Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 21;15:2663. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85540-y

Table 7.

Summary of analysis results of Kano model.

Function/service A (%) O (%) M (%) I (%) R (%) Q (%) Classification result SI (%) DSI (%)
A1 21.51 23.66 25.81 24.73 2.15 2.15 M 47.19 −51.69
A2 27.96 32.26 12.90 22.58 3.23 1.08 O 62.92 −47.19
A3 9.68 8.60 22.58 59.14 0.00 0.00 I 18.28 −31.18
A4 11.83 20.43 37.63 27.96 2.15 0.00 M 32.97 −59.34
A5 23.66 35.48 16.13 19.35 4.30 1.08 O 62.50 −54.55
A6 11.83 23.66 36.56 27.96 0.00 0.00 M 35.48 −60.22
A7 34.41 23.66 18.28 20.43 1.08 2.15 A 60.00 −43.33
A8 17.20 10.75 25.81 45.16 1.08 0.00 I 28.26 −36.96
A9 35.48 53.76 2.15 8.60 0.00 0.00 O 89.25 −55.91
A10 29.03 25.81 24.73 16.13 2.15 2.15 A 57.30 −52.81
A11 40.86 27.96 18.28 9.68 3.23 0.00 A 71.11 −47.78
A12 20.43 29.03 21.51 27.96 1.08 0.00 O 50.00 −42.39

Attractive (A), One-dimensional (O), Must-be (M), Indifferent (I), Reverse (R), and Questionable (Q).