Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec;17(12):1363–1369. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3013

Table 2:

Intergroup comparison of space analysis on plaster models and digital models

t-test for equality of means
t df Sig. (two-tailed) Mean difference Std. error difference 95% confidence interval of the difference
Lower Upper
RA available space Plaster model −.286 66 .776 −.33422 1.16758 −2.66537 1.99693
Digital model −.286 65.998 .776 −.33422 1.16758 −2.66537 1.99694
RB available space Plaster model −.634 66 .528 −.65382 1.03106 −2.71240 1.40475
Digital model −.634 65.998 .528 −.65382 1.03106 −2.71240 1.40475
RA required space Plaster model −.073 66 .942 −.06735 .91829 −1.90079 1.76608
Digital model −.073 65.961 .942 −.06735 .91829 −1.90081 1.76610
RB required space Plaster model −.152 66 .880 −.12412 .81690 −1.75511 1.50687
Digital model −.152 65.967 .880 −.12412 .81690 −1.75513 1.50689