Table 1.
Summary of included studies assessing physical activity to hip contact stress.
No. | Author (year) | Title | Sample/event size | Procedure | Aspect of activity | Aspect of hip contact stress |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | van den Bogert et al. (1999) [12] | An analysis of hip joint loading during walking, running, and skiing | 9 male models | Analyzing hip contact force during walking (1.5 m/s), running (3.5 m/s), and various type of skiing using accelerometer and based on hip joint moment and lever arm | Walking, running, skiing (Alpine skiing in several styles) | Hip contact force |
2 | Assassi and Magnenat‐Thalmann (2016) [13] | Assessment of cartilage contact pressure and loading in the hip joint during split posture | 11 ballet dancer models | Finite element analyses of hip contact pressure (Mpa), hip contact area (%), and hip contact force (%BW), during walking, standing, and split position | Walking, standing, splitting | Hip contact force, hip mean contact stress |
3 | Sangeux (2019) [5] | Biomechanics of the hip during gait | 1 computerized model in 8 activities simulation | Analyzing and simulating hip biomechanics and hip contact force (based on Bergmann et al.) | Cycling, sitting down, standing up, squatting, walking, walking upstairs, walking downstairs, jogging | Hip contact force |
4 | Heller et al. (2005) [14] | Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in preclinical testing | 1 computerized model simulating walking and walking upstairs | Analyzing hip contact force during walking and stair climbing using computerized model | Walking, walking upstairs (in several % of stance phase of the gait cycle) | Hip contact force |
5 | Anderson et al. (2010) [15] | Effects of idealized joint geometry on finite element predictions of cartilage contact stresses in the hip | 6 finite element models | Analyzing hip joint contact stress during several activities on subject‐specific FE models compared with a simple‐modified model | Walking, walking upstairs, and walking downstairs | Hip mean contact stress, hip peak contact stress |
6 | Altai et al. (2021) [16] | Femoral neck strain prediction during level walking using a combined musculoskeletal and finite element model approach | 5 models | Analyzing femoral neck strain during walking using combination of FEM and computerized mechanical model | Walking (in several % of the gait cycle) | Hip contact force |
7 | Deng et al. (2018) [17] | Femoral neck stress in older adults during stair ascent and descent | 17 models (7 males, 10 females) | Comparing hip contact force during stair ascent and stair descent using computerized hip model 17 models based on 7 males and 10 females | Walking upstairs and walking downstairs (in several % of stance phase of the gait cycle) | Hip contact force, hip peak contact stress |
8 | Harris et al. (2012) [18] | Finite element prediction of cartilage contact stresses in normal human hips | 10 models | Analyzing cartilage contact stress of hip joint using FE based on 10 sample | Walking (several phase of gait), walking upstairs, walking downstairs | Hip contact force, hip mean contact stress, hip peak contact stress |
9 | Henak et al. (2013) [19] | Finite element predictions of cartilage contact mechanics in hips with retroverted acetabula | 20 models (10 normal acetabulum, 10 retroverted acetabulum) | Analyzing hip contact stress of hip joint with normal acetabulum in comparation to retroverted acetabulum using finite elements models | Walking, walking upstairs, walking downstairs, chair rise | Hip peak contact stress, hip mean contact stress, contact area |
10 | Daniel et al. (2008) [20] | hip contact stress during normal and staircase walking: the influence of acetabular anteversion angle and lateral coverage of the acetabulum | 1 mathematical models with modification of femoral anteversion and center edge angle | Analyzing hip center edge angle and femoral anteversion to determine hip contact pressure during several activities | Walking (in several % of gait phase), walking upstairs, walking downstairs | Normalized peak contact stress on body weight |
11 | Heller et al. (2001) [21] | influence of femoral anteversion on proximal femoral loading: measurement and simulation in four patients | Computerized model from four models | Analyzing proximal femoral loading based on femoral anteversion variation during several activities | Walking (% of gait phase), walking upstairs | Hip contact force |
12 | Duda, Schneider, and Chao (1997) [22] | Internal forces and moments femur during walking | 1 model to analyze in several methods during activity | Describe the internal load state acting at different levels along the human femur during various phases of gait | Walking (% of gait phase) | Hip contact force |
13. | Schache et al. (2018) [23] | Is running better than walking for reducing hip joint load | 8 models adapted from eight participants (4 male, 4 females) | Analyzing and comparing hip contact force during walking and running | Walking (various steady state), running | Ground reaction force, hip joint contact force |
14. | Costigan, Deluzio, and Wyss (2002) [24] | Knee and hip kinetics during normal stair climbing | 35 students (15 males, 20 females) without any hip and knee complaints | Analyzing reaction force of the hip and knee joint using markers to measure estimated muscle force | Walking, walking upstairs | Hip reaction force, hip joint moments |
15 | Giarmatzis et al. (2015) [25] | Loading of hip measured by hip contact force at different speeds of walking and running | 20 participants (10 males, 10 females) | Analyzing hip contact force using markers (50 retro‐reflective markers) to measure kinematic force and construct musculoskeletal modeling | Walking (various speeds) | Hip contact force, ground reaction force, hip joint moment |
16 | Debevec et al. (2010) [26] | One‐legged stance as a representative static body position for calculation of hip contact stress distribution in clinical studies | 1 geometrical model representing normal walking (based on Bergmann study) | Analyzing hip joint reaction force during one‐leg stance and walking | One‐leg stance, walking | Normalized hip contact stress on body weight |
17 | Pellikaan et al. (2018) [27] | Ranking of osteogenic potential of physical exercises in post‐menopausal women based on femoral neck strains | 14 musculoskeletal modeling and Finite Elements Modeling adapted from 14 post‐menopausal elderly women | Analyzing hip contact force (proximal femur) on osteoporotic condition in relation to post‐menopausal condition | Walking (various speeds), running, hopping, resistance training exercise | Normalized hip contact force on body weight (additional measurements: femoral displacements, peak tensile strains, peak compressive strains) |
18 | Henak et al. (2013) [28] | Specimen‐specific predictions of contact stress under physiological loading in the human hip: validation and sensitivity studies | 5 finite elements models based on 5 cadaveric male models | Analyzing hip contact stress on several hip joint anatomical regions during various loading in the representation of walking downstairs | Walking downstairs (with various loading) | Hip peak contact stress, hip mean contact stress |
19 | Martell et al. (2014) [29] | Strain energy in the femoral neck during exercise | 1 finite elements model generated from 1 cadaveric female on 15 weight‐bearing activities | Analyzing energy working on femoral neck during several activities | Chair up/down, step up, squat, squat with weight, walking upstairs, walking downstairs, walking (1.3 m/s), long jump, vertical jump, hip isokinetic motion | Hip joint reaction force (additional measurements: normalized strain energy on body weight) |
20 | Wang et al. (2005) [30] | The hip stress level analysis for human routine activities | 1 computerized model on 8 different activities | Analyzing hip contact stress during eight daily activities using computerized modeling | Slow walking, normal walking, fast walking, walking upstairs, walking downstairs, standing up, sitting down, knee bend | Hip peak contact stress |
21 | Xiong et al. (2022) [31] | Changes in hip joint contact stress during a gait cycle based on the individualized modeling method of “gait‑musculoskeletal system‑finite element” | 2 computerized model based on 1 male and 1 female | Analyzing hip joint dynamics characteristics and the changes in the hip contact stress during gait cycle | Walking (% gait cycle) | Hip peak contact stress |