac148. 10.1093/genetics/iyac148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reed, D. H. , and Frankham R.. 2003. “Correlation Between Fitness and Genetic Diversity.” Conservation Biology 17: 230–237. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01236.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ritchie, J. 1920. The Influence of Man on Animal Life in Scotland. London, UK: Cambrige University press. [Google Scholar]
- Robinson, J. A. , Ortega‐Del Vecchyo D., Fan Z., et al. 2016. “Genomic Flatlining in the Endangered Island Fox.” Current Biology 26: 1183–1189. 10.1016/j.cub.2016.02.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rozas, J. , Ferrer‐Mata A., Sánchez‐DelBarrio J. C., et al. 2017. “DnaSP 6: DNA Sequence Polymorphism Analysis of Large Data Sets.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 34: 3299–3302. 10.1093/molbev/msx248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rushton, S. P. , Lurz P. W. W., Gurnell J., et al. 2006. “Disease Threats Posed by Alien Species: The Role of a Poxvirus in the Decline of the Native Red Squirrel in Britain.” Epidemiology and Infection 134: 521–533. 10.1017/S0950268805005303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sacks, B. N. , Mitchell K. J., Quinn C. B., et al. 2021. “Pleistocene Origins, Western Ghost Lineages, and the Emerging Phylogeographic History of the Red Wolf and Coyote.” Molecular Ecology 30: 4292–4304. 10.1111/mec.16048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sainsbury, A. W. , Chantrey J., Ewen J. G., et al. 2020. “Implications of Squirrelpox Virus for Successful Red Squirrel Translocations Within Mainland UK.” Conservation Science and Practice 2: e200. 10.1111/csp2.200. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sainsbury, A. W. , Nettleton P., Gilray J., and Gurnell J.. 2000. “Grey Squirrels Have High Seroprevalence to a Parapoxvirus Associated With Deaths in Red Squirrels.” Animal Conservation 3: 229–233. 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2000.tb00107.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Santiago, E. , Novo I., Pardiñas A. F., Saura M., Wang J., and Caballero A.. 2020. “Recent Demographic History Inferred by High‐Resolution Analysis of Linkage Disequilibrium.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 37: 3642–3653. 10.1093/molbev/msaa169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seddon, P. J. , Armstrong D. P., and Maloney R. F.. 2007. “Developing the Science of Reintroduction Biology.” Conservation Biology 21: 303–312. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00627.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shuttleworth, C. M. , and Halliwell E. C.. 2016. “Red Squirrel Conservation Plan for Anglesey & Gwynedd.”
- Skotte, L. , Korneliussen T. S., and Albrechtsen A.. 2013. “Estimating Individual Admixture Proportions From Next Generation Sequencing Data.” Genetics 195: 693–702. 10.1534/genetics.113.154138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slade, A. , White A., Kortland K., and Lurz P. W. W.. 2021. “Natural Strongholds for Red Squirrel Conservation in Scotland.” Nature Conservation 43: 93–108. 10.3897/natureconservation.43.62864. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Szűcs, M. , Melbourne B. A., Tuff T., Weiss‐Lehman C., and Hufbauer R. A.. 2017. “Genetic and Demographic Founder Effects Have Long‐Term Fitness Consequences for Colonising Populations.” Ecology Letters 20: 436–444. 10.1111/ele.12743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, G. , Canessa S., Clarke R. H., et al. 2017. “Is Reintroduction Biology an Effective Applied Science?” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 32: 873–880. 10.1016/j.tree.2017.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species . 2023. https://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed on 27 June 2024.
- Thompson, E. A. 2013. “Identity by Descent: Variation in Meiosis, Across Genomes, and in Populations.” Genetics 194: 301–326. 10.1534/genetics.112.148825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tompkins, D. M. , White A. R., and Boots M.. 2003. “Ecological Replacement of Native Red Squirrels by Invasive Greys Driven by Disease.” Ecology Letters 6: 189–196. 10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00417.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Tonkin, M. , Hatcher G., and Tipple N.. 2023. “Saving an Icon: Final Report From Developing Community Action Phase of Saving Scotland's Red Squirrels.” Sav. Scotl. Red Squirrels Edinb. UK.
- Vega, R. , Hopper J., Kitchener A. C., et al. 2023. “The Mitochondrial DNA Diversity of Captive Ruffed Lemurs (Varecia spp.): Implications for Conservation.” Oryx 57: 649–658. 10.1017/S0030605322000643. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wauters, L. A. , Lurz P. W. W., Santicchia F., et al. 2023. “Interactions Between Native and Invasive Species: A Systematic Review of the Red Squirrel‐Gray Squirrel Paradigm.” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 11: 1083008. 10.3389/fevo.2023.1083008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wilder, A. P. , Dudchenko O., Curry C., et al. 2022. “A Chromosome‐Length Reference Genome for the Endangered Pacific Pocket Mouse Reveals Recent Inbreeding in a Historically Large Population.” Genome Biology and Evolution 14: evac122. 10.1093/gbe/evac122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Willi, Y. , Van Buskirk J., and Hoffmann A. A.. 2006. “Limits to the Adaptive Potential of Small Populations.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 37: 433–458. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110145. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wilson, L. , Marr M., Logie C., et al. 2024. “Squirrelpox in a Red Squirrel in Fife.” Veterinary Record 194: 312. 10.1002/vetr.4182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Figure S1. SNP densities across the red squirrel genome.
Figure S2. Folded site frequency spectra (SFS).
Figure S3. PCA variance in the first 15 PC’s.
Figure S4. PCA plot for pruned sample dataset.
Figure S5. NGSadmix likelihood curve and DeltaK for the admixture analysis.
Figure S6. Fast estimation of effective migration surfaces (FEEMS).
Figure S7. Watterson’s estimator.
Figure S8. Pearson’s correlations between individual heterozygosity and read depth.
Figure S9. Estimates of historical effective population size (N e ) from hard‐masked SNPs.
Table S1. Metadata for red squirrels sampled for this study.
Table S2. Depth and marker numbers for ANGSD runs.
Table S3. Filters applied for each analysis.
Table S4. Individuals randomly subsampled for PCA with even sample sizes.
Table S5. Data used to compare genome‐wide heterozygosity.
Table S6. Shapiro–Wilks test for depature form normality on heterozygosity.
Table S7. Percentage and mean length (Mb) of FROH in red squirrel populations.
Table S8. ROH for samples R232‐98 and R235‐98 at differing coverage depths.
Data Availability Statement
Genotype likelihoods, SNP genotypes, and metadata can be assessed and downloaded from the Harvard Dataverse https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/CK1ILL and will be made available 12 months from the date of publication. Code and scripts can be accessed at https://github.com/space‐beaver/Red‐squirrel‐genomics‐.git.
