Abstract
Purpose
Encephalitozoon intestinalis is an obligate intracellular microsporidian fungus that causes severe gastrointestinal infections, particularly in immunocompromised individuals. Propolis (PROP), a resinous substance derived from bees, has antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties, while royal jelly (RJ) has immunomodulatory, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic potential of PROP and RJ against E. intestinalis.
Methods
The phenolic composition of PROP was analysed by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection, and the chemical components of RJ were evaluated according to ISO12824 standards. The cytotoxicity of PROP and RJ on HEK-293 cells was evaluated using the XTT assay. The three highest non-cytotoxic concentrations of each sample were tested for their effects on E. intestinalis spores by qRT-PCR. Trichrome-stained photomicrographs were used to assess spore density in HEK-293 cells treated with PROP and RJ.
Results
PROP analysis revealed flavonoids such as quercetin, kaempferol, pinocembrin and galangin, as well as phenolic acids such as caffeic and cinnamic acids, known for their bioactive properties. RJ contained mainly proteins, lipids, carbohydrates and sugars, reflecting its role as a nutritionally and biologically active substance. According to the results of this first study evaluating the effect of PROP and RJ on E. intestinalis, all concentrations evaluated in the study showed a significant inhibitory effect on the growth of E. intestinalis spores compared to the control group.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we believe that PROP and RJ should be considered as an alternative option in the development of antimicrosporidial drugs due to their potential medicinal and pharmaceutical properties.
Keywords: Encephalitozoon intestinalis, Propolis, Royal jelly, In vitro
Introduction
Microsporidia are obligate unicellular, intracellular spore-forming parasitic fungi grouped with Cryptomycota [1]. Microsporidia have a wide host range from protists to vertebrates [2]. Of the approximately 1500 species identified, 17 are pathogenic to humans. Enterocytozoon bieneusi and Encephalitozoon intestinalis are the 2 most commonly detected microsporidian [3]. Encephalitozoon species have the ability to disseminate widely within their hosts, potentially affecting almost all organ systems during infection. E. intestinalis infections primarily manifest as gastrointestinal disease, particularly chronic diarrhoea and malabsorption syndrome, but in immunocompromised individuals can progress to disseminated infections involving organs such as the liver, kidneys, lungs and eyes [4, 5]. These infections are predominantly observed in immunocompromised patients, including those with HIV and CD4 counts < 50/mm³, transplant recipients and those undergoing immunomodulatory therapy. However, Encephalitozoon infections have also been documented in immunocompetent individuals [6, 7]. Treatment of infections caused by microsporidian species is not easy because they are intracellular pathogens and show natural resistance due to their spore wall structure [8, 9]. Albendazole, which inhibits tubulin, and fumagillin, which inhibits methionine aminopeptidase type 2 (MetAP2), are the two main therapeutic agents used to treat microsporidiosis [10]. Due to the failure of existing drugs to treat microsporidiosis infections, new therapeutic agents have been developed.
Propolis (PROP) is a resinous substance produced by honeybees by mixing their salivary gland secretions with exudate accumulated from various parts of plants, especially branches, bark, flower buds, leaves and stems. It is a bee product that has been used in medicine since ancient times [11, 12]. Although its anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antimicrobial, antitumour and immunomodulatory activities have been studied, research on its antiparasitic properties is limited [13, 14]. Royal jelly (RJ) is produced by the hypopharyngeal and mandibular glands of worker bees and plays a critical role in the development of queen bees and larvae [15]. As a natural and highly nutritious product, RJ has great potential for use in medicine, cosmetics and as a health-promoting food. RJ exhibits numerous biological activities, including vasodilatory, hypotensive, antihypercholesterolemic, anti-diabetic, immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anti-aging, neuroprotective, antimicrobial, estrogenic, anti-allergic, anti-osteoporotic and anti-tumour effects [16–18].
The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro effects of PROP and RJ on Encephalitozoon intestinalis the most common fungus in humans, due to the lack of similar studies in the literature. These natural products are expected to contribute to the development of promising new therapeutic agents for the treatment of microsporidiosis.
Materials and methods
PROP and RJ Samples and Analysis
The PROP and RJ samples used in this study were obtained from Eğriçayır Organic Bee Products Limited Company. The phenolic content of PROP was analysed by high performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection (HPLC-DAD). The chemical composition of RJ was evaluated according to the standards of the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) 12,824.
For propolis extraction, raw propolis samples were frozen at -20 °C for 24 h, then crushed into small pieces and ground to a fine powder using a mill. The powdered propolis was mixed with 70% ethanol for extraction. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 48 h using a magnetic stirrer and then filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper (Whatman® No. 1, Buckinghamshire, UK). The filtrate was further filtered through a polyvinylidene difluoride syringe filter (Millipore Millex-HV, 0.45 μm) and transferred to 1.5 mL vials for injection into the HPLC-DAD system. Chromatographic separation was performed on an Inertsil® ODS-3 column (5 μm, 4.6 × 150 mm, Tokyo, Japan) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The mobile phases consisted of mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid in deionised water, v/v) and mobile phase B (acetonitrile). The analysis was performed at a column temperature of 30 °C, with an injection volume of 5 µL, a detection wavelength of 270 nm and a gradient system. Stock solutions of phenolic compounds were prepared at a concentration of 1 mg/mL in methanol. Standards of phenolic compounds were injected into the HPLC system to identify the main peaks, retention times and spectra.
