Skip to main content
Bioscience logoLink to Bioscience
. 2024 Mar 27;74(5):322–332. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biae022

Ferns as facilitators of community recovery following biotic upheaval

Lauren Azevedo-Schmidt 1,, Ellen D Currano 2, Regan E Dunn 3, Elizabeth Gjieli 4, Jarmila Pittermann 5, Emily Sessa 6, Jacquelyn L Gill 7
PMCID: PMC11756664  PMID: 39850062

Abstract

The competitive success of ferns has been foundational to hypotheses about terrestrial recolonization following biotic upheaval, from wildfires to the Cretaceous–Paleogene asteroid impact (66 million years ago). Rapid fern recolonization in primary successional environments has been hypothesized to be driven by ferns’ high spore production and wind dispersal, with an emphasis on their competitive advantages as so-called disaster taxa. We propose that a competition-based view of ferns is outdated and in need of reexamination in light of growing research documenting the importance of positive interactions (i.e., facilitation) between ferns and other species. Here, we integrate fossil and modern perspectives on fern ecology to propose that ferns act as facilitators of community assemblage following biotic upheaval by stabilizing substrates, enhancing soil properties, and mediating competition. Our reframing of ferns as facilitators has broad implications for both community ecology and ecosystem recovery dynamics, because of ferns’ global distribution and habitat diversity.

Keywords: ecosystem recovery, facilitation, paleontology, plant ecology, interdisciplinary science


Ferns are typically found in the understory, where they dominate humid, low-light, and often nutrient-poor environments (Sharpe et al. 2010). Nevertheless, ferns can also successfully colonize highly disturbed or primary successional landscapes (e.g., newly exposed rock or mineral soil). Prior reviews have noted the adaptive capacity of ferns in successfully colonizing new environments including their wide physiological tolerances (Anderson 2021), adaptability to abiotic stress (Krieg and Chambers 2022), and dispersal capabilities (Jones et al. 2006, Thomas and Cleal 2022). In some cases, this adaptive capacity is thought to provide a competitive advantage following biotic upheaval, giving ferns a reputation as “disaster taxa” for their ability to quickly colonize and thrive following severe disturbance events. However, this competition-based framework overlooks the role ferns have played in promoting ecosystem recovery (Bulleri et al. 2016, Oreja et al. 2020), challenging a “disaster taxon” model that fails to account for positive interactions such as facilitation. In neoecology (i.e., the ecology of modern timescales), the ability of species to ameliorate environmental stressors via facilitation (sensu Stachowicz 2001) has been recognized for decades but is often overlooked by studies of community assembly and dynamics (Bruno et al. 2003). For example, nurse logs provide nutrients, moisture, and substrate that many species of trees require for regeneration (Oreja et al. 2020, Decombeix et al. 2021) and are a classic example of the importance of facilitation in forest regeneration. Meanwhile, paleoecology (i.e., the ecology of the fossil record) has largely ignored the role of facilitation (Valiente-Banuet et al. 2006, Decombeix et al. 2021), despite the existence of significant biological upheaval events such as mass extinctions, which provide ideal study systems for investigating the importance of positive interactions during the recovery of biodiversity following global perturbations.

To address this knowledge gap, we integrate neo- and paleoecological perspectives to propose a new model of ferns as facilitators following biotic upheaval. We first summarize the growing body of recent literature suggesting that ferns are facilitative following disturbance and, therefore, play an important role in ecosystem recovery by increasing soil nutrient quality (Lyu et al. 2019), shading newly growing species and increasing soil moisture or water availability (Gould et al. 2013), improving microclimates, altering microbial and macrofaunal communities, or influencing plant community assembly (table 1; Yang et al. 2021). Given these contemporary observations, we hypothesize that ferns act as facilitators rather than merely as successful pioneer taxa, following disaster events. We propose that ferns ameliorate their local environments, facilitating post-disaster recovery by making conditions more favorable for the recovery of other species that, in turn, promote the very high-moisture and low-light environments where many fern species thrive. By integrating modern ecological theory with deep-time paleontological thinking, our novel framework reimagines ferns as facilitators of community assembly. This framework, which envisions ferns as more than superior competitors, may help us to understand how terrestrial ecosystems recovered following some of the greatest challenges in Earth's history.

Table 1.

Summary of various mechanisms by which ferns benefit secondary succession within ecosystems.

Mechanism Benefit to secondary succession Citation
Reduce competition Tree ferns reduce available space for other conifer and angiosperm trees to colonize, decreasing overall competition for canopy producing trees. Ferns (Dicranopteris species) can outcompete invasive or alien species, sometimes not allowing invasive or alien communities to establish. Brock et al. 2019, Yang et al. 2021, Yuan et al. 2019
Increase soil organic carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus Increase overall soil nutrient content because of fern detrital input was greater post deforestation benefiting successional communities. Lyu et al. 2019, Zhao et al. 2012
Increase soil stability Decrease soil runoff for successional species or communities. Osman et al. 2021, Sanchez-Castillo et al. 2019, Yang et al. 2021
Aluminum accumulation Al can negatively influence root development and nutrient uptake within plant communities and fern's ability to accumulate AI ameliorates the soil environment Schmitt et al. 2017
Increase soil moisture and nitrogen Greater germination of tree seedlings under fern thickets due to higher soil moisture, nutrients, and lower soil surface temperature. Walker 1994, Gallegos et al. 2015
Reduce soil contamination and toxicity Reduction of soil contaminants and toxicity allows for species to cultivate landscapes that have been previously disturbed, such as mining locations. Yang et al. 2021
Recruitment Ferns support seedling growth by providing important ground cover in addition to acting as nurse logs within some environments. This can be seen within extinct and extant ecosystems. Gallegos et al. 2015, Decombeix et al. 2021, Zotz et al. 2021

Note: The hypothesized new framework of ferns as facilitators builds on the modern ecological research cited here.

Ferns as disaster taxa

As defined by Rodland and Bottjer (2001, 95), disaster taxa are “opportunistic taxa, characterized by long evolutionary histories, that invade vacant ecospace during the survival interval, but which are forced into marginal settings during later phases of the recovery.” This definition implies that disaster taxa are competitively superior in the highly stressed conditions following biotic crises but are outcompeted by other taxa once environmental stress abates. Ferns’ ability to recolonize disturbed habitats is well-documented in both modern and geologic records, with the two most commonly cited examples being the 1980 Mount St. Helens eruption and the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) asteroid impact that triggered the K–Pg mass extinction event 66 million years ago (mega-annum, Ma; Vajda and McLoughlin 2007, Schulte et al. 2010).

