ABSTRACT
Yersinia pestis is the etiological agent of human plague. However, certain evolutionarily divergent subspecies have different host specificities and virulence capacity compared to the more commonly studied strains with pandemic potential. This resource examines 10 diverse isolates representing some of the most understudied subspecies commonly referred to as Yersinia pestis Pestoides.
KEYWORDS: Yersinia pestis, Pestoides, genome sequencing
ANNOUNCEMENT
Yersinia pestis is a zoonotic pathogen that causes a lethal infection of humans known as plague. Y. pestis evolved from the gastrointestinal pathogen Y. pseudotuberculosis (1). During its evolution, several sylvatic plague strains emerged with restricted host range and virulence potential and are considered ancestral to strains with pandemic potential (2, 3). Of these sylvatic plague strains, a group commonly referred to as Y. pestis Pestoides provides a unique resource to investigate the genetic diversity within Y. pestis. Defining the genetic differences between the Y. pestis Pestoides strains and the strains associated with human plague will help understand the evolution of Y. pestis and the molecular mechanisms that contribute to the acute virulence of this pathogen.
Y. pestis Pestoides strains were isolated from locations within the former Soviet Union prior to 1984 (2, 4). Y. pestis Angola was originally isolated from Angola (2). Stabs were obtained from frozen stocks maintained at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. From the stab, bacteria were grown overnight in brain–heart infusion (BHI) at 26°C to make glycerol stocks stored at −80°C. All working stocks are less than three passages from frozen stocks.
All work with viable Y. pestis strains was performed in select agent-approved BSL-3 laboratories. Bacteria were cultured from frozen stocks on BHI plates for 48 hours at 26°C. From agar plates, multiple colonies were collected to inoculate 5 mL of BHI broth, which were incubated overnight at 26°C on a roller drum for aeration. One milliliter of overnight culture was harvested, and genomic DNA was prepared using the Promega Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit. After verification of pathogen inactivation, DNA was provided to SeqCenter (https://www.seqcenter.com/) for production sequencing on the Illumina platform. Sample libraries were prepared using the Illumina DNA Prep kit and IDT 10 bp UDI indices, and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 2000, producing 2 × 151 bp reads. Demultiplexing, quality control, and adapter trimming were performed with bcl-convert (v3.9.3) (5) and Trimmomatic v0.39 (6). The number of reads generated for each strain on average was 3,036,663 ± 1,084,806 (Table 1). The reads for each strain were then assembled with SPAdes v3.15.3 (7). The relevant statistics for each genome assembly are listed in Table 1. Default parameters we used with all software, unless otherwise specified. The average genome contained 159.5 ± 18.7 contigs with a complete genome size of 4,571,449 ± 55,878 bp and an average GC% of 47.36±0.43% (Table 1). When the genomes were examined with CheckM v1.2.3 (8), the average completeness was 99.58±0.32% with 0.04±0.03% contamination, indicating that these genomes are of acceptable quality. Genomes were annotated using the NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline (PGAP v6.8) (9).
TABLE 1.