For the preparation of RJ concentrations, 1000 mg of RJ was homogenised with 10 mL of colourless DMEM medium. The mixture was centrifuged at 6000 rpm for 40 min. The clear supernatant was collected and transferred to a new centrifuge tube. To the pellet, 10 mL of DMEM medium containing 1% dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) was added and the suspension was centrifuged again at 6000 rpm for 40 min. The second supernatant was collected, combined with the first supernatant and filtered through a 0.22 μm pore filter to give a sterile stock solution with a final concentration of 50 mg/mL. Serial dilutions were then prepared from this stock solution, ranging from 50 mg/mL to 0.09 mg/mL. The chemical composition of RJ was analysed by Intertek Testing Services in accordance with the chemical requirements of ISO 12,824 (Reference number ISO 12824:2016).
Cytotoxic Potential of PROP and RJ
Cytotoxicity tests were performed using HEK-293 cells (human renal epithelial cells, ATCC) [19]. Cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s minimum Eagle’s medium (DMEM) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution. Cultures were maintained in a humidified incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2. The cytotoxicity of PROP and RJ was evaluated in HEK-293 cells using the XTT assay. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 10⁴ cells/mL (100 µL per well) and incubated for 24 h to allow cell attachment. After attachment, 100 µL of final solutions prepared in serial dilutions at concentrations of 1000–1.9 µg/mL for PROP and 50-0.009 mg/mL for RJ were added to the cultures and incubated again for 24 h. Then 50 µL of XTT reagent was added to each well and after two hours the absorbance was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader. Control wells contained cells without samples and the basal control contained only culture medium and XTT reagent. Cytotoxicity was assessed in quadruplicate and cell viability (%) was calculated as [(OD450(sample)/OD450(negative control)) × 100].
Assessment of the Effect of PROP and RJ on E. Intestinalis
E. Intestinalis Strain and Preparation of Spores
The HEK-293 cell line was used to obtain E. intestinalis spores (ATCC 50506). Cells were seeded in 25 cm3 tissue culture plates and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 medium. Washings with PBS were performed to remove non-attached cells. E. intestinalis spores were added, at a ratio of 5 parasites/1 cell. and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 overnight for infection. The next day, the plates were washed with PBS to remove spores that had not entered the cells. Ten days after spore inoculation, free spores were observed in the medium (Fig. 1). Twice a week, free spores in the medium were collected, passed through a 5 μm porous filter to remove dead cells and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 min to separate the spores and stored at + 4◦C.
Fig. 1.
Unfiltered (A) and blue-filtered (B) views of free E. intestinalis spores (arrows) produced in the HEK-293 cell line (×40)
Evaluation of E. Intestinalis Load by Quantitative Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR Method)
Infection of Host Cells and Treatment with PROP and RJ
HEK-293 cells were cultured in 6-well plates at a density of 3 mL per well, with 1 × 105 cells per well. Medium containing 5 × 105 spores was added and incubated to initiate infection. After infection, DMEM medium supplemented with 2% FBS and the three highest non-cytotoxic concentrations of PROP (250, 125, 62.5 µg/mL) and RJ (25, 12.5, 6.25 mg/mL) was added. At this stage, in contrast to the medium used in the cytotoxic potential of PROP and RJ, 2% FBS was used to stress the cells, slow down their proliferation and infect them with spores. Cultures were maintained in an incubator at 37 °C with 5% CO2. Proliferation of HEK cells, the host cell of E. intestinalis spores, leads to depletion of essential nutrients in the medium and pH changes as a result of cellular metabolism. For these reasons, the medium was renewed on days 3 and 7 of the 10-day incubation period using the same concentrations of PROP and RJ. The experiment was terminated 10 days after infection. To assess E. intestinalis density, all media and trypsinised host cells were collected separately. These were then centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant was removed, and the resulting pellet was resuspended in medium and stored at -20 °C for subsequent DNA extraction.
