Summary
Background
Overweight and obesity pose serious health challenges for individuals and societies. This study aims to facilitate personalised treatment of obesity by summarising recent research on weight-loss pharmacotherapies, with a focus on their effects on weight reduction, cardiometabolic health, psychological outcomes, and adverse events.
Methods
This systematic review and meta-analysis included searches of Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to June 8, 2024. Randomised controlled trials evaluating weight-loss pharmacotherapies approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or European Medicines Agency (EMA) for treating overweight or obesity were included. Primary outcomes included changes in body weight, cardiometabolic indicators, psychological outcomes, and adverse events. Summary data was extracted from published reports. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to calculate weighted mean differences (WMDs), risk ratios (RRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to assess the certainty of evidence for each pooled analysis. PROSPERO registration: CRD42024547905.
Findings
A total of 154 randomised controlled trials (n = 112,515 participants) were included. Tirzepatide had the greatest weight-loss effect (WMD −11.69, 95% CI −19.22 to −4.15; P = 0.0024; I2 = 100.0%; moderate certainty), followed by semaglutide (−8.48, −12.68 to −4.27; P < 0.0001; I2 = 100.0%; moderate certainty). Tirzepatide had the strongest antihypertensive effect on both systolic (WMD −5.74, −9.00 to −2.48; P = 0.0006; I2 = 99.8%; moderate certainty) and diastolic blood pressure (WMD −2.91, −4.97 to −0.85; P = 0.0056; I2 = 99.8%; moderate certainty) and best reduced triglycerides (WMD −0.77, −0.85 to −0.69; P < 0.0001; I2 = 3.2%; high certainty), fasting glucose (WMD −3.06, −5.53 to −0.59; P = 0.015; I2 = 100.0%; moderate certainty), insulin (WMD −4.91, −8.15 to −1.68; P = 0.0029; I2 = 97.0%; moderate certainty), and glycated haemoglobin levels (WMD −1.27, −1.82 to −0.73; P < 0.0001; I2 = 100.0%; moderate certainty). Semaglutide (RR 0.83, 0.74–0.92; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; high certainty) and liraglutide (0.87, 0.79–0.96; P = 0.0059; I2 = 0.0%; high certainty) reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). However, all three medications were associated with adverse gastrointestinal effects. Naltrexone/bupropion increased the risk of elevated blood pressure (RR 1.72, 1.04–2.85; P = 0.036; I2 = 0.0%; high certainty). Topiramate increased depression risk (RR 1.62, 1.14 to 2.30; P = 0.0077; I2 = 0.0%; high certainty), and phentermine/topiramate raised concerns about anxiety (RR 1.91, 1.09 to 3.35; P = 0.025; I2 = 29.5%; high certainty), sleep disorders (RR 1.55, 1.24–1.93; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; high certainty), and irritability (RR 3.31, 1.69–6.47; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; high certainty). No medication increased the risk of serious adverse events.
Interpretation
For weight reduction, tirzepatide is the top choice, followed by semaglutide. Considering cardiometabolic risk factors, tirzepatide shows the best blood pressure- and glucose-lowering benefits, while semaglutide and liraglutide reduce the risk of MACEs. Naltrexone/bupropion carries a risk of increased blood pressure. Phentermine/topiramate should be used with caution due to its higher risk of psychological side effects. Despite limitations related to study heterogeneity, these findings provide valuable insights for weight management strategies across diverse individuals.
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Leading Talents Program of Hunan Province, and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University.
Keywords: Overweight, Obesity, Anti-obesity medications, Randomised controlled trials, Meta-analysis
Research in context.
Evidence before this study
We searched PubMed on May 17, 2024, for reviews and meta-analyses published in the past ten years, with no language restrictions, using the search terms “tirzepatide” and “obesity OR overweight”, which yielded 20 results. Among the identified papers, a 2023 review compared the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide and semaglutide with placebo or other antidiabetic medications in treating type 2 diabetes. This review included 38 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with 34,166 participants, searched from inception to April 3, 2023. Another 2023 review compared the effects of tirzepatide and other Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved weight loss medications on body weight, including 31 RCTs (35,458 participants) identified from 1998 to June 30, 2023, of which 2 focused on tirzepatide. However, these studies did not include the latest RCTs on tirzepatide, especially following its FDA approval for weight loss treatment in November 2023.
Many other reviews included relatively few RCTs (no more than 15 studies), and no meta-analysis has systematically and comprehensively compared all FDA/European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved weight loss medications including semaglutide, liraglutide, orlistat, and two combination therapies (naltrexone/bupropion and phentermine/topiramate), regarding their effects on weight loss, cardiovascular metabolism, psychological aspects, and adverse events. Importantly, no reviews have conducted stratified analyses based on the characteristics of the included populations to compare how various weight loss medications differ in their effects across different individuals with obesity.
Added value of this study
Our review identified more studies compared to earlier reviews: 154 randomised controlled trials (112,515 participants), including 31 recent studies conducted over the past three years, with 11 specifically focusing on the newly FDA-approved weight-loss medication tirzepatide. This review represents a comprehensive update to previous systematic reviews, investigating the impacts of various weight-loss pharmacotherapies across four key dimensions: weight reduction, cardiometabolic health, psychological outcomes, and adverse events. We conducted a detailed stratified analysis based on individuals living with overweight and obesity, assessing how different weight-loss medications varied in their effects across diverse patients, as well as their responsiveness and sensitivity to these medications. The findings are more relevant to real-world scenarios in individuals with obesity, thereby facilitating precision in clinical obesity treatment.
Implications of all the available evidence
Our study provides guidance for individuals living with obesity in selecting appropriate weight-loss medications. Tirzepatide emerges as the optimal choice for weight loss in clinical practice. Semaglutide offers cardiovascular benefits and lowers the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) for those with weight-related complications and comorbidities. Caution is advised when prescribing naltrexone/bupropion, given potential risks of hypertension and palpitations. Phentermine/topiramate should be used with care in individuals with psychiatric disorders, given the risk of psychological and neurological side effects. Despite potential study heterogeneity affecting result interpretation, most findings were supported by evidence of high to moderate certainty, thereby strengthening the credibility of the conclusions.
Introduction
Overweight and obesity have become global epidemics posing serious health challenges for individuals and societies.1 Overweight and obesity are defined by a body mass index (BMI) of 25–30 and ≥ 30, respectively.2 For Asians, the threshold is lower, at ≥23.0–27.5, owing to the higher risk of cardiometabolic diseases at lower BMI levels in this population.3, 4, 5 Obesity is a major risk factor for impaired glucose tolerance, type 2 diabetes (T2D), cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), stroke, dyslipidaemia, and several cancers.6, 7, 8 Moreover, BMI is strongly associated with all-cause mortality,9 with a high BMI accounting for 4.0 million deaths worldwide, over two-thirds of which are due to CVDs,6 such as heart failure, atrial fibrillation, coronary heart disease, and sudden cardiac death.10,11 In addition to BMI, waist circumference, an indicator of abdominal obesity, is associated with increased cardiometabolic risk12 and CVD death.8,13
A sustained weight loss of more than 10% can improve many obesity-related complications, including the prevention and control of T2D, hypertension, fatty liver, and obstructive sleep apnoea, while also enhancing quality of life.14 Evidence-based obesity treatments include behavioural interventions, nutritional changes, physical activity, pharmacotherapy, bariatric surgery, and anti-obesity devices.15 However, weight regain is common after behavioural interventions,16 physical exercise alone has a modest effect on significant weight loss,17 and the high costs and risks of bariatric surgery limit its use.18 Therefore, pharmacotherapy has advanced significantly, and guidelines endorse anti-obesity medications for non-pregnant patients who are obese or overweight (BMI ≥27) with related comorbidities when lifestyle interventions are insufficient.19,20 Notably, weight loss induced by anti-obesity medications is associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality and CVD deaths in individuals with overweight or obesity.21 Therefore, identifying safe and effective weight loss medications is crucial for improving cardiovascular metabolism and lowering all-cause and CVD mortality rates in these individuals.
Since 2020, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has requested the withdrawal of the weight-loss medication lorcaserin owing to its increased risk of cancer.22 Recently, the FDA and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved five categories of weight-loss medications, including tirzepatide (a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP)/glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor co-agonist), semaglutide and liraglutide (GLP-1 receptor agonists), and orlistat, and two combination therapies (naltrexone/bupropion and phentermine/topiramate).3 These pharmacotherapeutic agents operate via distinct mechanisms. Following the recent FDA approval of the novel weight-loss medication tirzepatide in December 2023,23 interest in comparing the effects and safety profiles of these medications has rapidly increased. Currently, a comprehensive meta-analysis evaluating the effects of the five categories of weight loss medications is lacking. This study investigated the effects of these medications across four dimensions: weight loss, cardiometabolic health, psychological outcomes, and adverse events in different individuals living with overweight or obesity. This study aimed to provide evidence-based guidance for pharmacological treatment and enhance personalised weight management in clinical practice.
Methods
Search strategy and selection criteria
We conducted a computerised search of PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for articles published up to June 8, 2024. The detailed search strategy is provided in Supplemental Appendix 1.
The methods used in this meta-analysis adhered to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement and checklist (PRISMA-2020).24 The study was a prespecified protocol registered in the international database of prospectively registered systematic reviews (PROSPERO: CRD42024547905). Studies were required to fulfil the following specifications: (a) placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials; (b) target population meeting diagnostic criteria for overweight/obesity; (c) receiving FDA- or EMA-approved weight-lowering pharmacotherapies; and (d) endpoints, including cardiometabolic or psychological indicators or adverse effects. The exclusion criteria are as follows: (a) participants were not overweight or obese; (b) the intervention did not involve weight-loss medications; (c) no placebo control was included; and (d) the outcomes did not assess weight-loss efficacy (e.g., changes in body weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference), cardiovascular and metabolic indicators (e.g., blood glucose, lipids, blood pressure), mental health-related indicators (e.g., depression, anxiety, sleep disorders), or safety indicators (e.g., severe adverse events or gastrointestinal side effects). The prespecified efficacy endpoints of this study included changes in body weight, BMI, waist circumference, body fat percentage, cardiovascular and metabolic indicators (systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, fasting glucose, insulin, C-peptide, glycated hemoglobin, Homeostasis Model Assessment-estimated Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), and C-reactive protein), as well as mental health indicators such as anxiety, depression, and sleep disorders. The prespecified safety endpoints included the occurrence of any adverse events, serious adverse events, and system-specific adverse reactions, particularly those affecting the gastrointestinal and nervous systems. The literature screening and selection process was performed independently by three authors (LL, ZL, and WY) following a predefined set of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Any disagreements arising during the screening were resolved through discussion and consensus among the authors to ensure an unbiased selection of studies.
Data analysis
Data extraction was independently performed by two investigators (LL and ZL) and then verified by two authors (WY and PP). The verification involved cross-checking against the original sources, resolving any discrepancies through discussion. For missing data, study authors were contacted to request access. Risk ratios (RRs) were calculated for binary outcomes, and mean differences for continuous outcomes. For studies reporting results for different doses, effect values were combined for analysis. Studies with high attrition rates were analysed using results reported via last observation carried forward. The average RR and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for discrete outcomes. The mean difference (post-/pre-intervention) and standard deviation (SD) were extracted from continuous data. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% CIs were calculated for continuous outcomes when the units of measurement were standardised to the metric.25 Inconsistent units were converted to a unified scale before calculating WMDs. Estimates of treatment differences are presented as forest plots. Owing to variability in interventions and population demographics, a random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled proportions for each outcome,26 with heterogeneity quantified using Tau2 and I2 statistics. Funnel plots and Egger's test were used to detect potential publication bias if more than 10 studies. The trim-and-fill method was used to identify possible asymmetries and assess the robustness of the conclusions.27 Meta-regression was conducted to assess the influence of medication categorisation and participants characteristics on intervention effectiveness, and chi-squared tests were used to evaluate the statistical significance of efficacy differences between medications.
