Table 1.
Single Term with the Best Sensitivity (Keeping Specificity ≥50%), Best Specificity (Keeping Sensitivity ≥50%), and Best Optimization of Sensitivity and Specificity (Based on the Lowest Possible Absolute Difference between Sensitivity and Specificity) for Detecting Studies of Prognosis in EMBASE in 2000
| Search Term Ovid Search* | Sensitivity (%) (95% CI) (n = 148) | Specificity (%) (95% CI) (n = 27,621) | Precision (%) (95% CI)† | Accuracy (%) (95% CI) (n = 27,769) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best sensitivity | ||||
| exp general aspects of disease | 86.5 (81.0–92.0) | 55.7 (55.1–56.3) | 1.0 (0.9–1.2) | 55.7 (55.3–56.5) |
| Best specificity | ||||
| exp disease course | 59.5 (51.6–67.4) | 86.3 (86.0–86.8) | 2.3 (1.8–2.8) | 86.2 (85.8–86.6) |
| Best optimization of sensitivity and specificity | ||||
| exp physical disease by body function | 51.4 (43.3–59.4) | 58.7 (58.1–59.3) | 0.7 (0.5–0.8) | 58.7 (58.1–59.3) |
CI = confidence interval; exp = exploded subject heading.
The search strategy is reported using Ovid's search engine syntax for EMBASE.
Denominator varies by row.