DNA Extraction
Samples were stored at -20 °C and thawed at room temperature prior to DNA isolation. DNA isolation was performed using the PureLink Genomic DNA Mini Kit (Invitrogen, USA) according to the recommended protocol of the kit. Briefly, digestion buffer and 20 µL Proteinase K were added to each sample, followed by vortexing. Samples were incubated overnight at 55 °C. After incubation, the lysate was centrifuged at room temperature to remove particles and 20 µL of RNase A was added to the supernatant. After this treatment, the mixture was incubated again. After incubation, 200 µL of Lysis/Binding Buffer was added to the sample and vortexed. Then 200 µL of 96–100% ethanol was added and mixed. The resulting 640 µL lysate was transferred to a spin column and centrifuged. The collection tube was removed, the spin column was placed in a new collection tube and washed according to the kit protocol. The isolated DNA was stored at -20 °C until use.
qRt-PCR Method
Specific primers targeting the 16S small subunit rRNA sequence were used: F (5’ - CCTGACTGGACGGACAGAAG − 3’) and R (5’ - TTCGTCCTTCATCGTCACAT − 3’) [20]. Amplification was performed in a total reaction volume of 20 µl, containing 3 µl distilled water, 10 µl 2x SYBR-Green Master Mix (Roche Diagnostic, Germany), 1 µl of each primer (10 pmol) and 5 µl extracted DNA. The thermal cycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 10 s and 72 °C for 10 s. This was followed by a single cycle of 95 °C for 5 s, 65 °C for 1 min and a final step at 40 °C for 30 s. A dilution series of plasmids encoding the E. intestinalis 16 S SSU rRNA region served as a positive control, with a calculated copy number of 2.8 × 108 in the main stock. This stock was diluted tenfold to produce nine sequential dilutions. Sterile distilled water was used as a negative control. All experiments were performed in four replicates.
Visualisation of the Effects of PROP and RJ on E. Intestinalis Spores in HEK-293 Cells
To assess the effect of PROP and RJ on E. intestinalis spores, sterile coverslips were placed at the bottom of 6-well tissue culture plates, with three replicates per sample. The procedures described in the section “Assessment of the effect of PROP and RJ on E. intestinalis” were followed. After 10 days of incubation, the coverslips were gently removed, stained with trichrome and examined at ×100 magnification, with detailed photographic documentation.
Statistical Analysis
The data collected, revised and validated to assess the in vitro effects of PROP and RJ were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23. Statistical analysis was based on four replicates, with results expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Spore counts for PROP and RJ concentration were compared with the control groups using an independent two-sample t-test. One-way ANOVA was used to compare mean E. intestisnalis spore counts across PROP and RJ concentrations. Pairwise comparisons of PROP and RJ concentrations were made using Tukey’s post-hoc test.
Results
Analysis of PROP and RJ Samples
As a result of the analysis, flavonoids such as galangin, quercetin, kaempferol, epigallocatechin gallate from the flavonol group; pinocembrin and naringenin from the flavanone group; apigenin and chyricin from the flavone group; trans-chalcone from the chalcone group were detected in the PROP sample. Galangin was the flavonoid detected in the highest concentration (3843.63 µg/g). In addition, non-flavonoid compounds such as caffeic acid, p-coumaric acid, trans-ferulic acid, trans-isoferulic acid, dimethoxycinnamic acid, trans-cinnamic acid, caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) were detected. CAPE was the non-flavonoid detected at the highest concentration (5157.48 µg/g). In the analysis of PROP sample, 17 phenolic compounds were determined. The amounts, classification, biological and pharmacological activity of these compounds are listed in Table 1.
Table 1.
Classification, amount, Biological and pharmacological activity of phenolic component content of PROP
| Phenolic Compounds | Classification | Biological and Pharmacological Activity | Amount (µg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gallic acid |
Non-flavonoid Hydroxybenzoic acids |
Anti-inflammatory, Cardioprotective effect, Antineoplastic activity, Metabolic disease, urogenital disease, respiratory disease [21–26] | 189.17 |
| Epigallocatechin gallate |
Flavonoid Flavanol |
antioxidant, antibacterial, antifungal, anti-cardiovascular, and antiviral [27–29] | 11.04 |
| Caffeic acid |
Non-flavonoid Hydroxycinnamic acid |
anticarcinogenic activity, antiinflammatory, anti-oxidant activity, medications and cosmetic use [30–33] | 461.85 |
| P-Coumaric acid |
Non-flavonoid Hydroxycinnamic acid |
UV protective, hypopigmentation and antimelanogenic effect, immunomodulatory and antiinflammatory activity, antidiabetic and antihyperlipidemic activity [34–36] | 12.96 |
| Trans-Ferulic acid |
Non-flavonoid Hydroxycinnamic acid |
anti-inflammatory, anti-aging, antiangiogenic, anticancer, antimicrobial, and antioxidant [37] | 185.19 |
| Trans-Isoferulic acid |
Non-flavonoid Hydroxycinnamic acid |
26.43 | |
| Dimethoxycinnamic acid | Pheonolic component | antioksidan, anti-inflamatuar [38] | 149.73 |
| Quercetin |
Flavonoid Flavonol |
antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-cardiovascular, antibacterial [39–41] | 280.35 |
| Trans-Cinnamic acid | Pheonolic component | Antioxidant, antitumor, antimicrobial [42–44] | 84.84 |
| Naringenin |
Flavonoid Flavanones |
antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-cardiovascular, antiviral [45–47] | 752.01 |
| Apigenin |
Flavonoid Flavone |
antiviral, |
270.51 |
| Kaempferol |
Flavonoid Flavonol |
antioxidant, antimicrobial, anticancer, neuroprotective, hepatoprotective activity [52] | 177.90 |
| Chrysin |
Flavonoid Flavone |
antitumor, anti-inflammatory, antiviral and antioxidant [53] | 1203.75 |
| Pinocembrin |
Flavonoid Flavanone |
antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticancer [54] | 2811.00 |
| Galangin |
Flavonoid Flavonol |
antifungal, anti-inflammatory, antiviral, antibacterial, and antidiabetic [55] | 3843.63 |
| Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) | Pheonolic component | anti-tumor, anti-oxidation, anti-inflammatory, immune regulation [56] | 5157.48 |
| Trans-Chalcon |
Flavonoid chalcones |
anti-inflammatory and anticancer | 2640.54 |
Proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, lipid content and sugars were generally found in the structure of the analysed RJ sample (Table 2). The analyses revealed the presence of a substance called 10-hydroxy-α-2-deconoic acid (10-HAD), which has antibiotic activity against many bacteria and fungi [57].The amount of 10-HAD, which is one of the most important quality factors for RJ, was determined to be 2.39%.