The K–Pg asteroid strike (located in the modern-day Yucatán peninsula of Mexico) is recorded worldwide as an iridium-rich clay layer (Schulte et al. 2010). An anomalous fern spore spike just above the iridium layer was first identified within the Raton Basin, New Mexico (Orth et al. 1981), and was later found in additional sections (Tschudy et al. 1984). The fern spike was formally defined as a “palynological assemblage composed of 70 to 100% fern spores of a single species occurring within an interval 0–15 cm above the K–T boundary” (Nicholas and Johnson 2008, 18). Such spikes have also been identified within New Zealand (Vajda et al. 2001) and Japan (Saito et al. 1986), indicating global devastation of terrestrial vegetation and first recolonization of the post-K–Pg landscape by ferns (reviewed in Vajda and Bercovici 2014). In addition to the relatively rapid recovery of ferns represented by the fern spore spike itself, the K–Pg impact event may also have altered the trajectory of fern diversification. While ferns as a group are an ancient lineage (their earliest fossils date to the Devonian), most modern fern diversity at the species level has evolved in the 66 million years since the K–Pg impact (figure 1; Schuettpelz and Pryer 2009, Testo and Sundue 2016).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Time-calibrated fern phylogeny adapted from Shen and colleagues (2018). Major extinction events are shown as boxes centered around the Permian–Triassic (251 million years ago; in purple), Triassic–Jurassic (201.3 million years ago; in pink), Cretaceous–Paleogene (66 million years ago; in pink), and Eocene–Oligocene (33.9 million years ago; in purple). The dominance of ferns varies following these extinction events, with true fern spikes occurring during the Triassic–Jurassic and Cretaceous–Paleogene recoveries (the pink boxes), whereas the Permian–Triassic and Eocene–Oligocene events (the purple boxes) experienced a radiation but not dominance of ferns, and lack true fern spore spikes. Numbers in circles indicate corresponding lineages and representative leaves and sporangium with the same numbers.

Tschudy and colleagues (1984) introduced the idea of ferns as disaster taxa and proposed the Krakatau eruption and subsequent vegetation recovery as an analogue for the K–Pg boundary (for an example of ferns colonizing volcanos, see figure 2). They attributed ferns’ success in the earliest Paleocene to their wind-dispersed spores and tolerance of nutrient-poor soils, as well as the extinction of their competitors. In addition to their dispersal capabilities (Barrington 1993, Perrie and Brownsey 2007), fern spores also tend to form resilient, perennial spore banks in both temperate and tropical regions (Dyer and Lindsay 1992, Esaete et al. 2014, Berry 2019), and some species are able to tolerate soil conditions such as anoxia, heavy metal contamination, and increased salinity (Kachenko et al. 2007, Husby 2013), all of which would contribute to their post-disaster recovery and success. In modern systems, ferns have served as a primary carbon source for ecosystem regrowth after disturbance (Douterlungne et al. 2013). Finally, ferns are widely recognized for the frequency with which they undergo whole genome duplication to become polyploid (Wood et al. 2009), and researchers have increasingly posited a link between polyploidy, the capacity for ecological plasticity or adaptation, and diversification in plants (Cai et al. 2019, Sessa 2019), including in ferns (Berry 2022). These and other studies have demonstrated a tendency for polyploid lineages to be overrepresented following large-scale environmental change; given the frequency of polyploidy in ferns, it seems likely that their propensity for polyploidy may have played a role in their success after biotic upheavals, although additional tests of this hypothesis are needed.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Examples of fern preservation within the fossil record as either compression macrofossils (a) from the Paleocene (Cladophlebis sp.; DMNH EPI.51030) or microfossils (b) such as fern spores (Barrington et al. 2020). Within modern ecosystems ferns recolonize heavily disturbed landscapes such as the tephra of El Chichón in Southern Mexico (c). Photograph: RA Spicer, used with permission; Thomas and Cleal (2022).

Since the discovery of the K–Pg fern spike, paleobotanists have searched for similar patterns of recolonization and ecosystem recovery following global catastrophes and climate changes with varying success (e.g., Vajda and Bercovici 2014, Thomas and Cleal 2022). There is little evidence for fern dominance in recovery floras following the Permian–Triassic (P–T) extinction, the largest mass extinction in Earth's history, which has been attributed to a period of enhanced volcanism. Thomas and Cleal (2022) proposed that the absence of a P–T fern spike is because Permian ferns lacked the small sporangia and advanced dehiscence mechanisms present in more modern leptosporangiate ferns. A fern spike was documented in North America at the Triassic–Jurassic boundary (Olsen et al. 1990), when extensive volcanism in the Central Atlantic magmatic province triggered the end-Triassic extinction. Osmundaceous, marattalian, and schizaealean ferns were important, although not always dominant, components of end-Triassic extinction recovery floras in Greenland, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand (reviewed in Lindström 2016). These recovery floras were quickly replaced by gymnosperm-dominated floras typical of the Jurassic. A fern spike has also been observed in the Salisbury Embayment, in what is now Delaware, USA (Self-Trail et al. 2017) and in the North Sea (Eldrett et al. 2014), during the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM; Self-Trail et al. 2017), a geologically abrupt global warming event 56 million years ago that caused significant floral migration but little extinction (Wing and Currano 2013). However, similar patterns have not been noted elsewhere during the PETM (Korasidis et al. 2022).

Fern functional traits and physiological resilience

Contemporary fern communities are the legacy of species diversification (figure 1), especially following the dominance of closed canopies with the rise of angiosperms (Watkins and Cardelús 2012, Cai et al. 2021). This diversification has also allowed modern fern communities to colonize all major ecosystems (figure 3; Qian et al. 2022) because of a combination of unique physiological traits that are responsible for ferns’ success throughout the tropics, as well as in temperate and semi-arid environments (Sharpe et al. 2010); this suite of traits also supports their role as facilitators of community assembly.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Map visualizing global fern species (class Polypodiopsida) richness using all known herbarium collection occurrences (after 1950; GBIF.Org 2023a 2), produced using geographic information system (GIS) mapping software ArcGIS Desktop Advanced 10.6 (ESRI 2018). Georeferenced data sets were spatially joined with a regular grid of 100,000 square kilometer cells (100 × 100 kilometers). The conjoined data set was extracted from the GIS and reconfigured to calculate and map the distinct species count per unique grid cell.

Compared with seed plants, most fern sporophytes have a simplified body plan and slower metabolic rates that make them ideally suited to colonize dark and disturbed habitats such as those that resulted from the K–Pg impact (Walker and Sharpe 2010, Thomas and Cleal 2022). Relative to woody seed plants, fern sporophytes are metabolically inexpensive to build because they lack secondary growth (wood); the so-called trunks of tree ferns rely on a combination of rigid fibers, soft tissues, and turgor pressure for support (Pittermann et al. 2011, Mahley et al. 2018). Leaves emerge from a modified stem known as the rhizome, which serves as an anchor, a storage organ, and a meristem. Belowground, ferns’ roots are fine and shallow, and species may be adapted to myriad substrates, from rock to bark. Because respiration rates are higher in faster-growing plants (Lambers et al. 2008), a slow metabolism may be an advantage for colonizing low-light or resource-poor environments because such plants consume their carbon stores slowly and can effectively idle until conditions improve. Compared with conifers and woody angiosperms, which expend greater costs to produce seeds and wood, the generally simplified fern sporophyte body plan can support relatively consistent growth and spore production in resource-limited habitats.