Through analysis of all included study participants, we categorised all individuals living with overweight or obesity into three groups: those with simple overweight/obesity, those with overweight/obesity and body weight-related complications and comorbidities, and those with psychiatric disorder-related overweight/obesity. To investigate the effects of each weight-loss medication on these distinct patient groups, we performed stratified analyses. Detailed information for patient grouping is provided in Supplemental Appendix 2. We also compared the effects of different weight-loss medications in different patients to assess their responsiveness and sensitivity. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by omitting each study individually and recalculating the pooled effect size estimates for the remaining studies to evaluate the impact of individual studies on the pooled results. Statistical analyses and graphs were generated using Stata/SE (version 12.0) and Review Manager (version 5.2).
Four authors (LL, ZL, WY, and PP) independently assessed the methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (ROB) tool 1.0,28 which includes allocation concealment, evaluation of sequence generation, selective reporting of outcome data, blinding of participants, personnel, and outcome assessors, incomplete presentation of outcome data, and other sources of bias. Any discordances in the methodological quality assessments among the authors were addressed through discussion and consensus. If agreement could not be reached, a fifth author (JL) was consulted to ensure a fair and unbiased evaluation. A sensitivity analysis excluding studies with a high or medium risk of bias was also conducted.
We employed the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system to assess the certainty of the evidence for each pooled analysis, classifying the results as “high,” “moderate,” “low,” or “very low” (Supplementary Appendix 4).29, 30, 31 Initially, the GRADE approach considers all randomised control trials as high-quality evidence. However, five criteria may reduce confidence in effect estimates and lead to downgrading: risk of bias, inconsistency across studies, indirectness of evidence, imprecision, and publication bias.
Role of the funding source
The funder of this study had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. All authors had full access to the data in the study. DX and JZ had final responsibility for the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Results
Of the initial 5864 potential articles identified, 154 full-text reviews were retained after removing duplicates and articles that did not meet the inclusion criteria (Fig. 1). The comprehensive summary of the included studies is presented in Table S1 in Supplementary Appendix 7. Table S2 in Supplementary Appendix 7 lists the key excluded studies.
Fig. 1.
Search and selection of studies for inclusion.
The study included 112,515 individuals with overweight or obesity. Among them, 6335 (5.6%) individuals had simple overweight/obesity, 103,982 (92.4%) had body weight-related complications and comorbidities, and 2198 (2.0%) had psychiatric disorder-related overweight/obesity. Patients underwent treatment with ten weight-lowering pharmacotherapies, including tirzepatide (6505, 5.8%), semaglutide (26,859, 23.9%), liraglutide (28,367, 25.2%), orlistat (11,553, 10.3%), naltrexone/bupropion (27,340, 24.3%), phentermine/topiramate (4862, 4.3%), naltrexone (268, 0.2%), bupropion (955, 0.8%), phentermine (618, 0.6%), and topiramate (5188, 4.6%). Overall, 151 (98.1%) studies showed a low or medium risk of bias (Figure S1 in Supplementary Appendix 7).
All pharmacotherapies for weight loss effectively reduced body weight. The specific reductions were as follows (Table 1): tirzepatide (WMD −11.69, 95% CI −19.22 to −4.15; P = 0.0024; I2 = 100.0%; Tau2 = 88.35; moderate certainty), semaglutide (−8.48, −12.68 to −4.27; P < 0.0001; I2 = 100.0%; Tau2 = 27.52; moderate certainty), liraglutide (−4.18, −4.84 to −3.53; P < 0.0001; I2 = 90.7%; Tau2 = 1.35; low certainty), orlistat (−2.19, −2.62 to −1.77; P < 0.0001; I2 = 99.5%; Tau2 = 0.96; moderate certainty), naltrexone/bupropion (−4.06, −4.98 to −3.14; P < 0.0001; I2 = 99.9%; Tau2 = 1.58; moderate certainty), phentermine/topiramate (−5.67, −9.70 to −1.64; P = 0.0059; I2 = 99.1%; Tau2 = 16.60; moderate certainty), naltrexone (−0.47, −0.71 to −0.23; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; Tau2 < 0.0001; moderate certainty), bupropion (−2.31, −3.09 to −1.52; P < 0.0001; I2 = 97.9%; Tau2 = 0.31; moderate certainty), phentermine (−5.41, −7.37 to −3.45; P < 0.0001; I2 = 66.8%; Tau2 = 1.34; moderate certainty), and topiramate (−2.65, −4.35 to −0.94; P = 0.0023; I2 = 31.4%; Tau2 = 1.11; moderate certainty). Notably, tirzepatide demonstrated the greatest effect on weight reduction. Additionally, tirzepatide achieved the largest reductions in body weight percentage (WMD −16.29, −23.86 to −8.72; P < 0.0001; I2 = 100.0%; Tau2 = 74.01; moderate certainty), BMI (WMD −4.84, −8.42 to −1.26; P = 0.0080; I2 = 100.0%; Tau2 = 13.28; moderate certainty), and waist circumference (WMD −11.27, −16.46 to −6.07; P < 0.0001; I2 = 100.0%; Tau2 = 41.80; moderate certainty), followed by semaglutide. Combination therapies, such as naltrexone/bupropion and phentermine/topiramate, exhibited superior weight-loss effects compared to monotherapies.
Table 1.
Cardiometabolic effects of weight loss medications in individuals with overweight or obesity.
| Cardiometabolic outcomes | Studies (No) | Participants (No) | WMD (95% CI) | P-value | I2 (100%) | Tau2 | Certainty of evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (kg) | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 4 | 234 | −0.47 (−0.71 to −0.23) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 2 | 563 | −2.31 (−3.09 to −1.52) | <0.0001 | 97.9% | 0.31 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 10 | 18,236 | −4.06 (−4.98 to −3.14) | <0.0001 | 99.9% | 1.58 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 30 | 8253 | −2.19 (−2.62 to −1.77) | <0.0001 | 99.5% | 0.96 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 6 | 4153 | −8.48 (−12.68 to −4.27) | <0.0001 | 100.0% | 27.52 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 21 | 5579 | −4.18 (−4.84 to −3.53) | <0.0001 | 90.7% | 1.35 | Low |
| Phentermine | 2 | 125 | −5.41 (−7.37 to −3.45) | <0.0001 | 66.8% | 1.34 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 5 | 252 | −2.65 (−4.35 to −0.94) | 0.0023 | 31.4% | 1.11 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 4 | 1375 | −5.67 (−9.70 to −1.64) | 0.0059 | 99.1% | 16.60 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 6 | 2939 | −11.69 (−19.22 to −4.15) | 0.0024 | 100.0% | 88.35 | Moderate |
| Body weight (%) | |||||||
| Bupronpion | 2 | 749 | −3.2 (−3.29 to −3.10) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Low |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 9 | 9523 | −1.95 (−5.10 to 1.20) | 0.23 | 100.0% | 22.67 | High |
| Orlistat | 13 | 4431 | −2.05 (−2.77 to −1.33) | <0.0001 | 99.8% | 1.53 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 5 | 19,487 | −10.48 (−11.74 to −9.21) | <0.0001 | 99.7% | 2.00 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 5 | 4104 | −4.58 (−5.71 to −3.44) | <0.0001 | 35.4% | 0.60 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 3 | 256 | −4.05 (−6.15 to −1.95) | <0.0001 | 66.8% | 2.21 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 2 | 2530 | −7.37 (−9.82 to −4.92) | <0.0001 | 98.10% | 3.07 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 5 | 4936 | −16.29 (−23.86 to −8.72) | <0.0001 | 100.0% | 74.01 | Moderate |
| BMI (kg/m2) | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 2 | 47 | −0.12 (−2.23 to 2.00) | 0.91 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 1 | 61 | −0.30 (−7.27 to 6.67) | 0.93 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 3 | 156 | −1.24 (−1.78 to −0.69) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 13 | 1662 | −1.02 (−1.46 to −0.57) | <0.0001 | 95.3% | 0.39 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 7 | 4457 | −3.32 (−4.59 to −2.05) | <0.0001 | 100.0% | 2.93 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 12 | 5252 | −1.46 (−1.80 to −1.13) | <0.0001 | 92.2% | 0.21 | Low |
| Topiramate | 4 | 226 | −0.89 (−1.61 to −0.17) | 0.015 | 71.3% | 0.35 | High |
| Tirzepatide | 4 | 1989 | −4.84 (−8.42 to −1.26) | 0.0080 | 100.0% | 13.28 | Moderate |
| Waist circumference (cm) | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 1 | 93 | −2.80 (−3.31 to −2.29) | <0.0001 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 2 | 431 | −1.44 (−2.30 to −0.59) | 0.0009 | 91.5% | 0.35 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 6 | 12,989 | −3.33 (−4.79 to −1.87) | <0.0001 | 99.7% | 3.15 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 19 | 5390 | −1.82 (−2.47 to −1.18) | <0.0001 | 99.3% | 1.47 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 8 | 21,255 | −7.53 (−9.05 to −6.01) | <0.0001 | 99.9% | 4.76 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 16 | 5828 | −3.15 (−3.80 to −2.50) | <0.0001 | 85.7% | 0.82 | Very low |
| Phentermine | 3 | 438 | −4.11 (−5.74 to −2.49) | <0.0001 | 98.6% | 1.75 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 5 | 532 | −2.48 (−2.65 to −2.30) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 3 | 4020 | −5.96 (−6.74 to −5.17) | <0.0001 | 71.3% | 0.32 | High |
| Tirzepatide | 6 | 5198 | −11.27 (−16.46 to −6.07) | <0.0001 | 100.0% | 41.80 | Moderate |
| Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 1 | 93 | 2.70 (2.00–3.40) | <0.0001 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 3 | 853 | 1.96 (1.09–2.82) | <0.0001 | 96.4% | 0.55 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 6 | 12,989 | 2.01 (1.26–2.76) | <0.0001 | 99.3% | 0.82 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 17 | 5533 | −1.18 (−1.91 to −0.46) | 0.0013 | 98.3% | 1.30 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 7 | 20,854 | −4.64 (−5.96 to −3.32) | <0.0001 | 99.8% | 3.06 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 19 | 6089 | −2.75 (−3.62 to −1.88) | <0.0001 | 75.8% | 1.20 | Low |
| Phentermine | 2 | 125 | −1.42 (−8.55 to 5.72) | 0.70 | 74.9% | 19.96 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 4 | 438 | −3.21 (−5.17 to −1.25) | 0.0013 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 4 | 3798 | −4.51 (−7.32 to −1.70) | 0.0016 | 88.0% | 6.30 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 6 | 4543 | −5.74 (−9.00 to −2.48) | 0.0006 | 99.8% | 16.20 | Moderate |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 1 | 93 | 4.00 (3.49–4.51) | <0.0001 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 3 | 853 | 2.00 (0.23–3.76) | 0.026 | 99.3% | 2.40 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 5 | 4084 | 1.25 (0.52–1.97) | 0.0007 | 99.6% | 0.64 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 14 | 4462 | −1.35 (−1.93 to −0.76) | <0.0001 | 97.1% | 0.62 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 8 | 22,061 | −1.76 (−2.38 to −1.13) | <0.0001 | 99.8% | 0.77 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 19 | 6089 | −0.93 (−1.35 to −0.52) | <0.0001 | 50.4% | 0.19 | Moderate |
| Phentermine | 2 | 125 | −0.28 (−5.44 to 4.89) | 0.92 | 71.0% | 9.97 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 4 | 438 | −1.92 (−3.67 to −0.17) | 0.032 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 4 | 3798 | −1.18 (−2.51 to 0.14) | 0.080 | 75.4% | 1.18 | Low |
| Tirzepatide | 6 | 4543 | −2.91 (−4.97 to −0.85) | 0.0056 | 99.8% | 6.44 | Moderate |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 3 | 140 | −0.13 (−1.65 to 1.38) | 0.86 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 3 | 853 | −0.11 (−0.48 to 0.26) | 0.57 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 3 | 208 | −0.12 (−1.98 to 1.74) | 0.90 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Orlistat | 23 | 6930 | −0.33 (−0.39 to −0.28) | <0.0001 | 98.2% | 0.0098 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 3 | 1959 | −0.08 (−0.16 to 0.01) | 0.069 | 99.9% | 0.0037 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 11 | 1549 | −0.30 (−0.53 to −0.07) | 0.012 | 86.7% | 0.058 | Low |