Table 2.
Chemical composition of RJ
| Content | Amount-Unit |
|---|---|
| Moist content | 63.3% |
| 10-Hydroxy-2-Decanoic acid (10-HDA) | 2.39% |
| Protein | 14.6% |
| Total sugar | 11.7% |
| Fructose | 5.2% |
| Glucose | 4.8% |
| Sucrose | 1.7% |
| Total acidity (mL 1 N NaOH/100 g) | 36.5% |
| Total lipids | 3.3% |
Cytotoxic Potential of PROP and RJ
According to the cytotoxicity results, 250, 125, 62.5 µg/mL concentrations of PROP did not show toxic effect on HEK-293 cells (p > 0.05); however, the difference in viability rate of 1000, 500 µg/mL concentrations was statistically significant (p < 0.05) compared to the control, these concentrations were considered as cytotoxic (Fig. 2.A.). RJ concentrations of 25, 12.5, 6.25 mg/mL showed no toxic effect on HEK-293 cells (p > 0.05) (Fig. 2.B).
Fig. 2.
PROP (1000, 500, 250, 125, 62.5, 31.25, 15.6, 7.8, 3.9, 1.9 µg/mL) (A) and RJ (50, 25, 12.5, 6.25, 3.12, 1.5, 0.78, 0.39, 0.19, 0.09 mg/mL) (B) in vitro cytotoxicity. *p < 0.05 vs. control
Evaluation of the E. Intestinalis Spore Load of PROP and RJ
All concentrations of PROP evaluated showed a significant inhibitory effect on the growth of E. intestinalis spores compared to the control group (p < 0.05). The three highest non-cytotoxic concentrations of PROP evaluated in vitro, 250, 125 and 62.5 µg/mL, showed 99.62%, 94.27% and 68.4% inhibition, respectively (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3.
(A) qRT-PCR results of the in vitro effect of PROP concentrations (250 µg/mL, 125 µg/mL and 62.5 µg/mL) on E. intestinalis spores after 10 days of incubation.*p < 0.05 vs. control. (B-D) Trichrome staining images showing E. intestinalis spore density at PROP concentrations of 250 µg/mL (B), 125 µg/mL (C) and 62.5 µg/mL (D) after 10 days of incubation. Arrows indicate free and intracellular spores and highlight differences in spore density between the concentrations applied
Similar to the PROP results, all concentrations of RJ had an inhibitory effect on the growth of E. intestinalis spores in comparison to the control group (p < 0.05). The three highest non-cytotoxic concentrations of RJ, 25, 12.5, 6.25 mg/mL, showed 99.35%, 95.5%, 80.16% antimicrosporidial effect, respectively (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.
(A) qRT-PCR analysis demonstrating the in vitro effects of RJ at concentrations of 25 mg/mL, 12.5 mg/mL and 6.25 mg/mL on E. intestinalis spores after 10 days of incubation (*p < 0.05 vs. control). (B-D) Trichrome-stained images showing the spore density of E. intestinalis at PROP concentrations of 25 mg/mL (B), 12.5 mg/mL (C) and 6.25 mg/mL (D) after 10 days of incubation. Arrows indicate free and intracellular spores, highlighting the variation in spore density at different concentrations
The results indicate that both PROP and RJ have a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on the growth of E. intestinalis spores, as confirmed by independent two-sample t-tests (p < 0.05). The detailed percentage viability rates, mean ± SD values and p values for the qRt-PCR data are shown in Fig. 5, highlighting the comparative effects of PROP and RJ concentrations on E. intestinalis spore viability versus control.
Fig. 5.
Percentage viability rates, means and p-values of qRt-PCR data on the effects of PROP (A) and RJ (B) concentrations used in the study on E. intestinalis spores versus control
Discussion
Microsporidiosis is a common infection in AIDS and immunocompromised individuals worldwide, and its prevalence and severity have increased significantly in recent years [58]. The most common manifestation is gastrointestinal infection, but it can infect almost any organ system [59]. Various medical regimens have been used to treat microsporidiosis, but treatment results range from disappointing to promising [10]. Our study provides the first evaluation of PROP and RJ on E. intestinalis spores in the literature.
