Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 22;22:6. doi: 10.1186/s12986-025-00894-4

Table 5.

Effect size of DOBS on Sarcopenia in prespecified and exploratory subgroups

Characteristic Number of Participants (%) Effect Size (95% CI) P-value P for interaction
Age 0.77
< 39 3,120 (38%) 0.971(0.950, 0.993) 0.017
≥ 39 5,120 (62%) 0.975(0.959, 0.992) 0.022
Gender 0.62
Male 3,959 (48%) 0.976 (0.958, 0.995) 0.013
Female 4,281 (52%) 0.969 (0.951, 0.989) 0.009
Diabetes 0.30
Yes 622 (7.5%) 0.986 (0.951, 1.023) 0.281
No 7,222 (87.6%) 0.972 (0.958, 0.987) 0.015
Borderline 396 (4.8%) 0.924(0.856, 0.997) 0.034
Hypertension 0.93
Yes 1,946 (23.6%) 0.972 (0.949, 0.996) 0.021
No 6,294 (76.4%) 0.973 (0.958, 0.989) 0.018
Cardiovascular diseases 0.79
Yes 82 (1%) 0.987(0.882, 1.104) 0.736
No 8,158 (99%) 0.972(0.959, 0.986) 0.012
Self-reported cancer 0.53
Yes 331 (4%) 0.992(0.931, 1.058) 0.668
No 7,909 (96%) 0.972(0.958, 0.985) 0.010
Nutrient supplement use 0.15
Yes 2,574 (31.2%) 0.958 (0.935, 0.983) 0.001
No 5,666 (68.8%) 0.979 (0.963, 0.993) 0.007

Note 1: Above model adjusted for age, gender, BMI, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity, education level, PIR, nutrient supplement use, self-reported cancer, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and diabetes

Note 2: In each case, the model is not adjusted for the stratification variable

Statistical analysis: stratified linear regression models. Significance level: P < 0.05 (two-tailed). Bold values indicate statistical significance

CI: confidence interval; DOBS: dietary oxidative balance score

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure