Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan;39(1):70–74. [Article in Chinese] doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202409088

表 1.

Comparison of baseline data between the two groups

两组患儿基线资料比较

基线资料
Baseline data
研究组(n=28)
Study group (n=28)
对照组(n=30)
Control group (n=30)
统计量
Statistical value
P
P value
注:*2-1构型为外侧2根针、内侧1根针,其余构型包括1-1、1-2、2-2、3-1
Note: *The 2-1 configuration represented 2 needles outside and 1 needle inside, and the other configurations included 1-1, 1-2, 2-2, and 3-1
性别(男/女,例) 15/13 18/12 χ2=0.244 0.621
年龄(x±s,岁) 5.75±2.22 6.56±2.13 t=1.418 0.162
侧别(左/右,例) 19/9 19/11 χ2=0.131 0.717
致伤原因(跌倒伤/交通事故伤,例) 23/5 24/6 χ2=0.043 0.835
Gartland分型(Ⅱ/Ⅲ,例) 18/10 19/11 χ2=0.006 0.940
克氏针构型(2-1/其余构型*,例) 23/5 23/7 χ2=0.265 0.607
受伤至手术时间(x±s,h) 46.04±39.24 53.47±51.39 t=0.616 0.541