PROP is a bee product that has been used in medicine since ancient times. Studies have shown that PROP has two distinct effects in terms of its antimicrobial and antiparasitic properties, namely its effect on the pathogen and its effect on the host [60]. With regard to pathogens, PROP acts by inhibiting the ability of pathogens to invade host cells (by forming a physical barrier and inhibiting enzymes and proteins required for invasion of host cells) [60, 61]. PROP also inhibits the replication process of pathogens by inhibiting the enzymes required to replicate the genetic material of pathogens [62, 63]. For the host, PROP acts as an immunomodulator [64–66]. It regulates innate immunity and modulates inflammatory pathways [60, 67]. PROP also helps to maintain the host’s cellular antioxidant status throughout infection [68].
The curative properties of PROP and RJ are directly related to their chemical constituents. However, the chemical constituents of bee products are complex and regional variations in their antiparasitic activity may differ according to their botanical source and geographical origin [69–71]. Therefore, the chemical constituents of PROP and RJ used in this study were characterised and evaluated.
Although HEK-293 cells are widely used in biotechnology and cell biology [72]; the selection of this cell line was affected by several factors. First of all, HEK293 cells are a well-characterized, easily cultured cell line. In addition, E. intestinalis causes widespread infection in immunocompromised patients and can cause renal involvement in these patients [73]. In the study conducted by Çetinkaya and colleagues on cells that can be host cells for E. intestinalis species under in vitro conditions, they found that the reproductive potential of E. intestinalis in HEK-293 cells was quite high and the number of spores increased significantly [74]. Therefore, in the study, HEK-293 cell line was used as a host cell to evaluate the therapeutic potential of PROP and RJ on E. intestinalis and cytotoxicity tests were performed on these cells.
According to the results of HPLC-DAD analysis of PROP, the most dominant phenolic compounds were found to be caffeic acid, phenethyl ester, galangin, pinocembrin, trans-chalcone, chrysin, naringenin. Smaller amounts of gallic acid, epigallocatechin gallate, p-coumaric acid, trans-ferulic acid, trans-isoferulic acid, dimethoxycinnamic acid, quercetin, transcinnamic acid, apigenin, kaempferol. The constituents found are similar to those reported in the literature [75–77].
Apigenin, quercetin and caffeic acid exhibit antiparasitic effects through different mechanisms of action. Studies found that apigenin induced inhibition of cell proliferation and upregulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) expression in L. amazonensis and altered the mitochondrial membrane potential of the parasite by causing swelling in parasite mitochondria [78]. In the L. amazonensis study, quercetin treatment significantly increased ROS production and induced mitochondrial function and membrane potential disturbances [79]. Caffeic acid caused morphological changes in parasitic cells, integrity of the cellular plasma membrane and mitochondria, and promoted apoptosis. Microsporidia are obligate intracellular pathogens. It takes about 1 week to multiply in the infected cell. During this period, the infected cell swells and reaches about twice its size. Under normal conditions, microsporidia species complete the life cycle by preventing the cell from entering apoptosis while growing cells go to apoptosis [80]. We think that the caffeic acid in PROP encourages the cells to apoptosis and the spore density decreases because E. intestinalis cannot complete its life cycle. However, studies have shown that caffeic acid enhanced the inflammatory response of infected macrophages by promoting the expression of ROS and TNF-α, as well as decreasing the expression of IL-10 and the presence of iron, which significantly increased the antiparasitic activity of macrophages [81]. Özdal et al. [82] reported that the caffeic acid content in PROP samples collected from different parts of Türkiye ranged from 0.04 to 0.61 mg/g. In our study, caffeic acid was found between these values in the analytical results of PROP. According to our HPLC-DAD analysis results, CAPE (5157.48 µg/g) was the phenolic component detected in the highest amount in the ethanolic extract of propolis and it was reported that this component exhibited potential antifungal, antibiofilm, anti-tumor, anti-oxidation, anti-inflammatory, immune regulation properties [56, 83]. According to the results of the analysis, galangin (3843.63 µg/g), which was detected in the highest amount among the flavonols, shows many pharmacological properties including antifungal anti-inflammatory, antiviral, antibacterial, and antidiabetic activities [55]. The biological and pharmacological activities of phenolic compounds may be attributed to the antimicrosporidial activity of PROP. In the literature, some studies evaluating the effect of PROP on microsporidiosis in bees infected with Microsporidia have been reported. Ethanol extracts of PROP significantly reduced Nosema ceranae infection rate and bee mortality [84].A dichloromethane extract of PROP from northern New York was reported to greatly reduce N. ceranae spore loads in a dose-dependent manner [85]. In a similar study, ethanol extract of PROP from honey bee Apis mellifera in Italy was reported to reduce spore load, increase food consumption and survival of worker bees infected with N. ceranae [86].