The vast majority of ferns occupy low-light environments either within or under angiosperm canopies (Kawai et al. 2003, Schneider et al. 2004, Schuettpelz and Pryer 2009), and fern sporophytes would have been well-adapted for the cool, dark conditions that followed the K–Pg impact. A unique photoreceptor—neochrome—allows ferns to thrive in low light environments and may therefore have predisposed ferns to tolerate the presumably dark and cool K–Pg conditions (Li et al. 2014). Accordingly, fern photosynthetic rates rarely reach the levels of angiosperms in full sun and generally range from 2 to 10 micromols per square meter per second, whereas angiosperm leaves can reach over 50 umol/m2/s (Brodribb et al. 2007, Watkins et al. 2010, Pittermann et al. 2011). Although ferns are most often associated with mesic habitats, weedy ferns such as Pteridium aquilinum show remarkable plasticity when faced with habitat variation (Baer et al. 2020); a large number of fern species are surprisingly resilient to prolonged drought stress, with some species even thriving in arid, sunny environments (Hevly 1963, Riaño and Briones 2013). For example, many epiphytic ferns can experience seasonal and daily fluctuations in light and water availability and may have little to no organic substrate on which to anchor their sporophytes (Watkins and Cardelús 2012, Nitta et al. 2020). Such ferns may lack the water-holding capacity of soil that buffers terrestrial ferns during episodes of mild water scarcity, so their key strategy is to retain leaf water by reducing stomatal conductance and, therefore, minimizing water loss (Hietz and Briones 1998, Campany et al. 2021, Pittermann et al. 2023). However, some epiphytes, such as the well-studied Pleopeltis sp. (Polypodiaceae), are desiccation tolerant, meaning that they can lose over 95% of their metabolically active water and exist in a dormant stage until conditions improve (Oliver et al. 2000). Photosynthesis resumes quickly after rehydration, and recovery is facilitated by root pressure and capillarity, as well as the direct absorption of leaf water, a process known as foliar uptake (Holmlund et al. 2019, 2020, Prats and Brodersen 2021). Desiccation tolerance is an extreme and costly means to avoid mortality but is also indicative of ferns’ ability to thrive in harsh habitats.

In addition to their sporophytic traits, ferns (and lycophytes) are also unique among land plants in having gametophytes that are ecologically and nutritionally independent from the sporophyte parent. As with the other land plant lineages, the gametophyte is the site of sexual reproduction in ferns and is therefore a critical stage of the life cycle. Although they have a reputation for being delicate and ephemeral, fern gametophytes can be quite tolerant of stressful environments, including drought (Watkins et al. 2007, Pittermann et al. 2013, Chambers et al. 2017, López-Pozo et al. 2018). Several studies have demonstrated that fern gametophytes can have wider ecological tolerances than their sporophyte counterparts, and the gametophytes of a number of species have been shown to be capable of colonizing and persisting in microhabitats where sporophytes cannot (Watkins et al. 2007, Pittermann et al. 2013, Nitta et al. 2021; reviewed in Pinson et al. 2017). Fern gametophyte communities may also be structured differently than sporophyte communities (Nitta et al. 2017) and can demonstrate high functional diversity (Nitta et al. 2020). Taken together and considering the crucial importance of the gametophyte for sexual reproduction, it seems clear that the gametophyte generation must play an important role in how ferns respond to ecological disaster, although this has not yet been investigated directly.

The facilitative potential of ferns arises, in part, from their unique physiology, which enables them to colonize and transform devastated habitats under even the most climatically dismal conditions. A relatively inexpensive sporophyte body plan, coupled with a subterranean rhizome and slow metabolism, helps ferns to conserve their resources, whereas strategies to quickly ramp up photosynthesis after stress allow for quick recovery and growth when circumstances improve. The resilience of gametophytes and their ability to tolerate a wide range of ecological conditions would also promote recovery after large-scale environmental change. Slow nutrient release and light filtration may temper the initial success of seed plants in habitats dominated by ferns, but with the accumulation of organic matter and nutrients over time, ferns can be expected to thrive in a variety of conditions, even if they ultimately give way to the establishment of complex ecosystems that, together, form a mosaic of biodiversity (figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Conceptual figure showing fern facilitation before and after a biotic upheaval. Each column (a–e) shows how a theoretical community may respond at the level of species abundance (top) and the realized niche (bottom). In the top panels, time is on the x-axis, and species abundance is shown on the y-axis. Before the biotic upheaval, ferns (fern icons and green dotted line) are dominant on the landscape relative to seed plants (the black icons) with natural variability (a). Following the K–Pg (represented by the asteroid icon; b), fern and seed plant abundance dropped significantly, with widespread extinctions. However, because the habitat was ameliorated by fern facilitation, species began to reestablish (c–e; black dotted line). The presence of other species eventually decreased fern abundance, restricting them on the landscape (e). The black dotted line differs from the solid black line in panels (a) and (b) because of assumed differences in pre- and post-impact communities; in addition, it represents the positive influence ferns have on outside species that fosters both seed plant establishment and expands the available niche space available for ferns themselves. These changes in the environment are also shown in realized two-dimensional idealized niche space in the bottom panels with niche variable 1 on the x-axis and niche variable 2 on the y-axis. Non-fern plant communities are shown in various black circles and ferns are shown in green dotted circles with overlapping circles representing theorized overlap in niche space. Prior to the K–Pg ferns were limited in their realized niche space (a), minimally occurring on the landscape during the disturbance (b) but recolonized post-impact (c–e). Ferns were able to expand their niches because of a lack of competition (c) but eventually were restricted again on the landscape (d–e), highlighting the dynamic nature of community recovery.

Ferns as facilitators of community assembly and ecological recovery

The role of positive interactions among species has been increasingly acknowledged by ecological theory (albeit slowly; Bruno et al. 2003), and the field has shifted from a predominant focus on competition (e.g., Clements 1916) to a growing appreciation for the importance of processes such as facilitation and mutualism in driving species’ interactions and community dynamics (Koffel et al. 2021). Interactions germane to a facilitative framework have been documented across a range of communities, including bacterial assemblages (Piccardi et al. 2019), barnacle–snail systems (Cartwright and Williams 2012), hummingbird-pollinated plants (Bergamo et al. 2018), and carnivore communities (Périquet et al. 2015). A growing body of research indicates that ferns also play an important role as facilitators, due in part to their ability to alter and improve microhabitats following disturbance events (Wan et al. 2014).

Ferns improve environmental conditions in numerous ways (table 1), with many such changes occurring below-ground via soil modification. Ferns have been shown to alter microenvironments by ameliorating soil temperature, increasing moisture-holding capacity, reducing erosion, and increasing nutrient contents (Gallegos et al. 2015), which have been found to be important for enabling recolonization by secondary successional species (table 1). Some fern species also have the ability to stabilize soil through the pull-out force (i.e., the uprooting force) of their rhizomes (Sanchez-Castillo et al. 2019) and by decreasing runoff in denuded environments (Sanchez-Castillo et al. 2019, Osman et al. 2021, Yang et al. 2021). Fern communities therefore protect soil against erosion, allowing secondary successional species to recolonize. This is of particular importance when soil is newly developing after disturbance or disaster. Soil properties are also enhanced by fern communities, which increase organic carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus through detrital inputs, specifically following disturbance such as deforestation (Zhao et al. 2012, Lyu et al. 2019). This is likely an artifact of ferns’ ability to colonize disturbed habitats first, leading to their detritus having the most impact on the recovering ecosystem.

