Skip to main content
. 2001 Dec 26;99(1):455–460. doi: 10.1073/pnas.012467899

Table 1.

ROI activation data for the Novel vs. Fixation (NvF) contrast across four scanning sessions

Region Extent of activation, % voxels activated, NvF
Magnitude of activation, % signal change, NvF
Placebo 1 Placebo 2 Lorazepam Scopolamine Placebo 1 Placebo 2 Lorazepam Scopolamine
Striate 66.0 (5.1) 64.3 (4.4) 60.3 (3.9) 62.2 (6.7) 0.29 (0.02) 0.29 (0.02) 0.31 (0.03) 0.30 (0.04)
Fusiform 33.3 (2.8) 33.9 (3.0) 20.9§ (2.9) 21.1§ (3.4) 0.20 (0.02) 0.22 (0.03) 0.13 (0.02) 0.12§ (0.03)
Hippocampal 15.3 (3.6) 10.7 (2.3) 6.1 (1.9) 6.0 (1.5) 0.08 (0.01) 0.06 (0.01) 0.03* (0.01) 0.03 (0.01)
Dorsolateral prefrontal 9.8 (2.7) 10.2 (2.9) 6.7 (1.8) 6.7 (2.3) 0.07 (0.02) 0.07 (0.02) 0.03* (0.02) 0.03* (0.02)
Inferior frontal 17.6 (5.3) 18.8 (6.3) 6.8 (2.9) 10.2* (3.9) 0.09 (0.02) 0.08 (0.02) 0.00§ (0.02) 0.03 (0.02)

Percent signal change is calculated for all voxels that activated in any of the four sessions. Numbers represent means with SEMs shown in parentheses. Significance values are based on a linear mixed-effects model, and are corrected for multiple comparisons:  

178

, P < 0.05;  

, P < 0.01;  

, P < 0.001;  

§

, P < 0.0001.