There is a wide range of extraction methods used to obtain PROP extracts. They range from the traditional separation technique using an organic solvent such as ethanol to more complex methods such as supercritical fluid extraction. Extraction methods can affect the amount of active ingredient in the extract. Therefore, it can alter the biological activity of extracts [87, 88]. The reason why ethanol is mostly preferred in PROP extraction in industry is that it dissolves more bioactives [89]. For this reason, ethanol was used as a solvent in the preparation of PROP concentrations in our study due to the high biological activity of ethanolic PROP extracts.
In our study, a significant inhibitory effect of PROP was observed on E. intestinalis spores in vitro, the first study in the literature to do so. Further research is required to elucidate the precise mechanisms of action and to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of these compounds in preclinical and clinical settings. However, the goal of PROP-related studies should be a better understanding of the mechanism of action, including toxicity, and standardisation of their key active components.
RJ, a natural product, has long been used in traditional medicines, health foods and cosmetics in different parts of the world and is recognised as a very valuable product for human health [16, 90, 91]. RJ is produced by the hypopharyngeal and mandibular glands of worker honeybees and plays a critical role in the development of queen bees and larvae [92]. There are many studies showing that royal jelly has many physiological and pharmacological properties, including antioxidant, immunomodulatory, antimicrobial, anticancer, wound healing, anti-aging, antimutagenic, antidiabetic, estrogenic, antiallergic, antiosteoporotic and anti-tumour effects [17, 18, 90].
Studies have shown that the main components of RJ are water (50–60%), proteins (18%), carbohydrates (7–18%) and lipids (3–8%) [90]. A similar chemical content was found in the RJ sample analysed in our study. In the analysis, the compound called 10-HAD, which is one of the most important quality components for RJ, is a substance that shows antibiotic activity against many bacteria and fungi [90]. The amount of 10-HAD, which is one of the most important quality factors for RJ and should be present at a minimum of 1.40% and above by mass [93], was found to be 2.39%.
One study investigated the insecticidal, antimalarial, antileishmanial and cytotoxic effects of RJ and three major fatty acids (trans-10-hydroxy-2-decenoic acid (10-H2DA), 10-hydroxydecanoic acid (10-HDAA), sebacic acid (1,10-decandioic acid)). As a result, RJ, 10-H2DA, 10-HDAA and sebacic acid showed antileishmanial activity. In the study, different concentrations of RJ, 10-H2DA, 10-HDAA and sebacic acid significantly increased nitric oxide production, plasma membrane permeability and caspase-3-like activity levels as a dose-dependent response [94]. In another study, the potential therapeutic effects of combinations containing PROP, RJ, ostrich oil and A. vera were evaluated in BALB/c mice in a model experimentally induced by L. major, and the proposed natural combinations were found to be significantly more effective than the standard drug Glucantime® in reducing ulcer size [95]. In our study, we think that 10-HAD may be effective in the strong antimicrosporial effect of RJ. However, further research is required to confirm the effectiveness of this compound and to elucidate its mechanism of action.
Conclusions
In conclusion, our study, as the first evaluation in the literature, showed potent antimicrosporidial effects of PROP and RJ against E. intestinalis in an in vitro model. Due to their potential medicinal and pharmaceutical properties, these natural bee products should be considered as an option in the drug pool for the development of antimicrosporidial drugs. Further research is required to elucidate the precise mechanisms of action and to evaluate the microsporidial activity of bee products in preclinical and clinical settings.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by the Scientific Research Project Fund of Sivas Cumhuriyet University under the project number T-2021-925.
Author Contributions
Derya Gül Gülpinar: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Validation Zubeyda Akin Polat: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing– original draft.Ülfet Çetinkaya: Conceptualization, Formal analysis; Investigation, Methodology, Validation.
Funding
Open access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK).
Data Availability
• The study is the first to evaluate the effect of PROP and RJ on E. intestinalis.• All concentrations evaluated in the study showed a significant inhibitory effect on the growth of E. intestinalis spores compared to the control group.• PROP and RJ are promising products for the development of alternative treatments against microsporidial infections.
Declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Wei J, Fei Z, Pan G, Weiss LM, Zhou Z (2022) Current therapy and therapeutic targets for microsporidiosis. Front Microbiol 13:835390. 10.3389/fmicb.2022.835390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.James TY, Pelin A, Bonen L, Ahrendt S, Sain D, Corradi N, Stajich JE (2013) Shared signatures of parasitism and phylogenomics unite Cryptomycota and microsporidia. Curr Biol 23:(16):1548–1553. 10.1016/j.cub.2013.06.057 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lobo ML, Xiao L, Antunes F, Matos O (2012) Microsporidia as emerging pathogens and the implication for public health: a 10-year study on HIV-positive and-negative patients. Int J Parasitol 42:(2):197–205. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Weber R, Deplazes P, Schwartz D (2000) Diagnosis and clinical aspects of human microsporidiosis. Cryptosporidiosis Microsporidiosis 6:166–192. 10.1159/000060360 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Weiss LM, Becnel JJ, Microsporidia Springer 2014
- 6.George B, Coates T, McDonald S, Russ G, Cherian S, Nolan J, Brealey J (2012) Disseminated microsporidiosis with Encephalitozoon species in a renal transplant recipient. Nephrol 17:5–8. 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2012.01580.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Meissner EG, Bennett JE, Qvarnstrom Y, da Silva A, Chu EY, Tsokos M, Gea-Banacloche J (2012) Disseminated microsporidiosis in an immunosuppressed patient. Emerg Infect Dis 18(7):1155. 10.3201/eid1807.120047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Costa SF, Weiss LM (2000) Drug treatment of microsporidiosis. Drug Resist Updat 3(6):384–399. 10.1054/drup.2000.0174 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 9.Didier PJ, Phillips JN, Kuebler DJ, Nasr M, Brindley PJ, Stovall ME, Bowers LC, Didier E (2006) Antimicrosporidial activities of fumagillin, TNP-470, ovalicin, and ovalicin derivatives in vitro and in vivo. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50(6):2146–2155. 10.1128/aac.00020-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 10.Han B, Weiss LM (2018) Therapeutic targets for the treatment of microsporidiosis in humans. Expert Opin Ther Targets 22:(11)903– 15. 10.1080/14728222.2018.1538360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 11.Hossain R, Quispe C, Khan RA, Saikat ASM, Ray P, Ongalbek D, Yeskaliyeva B, Jain D, Smeriglio A, Trombetta D (2022) Propolis: an update on its chemistry and pharmacological applications. Chin Med J 17(1):100. 10.1186/s13020-022-00651-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nainu F, Masyita A, Bahar MA, Raihan M, Prova SR, Mitra S, Emran TB, Simal-Gandara J (2021) Pharmaceutical prospects of bee products: special focus on anticancer, antibacterial, antiviral, and antiparasitic properties. Antibiotics 10:7822. 10.3390/antibiotics10070822 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bhatti N, Hajam YA, Mushtaq S, Kaur L, Kumar R, Rai S (2024) A review on dynamic pharmacological potency and multifaceted biological activities of propolis. Discov Sustain 5:(1):1–55. 10.1007/s43621-024-00375-3 [Google Scholar]
- 14.de Paula L, Cândido LA, Santos AC, Caffrey MF, Bastos CR, Ambrósio JK, Magalhães SR LG (2021) Antiparasitic properties of propolis extracts and their compounds. Chem Biodivers 18:9e2100310. 10.1002/cbdv.202100310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Alhosin M (2023) Epigenetics mechanisms of honeybees: secrets of Royal Jelly. Epigenet Insights 16:25168657231213717. 10.1177/25168657231213717 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Botezan S, Baci G-M, Bagameri L, Pașca C, Dezmirean DS (2023) Current status of the bioactive properties of royal jelly: a comprehensive review with a focus on its anticancer, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant effects. Molecules 28(3):1510. 10.3390/molecules28031510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kumar R, Thakur A, Kumar S, Hajam YA (2024) Royal jelly a promising therapeutic intervention and functional food supplement: A systematic review. Heliyon 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 18.Oršolić N, Jazvinšćak Jembrek M (2024) Royal Jelly: Biological Action and Health benefits. Int J Mol Sci 25:(11)6023. 10.3390/ijms25116023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 19.Nazemi M, Golshan M, Khaledi M, Shushizadeh M, Zare M, Moradipoodeh B, Jenabidehkordi K (2024) Cytotoxic activity and molecular Docking studies of the Fraction Containing Ergosta-14, 22-dien-3-ol (3β, 5α, and 22E) from Dysidea avara Sponges. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod 19:3. 10.5812/jjnpp-147745 [Google Scholar]