The presence of ferns in a habitat can also increase soil moisture and decrease soil surface temperature (Walker 1994); further benefits to soil include the removal of contaminants, which greatly expedites recolonization by other plants. Some fern species have been found to remove heavy metals that accumulate in the soil such as aluminum (Schmitt et al. 2017) and arsenic (Chang et al. 2009), an advantageous trait because toxic levels of heavy metals have been recorded following the K–Pg impact (Erickson and Dickson 1987, Arenillas et al. 2018). The presence of metals such as aluminum negatively influences other plant species’ ability to uptake nutrients; therefore, because ferns reduce them from the soil, this could facilitate the establishment of more sensitive plants. Ferns also influence their habitats via seedling filtration, which mediates coexistence by minimizing competition among woody species, specifically between angiosperms and gymnosperms (Brock et al. 2018). Although the presence of some species of ferns have been found to suppress the regeneration of tree species (George and Bazzaz 1999a, 1999b, Levy-Tacher et al. 2015, Liu et al. 2022), in general, ferns support greater biodiversity in forest ecosystems by promoting establishment and minimizing competition (Brock et al. 2018, Yuan et al. 2019, Yang et al. 2021). By physically alternating their habitats, ferns influence community assembly via facilitation. Such mechanisms become especially important for ecosystem recovery in the aftermath of disturbance or disasters, because ferns promote the recruitment or growth of non-fern species (Valiente-Banuet et al. 2006, Bulleri et al. 2016). Such facilitative relationships have been documented within both terrestrial and aquatic environments and in a variety of organisms, from bryophyte and tree seedlings in temperate rainforests (Woods et al. 2021) to algae–barnacle interactions in coastal settings (Menge and Menge 2013).

Building from these contemporary examples, we hypothesize that the ferns represented by the K–Pg spore spike may also have been facilitators of ecosystem recovery in the aftermath of the K–Pg impact 66 million years ago. Under this model, ferns would have occupied a narrower realized niche space in the pre-impact landscape (figure 4a). The abiotic conditions following the K–Pg extinction event differed from the habitats in which most fern species are found today, and the ferns recorded by the fern spike were likely at the margins of their fundamental niches and physiological tolerances, although the realized niche may have been greater because of a release from competitive pressure. Following the biotic upheaval of the extinction event (figure 4b), ferns would have been some of the first plants to recolonize the barren landscape, possibly because of superior dispersal capabilities or because of physiological traits (discussed above) that allowed them to tolerate the extreme stress of the post-impact world, including low light conditions, acid rain, and denuded soils (figure 4c). Because ferns established in the absence of competition, they would have then modified these conditions via increasing soil moisture and nutrients and reducing erosion, therefore ameliorating the post-impact environment (figure 4d). Once established, fern sporophytes would have further improved soil stability and increased moisture and nutrient contents, expanding the availability of conditions for fern establishment and reproduction, especially for a greater diversity of species (fern gametophytes have a variety of environmental optima and niche breadths that vary among species; for a review, see Krieg and Chambers 2022). However, as a result of this facilitation, non-fern plant species (which were able to survive in isolated refugia or in the seed bank) would have then been able to expand, and ferns would eventually have become competitively excluded or marginalized within the very habitats they helped establish (figure 4e). Although fern abundances would have initially increased following the impact event (figure 4’s green line), non-fern species (the black dashed line) would have then out-competed ferns in high-light or disturbed environments, ultimately restricting most fern species back to the darker, more humid, nutrient-poor soils of the understory (figure 4e). Under this model, ferns would have played an essential role in ecosystem resilience and the recovery of biodiversity in the aftermath of one of the most significant biotic upheavals in Earth history.

Recovery trajectories in modern versus fossil communities

If ferns are facilitators of community assembly following biotic upheaval, an improved understanding of their role in recovery dynamics—past and present—could help inform our understanding of the underpinnings of ecological resilience in the Anthropocene. Notably, there is an apparent orders-of-magnitude difference in the timescales of fern dominance in modern and fossil assemblages. Following modern upheavals such as the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens, ferns were the first to re-establish, but were followed by other plants within decades (Halpern et al. 1990, Titus et al. 2023). Recovery following the K–Pg impact was slower, because of the severity of the extinction event and the global impacts of the asteroid and its aftermath. According to some exceptionally well-dated records (Clyde et al. 2016), ferns likely dominated for ∼1000 years (but perhaps as long as 71,000 years because of dating uncertainty). Recovery was highly variable, both across clades and geographically, with some evidence that increasing distance from the impact site might have provided a buffer. For some groups, recovery was surprisingly quick; mammalian richness and body size recovery were estimated to have taken ∼100,000 years to reach pre-extinction levels (Lyson et al. 2019). In general, however, it took 10 million years for generic richness (i.e., the number of genera) to recover, which is comparable to or even faster than previous mass extinctions (Hull 2015). The temporal resolution of the fossil record influences our ability to determine true rates of recolonization, but by its very nature, a globally devastating event such as the K–Pg mass extinction had orders of magnitude greater influence on the timescale of ecosystem rebound than local events such as the 1980 Mount St. Helens eruption. Although the latter volcanic event influenced regional species pools in the short term (Dale et al. 2005), it is overshadowed in comparison to the global mass extinction and impact winter of the K–Pg aftermath, which decimated the global species pool and drove large-scale reductions in plant diversity (though few global extinctions at the family level; Wilf et al. 2023).

Compositional differences between fossil and modern floral communities could also contribute to differences in ecological recovery dynamics after biotic upheavals. Fern rhizomes (Spicer et al. 1985, Adams et al. 1987, Walker and Boneta 1995) and spores (Trejo et al. 2010) have been demonstrated to survive fires and other severe disturbance events, but this is also true for many members of non-fern clades, many of which evolved after the K–Pg (e.g., grasses). Although it's clear that ferns play a role in ecological recovery following modern-day disturbances such as fire, landslides, logging, or volcanic eruptions, community assembly and recovery dynamics in modern systems have almost certainly been shaped by the diversification of angiosperms throughout the Cenozoic. More work is needed to elucidate the role that ferns play in community assembly and resilience in both modern and fossil communities, which will allow us to better understand the degree to which fossil systems can be analogs for the present-day climate and biodiversity crises (i.e., conservation paleobiology; Dietl et al. 2015). For example, it would be helpful to know the degree to which recovery trajectories are influenced by the identity of pioneer taxa (i.e., priority effects), and whether, for example, ferns’ phylogenetic histories play a role in structuring recovery dynamics relative to angiosperms (Emerson and Gillespie 2008).

Ecoevolutionary and conservation implications of ferns as facilitators

Although we have focused on a single clade (ferns), our framework has broadscale relevance for the understanding of facilitation in ecosystem resilience and recovery. As discussed above, ferns have played an important role in ecosystem recovery for millions of years and are able to tolerate a wide range of environments and stressors. Ferns are globally distributed (figure 3) and have an evolutionary history dating back to Devonian or earlier (Testo and Sundue 2016), allowing us to examine the importance of plant facilitation at broad spatiotemporal scales. If ferns are architects of recovery following upheaval, they may play an important role in ecological stability, which despite being widely studied remains poorly understood (Donohue et al. 2016, Domínguez-García et al. 2019). As we explore these relationships further, we may find even more positive interspecific interactions that have previously gone unrecognized but are nonetheless important for understanding biodiversity dynamics.

A growing body of research suggests that facilitation plays an important role in contemporary ecosystem and community processes, including stability and recovery (Horton and Van der Heijden 2008, Karst et al. 2015, Rodriguez-Ramos et al. 2021). As we have explored here, ferns may play a particularly important role in terrestrial ecosystem recovery following disturbance and upheaval across spatiotemporal scales. Furthermore, by viewing the fossil record through a facilitative lens, we can deepen our understanding of the drivers of long-term ecological and evolutionary dynamics in the aftermath of the K–Pg mass extinction, the most recent of Big Five mass extinctions widely recognized by paleontologists (Raup and Sepkoski 1982). As terrestrial ecosystems respond to a growing intersection of global changes, recognizing the role of facilitation in community assembly and ecological recovery becomes of critical importance for providing tools to support management efforts. By incorporating positive interactions into our ecological frameworks, we can better understand and support communities in an uncertain future.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the University of Maine EcoLunch discussion group for providing early feedback on the ideas presented in this article, as well as several anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved the manuscript. This work was funded by NASA Exobiology grant no. 80NSSC20K0617 to EBS, EDC, RED, JLG, and JP.

Author Biography

Lauren Azevedo-Schmidt (LAzSchmidt@ucdavis.edu) is affiliated with the Department of Entomology and Nematology at the University of California Davis, in Davis, California, and with the Climate Change Institute at the University of Maine, in Orono, Maine, in the United States. Ellen D. Currano is affiliated with the Department of Botany and the Department of Geology and Geophysics at the University of Wyoming, in Laramie, Wyoming, in the United States. Regan E. Dunn is affiliated with the Natural History Museums of Los Angeles County and of the La Brea Tar Pits and Museum, in Los Angeles, California, in the United States. Elizabeth Gjieli is affiliated with the New York Botanical Garden, in the Bronx, New York, in the United States. Jarmila Pittermann is affiliated with the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of California Santa Cruz, in Santa Cruz, California, in the United States. Emily B. Sessa is affiliated with the New York Botanical Garden, in the Bronx, New York, in the United States. Jacquelyn L. Gill is affiliated with the Climate Change Institute, and with the School of Biology and Ecology at the University of Maine, in Orono, Maine, in the United States.

Contributor Information

Lauren Azevedo-Schmidt, Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California Davis, Davis, California, and Climate Change Institute, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, United States.

Ellen D Currano, Department of Botany, Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming, United States.

Regan E Dunn, Natural History Museums of Los Angeles County, La Brea Tar Pits and Museum, Los Angeles, California, United States.

Elizabeth Gjieli, New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, United States.

Jarmila Pittermann, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California, United States.

Emily Sessa, New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, United States.

Jacquelyn L Gill, Climate Change Institute, School of Biology and Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, Maine, United States.

Author contributions

Lauren Azevedo-Schmidt (Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing), Ellen D. Currano (Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing), Regan E. Dunn (Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing), Elizabeth Gjieli (Visualization, Writing – review & editing), Jarmila Pittermann (Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing), Emily Sessa (Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing), and Jacquelyn L. Gill (Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing).

References cited

  1. Adams  AB, Dale  VH, Smith  EP, Kruckeberg  AR. 1987. Plants Survival, Growth Form and Regeneration Following the 18 May1980 Eruption of Mount St. Helens. Northwest Science  61: 160–170. [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson  OR. 2021. Physiological ecology of ferns: Biodiversity and conservation perspectives. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation  13: 49–63. [Google Scholar]
  3. Arenillas  I, Arz  JA, Gilabert  V. 2018. Blooms of aberrant planktic foraminifera across the K/Pg boundary in the Western Tethys: Causes and evolutionary implications. Paleobiology  44: 460–489. [Google Scholar]
  4. Baer  A, Wheeler  JK, Pittermann  J. 2020. Limited hydraulic adjustments drive the acclimation response of Pteridium aquilinum to variable light. Annals of Botany  125: 691–700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barrington  DS. 1993. Ecological and historical factors in fern biogeography. Journal of Biogeography  20: 275. 10.2307/2845635. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barrington  DS, Patel  NR, Southgate  MW. 2020. Inferring the impacts of evolutionary history and ecological constraints on spore size and shape in the ferns. Applications in Plant Sciences  8: e11339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergamo  P, Wolowski  M, Maruyama  P, Vizentin-Bugoni  J, Sazima  M. 2018. Trait patterns across space and time suggest an interplay of facilitation and competition acting on Neotropical hummingbird-pollinated plant communities. Oikos  127: 1690–1700. [Google Scholar]
  8. Berry  K. 2019. Fern spore viability considered in relation to the duration of the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) impact winter. A contribution to the discussion. Acta Palaeobotanica  59: 19–25. [Google Scholar]
  9. Berry  K. 2022. Revisiting R.H. Tschudy's fern-spore spike concept 40 years later: Connecting Tschudy's “disaster taxon” concept with paleopolyploidization in Stenochlaena J. Sm. Palynology  46: 1. 10.1080/01916122.2022.2103196. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brock  JMR, Perry  GLW, Burkhardt  T, Burns  BR. 2018. Forest seedling community response to understorey filtering by tree ferns. Journal of Vegetation Science  29: 887–897. [Google Scholar]
  11. Brodribb  TJ, Feild  TS, Jordan  GJ. 2007. Leaf maximum photosynthetic rate and venation are linked by hydraulics. Plant Physiology  144: 1890–1898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bruno  JF, Stachowicz  JJ, Bertness  MD. 2003. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution  18: 119–125. [Google Scholar]
  13. Bulleri  F, Bruno  JF, Silliman  BR, Stachowicz  JJ. 2016. Facilitation and the niche: Implications for coexistence, range shifts, and ecosystem functioning. Functional Ecology  30: 70–78. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cai  L, Xi  Z, Amorim  AM, Sugumaran  M, Rest  JS, Liu  L, Davis  CC. 2019. Widespread ancient whole-genome duplications in Malpighiales coincide with Eocene global climatic upheaval. New Phytologist  221: 565–576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cai  S  et al.  2021. Evolution of rapid blue-light response linked to explosive diversification of ferns in angiosperm forests. New Phytologist  230: 1201–1213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Campany  CE, Pittermann  J, Baer  A, Holmlund  H, Schuettpelz  E, Mehltreter  K, Watkins  JE, Jr. 2021. Leaf water relations in epiphytic ferns are driven by drought avoidance rather than tolerance mechanisms. Plant, Cell, & Environment  44: 1741–1755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cartwright  SR, Williams  GA. 2012. Seasonal variation in use of biogenic microhabitats by littorinid snails on tropical rocky shores. Marine Biology  159: 2323–2332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chambers  SM, atkins  W, J  E Jr, Sessa  EB. 2017. Differences in dehydration tolerance among populations of a gametophyte-only fern. American Journal of Botany  104: 598–607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chang  J-S, Yoon  I-H, Kim  K-W. 2009. Heavy metal and arsenic accumulating fern species as potential ecological indicators in As-contaminated abandoned mines. Ecological Indicators  9: 1275–1279. [Google Scholar]
  20. Clements  FE. 1916. Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Carnegie Institute of Washington. [Google Scholar]
  21. Clyde  WC, Ramezani  J, Johnson  KR, Bowring  SA, Jones  MM. 2016. Direct high-precision U–Pb geochronology of the end-Cretaceous extinction and calibration of Paleocene astronomical timescales. Earth and Planetary Science Letters  452: 272–280. [Google Scholar]
  22. Dale  VH, Swanson  FJ, Crisafulli  CM, eds. 2005. Ecological Responses to the 1980 Eruption of Mount St. Helens. Springer. [Google Scholar]
  23. Decombeix  A, Durieux  T, Harper  CJ, Serbet  R, Taylor  EL. 2021. A Permian nurse log and evidence for facilitation in high-latitude Glossopteris forests. Lethaia  54: 96–105. [Google Scholar]
  24. Dietl  GP, Kidwell  SM, Brenner  M, Burney  DA, Flessa  KW, Jackson  ST, Koch  PL. 2015. Conservation paleobiology: Leveraging knowledge of the past to inform conservation and restoration. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences  43: 79–103. [Google Scholar]
  25. Domínguez-García  V, Dakos  V, Kéfi  S. 2019. Unveiling dimensions of stability in complex ecological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences  116: 25714–25720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Donohue  I  et al.  2016. Navigating the complexity of ecological stability. Ecology Letters  19: 1172–1185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Douterlungne  D, Thomas  E, Levy-Tacher  SI. 2013. Fast-growing pioneer tree stands as a rapid and effective strategy for bracken elimination in the Neotropics. Journal of Applied Ecology  50: 1257–1265. [Google Scholar]
  28. Dyer  AF, Lindsay  S. 1992. Soil Spore Banks of Temperate Ferns. American Fern Journal  82: 89. 10.2307/1547792. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Eldrett  JS, Greenwood  DR, Polling  M, Brinkhuis  H, Sluijs  A. 2014. A seasonality trigger for carbon injection at the Paleocene–Eocene thermal maximum. Climate of the Past  10: 759–769. [Google Scholar]
  30. Emerson  BC, Gillespie  RG. 2008. Phylogenetic analysis of community assembly and structure over space and time. Trends in Ecology and Evolution  23: 619–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Erickson III  DJ, Dickson  SM. 1987. Global trace-element biogeochemistry at the K/T boundary: Oceanic and biotic response to a hypothetical meteorite impact. Geology  15: 1014–1017. [Google Scholar]
  32. Esaete  J, Eycott  AE, Reiniö  J, Telford  RJ, Vandvik  V. 2014. The seed and fern spore bank of a recovering African tropical forest. Biotropica  46: 677–686. [Google Scholar]
  33. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) . 2018. ArcGIS Desktop Help 10.6 Geostatistical Analyst. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gallegos  SC, Hensen  I, Saavedra  F, Schleuning  M. 2015. Bracken fern facilitates tree seedling recruitment in tropical fire-degraded habitats. Forest Ecology and Management  337: 135–143. [Google Scholar]
  35. [GBIF] Global Biodiversity Information Facility . 2023a. GBIF occurrence download  dl.tw4fyp. GBIF. https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.tw4fyp. [Google Scholar]
  36. [GBIF] Global Biodiversity Information Facility . 2023b. GBIF occurrence download  dl.dn27y9. GBIF. https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.dn27y9.
  37. George LO, Bazzaz FA . 1999a. The fern understory as an ecological filter: Growth and survival of canopy-tree seedlings. Ecology  80: 846–856. [Google Scholar]
  38. George LO, Bazzaz FA . 1999b. The fern understory as an ecological filter: Emergence and establishment of canopy-tree seedlings. Ecology  80: 833–845. [Google Scholar]
  39. Gould  R, Mooney  H, Nelson  L, Shallenberger  R, Daily  G. 2013. Restoring native forest understory: The influence of ferns and light in a Hawaiian experiment. Sustainability  5: 1317–1339. [Google Scholar]
  40. Halpern  CB, Frenzen  PM, Means  JE, Franklin  JF. 1990. Plant succession in areas of scorched and blown-down forest after the 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens, Washington. Journal of Vegetation Science  1: 181–194. [Google Scholar]