| Phentermine | 2 | 125 | −0.60 (−0.89 to −0.31) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 6 | 1016 | −0.27 (−0.39 to −0.15) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 3 | 3689 | −0.01 (−0.11 to 0.09) | 0.81 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 6 | 5003 | −0.52 (−0.89 to −0.16) | 0.0049 | 82.5% | 0.11 | Moderate |
| Low density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L) | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 3 | 146 | −0.15 (−1.43 to 1.13) | 0.82 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 3 | 853 | −0.08 (−0.39 to 0.22) | 0.59 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 7 | 4206 | −0.04 (−0.11 to 0.03) | 0.25 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 26 | 7051 | −0.25 (−0.30 to −0.20) | <0.0001 | 98.2% | 0.0079 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 3 | 1959 | −0.09 (−0.19 to 0.01) | 0.072 | 99.8% | 0.0050 | Low |
| Liraglutide | 12 | 1593 | −0.02 (−0.03 to −0.02) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Low |
| Phentermine | 2 | 125 | −0.59 (−0.87 to −0.31) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 6 | 993 | −0.15 (−0.25 to −0.05) | 0.0039 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 3 | 3681 | −0.11 (−1.63 to 1.42) | 0.89 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 6 | 5003 | −0.18 (−0.21 to −0.14) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| High density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L) | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 3 | 140 | 0.03 (−0.40 to 0.45) | 0.90 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 3 | 853 | 0.03 (−0.07 to 0.14) | 0.52 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 7 | 4207 | 0.09 (0.07–0.11) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Orlistat | 26 | 7061 | −0.03 (−0.04 to −0.02) | <0.0001 | 95.2% | 0.0002 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 3 | 1959 | −0.01 (−0.03 to 0.02) | 0.69 | 99.4% | 0.0004 | Low |
| Liraglutide | 11 | 1506 | −0.03 (−0.06 to 0.00) | 0.073 | 58.5% | 0.0008 | Low |
| Phentermine | 2 | 125 | 0.03 (−0.06 to 0.12) | 0.53 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 6 | 1013 | −0.04 (−0.08 to −0.00) | 0.048 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 3 | 3689 | −0.06 (−0.65 to 0.53) | 0.85 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 6 | 5003 | 0.03 (0.01–0.04) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Triglycerides (mmol/L) | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 3 | 140 | −0.07 (−4.10 to 3.97) | 0.98 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 3 | 853 | −0.26 (−1.18 to 0.66) | 0.58 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 6 | 4153 | −0.00 (−0.05 to 0.04) | 0.85 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 25 | 6841 | −0.29 (−0.37 to −0.20) | <0.0001 | 98.9% | 0.023 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 3 | 1959 | −0.14 (−0.22 to −0.07) | <0.0001 | 99.2% | 0.0027 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 10 | 1486 | −0.05 (−0.06 to −0.04) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Phentermine | 2 | 125 | −0.64 (−1.38 to 0.10) | 0.092 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 6 | 1016 | −0.20 (−0.41 to 0.02) | 0.071 | 4.0% | 0.0073 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 3 | 3689 | −0.23 (−3.54 to 3.07) | 0.89 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 6 | 5003 | −0.77 (−0.85 to −0.69) | <0.0001 | 3.2% | 0.0010 | High |
| Heart rate (beats/min) | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 1 | 93 | −1.20 (−1.67 to −0.73) | <0.0001 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 3 | 853 | 1.55 (1.15–1.95) | <0.0001 | 92.2% | 0.11 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 4 | 12,216 | 0.83 (0.56–1.11) | <0.0001 | 98.5% | 0.062 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 1 | 60 | −1.70 (−1.91 to −1.49) | <0.0001 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 2 | 17,906 | 3.10 (3.10–3.10) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Liraglutide | 9 | 4205 | 3.00 (1.37–4.64) | <0.0001 | 61.0% | 2.20 | Moderate |
| Phentermine | 2 | 305 | 4.20 (0.46–7.94) | 0.028 | 41.5% | 3.48 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 2 | 259 | −2.16 (−4.63 to 0.30) | 0.085 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 3 | 314 | 3.35 (−0.82 to 7.51) | 0.12 | 85.2% | 10.96 | Low |
| Tirzepatide | 6 | 4543 | 1.90 (1.15–2.65) | <0.0001 | 99.5% | 0.86 | Moderate |
| Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 2 | 116 | 0.08 (−0.58 to 0.75) | 0.81 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 3 | 853 | −0.14 (−0.30 to 0.03) | 0.11 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 5 | 4084 | −0.09 (−0.13 to −0.04) | 0.0006 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Orlistat | 22 | 6057 | −0.60 (−0.80 to −0.41) | <0.0001 | 99.7% | 0.14 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 6 | 3845 | −1.05 (−1.47 to −0.63) | <0.0001 | 100.0% | 0.24 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 16 | 5478 | −0.57 (−0.77 to −0.37) | <0.0001 | 74.6% | 0.066 | Low |
| Phentermine | 3 | 427 | −0.01 (−0.05 to 0.03) | 0.53 | 40.1% | 0.0006 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 7 | 778 | −0.63 (−1.20 to −0.06) | 0.031 | 84.2% | 0.26 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 5 | 4645 | −0.19 (−0.42 to 0.05) | 0.12 | 89.0% | 0.030 | Low |
| Tirzepatide | 7 | 5478 | −3.06 (−5.53 to −0.59) | 0.015 | 100.0% | 10.15 | Moderate |
| Glycated hemoglobin (%) | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 1 | 23 | 0.25 (−0.91 to 1.41) | 0.67 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 1 | 422 | 0.00 (−0.03 to 0.03) | 1.00 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 3 | 546 | −0.22 (−0.56 to 0.11) | 0.20 | 97.8% | 0.087 | Low |
| Orlistat | 13 | 3019 | −0.50 (−0.93 to −0.07) | 0.024 | 100.0% | 0.62 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 5 | 2638 | −0.57 (−0.95 to −0.19) | 0.0032 | 100.0% | 0.19 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 18 | 5761 | −0.31 (−0.36 to −0.26) | <0.0001 | 90.4% | 0.0038 | Very low |
| Phentermine | 1 | 266 | 0.00 (−0.01 to 0.01) | 1.00 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 4 | 694 | −0.50 (−0.83 to −0.17) | 0.0030 | 93.4% | 0.092 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 3 | 3097 | −0.13 (−0.17 to −0.08) | <0.0001 | 63.2% | 0.0011 | High |
| Tirzepatide | 6 | 4899 | −1.27 (−1.82 to −0.73) | <0.0001 | 100.0% | 0.45 | Moderate |
| Fasting insulin (μIU/ml) | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 2 | 116 | 0.80 (0.30–1.30) | 0.0016 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 1 | 104 | −1.40 (−1.80 to −1.00) | <0.0001 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 5 | 4084 | −0.38 (−0.64 to −0.11) | 0.0054 | 88.0% | 0.047 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 18 | 4780 | −1.72 (−2.42 to −1.01) | <0.0001 | 49.5% | 0.82 | High |
| Semaglutide | 2 | 912 | −2.64 (−12.71 to 7.43) | 0.61 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 8 | 1185 | −1.95 (−6.09 to 2.20) | 0.36 | 61.1% | 13.26 | Low |
| Topiramate | 4 | 124 | −2.71 (−9.61 to 4.20) | 0.44 | 33.2% | 17.11 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 2 | 720 | −3.69 (−5.63 to −1.75) | <0.0001 | 72.2% | 1.42 | High |
| Tirzepatide | 5 | 4528 | −4.91 (−8.15 to −1.68) | 0.0029 | 97.0% | 8.30 | Moderate |
| Fasting C-peptide (ng/mL) | |||||||
| Orlistat | 1 | 34 | 0.10 (−0.29 to 0.49) | 0.62 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 1 | 109 | 23.64 (23.53–23.75) | <0.0001 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 6 | 1164 | 9.35 (−12.95 to 31.64) | 0.41 | 100.0% | 537.44 | Very low |
| Tirzepatide | 1 | 262 | −15.48 (−38.40 to 7.44) | 0.19 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Insulin resistance on HOMA | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 1 | 24 | −6.10 (−9.07 to −3.13) | <0.0001 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 4 | 3999 | −0.23 (−0.35 to −0.12) | <0.0001 | 47.6% | 0.0050 | High |
| Orlistat | 7 | 1946 | −1.56 (−2.54 to −0.58) | 0.0018 | 99.5% | 1.14 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 6 | 1074 | −0.21 (−0.46 to 0.04) | 0.10 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Low |
| Tirzepatide | 1 | 262 | −0.35 (−0.42 to −0.28) | <0.0001 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (mg/L) | |||||||
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 4 | 3999 | −0.15 (−0.21 to −0.09) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Orlistat | 3 | 339 | −0.34 (−0.82 to 0.13) | 0.16 | 42.6% | 0.079 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 4 | 1024 | −0.39 (−0.50 to −0.29) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Phentermine | 2 | 303 | −0.79 (−1.05 to −0.53) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 2 | 348 | −0.50 (−0.80 to −0.21) | 0.0009 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 2 | 2371 | −1.30 (−1.92 to −0.68) | <0.0001 | 67.3% | 0.14 | High |
| Body fat (%) | |||||||
| Orlistat | 7 | 966 | −3.67 (−7.11 to −0.23) | 0.036 | 99.7% | 20.36 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 1 | 30 | −0.95 (−2.14 to 0.24) | 0.12 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
Regarding cardiovascular risk factors, tirzepatide exhibited the strongest antihypertensive effects on both systolic (WMD −5.74, 95% CI −9.00 to −2.48; P = 0.0006; I2 = 99.8%; Tau2 = 16.20; moderate certainty) and diastolic blood pressure (WMD −2.91, −4.97 to −0.85; P = 0.0056; I2 = 99.8%; Tau2 = 6.44; moderate certainty), followed by semaglutide (Table 1). In contrast, naltrexone/bupropion, naltrexone, and bupropion increased both systolic and diastolic blood pressure. In terms of lipid profiles, phentermine had the greatest reductions in total cholesterol (WMD −0.60, −0.89 to −0.31; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; Tau2 < 0.0001; moderate certainty) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (WMD −0.59, −0.87 to −0.31; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; Tau2 < 0.0001; moderate certainty), followed by tirzepatide. Tirzepatide also demonstrated the most substantial improvements in triglyceride (WMD −0.77, −0.85 to −0.69; P < 0.0001; I2 = 3.2%; Tau2 = 0.0010; high certainty) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels (WMD 0.03, 0.01–0.04; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; Tau2 < 0.0001; high certainty). The known mechanism by which orlistat decreases dietary cholesterol absorption is the inhibition of intestinal lipases.32 Our results suggest that orlistat also exerts a significant lipid-lowering effect (Table 1). Semaglutide did not reduce total cholesterol and LDL-C levels, likely due to the small number of studies included and high heterogeneity, leading to a moderate to low certainty of the evidence. Regarding glycemic control, tirzepatide showed the largest reduction in fasting glucose (WMD −3.06, −5.53 to −0.59; P = 0.015; I2 = 100.0%; Tau2 = 10.15; moderate certainty) and glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels (WMD −1.27, −1.82 to −0.73; P < 0.0001; I2 = 100.0%; Tau2 = 0.45; moderate certainty), followed by semaglutide. Additionally, tirzepatide achieved the greatest reduction in fasting insulin levels (WMD −4.91, −8.15 to −1.68; P = 0.0029; I2 = 97.0%; Tau2 = 8.30; moderate certainty), and significantly improved Homeostasis Model Assessment-estimated Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) (WMD −0.35, −0.42 to −0.28; P < 0.0001; Tau2 < 0.0001; moderate certainty). These results collectively highlight the significant advantage of tirzepatide in improving cardiovascular metabolism.
Chi-squared test results revealed significant statistical differences across different weight-loss medications for all efficacy indicators except body fat (%) (Supplemental Appendix 3). Most findings were supported by high to moderate evidence (Supplemental Appendix 4), with heterogeneity and imprecision as the primary reasons for downgrading. Outcomes related to liraglutide showed slightly lower quality due to high-bias risk in some studies. Notably, tirzepatide-related outcomes consistently maintained high to moderate quality, underscoring its significant value in weight reduction and cardiometabolic improvement.
Moreover, we explored the effects of different weight-loss medications on the psychological aspects of individuals with overweight or obesity (Tables 2 and 3). The results showed that tirzepatide exhibited the greatest improvement in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) total scores (WMD 10.06, 95% CI 4.56–15.56; P < 0.0001; I2 = 99.9%; Tau2 = 17.69; moderate certainty), followed by semaglutide (7.96, 2.96–12.95; P = 0.0018; I2 = 99.7%; Tau2 = 12.97; moderate certainty). However, topiramate increased the incidence of depression (RR 1.62, 1.14–2.30; P = 0.0077; I2 = 0.0%; Tau2 < 0.0001; high certainty), while bupropion decreased beck depression inventory depression scores (WMD −1.86, −3.26 to −0.45; P = 0.0095; I2 = 0.0%; Tau2 < 0.0001; high certainty). Naltrexone/bupropion (RR 2.44, 1.29–4.63; P = 0.0062; I2 = 27.3%; Tau2 = 0.090; high certainty) and phentermine/topiramate (RR 1.91, 1.09–3.35; P = 0.025; I2 = 29.5%; Tau2 = 0.056; high certainty) increased the incidence of anxiety disorders. Phentermine/topiramate also increased irritability, 3.31 times higher than that in the placebo group (RR 3.31, 1.69–6.47; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; Tau2 < 0.0001; high certainty). Liraglutide (RR 1.50, 1.09–2.07; P = 0.013; I2 = 0.0%; Tau2 < 0.0001; high certainty) and phentermine/topiramate (RR 1.55, 1.24–1.93; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; Tau2 < 0.0001; high certainty) increased the incidence of sleep disorders. Notably, none of the medications increased the risk of suicidal events. High-certainty evidence demonstrated that topiramate and phentermine/topiramate negatively impacted psychological outcomes.
Table 2.
Psychological effects of weight loss medications in individuals with overweight or obesity (Continuous outcomes).
| Psychological outcomes | Studies (No) | Participants (No) | WMD (95% CI) | P-value | I2 (100%) | Tau2 | Certainty of evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWQOL-Lite total score | |||||||
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 4 | 7055 | 4.01 (3.31–4.71) | <0.0001 | 99.4% | 0.32 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 1 | 89 | 2.30 (1.45–3.15) | <0.0001 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 2 | 965 | 7.96 (2.96–12.95) | 0.0018 | 99.7% | 12.97 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 3 | 3677 | 3.03 (2.12–3.94) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Tirzepatide | 3 | 1727 | 10.06 (4.56–15.56) | <0.0001 | 99.9% | 17.69 | Moderate |
| IDS-SR total score | |||||||
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 3 | 3693 | 0.22 (−0.11 to 0.55) | 0.20 | 49.8% | 0.046 | Moderate |
| BDI scores | |||||||
| Bupronpion | 2 | 388 | −1.86 (−3.26 to −0.45) | 0.0095 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 3 | 152 | 0.48 (−2.40 to 3.36) | 0.74 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 4 | 201 | −0.18 (−1.03 to 0.66) | 0.68 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 1 | 70 | −3.75 (−7.98 to 0.48) | 0.082 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
Table 3.
Psychological effects of weight loss medications in individuals with overweight or obesity (Discontinuous outcomes).
| Psychological outcomes | Studies (No) | Participants (No) | RR (95% CI) | P-value | I2 (100%) | Tau2 | Certainty of evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Depressed mood or depression | |||||||
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 3 | 10,191 | 0.81 (0.22–2.96) | 0.76 | 79.8% | 1.03 | Low |
| Orlistat | 2 | 606 | 0.61 (0.06–5.96) | 0.67 | 36.8% | 1.04 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 3 | 5931 | 1.23 (0.88–1.73) | 0.22 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 5 | 3405 | 1.62 (1.14–2.30) | 0.0077 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 2 | 3749 | 1.94 (0.68–5.55) | 0.22 | 79.0% | 0.46 | Low |
| Tirzepatide | 2 | 3477 | 0.86 (0.04–18.15) | 0.92 | 50.2% | 2.44 | Moderate |
| Anxiety disorder | |||||||
| Bupronpion | 1 | 327 | 5.62 (0.31–100.82) | 0.24 | NA | 0.15 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 3 | 10,191 | 2.44 (1.29–4.63) | 0.0062 | 27.3% | 0.090 | High |
| Orlistat | 1 | 73 | 0.74 (0.36–1.52) | 0.41 | NA | 0.090 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 1 | 611 | 1.50 (0.16–14.33) | 0.73 | NA | 0.090 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 3 | 5740 | 1.33 (0.93–1.90) | 0.12 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Phentermine | 1 | 53 | 0.84 (0.13–5.55) | 0.86 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 2 | 491 | 2.93 (0.70–12.18) | 0.14 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 2 | 3749 | 1.91 (1.09–3.35) | 0.025 | 29.5% | 0.056 | High |
| Tirzepatide | 1 | 579 | 0.50 (0.23–1.08) | 0.078 | NA | 0.056 | Moderate |
| Irritability | |||||||
| Phentermine | 1 | 326 | 1.97 (0.43–9.14) | 0.39 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 2 | 348 | 1.46 (0.34–6.30) | 0.61 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 2 | 2808 | 3.31 (1.69–6.47) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Sleep disorder | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 1 | 141 | 1.48 (0.45–4.88) | 0.52 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 2 | 531 | 1.13 (0.62–2.07) | 0.69 | 15.6% | 0.038 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 5 | 2940 | 1.32 (0.96–1.82) | 0.092 | 8.9% | 0.015 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 3 | 5740 | 1.50 (1.09–2.07) | 0.013 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Phentermine | 2 | 379 | 3.09 (0.38–25.14) | 0.29 | 57.1% | 1.49 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 11 | 2061 | 1.14 (0.90–1.46) | 0.27 | 3.0% | 0.0056 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 4 | 4747 | 1.55 (1.24–1.93) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Suicide | |||||||
| Liraglutide | 2 | 606 | 4.72 (0.54–41.28) | 0.16 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 1 | 579 | 3.04 (0.12–74.35) | 0.50 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
Regarding adverse events, no weight-loss medications increased the risk of serious adverse events (defined as any event that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required prolonged hospitalisation, or caused persistent disability or incapacity33) (Table 4). However, naltrexone/bupropion, orlistat, semaglutide, liraglutide, topiramate, phentermine/topiramate, and tirzepatide were associated with higher discontinuation rates due to adverse events, with tirzepatide presenting the highest risk (RR 2.13, 95% CI 1.57–2.89; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; Tau2 < 0.0001; high certainty). GLP-1 receptor agonists, including tirzepatide, semaglutide, and liraglutide, were associated with a higher risk of gastrointestinal disorders. In particular, tirzepatide was associated with the highest risk of vomiting (RR 4.95, 3.44–7.13; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; Tau2 < 0.0001; high certainty) and gastroenteritis (RR 2.80, 1.69–4.63; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; Tau2 < 0.0001; high certainty). Semaglutide had the highest risk of abdominal pain (RR 1.97, 1.55–2.51; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; Tau2 < 0.0001; high certainty). Liraglutide had the highest risk for diarrhoea (RR 1.64, 1.39–1.93; P < 0.0001; I2 = 31.1%; Tau2 = 0.034; moderate certainty), dyspepsia (RR 2.63, 1.91–3.61; P < 0.0001; I2 = 28.8%; Tau2 = 0.065; high certainty), and eructation (RR 9.54, 3.87 to 23.52; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; Tau2 < 0.0001; moderate certainty). None of the weight-loss medications altered the risk for acute pancreatitis. Importantly, semaglutide (RR 0.83, 0.74–0.92; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; Tau2 < 0.0001; high certainty) and liraglutide (0.87, 0.79–0.96; P = 0.0059; I2 = 0.0%; Tau2 < 0.0001; high certainty) significantly reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Moreover, semaglutide significantly decreased the risk of cardiac disorder (RR 0.74, 0.59–0.92; P = 0.0070; I2 = 66.8%; Tau2 = 0.069; high certainty), including events classified as severe or serious arrhythmias and cardiac conduction disorders.34
Table 4.
Adverse events of weight loss medications in individuals with overweight or obesity.
| Adverse events outcomes | Studies (No) | Participants (No) | RR (95% CI) | P-value | I2 (100%) | Tau2 | Certainty of evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any adverse events | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 1 | 1484 | 1.08 (0.98–1.18) | 0.11 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 2 | 2213 | 1.08 (1.00–1.17) | 0.040 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Orlistat | 21 | 6862 | 1.17 (1.07–1.28) | 0.0008 | 32.9% | 0.011 | High |
| Semaglutide | 13 | 8003 | 1.03 (1.00–1.07) | 0.080 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Liraglutide | 15 | 18,705 | 1.05 (1.02–1.09) | <0.0001 | 3.9% | 0.0002 | High |
| Phentermine | 2 | 220 | 1.03 (0.79–1.33) | 0.85 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 3 | 1286 | 1.05 (0.96–1.15) | 0.29 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 10 | 6030 | 1.05 (1.00–1.11) | 0.040 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Serious adverse events | |||||||
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 1 | 1475 | 0.88 (0.65–1.18) | 0.40 | NA | 0.0030 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 8 | 3921 | 1.17 (0.85–1.60) | 0.34 | 20.7% | 0.041 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 15 | 26,141 | 0.95 (0.81–1.12) | 0.57 | 48.6% | 0.035 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 14 | 18,565 | 1.01 (0.96–1.05) | 0.80 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 1 | 111 | 0.54 (0.05–5.75) | 0.61 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 10 | 6452 | 0.97 (0.78–1.20) | 0.77 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Nausea | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 2 | 1625 | 10.65 (2.83–40.08) | <0.0001 | 69.9% | 0.65 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 3 | 858 | 0.92 (0.56–1.51) | 0.74 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 7 | 15,482 | 4.94 (3.07–7.93) | <0.0001 | 85.1% | 0.29 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 4 | 1291 | 1.02 (0.71–1.47) | 0.91 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 13 | 8003 | 2.25 (2.03–2.49) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Liraglutide | 19 | 18,902 | 2.28 (1.99–2.61) | <0.0001 | 34.0% | 0.024 | Moderate |
| Phentermine | 2 | 379 | 0.91 (0.43–1.91) | 0.80 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 11 | 3258 | 1.40 (1.11–1.76) | 0.0044 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 4 | 4747 | 1.34 (1.04–1.71) | 0.021 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Tirzepatide | 11 | 6505 | 2.62 (2.11–3.26) | <0.0001 | 13.3% | 0.017 | High |
| Vomiting | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 2 | 1625 | 3.84 (2.06–7.18) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Bupronpion | 1 | 145 | 2.77 (0.26–29.92) | 0.40 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 7 | 15,482 | 4.25 (2.24–8.07) | <0.0001 | 79.1% | 0.45 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 2 | 536 | 1.03 (0.26–4.07) | 0.97 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 13 | 8003 | 3.53 (2.91–4.30) | <0.0001 | 8.0% | 0.011 | High |
| Liraglutide | 20 | 19,005 | 3.15 (2.52–3.93) | <0.0001 | 17.9% | 0.037 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 2 | 410 | 1.91 (0.51–7.15) | 0.34 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 11 | 6505 | 4.95 (3.44–7.13) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Decreased appetite | |||||||
| Semaglutide | 7 | 2720 | 2.46 (1.80–3.36) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Liraglutide | 11 | 16,531 | 3.27 (2.61–4.08) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Topiramate | 2 | 1020 | 3.76 (1.64–8.61) | 0.0017 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Tirzepatide | 10 | 5835 | 3.03 (2.29–4.01) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Constipation | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 1 | 1484 | 2.41 (1.71–3.40) | <0.0001 | NA | 0.064 | High |
| Bupronpion | 2 | 713 | 1.25 (0.74–2.10) | 0.40 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 7 | 15,482 | 2.74 (1.81–4.14) | <0.0001 | 77.6% | 0.19 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 3 | 472 | 0.61 (0.25–1.44) | 0.26 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 12 | 7894 | 2.05 (1.65–2.56) | <0.0001 | 53.0% | 0.065 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 16 | 8955 | 1.82 (1.56–2.13) | <0.0001 | 16.3% | 0.014 | High |
| Phentermine | 2 | 379 | 0.86 (0.42–1.80) | 0.70 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 8 | 2135 | 1.52 (0.94–2.46) | 0.088 | 24.3% | 0.11 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 5 | 4792 | 2.06 (1.65–2.57) | <0.0001 | 17.5% | 0.012 | High |
| Tirzepatide | 8 | 5572 | 2.56 (2.02–3.24) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Diarrhoea | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 1 | 1484 | 1.49 (0.88–2.51) | 0.14 | NA | 0.49 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 1 | 327 | 1.31 (0.56–3.06) | 0.53 | NA | 0.49 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 4 | 5645 | 1.20 (0.96–1.50) | 0.11 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 3 | 294 | 2.20 (0.89–5.46) | 0.088 | 23.0% | 0.18 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 13 | 8003 | 1.60 (1.44–1.78) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Liraglutide | 21 | 19,066 | 1.64 (1.39–1.93) | <0.0001 | 31.1% | 0.034 | Moderate |
| Phentermine | 1 | 326 | 0.51 (0.15–1.74) | 0.28 | NA | 0.034 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 10 | 2721 | 1.32 (1.01–1.73) | 0.045 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 5 | 4792 | 1.24 (0.98–1.59) | 0.078 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 11 | 6505 | 1.73 (0.52–5.73) | 0.37 | 97.3% | 3.73 | Low |
| Dyspepsia | |||||||
| Semaglutide | 6 | 3627 | 2.59 (1.93–3.48) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Liraglutide | 11 | 8178 | 2.63 (1.91–3.61) | <0.0001 | 28.8% | 0.065 | High |
| Phentermine | 1 | 53 | 1.09 (0.27–4.46) | 0.90 | NA | 0.065 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 5 | 1265 | 1.36 (0.84–2.20) | 0.21 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 9 | 5625 | 2.37 (1.79–3.14) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Abdominal pain | |||||||
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 1 | 784 | 2.39 (0.12–46.12) | 0.56 | NA | 0.0074 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 8 | 2614 | 1.38 (1.07–1.79) | 0.013 | 23.8% | 0.031 | High |
| Semaglutide | 8 | 5321 | 1.97 (1.55–2.51) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Liraglutide | 10 | 16,963 | 1.51 (1.22–1.86) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Topiramate | 1 | 380 | 8.24 (0.50–135.43) | 0.14 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 9 | 5552 | 1.89 (1.36–2.62) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Upper abdominal pain | |||||||
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 2 | 1286 | 3.14 (1.35–7.30) | 0.0078 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Semaglutide | 4 | 1546 | 1.63 (0.89–2.99) | 0.11 | 56.7% | 0.21 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 5 | 7110 | 1.46 (1.14–1.88) | 0.0028 | 9.6% | 0.0088 | High |
| Tirzepatide | 3 | 927 | 1.17 (0.37–3.74) | 0.79 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Eructation | |||||||
| Semaglutide | 5 | 2411 | 4.88 (2.59–9.18) | <0.0001 | 9.9% | 0.058 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 2 | 2487 | 9.54 (3.87–23.52) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 5 | 4584 | 6.32 (3.38–11.84) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Dizziness | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 2 | 1625 | 2.80 (0.57–13.76) | 0.21 | 40.9% | 0.78 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 2 | 472 | 1.68 (0.02–130.82) | 0.82 | 75.7% | 7.48 | Low |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 7 | 15,482 | 3.26 (2.29–4.65) | <0.0001 | 40.5% | 0.081 | High |
| Semaglutide | 4 | 1853 | 1.75 (1.20–2.57) | 0.0039 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Liraglutide | 11 | 6805 | 1.48 (1.15–1.90) | 0.0020 | 9.3% | 0.017 | High |
| Phentermine | 2 | 379 | 1.96 (0.75–5.11) | 0.17 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 11 | 2810 | 1.47 (1.15–1.89) | 0.0025 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 4 | 4747 | 1.97 (1.20–3.26) | 0.0078 | 57.5% | 0.14 | High |
| Tirzepatide | 6 | 4619 | 2.04 (1.40–2.97) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Headache | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 2 | 1625 | 1.80 (1.33–2.45) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Bupronpion | 3 | 858 | 0.86 (0.60–1.24) | 0.43 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 7 | 15,482 | 1.64 (1.34–2.01) | <0.0001 | 36.4% | 0.024 | High |
| Orlistat | 4 | 1631 | 1.15 (0.91–1.44) | 0.24 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 9 | 5709 | 1.29 (1.10–1.52) | 0.0016 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Liraglutide | 16 | 13,828 | 1.07 (0.99–1.17) | 0.10 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Phentermine | 2 | 379 | 1.10 (0.57–2.09) | 0.78 | 15.3% | 0.045 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 10 | 2423 | 1.00 (0.82–1.23) | 0.97 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 4 | 4747 | 1.02 (0.86–1.22) | 0.82 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 7 | 5039 | 1.04 (0.82–1.33) | 0.73 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Influenza | |||||||
| Bupronpion | 1 | 386 | 1.35 (0.61–2.96) | 0.46 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 1 | 222 | 1.22 (0.58–2.59) | 0.60 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 4 | 1985 | 1.13 (0.82–1.56) | 0.45 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 8 | 7437 | 1.00 (0.78–1.29) | 1.00 | 31.7% | 0.035 | Moderate |
| Phentermine | 1 | 326 | 0.81 (0.27–2.42) | 0.71 | NA | 0.035 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 3 | 2262 | 1.29 (0.93–1.79) | 0.13 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 3 | 1319 | 0.86 (0.34–2.15) | 0.75 | 36.0% | 0.26 | Moderate |
| Fatigue | |||||||
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 1 | 8905 | 11.96 (1.56–91.92) | 0.017 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 1 | 193 | 0.52 (0.05–5.65) | 0.59 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 4 | 1689 | 1.29 (0.81–2.04) | 0.29 | 30.3% | 0.067 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 9 | 7068 | 1.43 (1.19–1.72) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Phentermine | 2 | 379 | 0.98 (0.38–2.52) | 0.97 | 31.4% | 0.15 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 10 | 4245 | 1.26 (1.04–1.52) | 0.021 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 4 | 4747 | 1.21 (0.94–1.56) | 0.14 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 2 | 769 | 1.93 (1.01–3.70) | 0.048 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 1 | 1484 | 0.79 (0.57–1.10) | 0.16 | NA | 0.0085 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 2 | 713 | 1.15 (0.60–2.19) | 0.67 | 48.7% | 0.13 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 3 | 5623 | 0.82 (0.69–0.96) | 0.017 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 2 | 755 | 1.16 (0.87–1.55) | 0.30 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 8 | 5865 | 0.85 (0.68–1.06) | 0.15 | 41.2% | 0.037 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 14 | 7785 | 0.92 (0.82–1.04) | 0.18 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Low |
| Phentermine | 1 | 326 | 0.77 (0.38–1.55) | 0.47 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 8 | 2705 | 1.31 (1.10–1.56) | 0.0024 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 5 | 4792 | 1.01 (0.88–1.16) | 0.89 | 5.2% | 0.0015 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 5 | 2659 | 0.79 (0.51–1.24) | 0.31 | 49.4% | 0.12 | Moderate |
| Gastroenteritis | |||||||
| Orlistat | 3 | 1069 | 1.84 (0.96–3.54) | 0.066 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 11 | 25,041 | 1.49 (1.28–1.74) | <0.0001 | 65.7% | 0.030 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 10 | 4775 | 1.53 (1.35–1.73) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 3 | 702 | 1.23 (0.73–2.06) | 0.44 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 2 | 720 | 0.72 (0.42–1.25) | 0.24 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 6 | 5414 | 2.80 (1.69–4.63) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Bronchitis | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 1 | 1484 | 0.29 (0.15–0.55) | <0.0001 | NA | 0.14 | High |
| Orlistat | 1 | 290 | 1.66 (0.76–3.64) | 0.21 | NA | 0.14 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 3 | 6031 | 0.99 (0.51–1.90) | 0.97 | 40.8% | 0.15 | Moderate |
| Phentermine | 1 | 326 | 0.84 (0.20–3.46) | 0.81 | NA | 0.15 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 1 | 322 | 0.69 (0.16–3.02) | 0.62 | NA | 0.15 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 4 | 4747 | 1.27 (0.99–1.65) | 0.064 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 1 | 262 | 0.42 (0.10–1.69) | 0.22 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Nasopharyngitis | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 1 | 1484 | 1.02 (0.71–1.46) | 0.93 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 1 | 386 | 1.10 (0.57–2.15) | 0.78 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 3 | 5623 | 0.93 (0.74–1.16) | 0.50 | 10.4% | 0.0046 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 3 | 948 | 1.03 (0.67–1.58) | 0.89 | 25.4% | 0.047 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 8 | 4397 | 0.94 (0.81–1.09) | 0.42 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Liraglutide | 6 | 7353 | 0.93 (0.85–1.03) | 0.17 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Phentermine | 1 | 326 | 0.75 (0.36–1.56) | 0.44 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 4 | 1372 | 1.10 (0.69–1.76) | 0.70 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 5 | 4792 | 1.05 (0.82–1.34) | 0.70 | 40.7% | 0.029 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 4 | 2153 | 0.66 (0.48–0.92) | 0.014 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Sinusitis | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 1 | 1484 | 0.79 (0.49–1.12) | 0.15 | NA | 0.021 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 1 | 1711 | 0.94 (0.63–1.41) | 0.77 | NA | 0.021 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 1 | 533 | 1.07 (0.64–1.80) | 0.79 | NA | 0.021 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 3 | 1489 | 0.68 (0.48–0.97) | 0.033 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Liraglutide | 3 | 6183 | 0.87 (0.67–1.13) | 0.31 | 33.9% | 0.019 | Moderate |
| Phentermine | 1 | 326 | 0.92 (0.35–2.44) | 0.87 | NA | 0.019 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 5 | 1344 | 1.21 (0.75–1.95) | 0.45 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 5 | 4792 | 1.21 (0.97–1.50) | 0.092 | 10.4% | 0.0071 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 1 | 579 | 0.39 (0.16–0.99) | 0.048 | NA | 0.0071 | High |
| Dry mouth | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 2 | 1625 | 2.56 (0.77–8.53) | 0.13 | 20.3% | 0.35 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 3 | 858 | 2.95 (1.26–6.89) | 0.013 | 36.8% | 0.22 | High |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 6 | 6577 | 3.07 (2.32–4.07) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Orlistat | 1 | 343 | 0.21 (0.01–4.31) | 0.31 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 3 | 133 | 2.21 (0.58–8.47) | 0.25 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Low |
| Phentermine | 2 | 379 | 5.10 (0.54–48.05) | 0.15 | 60.4% | 1.75 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 6 | 2523 | 1.91 (1.12–3.27) | 0.018 | 46.3% | 0.19 | High |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 5 | 4792 | 5.50 (3.42–8.83) | <0.0001 | 43.3% | 0.11 | High |
| Insomnia | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 2 | 1625 | 1.42 (0.99–2.04) | 0.057 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 3 | 858 | 1.06 (0.69–1.64) | 0.79 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 7 | 15,482 | 1.51 (1.26–1.82) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Liraglutide | 2 | 5395 | 1.53 (1.10–2.13) | 0.011 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Phentermine | 2 | 379 | 3.09 (0.38–25.14) | 0.29 | 57.1% | 1.49 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 4 | 1278 | 1.07 (0.69–1.66) | 0.77 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 4 | 4747 | 1.55 (1.24–1.93) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Skin problem | |||||||
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 1 | 784 | 4.38 (0.58–33.25) | 0.15 | NA | 0.43 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 1 | 193 | 0.63 (0.15–2.57) | 0.52 | NA | 0.43 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 3 | 1478 | 1.04 (0.31–3.45) | 0.95 | 61.4% | 0.68 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 3 | 607 | 0.88 (0.45–1.71) | 0.71 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Phentermine | 1 | 53 | 3.91 (0.20–77.75) | 0.37 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 1 | 561 | 1.52 (0.83–2.77) | 0.17 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 1 | 1264 | 5.42 (0.68–43.19) | 0.11 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 2 | 3118 | 5.16 (2.70–9.86) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Palpitation | |||||||
| Bupronpion | 1 | 327 | 0.52 (0.03–8.29) | 0.65 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 1 | 8905 | 3.78 (1.41–10.12) | 0.0080 | NA | <0.0001 | High |
| Liraglutide | 3 | 268 | 3.79 (0.96–14.92) | 0.056 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Phentermine | 2 | 220 | 1.44 (0.30–7.02) | 0.65 | 12.9% | 0.24 | Moderate |
| Arthralgia | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 1 | 1484 | 0.69 (0.43–1.10) | 0.12 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 4 | 2056 | 0.85 (0.53–1.35) | 0.49 | 34.3% | 0.078 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 7 | 6895 | 0.92 (0.77–1.09) | 0.31 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Low |
| Topiramate | 1 | 320 | 0.70 (0.25–1.97) | 0.50 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 2 | 3160 | 0.80 (0.61–1.04) | 0.10 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 3 | 1244 | 1.17 (0.35–3.97) | 0.80 | 55.8% | 0.65 | Moderate |
| Osteoarthritis | |||||||
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 1 | 1475 | 0.55 (0.17–1.79) | 0.32 | NA | 1.35 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 1 | 611 | 3.49 (0.18–67.27) | 0.41 | NA | 1.35 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 1 | 3723 | 6.49 (0.37–115.20) | 0.20 | NA | 1.35 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 1 | 1264 | 8.82 (0.50–156.14) | 0.14 | NA | 1.35 | Moderate |
| Blurred vision | |||||||
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 1 | 100 | 2.94 (0.12–70.56) | 0.51 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Phentermine | 1 | 326 | 1.29 (0.47–3.53) | 0.62 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 2 | 857 | 1.86 (1.03–3.38) | 0.041 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 3 | 4072 | 1.47 (1.08–1.99) | 0.014 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Major adverse cardiovascular events | |||||||
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 1 | 8905 | 0.88 (0.67–1.17) | 0.39 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 6 | 20,657 | 0.83 (0.74–0.92) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Liraglutide | 3 | 9942 | 0.87 (0.79–0.96) | 0.0059 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Tirzepatide | 6 | 5391 | 0.85 (0.42–1.71) | 0.64 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Paresthesia | |||||||
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 1 | 784 | 1.03 (0.11–9.82) | 0.98 | NA | 0.086 | Moderate |
| Phentermine | 2 | 379 | 1.21 (0.40–3.61) | 0.74 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 16 | 5116 | 3.32 (2.77–3.98) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 5 | 4792 | 6.91 (5.05–9.47) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Back pain | |||||||
| Orlistat | 2 | 755 | 1.34 (0.73–2.47) | 0.35 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 4 | 1793 | 0.70 (0.46–1.04) | 0.077 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 5 | 6703 | 0.84 (0.72–0.98) | 0.026 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Phentermine | 1 | 53 | 5.30 (0.29–98.06) | 0.26 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 4 | 1154 | 1.18 (0.78–1.80) | 0.43 | 4.8% | 0.012 | Moderate |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 3 | 4424 | 1.22 (0.97–1.53) | 0.097 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 2 | 1054 | 0.99 (0.58–1.69) | 0.97 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Hypoglycaemia | |||||||
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 1 | 502 | 1.05 (0.54–2.05) | 0.88 | NA | 0.15 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 9 | 7237 | 1.57 (0.93–2.64) | 0.089 | 27.9% | 0.16 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 4 | 9703 | 0.75 (0.59–0.94) | 0.014 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Topiramate | 1 | 640 | 1.05 (0.52–2.10) | 0.90 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 8 | 4798 | 1.93 (0.97–3.84) | 0.061 | 28.4% | 0.26 | Moderate |
| Cardiac disorder | |||||||
| Semaglutide | 10 | 23,681 | 0.74 (0.59–0.92) | 0.0070 | 66.8% | 0.069 | High |
| Liraglutide | 3 | 344 | 1.37 (0.80–2.35) | 0.26 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 3 | 4056 | 1.21 (0.30–4.91) | 0.79 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Blood pressure increased or hypertension | |||||||
| Bupronpion | 1 | 327 | 1.56 (0.06–38.04) | 0.78 | NA | 0.25 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 2 | 9689 | 1.72 (1.04–2.85) | 0.036 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Semaglutide | 1 | 667 | 0.47 (0.23–0.98) | 0.043 | NA | <0.0001 | High |
| Liraglutide | 1 | 2248 | 0.80 (0.56–1.15) | 0.23 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Phentermine | 1 | 502 | 2.27 (1.02–5.02) | 0.044 | NA | <0.0001 | High |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 1 | 2485 | 1.50 (0.44–5.17) | 0.52 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 2 | 737 | 0.34 (0.13–0.88) | 0.026 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Gallbladder disorder | |||||||
| Orlistat | 1 | 533 | 1.54 (0.06–37.67) | 0.79 | NA | 0.0024 | Moderate |
| Semaglutide | 10 | 24,822 | 1.28 (0.99–1.65) | 0.062 | 10.9% | 0.022 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 7 | 13,677 | 1.47 (0.61–3.55) | 0.40 | 22.7% | 0.34 | Low |
| Tirzepatide | 5 | 4988 | 1.41 (0.79–2.50) | 0.24 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Covid 19 related events | |||||||
| Semaglutide | 5 | 19,375 | 0.98 (0.94–1.04) | 0.56 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 6 | 5126 | 0.96 (0.83–1.10) | 0.55 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Acute pancreatitis | |||||||
| Semaglutide | 5 | 22,155 | 0.71 (0.41–1.26) | 0.24 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 3 | 13,302 | 0.83 (0.46–1.49) | 0.53 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 3 | 1779 | 1.05 (0.28–3.85) | 0.94 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Acute kidney failure | |||||||
| Semaglutide | 8 | 23,447 | 0.88 (0.72–1.07) | 0.19 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 1 | 579 | 3.04 (0.12–74.35) | 0.50 | NA | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Malignant neoplasms | |||||||
| Semaglutide | 5 | 20,163 | 1.01 (0.89–1.15) | 0.85 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Liraglutide | 2 | 9790 | 1.06 (0.91–1.24) | 0.46 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Tirzepatide | 6 | 5411 | 0.74 (0.43–1.28) | 0.28 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Hepatobiliary disorders | |||||||
| Semaglutide | 7 | 6478 | 1.20 (0.48–2.99) | 0.69 | 77.1% | 1.09 | Low |
| Liraglutide | 2 | 2487 | 1.41 (0.06–34.51) | 0.84 | 84.5% | 4.52 | Low |
| Tirzepatide | 2 | 2749 | 0.70 (0.13–3.72) | 0.68 | 39.3% | 0.78 | Moderate |
| Cholelithiasis | |||||||
| Semaglutide | 5 | 4657 | 2.04 (1.03–4.03) | 0.040 | 5.7% | 0.037 | High |
| Liraglutide | 4 | 15,523 | 1.52 (1.25–1.86) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Tirzepatide | 6 | 5310 | 1.10 (0.58–2.08) | 0.78 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Discontinuation risk due to adverse events | |||||||
| Naltrexone | 1 | 149 | 2.11 (0.36–12.26) | 0.41 | NA | 0.027 | Moderate |
| Bupronpion | 3 | 1044 | 1.54 (0.89–2.68) | 0.13 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Naltrexone/Bupropion | 7 | 16,971 | 1.92 (1.54–2.41) | <0.0001 | 80.7% | 0.061 | Moderate |
| Orlistat | 23 | 9203 | 1.70 (1.35–2.14) | <0.0001 | 27.4% | 0.077 | High |
| Semaglutide | 15 | 26,648 | 1.85 (1.66–2.07) | <0.0001 | 2.2% | 0.0022 | High |
| Liraglutide | 13 | 13,293 | 2.13 (1.51–3.03) | <0.0001 | 39.0% | 0.11 | High |
| Phentermine | 4 | 603 | 1.27 (0.68–2.37) | 0.46 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | Moderate |
| Topiramate | 12 | 4465 | 1.80 (1.49–2.17) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Phentermine/Topiramate | 5 | 4798 | 1.82 (1.49–2.22) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
| Tirzepatide | 10 | 6454 | 2.13 (1.57–2.89) | <0.0001 | 0.0% | <0.0001 | High |
Other adverse event indicators are shown in Table 4. Naltrexone/bupropion had the highest risk of dizziness (RR 3.26, 95% CI 2.29–4.65; P < 0.0001; I2 = 40.5%; Tau2 = 0.081; high certainty), and naltrexone had the highest risk of headache (RR 1.80, 1.33–2.45; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; Tau2 < 0.0001; high certainty). Phentermine/topiramate showed the greatest risk for insomnia (RR 1.55, 1.24–1.93; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; Tau2 < 0.0001; high certainty) and paraesthesia (RR 6.91, 5.05–9.47; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; Tau2 < 0.0001; high certainty), with topiramate having the highest risk for blurred vision (RR 1.86, 1.03–3.38; P = 0.041; I2 = 0.0%; Tau2 < 0.0001; high certainty). Additionally, naltrexone/bupropion increased palpitation risk (RR 3.78, 1.41–10.12; P = 0.0080; Tau2 < 0.0001; high certainty). Tirzepatide had the highest risk of skin problems (RR 5.16, 2.70–9.86; P < 0.0001; I2 = 0.0%; Tau2 < 0.0001; high certainty), and semaglutide had the highest risk of cholelithiasis (RR 2.04, 1.03–4.03; P = 0.040; I2 = 5.7%; Tau2 = 0.037; high certainty). Other common adverse effects of weight-loss medications included fatigue and dry mouth. No medications increased the risk of acute kidney failure or malignancy.
Overall, most psychiatric and safety outcomes were supported by high-quality evidence (Supplemental Appendix 4). Importantly, the high certainty evidence for key outcomes—such as the reduction of MACEs with semaglutide and liraglutide—provides valuable guidance for clinical use.
To investigate the effects of weight-loss medications on different individuals with overweight or obesity, we conducted stratified analyses (Tables S3–S5 in Supplemental Appendix 7). Compared to individuals with psychiatric disorders-related or simple overweight/obesity, weight-loss medications showed greater benefits for weight loss and cardiometabolic improvement in those with weight-related complications, emphasising the importance of using weight-loss medications for weight control to improve cardiovascular metabolism in such populations. The impact of weight-loss medications on lipid and glucose levels varied, likely due to differences in baseline characteristics and the effects of concurrent medications such as antipsychotics, antidepressants, antihypertensives, antidiabetics, and lipid-lowering medications. However, adverse event outcomes showed less variability. Semaglutide was associated with a higher risk of gastrointestinal disorders across all cohorts. Naltrexone/bupropion increased systolic blood pressure, and bupropion raised heart rate across all cohorts.
Further, we analysed the response and sensitivity of individuals with overweight or obesity to various medications (Tables S6–S8 in Supplemental Appendix 7). GLP-1 receptor agonists are preferred for patients with simple overweight/obesity and those with weight-related complications or comorbidities, especially the latter, due to their significant benefits. Tirzepatide showed the greatest weight loss effect and significant improvements in blood pressure, lipid, and glucose levels. Semaglutide was the second most effective for weight loss and significantly improved cardiovascular metabolism. Although liraglutide was not the most effective for weight loss or cardiometabolic improvement, it significantly reduced the risk of MACEs in patients with weight-related complications, similar to semaglutide, indicating strong cardiovascular protective effects. However, these three medications require careful monitoring for gastrointestinal side effects.
Sensitivity analyses revealed that most pooled estimates did not show significant differences when only one study was omitted. Most of the summary estimates remained stable in studies with a low risk of bias; however, some effect sizes varied, indicating a residual risk of bias that may influence the overall findings and weaken their robustness. Future research in this field will require more high-quality, rigorously designed studies to further validate our findings (Supplemental Appendix 5). The Egger's test identified evidence of substantial publication bias (P < 0.05) in some outcomes (Table S9 in Supplemental Appendix 7), but correction for this bias using the trim-and-fill method did not alter the significance of the pooled estimates (Supplemental Appendix 6).
Discussion
Compared to previously published meta-analyses, our study systematically and comprehensively included 154 studies with a total of 112,515 individuals. Notably, we incorporated 31 of the most recent studies from the past three years (2022: 11 studies; 2023: 14 studies; 2024: 6 studies). Importantly, we included 11 studies on the newly FDA-approved weight-loss medication tirzepatide. Our research evaluated the safety and efficacy of five categories of ten weight-loss medications across four dimensions.
Moderate certainty evidence suggested that tirzepatide was the most effective medication for weight loss, followed by semaglutide. Osumili et al.35 also reported significantly greater reductions in body weight with tirzepatide compared to semaglutide. Additionally, our study indicated that combination therapies with naltrexone/bupropion and phentermine/topiramate were more effective for weight reduction than monotherapies, with phentermine/topiramate showing superior efficacy compared to naltrexone/bupropion. This finding aligns with Shi et al.,30 who observed greater weight reduction with phentermine/topiramate than with naltrexone/bupropion.
Regarding cardiometabolic effects, high to moderate certainty evidence suggested that tirzepatide had the strongest antihypertensive effect and best reduced triglycerides, fasting glucose, insulin, and glycated haemoglobin levels. Yao et al.,36 also found that tirzepatide is the most effective GLP-1 receptor agonist for reducing fasting glucose levels. These results emphasize the significant advantages of tirzepatide in improving cardiometabolic health. In contrast, our study found that naltrexone/bupropion increased blood pressure and palpitation risk. Previous studies also reported that the most common adverse events leading to study withdrawal in individuals using naltrexone/bupropion included hypertension and palpitations.37, 38, 39, 40 These results suggest that naltrexone/bupropion may not benefit cardiometabolic health, although our findings and those of other studies indicate that naltrexone/bupropion did not increase the risk of MACEs.41,42 Notably, high certainty evidence suggested that semaglutide and liraglutide significantly reduced the risk of MACEs in individuals with weight-related complications, which aligns with previous studies.43,44 Earlier clinical studies have demonstrated that both semaglutide and liraglutide significantly reduce the risk of MACEs in patients with T2D with a high cardiovascular risk.45, 46, 47 Collectively, these findings suggest that semaglutide and liraglutide exert substantial cardiovascular protective effects.
In terms of psychological effects, all weight-loss medications increased the IWQOL-Lite total score, with tirzepatide showing the greatest improvement. This may be attributable to enhanced quality-of-life due to weight loss and cardiometabolic health improvement. Topiramate and phentermine/topiramate had the most significant adverse psychological effects, as they can simultaneously increase the risk of anxiety, irritability, and sleep disorders, which may explain why the medication label on phentermine/topiramate explicitly warns about the increased risk of anxiety and insomnia.48 Moreover, topiramate significantly increased the incidence of depression or depressive symptoms and has been reported to potentially exacerbate depression in individuals with bipolar disorder.49 Therefore, the risk of depression must be carefully monitored when using topiramate.
Regarding adverse event risks, most weight loss medications are associated with an increased risk of discontinuation due to adverse events, with tirzepatide presenting the highest risk. Gastrointestinal disorders were the most common adverse events, particularly with tirzepatide, semaglutide, and liraglutide. However, none of these medications increased the risk of acute pancreatitis. Semaglutide and liraglutide also increased the risk of cholelithiasis. These results are consistent with those of previous studies on GLP-1 receptor agonists.50, 51, 52 Notably, topiramate and phentermine/topiramate are prone to cause adverse events in the nervous system, increasing the risk of dizziness, blurred vision, and paraesthesia, which is consistent with the conclusions of Lei et al.53
This study found that most outcomes had high to moderate certainty evidence, particularly for psychiatric and safety-related results. However, efficacy-related indicators exhibited lower evidence levels due to significant heterogeneity. Some studies on liraglutide showed a high risk of bias, which reduced some evidence certainty. Additionally, some results for naltrexone were downgraded for precision due to small sample sizes. The limited and heterogeneous studies on semaglutide's effects on lipid metabolism weaken the certainty of the evidence, particularly for LDL-C (rated as low), which affects the reliability of the conclusion that it does not improve LDL-C, whereas high certainty evidence supports its cardiovascular protective effects and reduction in MACEs risk. Furthermore, after excluding studies with a high or medium risk of bias, semaglutide was shown to significantly lower total cholesterol and LDL-C (Supplemental Appendix 5). Similarly, the low incidence of MACEs in tirzepatide studies diminishes the reliability of its conclusions, as high to moderate certainty evidence confirms its significant benefits in weight loss and cardiometabolic improvement. Therefore, further high-quality studies are needed to investigate the effects of semaglutide on lipid metabolism and tirzepatide on MACEs events.
In this meta-analysis, we not only compared the weight-loss effects of medications across multiple indicators but also evaluated nearly all cardiometabolic outcomes. Further, we evaluated the effects of weight loss medications on psychological well-being and covered multiple safety indicators across various systems. Additionally, we conducted stratified analysis on individuals living with overweight or obesity to evaluate the differential effects of weight-loss medications on various individuals living with overweight or obesity and the responsiveness and sensitivity of different individuals to these medications, providing valuable clinical guidance. The certainty of evidence for most of our results is also high to moderate. The novelty and contribution of this study lie in its comprehensive analysis of a wide range of weight-loss medications and their impacts across diverse populations. Through risk-benefit assessments, the study aims to minimise risks and maximise cardiovascular metabolic benefits, thereby supporting precise treatment strategies for obesity. The policy implications are significant, as it informs healthcare providers and policymakers about the most effective pharmacotherapies for individuals with overweight or obesity. This knowledge not only facilitates personalised weight management but also has the potential to reduce mortality rates and healthcare costs, ultimately improving global health outcomes.
However, this study had some limitations, particularly the significant heterogeneity observed in efficacy and cardiometabolic-related outcomes. To explore possible sources of heterogeneity, we conducted a meta-regression analysis to evaluate how factors such as medication categorisation, obesity characteristics (simple conditions, weight-related complications, and psychiatric disorder-related overweight/obesity), use of psychiatric medications, and comorbidities like hypertension and diabetes impact efficacy and cardiometabolic outcomes due to their significant heterogeneity (Supplementary Appendix 3). The results indicated that medication categorisation is closely related to weight loss outcomes (weight, BMI, and waist circumference), blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), glucose levels (fasting blood glucose, insulin, and HbA1c), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, while having little effect on lipid levels. Additionally, patient baseline characteristics were found to influence diastolic blood pressure and HOMA-IR, with the latter also associated with the use of antipsychotic medications. The results provide insights into the sources of heterogeneity in efficacy and cardiometabolic outcomes, reinforcing the necessity of conducting stratified analyses based on medication categorisation and patient characteristics. We further focused on how the categorisation of mental disorders affects outcomes in individuals with psychiatric disorder-related overweight/obesity. The meta-regression results showed that medication categorisation impacts body weight, while the type of mental disorder and the presence of obesity-related comorbidities did not significantly affect the outcomes.
Additionally, our inclusion criteria did not limit participants to adults with obesity. This meta-analysis includes 7 studies involving 1149 adolescents with obesity (3 studies on orlistat with 638 participants, 1 on semaglutide with 200 participants, 1 on liraglutide with 251 participants, and 2 on topiramate with 60 participants), we cannot overlook its potential to increase heterogeneity in our analysis. Given the growing prevalence of obesity among adolescents, this population is increasingly important and warrants further attention.
Furthermore, we opted for a standard meta-analysis rather than a network meta-analysis due to the significant heterogeneity observed among placebo groups across included trials, which indicated imbalanced effect modifiers.54 Our findings are constrained to comparing the efficacy differences of various medications against the placebo group, without further indirect comparisons between medications. Thus, we conducted meta-regression to examine the associations between effect size and categorisation of weight loss medications, revealing significant relationships between efficacy outcomes and medication types. Furthermore, chi-squared tests were used to assess the statistical significance of efficacy differences between medications, with nearly all efficacy outcomes showing significant results (P < 0.0001) (Supplemental Appendix 3). These additions strengthen our findings, even within the constraints of a standard meta-analysis.
Despite these limitations, most of our findings are supported by high to moderate certainty evidence. Our sensitivity analyses demonstrated consistent estimates, and the trim-and-fill method further confirmed the stability of our pooled results. However, we acknowledge that the possibility of publication bias cannot be fully excluded, which may still affect the robustness of certain findings.
In conclusion, tirzepatide showed the highest efficacy in reducing body weight and improving cardiometabolism. Both semaglutide and liraglutide significantly reduced the risk of MACEs, offering substantial cardiovascular protection. These medications should be prioritised, particularly in individuals with weight-related complications and comorbidities. However, caution should be exercised while treating gastrointestinal disorders. Naltrexone/bupropion and phentermine/topiramate should be used cautiously because of their potential cardiometabolic and psychological/neurological adverse effects, respectively. These findings provide valuable guidance for personalised weight management and may help improve health and reduce the risk of all-cause or cardiovascular mortality in individuals living with overweight or obesity. Although our meta-analysis suggested that tirzepatide did not significantly decrease MACEs risk, large-scale randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are lacking. Given its significant advantages in weight loss and cardiovascular metabolism, further research is needed to clarify its effect on MACEs risk in individuals with obesity.
