Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e083950. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-083950

Table 2. Characteristics of included reviews.

N out of 35 %
Year published
 2015 2 6%
 2016 3 9%
 2017 2 6%
 2018 3 9%
 2019 5 14%
 2020 5 14%
 2021 4 11%
 2022 6 17%
 2023 5 14%
Geographic regions*
 Africa 35 100%
 Asia 13 37%
 Europe 4 11%
 Latin America and the Caribbean 12 34%
 North America 4 11%
 Oceania 1 3%
Type of review
 Systematic review 20 57%
 Systematic review and meta-analysis 6 17%
 Systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis 1 3%
 Scoping review 6 17%
 Review (type unspecified) 2 6%
SHRH domain
 Helping people realise their desired family size (contraception and family planning; prevention and treatment of infertility) 7 20%
 Ensuring the health of pregnant women/girls and their newborn infants (maternal and infant mortality; preventing complications in pregnancy, childbirth and postnatal period)) 14 40%
 Preventing unsafe abortion 1 3%
 Promoting sexual health and well-being (prevention of reproductive tract and sexually transmitted infections; HIV/AIDS; and promotion of sexual well-being and function) 23 66%
 Promoting SRHR in disease outbreaks (including prevention of sexual transmission, eg, of Zika or Ebola viruses) 3 9%
 Promoting healthy adolescence for a healthy future (covering all SRHR outcomes, with a specific focus on adolescents) 5 14%
 Preventing and responding to gender-based violence and harmful practices (intimate partner violence, domestic violence and sexual coercion/violence; and harmful practices (ie, female genital mutilation; child, early and forced marriage)) 11 31%
Covered at least two SRHR domains 16 46%
Number of primary studies included - mean (range, IQR) 33 (5–127; 15, 50)
Methodology of included studies
Quantitative only (of these, number limited to experimental designs) 17 (5/17) 49%
 Quantitative and qualitative (mixed methods) 16 46%
 Qualitative only 2 6%
Main focal population(s) for interventions
 Both adults and youth§ 17 49%
 Adults 11 31%
 Youth 3 9%
 Men and young men 4 11%
Extent to which studies collected data with men
 All/most 16 46%
 Some 13 37%
 Few/none 4 11%
Types of interventions
 Community education 27 77%
 Health facility education 19 54%
 Health facility service delivery approaches 20 57%
 Community service delivery approaches 21 60%
 Couples counselling 19 54%
 Reaching men via their partners 17 49%
 Mass media social mobilisation campaigns 15 43%
 Gender transformative workshops 12 34%
 School-based programmes 13 37%
 Health facility strengthening/provider training 9 26%
 Financial incentives 11 31%
 Structural interventions 7 20%
 mHealth interventions 8 23%
 Workplace programmes 2 6%
 Other 121 34%
Funding reported
 National Institutes of Health 5 14%
 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation 3 9%
 USAID/PEPFAR 5 14%
 WHO 4 11%
 DFID/FCDO 3 9%
 Other 14 40%
 None reported 12 34%
*

Per United Nations regions.

WHO SRHR domains.

Excluding conditions not acquired sexually, for example, testicular and prostate cancers.

§

By ‘youth’/‘”young men’ is meant ages 10–24.

DFIDDepartment for International DevelopmentFCDOForeign, Commonwealth & Development OfficePEPFARU.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS ReliefSRHRsexual and reproductive health and rightsUSAIDUnited States Agency for International Development