  41. Hevly  RH. 1963. Adaptations of cheilanthoid ferns to desert environments. Journal of the Arizona Academy of Science  2: 164–175. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hietz  P, Briones  O. 1998. Correlation between water relations and within-canopy distribution of epiphytic ferns in a Mexican cloud forest. Oecologia  114: 305–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Holmlund  HI, Davis  SD, Ewers  FW, Aguirre  NM, Sapes  G, Sala  A, Pittermann  J. 2020. Positive root pressure is critical for whole-plant desiccation recovery in two species of terrestrial resurrection ferns. Journal of Experimental Botany  71: 1139–1150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Holmlund  HI, Pratt  RB, Jacobsen  AL, Davis  SD, Pittermann  J. 2019. High-resolution computed tomography reveals dynamics of desiccation and rehydration in fern petioles of a desiccation-tolerant fern. New Phytologist  224: 97–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Horton  TR, Van der Heijden  MGA. 2008. The role of symbioses in seedling establishment and survival. Pages 189–213 in Leck  MA, Parker  VT, Simpson  RL, eds. Seedling Ecology and Evolution. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  46. Hull  P. 2015. Life in the aftermath of mass extinctions. Current Biology  25: R941–R952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Husby  C. 2013. Biology and functional ecology of equisetum with emphasis on the giant horsetails. Botanical Review  79: 147–177. [Google Scholar]
  48. Jones  MM, Tuomisto  H, Clark  DB, Olivas  P. 2006. Effects of mesoscale environmental heterogeneity and dispersal limitation on floristic variation in rain forest ferns. Journal of Ecology  94: 181–195. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kachenko  AG, Singh  B, Bhatia  NP. 2007. Heavy metal tolerance in common fern species. Australian Journal of Botany  55: 63–73. [Google Scholar]
  50. Karst  J, Erbilgin  N, Pec  GJ, Cigan  PW, Najar  A, Simard  SW, Cahill  JF  Jr. 2015. Ectomycorrhizal fungi mediate indirect effects of a bark beetle outbreak on secondary chemistry and establishment of pine seedlings. New Phytologist  208: 904–914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Kawai  H, Kanegae  T, Christensen  S, Kiyosue  T, Sato  Y, Imaizumi  T, Kadota  A, Wada  M. 2003. Responses of ferns to red light are mediated by an unconventional photoreceptor. Nature  421: 287–290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Koffel  T, Daufresne  T, Klausmeier  CA. 2021. From competition to facilitation and mutualism: A general theory of the niche. Ecological Monographs  91: 91. 10.1002/ecm.1458. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Korasidis  VA, Wing  SL, Shields  CA, Kiehl  JT. 2022. Global changes in terrestrial vegetation and continental climate during the Paleocene–Eocene thermal maximum. Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology  37: e2021PA004325. 10.1029/2021PA004325. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Krieg  CP, Chambers  SM. 2022. The ecology and physiology of fern gametophytes: A methodological synthesis. Applications in Plant Sciences  10: e11464. 10.1002/aps3.11464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Lambers  H, Chapin  FS, Pons  TL. 2008. Ecological biochemistry: Allelopathy and defense against herbivores. Pages 445–477 in Lambers  H, Chapin  FS, Pons  TL, eds. Plant Physiological Ecology. Springer. [Google Scholar]
  56. Levy-Tacher  S, Vleut  I, Román-Dañobeytia  F, Aronson  J. 2015. Natural regeneration after long-term bracken fern control with balsa (Ochroma pyramidale) in the Neotropics. Forests  6: 2163–2177. [Google Scholar]
  57. Li  F-W  et al.  2014. Horizontal transfer of an adaptive chimeric photoreceptor from bryophytes to ferns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences  111: 6672–6677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Lindström  S. 2016. Palynofloral patterns of terrestrial ecosystem change during the end-Triassic event: A review. Geological Magazine  153: 223–251. [Google Scholar]
  59. Liu  H, Liang  M, Yang  Q, Zhang  J, Shen  G, Zhang  Z, Wang  X. 2022. Responses of tree seedlings to understory filtering by the recalcitrant fern layer in a subtropical forest. Frontiers in Plant Science  13: 1033731. 10.3389/fpls.2022.1033731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. López-Pozo  M, Fernández-Marín  B, García-Plazaola  JI, Ballesteros  D. 2018. Desiccation tolerance in ferns: From the unicellular spore to the multi-tissular sporophyte. Pages 401–426 in Fernández  H, ed. Current Advances in Fern Research. Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-75103-0_19. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Lyson  TR  et al.  2019. Exceptional continental record of biotic recovery after the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction. Science  366: 977–983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Lyu  M, Xie  J, Giardina  CP, Vadeboncoeur  MA, Feng  X, Wang  M, Ukonmaanaho  L, Lin  T-C, Kuzyakov  Y, Yang  Y. 2019. Understory ferns alter soil carbon chemistry and increase carbon storage during reforestation with native pine on previously degraded sites. Soil Biology and Biochemistry  132: 80–92. [Google Scholar]
  63. Mahley  JN  et al.  2018. Geometry, allometry, and biomechanics of fern leaf petioles: Their significance for the evolution of functional and ecological diversity within the Pteridaceae. Frontiers in Plant Science  9: 197. 10.3389/fpls.2018.00197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Menge  BA, Menge  DNL. 2013. Dynamics of coastal meta-ecosystems: The intermittent upwelling hypothesis and a test in rocky intertidal regions. Ecological Monographs  83: 283–310. [Google Scholar]
  65. Nicholas  DJ, Johnson  KR. 2008. Plants and the KT Boundary. Cambridge University Press. [Google Scholar]
  66. Nitta  JH, Meyer  JY, Taputuarai  R, Davis  CC. 2017. Life cycle matters: DNA barcoding reveals contrasting community structure between fern sporophytes and gametophytes. Ecological Monographs  87: 278–296. www.jstor.org/stable/26358571. [Google Scholar]
  67. Nitta  JH, Watkins  JE Jr, Davis  CC. 2020. Life in the canopy: Community trait assessments reveal substantial functional diversity among fern epiphytes. New Phytologist  227: 1885–1899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Nitta  JH, Watkins  JE Jr, Holbrook  NM, Wang  TW, Davis  CC. 2021. Ecophysiological differentiation between life stages in filmy ferns (Hymenophyllaceae). Journal of Plant Research  134: 971–988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Oliver  MJ, Tuba  Z, Mishler  BD. 2000. The evolution of vegetative desiccation tolerance in land plants. Plant Ecology  151: 85–100. [Google Scholar]
  70. Olsen  PE, Fowell  SJ, Cornet  B. 1990. The Triassic/Jurassic boundary in continental rocks of eastern North America: A progress report. Page 585–593 in Sharpton  VL, Ward  PD. , eds. GSA Special Papers, vol. 247: Global Catastrophes in Earth History: An Interdisciplinary Conference on Impacts, Volcanism, and Mass Mortality.  Geological Society of America. [Google Scholar]
  71. Oreja  B, Goberna  M, Verdú  M, Navarro-Cano  JA. 2020. Constructed pine log piles facilitate plant establishment in mining drylands. Journal of Environmental Management  271: 111015. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Orth  CJ, Gilmore  JS, Knight  JD, Pillmore  CL, Tschudy  RH, Fassett  JE. 1981. An iridium abundance anomaly at the palynological Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary in northern New Mexico. Science  214: 1341–1343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Osman  N, Dorairaj  D, Halim  A, Zelan  A, N  I, Rashid  A, M  A, Zakaria  RM. 2021. Dynamics of plant ecology and soil conservation: Implications for cut-slope protection. Acta Oecologica  111: 103744. 10.1016/j.actao.2021.103744. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Périquet  S, Fritz  H, Revilla  E. 2015. The Lion King and the Hyaena Queen: Large carnivore interactions and coexistence: Large carnivores coexistence. Biological Reviews  90: 1197–1214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Perrie  L, Brownsey  P. 2007. Molecular evidence for long-distance dispersal in the New Zealand pteridophyte flora. Journal of Biogeography  34: 2028–2038. [Google Scholar]
  76. Piccardi  P, Vessman  B, Mitri  S. 2019. Toxicity drives facilitation between 4 bacterial species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences  116: 15979–15984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Pinson  JB, Chambers  SM, Nitta  JH, Kuo  LY, Sessa  EB. 2017. The separation of generations: Biology and biogeography of long-lived sporophyteless fern gametophytes. International Journal of Plant Sciences  178: 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  78. Pittermann  J, Limm  E, Rico  C, Christman  MA. 2011. Structure–function constraints of tracheid-based xylem: A comparison of conifers and ferns. New Phytologist  192: 449–461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Pittermann  J, Brodersen  C, Watkins, JJr  E. 2013. The physiological resilience of fern sporophytes and gametophytes: Advances in water relations offer new insights into an old lineage. Frontiers in Plant Science  4: 285. 10.3389/fpls.2013.00285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Pittermann  J, Baer  A, Campany  C, Jansen  S, Holmlund  H, Schuettpelz  E, Mehltreter  K, Watkins  JE. 2023. A reduced role for water transport during the Cenozoic evolution of epiphytic Eupolypod ferns. New Phytologist  237: 1745–1758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Prats  KA, Brodersen  CR. 2021. Desiccation and rehydration dynamics in the epiphytic resurrection fern Pleopeltis polypodioides. Plant Physiology  187: 1501–1518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Qian  H, Zhang  J, Jiang  M-C. 2022. Global patterns of fern species diversity: An evaluation of fern data in GBIF. Plant Diversity  44: 135–140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Raup  DM, Sepkoski  JJ  Jr. 1982. Mass extinctions in the marine fossil record. Science  215: 1501–1503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Riaño  K, Briones  O. 2013. Leaf physiological response to light environment of three tree fern species in a Mexican cloud forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology  29: 217–228. [Google Scholar]
