Table 2.
Summary of Strategies to Mitigate Bias for Decision Makers in Medical Admissions.
| |||
---|---|---|---|
DESCRIPTION | CURRENT APPROACH | RECOMMENDED APPROACH | |
| |||
CONTEXTUALIZING IDENTITY | Examining power relations and assumptions including individual and societal beliefs and values. | Prompts or triggers such as the IAT are offered to groups to think about how bias influences decisions. | Individuals are invited to critically reflect on their own identities, motivations to be involved in admissions decisions, assumptions about what an ‘ideal’ candidate would look like. |
| |||
FOSTERING COMMUNITY | Groups of individuals with shared visions, learning together to achieve common goals through regular dynamic interaction | Admissions decision makers are offered training without ongoing coaching, dialogue, or contextually relevant sharing with peers. | Admissions decision-makers regularly interact with, and belong to, a safe and contextually relevant training group where they participate in dialogue about their own biases. |
| |||
FACILITATING DIALOGUE | Providing spaces for continuous engagement of participants’ whole selves with the goal of enhanced understanding of themselves, each other, and the world | Training sessions include facilitated discussion; however, such discussions are not sustained. | Cultivate an open and supportive training environment where members are encouraged to engage in dialogue to question assumptions and explore new knowledge and perspectives. |
|