Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 15;9:6. doi: 10.1186/s41747-024-00545-y

Table 2.

Variables, measurement method, and data collection times

Variables Measurement method Data collection timea
Main variables
 Knowledge and understanding of the procedure 12-point specific multiple-response questionnaire for each procedure (see Appendix 3) 1st 2nd 3rd
 Satisfaction with the method of communicating information 10-point VASb 1st 2nd 3rd
 Satisfaction with information transmitted 10-point Visual Analog Scaleb 1st 2nd 3rd
 Anxiety related to the procedure STAI questionnaire and 10-point VASb 1st 2nd 3rd
Other variables
 Demographic variables Sex, age, marital status, and educational level 1st
 Personal history Previous IR procedures, other types of interventions, history of anxiety and depression, and previous knowledge of IR 1st
 Procedure-specific variables Preparation method, anesthesia type, sedation level (Ramsay Sedation Scale), and procedure duration 4th
 Pain intensity during the procedure 10-point VASc 4th
 Intervention tolerance level 10-point VASb 4th
 Satisfaction level with the intervention 10-point VASb 4th
 Usefulness of explanatory videos 10-point VASb and dichotomous questionsd 2nd

IR Interventional radiology, STAI State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, VAS Visual analog scale

a Data collection times: 1st (screening visit), 2nd (after the consultation with the radiologist, only for the experimental group), 3rd (on the day of the procedure, before it is performed), and 4th (on the day of the procedure, after it is performed)

b VAS, where 1 represents the minimum value and 10 the maximum value

c VAS for pain, where 0 indicates no pain, 1–3 mild pain, 4–6 moderate pain, 7–8 severe pain, and 9–10 excruciating pain

d The questions are: Did you find the video useful for better understanding the intervention? Did you like the video as an explanatory tool? Do you feel less anxiety after watching the video? Do you understand the intervention better after watching the video?