  85. Rodland  DL, Bottjer  DJ. 2001. Biotic recovery from the end-Permian mass extinction: behavior of the inarticulate brachiopod Lingula as a disaster taxon. Palaios  16: 95–101. [Google Scholar]
  86. Rodriguez-Ramos  JC, Cale  JA, Cahill JF  Jr, Simard  SW, Karst  J, Erbilgin  N. 2021. Changes in soil fungal community composition depend on functional group and forest disturbance type. New Phytologist  229: 1105–1117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Saito  T, Yamanoi  T, Kaiho  K. 1986. End-Cretaceous devastation of terrestrial flora in the boreal Far East. Nature  323: 253–255. [Google Scholar]
  88. Sanchez-Castillo  L, Kosugi  K, Masaoka  N, Kubota  T. 2019. Eco-morphological characteristics of fern species for slope conservation. Journal of Mountain Science  16: 504–515. [Google Scholar]
  89. Schmitt  M, Mehltreter  K, Sundue  M, Testo  W, Watanabe  T, Jansen  S. 2017. The evolution of aluminum accumulation in ferns and lycophytes. American Journal of Botany  104: 573–583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Schneider  H, Schuettpelz  E, Pryer  KM, Cranfill  R, Magallón  S, Lupia  R. 2004. Ferns diversified in the shadow of angiosperms. Nature  428: 553–557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Schuettpelz  E, Pryer  KM. 2009. Evidence for a Cenozoic radiation of ferns in an angiosperm-dominated canopy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences  106: 11200–11205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Schulte  P  et al.  2010. The Chicxulub asteroid impact and mass extinction at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. Science  327: 1214–1218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Self-Trail  JM  et al.  2017. Shallow marine response to global climate change during the Paleocene–Eocene thermal maximum, Salisbury Embayment, USA. Paleoceanography  32: 710–728. [Google Scholar]
  94. Sessa  EB. 2019. Polyploidy as a mechanism for surviving global change. New Phytologist  221: 5–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Sharpe  JM, Mehltreter  K, Walker  LR. 2010. Ecological importance of ferns. Pages 1–21 in Mehltreter  K, Walker  LR, Sharpe  JM, eds. Fern Ecology. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511844898.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  96. Shen  H  et al.  2018. Large-scale phylogenomic analysis resolves a backbone phylogeny in ferns. GigaScience  7: gix116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Spicer  RA, Burnham  RJ, Grant  P, Glicken  H. 1985. Pityrogramma calomelanos, the primary, post-eruption colonizer of Volcán Chichonal, Chiapas, Mexico. American Fern Journal  75: 1–5. www.jstor.org/stable/1546571. [Google Scholar]
  98. Stachowicz  JJ. 2001. Mutualism, facilitation, and the structure of ecological communities. BioScience  51: 235–246. [Google Scholar]
  99. Testo  W, Sundue  M. 2016. A 4000-species dataset provides new insight into the evolution of ferns. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution  105: 200–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Thomas  BA, Cleal  CJ. 2022. Pteridophytes as primary colonisers after catastrophic events through geological time and in recent history. Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments  102: 59–71. [Google Scholar]
  101. Titus  JH, Moore  S, Arnot  M, Titus  PJ. 2023. Inventory of the vascular flora of the blast zone, Mount St. Helens, Washington. Madroño  45: 146–161. [Google Scholar]
  102. Trejo  MDRR, Pérez-García  B, Pérez-Salicrup  DR, Orozco-Segovia  A. 2010. Effect of fire on the germination of spores of Pteridium caudatum, an invasive fern. Journal of Tropical Ecology  26: 457–465. [Google Scholar]
  103. Tschudy  RH, Pillmore  CL, Orth  CJ, Gilmore  JS, Knight  JD. 1984. Disruption of the terrestrial plant ecosystem at the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary, western interior. Science  225: 1030–1032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Vajda  V, Bercovici  A. 2014. The global vegetation pattern across the Cretaceous–Paleogene mass extinction interval: A template for other extinction events. Global and Planetary Change  122: 29–49. [Google Scholar]
  105. Vajda  V, McLoughlin  S. 2007. Extinction and recovery patterns of the vegetation across the Cretaceous–Palaeogene boundary: A tool for unravelling the causes of the end-Permian mass-extinction. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology  144: 99–112. [Google Scholar]
  106. Vajda  V, Raine  JI, Hollis  CJ. 2001. Indication of global deforestation at the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary by New Zealand fern spike. Science  294: 1700–1702. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Valiente-Banuet  A, Rumebe  AV, Verdú  M, Callaway  RM. 2006. Modern Quaternary plant lineages promote diversity through facilitation of ancient Tertiary lineages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences  103: 16812–16817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Walker  LR. 1994. Effects of fern thickets on woodland development on landslides in Puerto Rico. Journal of Vegetation Science  5: 525–532. [Google Scholar]
  109. Walker  LR, Boneta  W. 1995. Plant and soil responses to fire on a fern-covered landslide in Puerto Rico. Journal of Tropical Ecology  11: 473–479. [Google Scholar]
  110. Walker  LR, Sharpe  JM. 2010. Ferns, disturbance and succession. Pages 177–219 in Mehltreter  K, Walker  LR, Sharpe  JM, eds. Fern Ecology. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511844898.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  111. Wan  S, Zhang  C, Chen  Y, Zhao  J, Wang  X, Wu  J, Zhou  L, Lin  Y, Liu  Z, Fu  S. 2014. The understory fern Dicranopteris dichotoma facilitates the overstory Eucalyptus trees in subtropical plantations. Ecosphere  5: 1. 10.1890/ES14-00017.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  112. Watkins  JE, Cardelús  CL. 2012. Ferns in an angiosperm world: Cretaceous radiation into the epiphytic niche and diversification on the forest floor. International Journal of Plant Sciences  173: 695–710. [Google Scholar]
  113. Jr JE  Watkins, Mack  MC  Jr, Sinclair  TR, Mulkey  SS. 2007. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of desiccation tolerance in tropical fern gametophytes. New Phytologist  176: 708–717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Jr  Watkins, Holbrook  NM, Zwieniecki  MA. 2010. Hydraulic properties of fern sporophytes: Consequences for ecological and evolutionary diversification. American Journal of Botany  97: 2007–2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Wilf  P, Carvalho  MR, Stiles  E. 2023. The end-Cretaceous plant extinction: Heterogeneity, ecosystem transformation, and insights for the future. Cambridge Prisms: Extinction  1: e14. [Google Scholar]
  116. Wing  SL, Currano  ED. 2013. Plant response to a global greenhouse event 56 million years ago. American Journal of Botany  100: 1234–1254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Wood  TE, Takebayashi  N, Baker  MS, Mayrose  I, Greenspoon  PB, Rieseberg  LH. 2009. The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences  106: 13875–13879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Woods  CL, Maleta  K, Ortmann  K. 2021. Plant–plant interactions change during succession on nurse logs in a northern temperate rainforest. Ecology and Evolution  11: 9631–9641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Yang  L, Huang  Y, Lima  LV, Sun  Z, Liu  M, Wang  J, Liu  N, Ren  H. 2021. Rethinking the ecosystem functions of Dicranopteris, a widespread genus of ferns. Frontiers in Plant Science  11: 581513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Yuan  S, Liu  N, Ren  H, Zhang  H, Wang  J. 2019. Do pioneer species enhance early performance of native species in subtropical shrublands? An examination involving six native species in South China. Community Ecology  20: 53–63. [Google Scholar]
  121. Zhao  J, Wan  S, Li  Z, Shao  Y, Xu  G, Liu  Z, Zhou  L, Fu  S. 2012. Dicranopteris-dominated understory as major driver of intensive forest ecosystem in humid subtropical and tropical region. Soil Biology and Biochemistry  49: 78–87. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bioscience are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES