Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 2;9:e57604. doi: 10.2196/57604

Table 3.

Recruitment and context of intervention participants and the implementation of the Physical Activity at Work intervention (n=140).


Baseline (n=140) Data monitoring (6-mo intervention period) (n=138)
Job description Cluster size, n (%) Recruitment rate n/N (%) Sedentary time (min/d), mean (SD) Lottery-incentive wins, n (%) Movement break participation (%), mean (SD) Maximum work from home, n/N (%) Notes
Research related 23 (16.4 23/25 (92) 541 (90.5) 15 (63) 59.7 (14.7) 2.5/5 (50) —a
Research related 8 (5.7) 8/44 (18) 483 (99.4) 0 (0) 25.8 (13.2) 5/5 (100) Different building and department
Nursing 13 (9.3) 13/37 (35) 463 (117) 4 (17) 38.8 (16.6) 0/5 (0) Different department
Finance 10 (7.1) 10/11 (90) 460 (95.9) 0 (0) 32.9 (5.49) 2/5 (40) Broadcast from another cluster
Finance 14 (10.0) 14/17 (82) 481 (94.1) 1 (4.17) 29 (16.4) 2/5 (40) —
Human resource 34 (24.3) 34/35 (97) 473 (113) 2 (8) 31.5 (11) 2.5/5 (50) —
Human resource 18 (12.9) 18/31 (58) 394 (141) 1 (4) 25 (7.99) 2.5/5 (50) Broadcast from another cluster
Digital 15 (10.7) 15/25 (60) 447 (116) 1 (4) 19.7 (9.83) 2/5 (40) —
Inspection 5 (3.6) 5/18 (27) 350 (121) 0 (0) 3.88 (4.54) 2/5 (40) n=3 (50%) participants at follow-up

aNot applicable.