Table 3.
Hierarchical development of artistic intervention in public spaces for ancient villages.
| First level of demand (A) | Second level of demand (B) | Third level of demand (C) |
|---|---|---|
| Comprehensive Evaluation of Artistic Intervention in Public Spaces for Ancient Villages (A) | Village Transformation (B1) | Spatial Coherence (C1) |
| Infrastructure Integrity (C2) | ||
| Spatial Accessibility (C3) | ||
| Artistic and Cultural Atmosphere (C4) | ||
| Environmental Appearance (B2) | Integration with Original Landscape (C5) | |
| Compliance with Village Cultural Aesthetics (C6) | ||
| Environmental Art Aesthetics (C7) | ||
| Environmental Sanitation Quality (C8) | ||
| Economic Benefits (B3) | Renovation Costs (C9) | |
| Maintenance Costs (C10) | ||
| Development Potential (C11) | ||
| Regional Economy (C12) | ||
| Social and Cultural Values (B4) | Conformity with village history and culture (C13) | |
| Participation in art intervention (C14) | ||
| Number of art activities (C15) | ||
| Improvement of Quality of Life (C16) |