Yersinia Isolate and Genome Metrics
| Species | Strain/Biovar | Isolation location (date) | Groupinga | Assembly names | Number of read pairs | Number of base pairs | Genome coverage | Contigs | Genome length (bp) | GC% | N50 | SRA accession | Assembly accession |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Y. pestis | Y. pestis: KIM5 | -- | -- | Ypestis_KIM5_LOU | 2,248,376 | 337,256,400 | 73.4 | 153 | 4,595,212 | 46.54 | 49656 | SRR30551973 | JBHFDC000000000 |
| Y. pestis | pestis: CO-92 | Colorado (1992) | -- | Ypestis_CO92_LOU | 2,412,894 | 361,934,100 | 78.2 | 178 | 4,627,323 | 47.51 | 42191 | SRR30551972 | JBHFDB000000000 |
| Y. pestis | Angola | Angola (pre-1984) | 0.PE3 | Ypestis_Angola_LOU | 2,475,982 | 371,397,300 | 83.8 | 203 | 4,431,249 | 47.51 | 37824 | SRR30551971 | JBHFDA000000000 |
| Y. pestis | Pestoides A | Former Soviet Union (pre-1984) | 0.PE1 | Ypestis_PestoidesA_LOU | 2,354,932 | 353,239,800 | 76.7 | 142 | 4,603,994 | 46.54 | 52729 | SRR30551970 | JBHFCZ000000000 |
| Y. pestis | Pestoides B | Former Soviet Union (pre-1984) | 0.PE1 | Ypestis_PestoidesB_LOU | 2,067,310 | 310,096,500 | 67.4 | 143 | 4,603,482 | 47.54 | 55022 | SRR30551969 | JBHFCY000000000 |
| Y. pestis | Pestoides C | Former Soviet Union (pre-1984) | 0.PE1 | Ypestis_PestoidesC_LOU | 2,783,276 | 417,491,400 | 90.8 | 149 | 4,597,839 | 47.55 | 48595 | SRR30551968 | JBHFCX000000000 |
| Y. pestis | Pestoides D | Former Soviet Union (pre-1984) | 0.PE1 | Ypestis_PestoidesD_LOU | 4,836,188 | 725,428,200 | 157.8 | 162 | 4,597,021 | 47.53 | 46967 | SRR30551967 | JBHFCW00000000 |
| Y. pestis | Pestoides E | Former Soviet Union (pre-1984) | 0.PE2.b | Ypestis_PestoidesE_LOU | 3,284,588 | 492,688,200 | 107.9 | 152 | 4,566,422 | 47.62 | 48543 | SRR30551966 | JBHFCV000000000 |
| Y. pestis | Pestoides F | Former Soviet Union (pre-1984) | 0.PE2.a | Ypestis_PestoidesF_LOU | 2,763,258 | 414488,700 | 91.2 | 150 | 4,546,209 | 47.62 | 48958 | SRR30551965 | JBHFCU000000000 |
| Y. pestis | Pestoides G | Former Soviet Union (pre-1984) | 0.PE2.b | Ypestis_PestoidesG_LOU | 5,139,822 | 770,973,300 | 169.6 | 163 | 4,545,741 | 47.59 | 48857 | SRR30551964 | JBHFCT000000000 |
groupings are derived from Achtman et al. (2).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Y. pestis Pestoides strains were kindly provided by Scott Bearden at the Center for Disease Control and Prevention and Robert Perry at the University of Kentucky. This project was funded in part by the NIH NIAID grant numbers R01AI178106 (MBL), R21AI169423 (MBL), R01AI148241 (MBL), T32AI132146 (AB), R01AI148241-S2 (TG), R01AI147314 (RKE) U19AI110820 (DAR), and the Jewish Heritage for Excellence Fund (MBL).
Contributor Information
Matthew B. Lawrenz, Email: matt.lawrenz@louisville.edu.
David A. Baltrus, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
DATA AVAILABILITY
All data have been released, and SRA and assembly accession numbers are listed in Table 1.
REFERENCES
- 1. Achtman M, Zurth K, Morelli G, Torrea G, Guiyoule A, Carniel E. 1999. Yersinia pestis, the cause of plague, is a recently emerged clone of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:14043–14048. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.24.14043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Achtman M, Morelli G, Zhu P, Wirth T, Diehl I, Kusecek B, Vogler AJ, Wagner DM, Allender CJ, Easterday WR, Chenal-Francisque V, Worsham P, Thomson NR, Parkhill J, Lindler LE, Carniel E, Keim P. 2004. Microevolution and history of the plague bacillus, Yersinia pestis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:17837–17842. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408026101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Suntsov VV. 2023. Molecular phylogenies of the plague microbe Yersinia pestis: an environmental assessment. AIMS Microbiol 9:712–723. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Anisimov AP, Lindler LE, Pier GB. 2004. Intraspecific diversity of Yersinia pestis. Clin Microbiol Rev 17:434–464. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.2.434-464.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Illumina . BCL convert conversion software support resources. Available from: https://emea.support.illumina.com/sequencing/sequencing_software/bcl-convert.html
- 6. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. 2014. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114–2120. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data have been released, and SRA and assembly accession numbers are listed in Table 1.