Contributors
LL and ZL drafted the study protocol. LL, ZL, and WY conducted the literature search and all authors participated in the screening process and the selection of included studies. LL and ZL performed data extraction and risk of bias assessment; The data were checked, and independent risk of bias scoring was undertaken by WY and PP. LL and ZL completed all data analysis and took responsibility for the accuracy of the data analysis. LL and ZL accessed and verified the underlying data. LL and ZL are designated as co-first authors, signifying their equal contributions to this study. DX and JZ serve as the study guarantors, with DX and JZ acknowledged as senior and corresponding authors, both contributing equally. All authors critically reviewed and approved the manuscript. The corresponding author certifies that all listed authors meet authorship criteria and that no other authors who meet the criteria were omitted.
Data sharing statement
The data analysed were based on published sources and will be available upon publication. Data extracted from the included studies are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Declaration of interests
Authors have no competing or conflicts of interests to declare.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge funding support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82370807, 81871858, and 82172550), Leading Talents Program of Hunan Province (2022RC3078), and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University (2024ZZTS0166). We also acknowledge the assistance of Jiaxin Liu, Tuotuo Liu, Xiaowu Li, and Lei Dong for their assistances with data visualisations.
Footnotes
Supplementary data related to this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103020.
Contributor Information
Danyan Xu, Email: xudanyan02@csu.edu.cn.
Jingjing Zhang, Email: Doctorzhangjj@csu.edu.cn.
Appendix A. Supplementary data
References
- 1.Stefan N., Häring H.U., Hu F.B., Schulze M.B. Metabolically healthy obesity: epidemiology, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2013;1(2):152–162. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70062-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Flegal K.M., Kit B.K., Orpana H., Graubard B.I. Association of all-cause mortality with overweight and obesity using standard body mass index categories: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2013;309(1):71–82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.113905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Elmaleh-Sachs A., Schwartz J.L., Bramante C.T., Nicklas J.M., Gudzune K.A., Jay M. Obesity management in adults: a review. JAMA. 2023;330(20):2000–2015. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.19897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gupta R.D., Parray A.A., Kothadia R.J., et al. The association between body mass index and abdominal obesity with hypertension among South Asian population: findings from nationally representative surveys. Clin Hypertens. 2024;30(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40885-023-00257-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lynch D.H., Howard A.G., Tien H.C., et al. Association between weight status and rate of cognitive decline: China health and nutrition survey 1997-2018. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2023;78(6):958–965. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glad051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Afshin A., Forouzanfar M.H., Reitsma M.B., et al. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(1):13–27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1614362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pischon T., Boeing H., Hoffmann K., et al. General and abdominal adiposity and risk of death in Europe. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(20):2105–2120. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0801891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Dikaiou P., Björck L., Adiels M., et al. Obesity, overweight and risk for cardiovascular disease and mortality in young women. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021;28(12):1351–1359. doi: 10.1177/2047487320908983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Global B.M.I.M.C., Di Angelantonio E., Bhupathiraju Sh N., et al. Body-mass index and all-cause mortality: individual-participant-data meta-analysis of 239 prospective studies in four continents. Lancet. 2016;388(10046):776–786. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30175-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Lavie C.J., Milani R.V., Ventura H.O. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: risk factor, paradox, and impact of weight loss. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(21):1925–1932. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.12.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Powell-Wiley T.M., Poirier P., Burke L.E., et al. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation. 2021;143(21):e984–e1010. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Georgoulis M., Damigou E., Chrysohoou C., et al. Increased body weight and central adiposity markers are positively associated with the 20-year incidence of cardiovascular disease: the ATTICA epidemiological study (2002-2022) Nutr Res. 2024;121:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2023.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Chen Y., Koirala B., Ji M., et al. Obesity paradox of cardiovascular mortality in older adults in the United States: a cohort study using 1997-2018 National Health Interview Survey data linked with the National Death Index. Int J Nurs Stud. 2024;155 doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Perdomo C.M., Cohen R.V., Sumithran P., Clément K., Frühbeck G. Contemporary medical, device, and surgical therapies for obesity in adults. Lancet. 2023;401(10382):1116–1130. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02403-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tchang B.G., Saunders K.H., Igel L.I. Best practices in the management of overweight and obesity. Med Clin North Am. 2021;105(1):149–174. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2020.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chao A.M., Wadden T.A., Berkowitz R.I., et al. Weight change 2 Years after termination of the intensive lifestyle intervention in the look AHEAD study. Obesity. 2020;28(5):893–901. doi: 10.1002/oby.22769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Oppert J.M., Bellicha A., van Baak M.A., et al. Exercise training in the management of overweight and obesity in adults: synthesis of the evidence and recommendations from the European association for the study of obesity physical activity working group. Obes Rev. 2021;22 Suppl 4(Suppl 4) doi: 10.1111/obr.13273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cooper T.C., Simmons E.B., Webb K., Burns J.L., Kushner R.F. Trends in weight regain following roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25(8):1474–1481. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1560-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Garvey W.T., Mechanick J.I., Brett E.M., et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology comprehensive clinical practice guidelines for medical care of patients with obesity. Endocr Pract. 2016;22(Suppl 3):1–203. doi: 10.4158/EP161365.GL. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Grunvald E., Shah R., Hernaez R., et al. AGA clinical practice guideline on pharmacological interventions for adults with obesity. Gastroenterology. 2022;163(5):1198–1225. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.08.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wei J., Hunter D., Lane N.E., et al. Weight loss induced by antiobesity medications and all-cause mortality among patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2024;76(4):577–586. doi: 10.1002/art.42754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sharretts J., Galescu O., Gomatam S., Andraca-Carrera E., Hampp C., Yanoff L. Cancer risk associated with lorcaserin - the FDA's review of the CAMELLIA-TIMI 61 trial. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(11):1000–1002. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2003873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Abbasi J. FDA green-lights tirzepatide, marketed as zepbound, for chronic weight management. JAMA. 2023;330(22):2143–2144. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.24539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Page M.J., McKenzie J.E., Bossuyt P.M., et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372 doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Andrade C. Mean difference, standardized mean difference (SMD), and their use in meta-analysis: as simple as it gets. J Clin Psychiatry. 2020;81(5) doi: 10.4088/JCP.20f13681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dettori J.R., Norvell D.C., Chapman J.R. Fixed-effect vs random-effects models for meta-analysis: 3 points to consider. Global Spine J. 2022;12(7):1624–1626. doi: 10.1177/21925682221110527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang L., Cheng H., Qu Y., Zhang Y., Cui Q., Zou H. The prevalence of child maltreatment among Chinese primary and middle school students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020;55(9):1105–1119. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-01916-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Higgins J.P., Altman D.G., Gøtzsche P.C., et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343 doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lane M.M., Gamage E., Du S., et al. Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses. BMJ. 2024;384 doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Shi Q., Wang Y., Hao Q., et al. Pharmacotherapy for adults with overweight and obesity: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Lancet. 2024;403(10434):e21–e31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00351-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Brignardello-Petersen R., Florez I.D., Izcovich A., et al. GRADE approach to drawing conclusions from a network meta-analysis using a minimally contextualised framework. BMJ. 2020;371 doi: 10.1136/bmj.m3900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Alqahtani S., Qosa H., Primeaux B., Kaddoumi A. Orlistat limits cholesterol intestinal absorption by Niemann-pick C1-like 1 (NPC1L1) inhibition. Eur J Pharmacol. 2015;762:263–269. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.05.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhao L., Cheng Z., Lu Y., et al. Tirzepatide for weight reduction in Chinese adults with obesity: the SURMOUNT-CN randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2024;332(7):551–560. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.9217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Garvey W.T., Frias J.P., Jastreboff A.M., et al. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity in people with type 2 diabetes (SURMOUNT-2): a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023;402(10402):613–626. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01200-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Osumili B., Fan L., Paik J.S., et al. Tirzepatide 5, 10 and 15 mg versus injectable semaglutide 0.5 mg for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: an adjusted indirect treatment comparison. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2024;212 doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2024.111759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Yao H., Zhang A., Li D., et al. Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile for type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2024;384 doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-076410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cohen J.B., Gadde K.M. Weight loss medications in the treatment of obesity and hypertension. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2019;21(2):16. doi: 10.1007/s11906-019-0915-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Katsiki N., Hatzitolios A.I., Mikhailidis D.P. Naltrexone sustained-release (SR) + bupropion SR combination therapy for the treatment of obesity: 'a new kid on the block'? Ann Med. 2011;43(4):249–258. doi: 10.3109/07853890.2010.541490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Makowski C.T., Gwinn K.M., Hurren K.M. Naltrexone/bupropion: an investigational combination for weight loss and maintenance. Obes Facts. 2011;4(6):489–494. doi: 10.1159/000335352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Halseth A., Shan K., Gilder K., Malone M., Acevedo L., Fujioka K. Quality of life, binge eating and sexual function in participants treated for obesity with sustained release naltrexone/bupropion. Obes Sci Pract. 2018;4(2):141–152. doi: 10.1002/osp4.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Dahlberg S., Chang E.T., Weiss S.R., Dopart P., Gould E., Ritchey M.E. Use of contrave, naltrexone with bupropion, bupropion, or naltrexone and major adverse cardiovascular events: a systematic literature review. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2022;15:3049–3067. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S381652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sposito A.C., Bonilha I., Luchiari B., et al. Cardiovascular safety of naltrexone and bupropion therapy: systematic review and meta-analyses. Obes Rev. 2021;22(6) doi: 10.1111/obr.13224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sattar N., McGuire D.K., Pavo I., et al. Tirzepatide cardiovascular event risk assessment: a pre-specified meta-analysis. Nat Med. 2022;28(3):591–598. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01707-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Del P.S., Kahn S.E., Pavo I., et al. Tirzepatide versus insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes and increased cardiovascular risk (SURPASS-4): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021;398(10313):1811–1824. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02188-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Husain M., Birkenfeld A.L., Donsmark M., et al. Oral semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2019;381(9):841–851. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Marso S.P., Bain S.C., Consoli A., et al. Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(19):1834–1844. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mirani M., Favacchio G., Serone E., Lucisano G., Rossi M.C., Berra C.C. Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in a real world type 2 diabetes cohort. Pharmacol Res. 2018;137:270–279. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Woloshin S., Schwartz L.M. The new weight-loss drugs, lorcaserin and phentermine-topiramate: slim pickings? JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(4):615–619. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.14629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Klufas A., Thompson D. Topiramate-induced depression. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158(10):1736. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.10.1736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Moll H., Frey E., Gerber P., et al. GLP-1 receptor agonists for weight reduction in people living with obesity but without diabetes: a living benefit-harm modelling study. eClinicalMedicine. 2024;73 doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Sattar N., Lee M.M.Y., Kristensen S.L., et al. Cardiovascular, mortality, and kidney outcomes with GLP-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9(10):653–662. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00203-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bethel M.A., Patel R.A., Merrill P., et al. Cardiovascular outcomes with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(2):105–113. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30412-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lei X.G., Ruan J.Q., Lai C., Sun Z., Yang X. Efficacy and safety of phentermine/topiramate in adults with overweight or obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity. 2021;29(6):985–994. doi: 10.1002/oby.23152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Jansen J.P., Naci H. Is network meta-analysis as valid as standard pairwise meta-analysis? It all depends on the distribution of effect modifiers. BMC Med. 2013;11:159. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