- 20.Çetinkaya Ü, Kuk S, SİVCAN E, Kaynar L, Arslan D, ŞAHİN İ (2016) The high prevalence of Encephalitozoon Intestinalis in patients receiving chemotherapy and children with growth retardation and the validity of real-time PCR in its diagnosis. Turk J Med Sci 46:(4):1050–1058. 10.3906/sag-1504-69 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Choi K-C, Lee Y-H, Jung MG, Kwon SH, Kim M-J, Jun WJ, Lee J, Lee JM, Yoon H-G (2009) Gallic acid suppresses lipopolysaccharide-induced nuclear factor-κB signaling by preventing RelA acetylation in A549 lung cancer cells. Mol Cancer Res 7:(12)2011-21. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-09-0239 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 22.Kanbak G, Canbek M, Oğlakçı A, Kartkaya K, Şentürk H, Bayramoğlu G, Bal C, Göl B, Özmen A (2012) Preventive role of gallic acid on alcohol dependent and cysteine protease-mediated pancreas injury. Mol Biol Rep 39:10249–10255. 10.1007/s11033-012-1901-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nair GG, Nair CKK (2013) Radioprotective effects of gallic acid in mice. Biomed Res Int 2013(1):953079. 10.1155/2013/953079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 24.Nikbakht J, Hemmati AA, Arzi A, Mansouri MT, Rezaie A, Ghafourian M (2015) Protective effect of gallic acid against bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in rats. Pharmacol Rep 67:(6):1061–1067. 10.1016/j.pharep.2015.03.012 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 25.Prince PSM, Priscilla H, Devika PT (2009) Gallic acid prevents lysosomal damage in isoproterenol induced cardiotoxicity in Wistar rats. Eur J Pharmacol 615:(1–3)139– 43. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2009.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 26.Yousuf MJ, Vellaichamy E (2015) Protective activity of gallic acid against glyoxal-induced renal fibrosis in experimental rats. Toxicol Rep 2:1246–1254. 10.1016/j.toxrep.2015.07.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 27.Efenberger-Szmechtyk M, Nowak A, Czyzowska A (2021) Plant extracts rich in polyphenols: antibacterial agents and natural preservatives for meat and meat products. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 61:(1)149– 78. 10.1080/10408398.2020.1722060 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 28.Tang S-M, Deng X-T, Zhou J, Li Q-P, Ge X-X, Miao L (2020) Pharmacological basis and new insights of quercetin action in respect to its anti-cancer effects. Biomed Pharmacother 121:109604. 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109604 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Torello CO, Alvarez MC, Olalla Saad ST (2021) Polyphenolic flavonoid compound quercetin effects in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. Molecules 26:(19)5781. 10.3390/molecules26195781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Da Cunha FM, Duma D, Assreuy J, Buzzi FC, Niero R, Campos MM, Calixto JB (2004) Caffeic acid derivatives: in vitro and in vivo anti-inflammatory properties. Free Radic Res 38(11):1241–1253. 10.1080/10715760400016139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Damasceno SS, Dantas BB, Ribeiro-Filho J, Antônio M, Araújo D, Galberto M, da Costa J (2017) Chemical properties of caffeic and ferulic acids in biological system: implications in cancer therapy. A review. Curr Pharm Des 23(20):3015–3023. 10.2174/1381612822666161208145508 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Magnani C, Isaac VLB, Correa MA, Salgado HRN (2014) Caffeic acid: a review of its potential use in medications and cosmetics. Anal Methods 6:(10)3203-10. 10.1039/C3AY41807C
- 33.Sidoryk K, Jaromin A, Filipczak N, Cmoch P, Cybulski M (2018) Synthesis and antioxidant activity of caffeic acid derivatives. Molecules 23:(9)2199 10.3390/molecules23092199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 34.Amalan V, Vijayakumar N, Indumathi D, Ramakrishnan A (2016) Antidiabetic and antihyperlipidemic activity of p-coumaric acid in diabetic rats, role of pancreatic GLUT 2: in vivo approach. Biomed Pharmacother 84:230–236. 10.1016/j.biopha.2016.09.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Boo YC (2019) p-Coumaric acid as an active ingredient in cosmetics: a review focusing on its antimelanogenic effects. Antioxidants 8:(8)275. 10.3390/antiox8080275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 36.Pragasam SJ, Venkatesan V, Rasool M (2013) Immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory effect of p-coumaric acid, a common dietary polyphenol on experimental inflammation in rats. Inflammation 36:169–176. 10.1007/s10753-012-9532-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rani U, Kumar M, Grewal S, Kaushik S, Thakur R (2024) Novel synthesis of trans-ferulic acid loaded tragacanth-chitosan nanoformulations and evaluation of their biological activities. Eur J Med Chem Rep 11:100165. 10.1016/j.ejmcr.2024.100165 [Google Scholar]
- 38.Theodosis-Nobelos P, Papagiouvannis G, Rekka EA (2023) Ferulic, sinapic, 3, 4-dimethoxycinnamic acid and indomethacin derivatives with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and hypolipidemic functionality. Antioxidants 12:(7)1436. 10.3390/antiox12071436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 39.Kiani AK, Dhuli K, Anpilogov K, Bressan S, Dautaj A, Dundar M, Beccari T, Ergoren MC, Bertelli M (2020) Natural compounds as inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 endocytosis: a promising approach against COVID-19. Acta Biomed 91(Suppl 13):e2020008. 10.23750/abm.v91i13-S.10520 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lesjak M, Beara I, Simin N, Pintać D, Majkić T, Bekvalac K, Orčić D, Mimica-Dukić N (2018) Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of quercetin and its derivatives. J Funct Foods 40:68–75. 10.1016/j.jff.2017.10.047 [Google Scholar]
- 41.Terao J (2017) Factors modulating bioavailability of quercetin-related flavonoids and the consequences of their vascular function. Biochem Pharmacol 139:15–23. 10.1016/j.bcp.2017.03.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Bezerra D, Castro F, Alves A, Pessoa C, Moraes M, Silveira E, Lima M, Elmiro F, Costa-Lotufo L (2006) In vivo growth-inhibition of Sarcoma 180 by piplartine and piperine, two alkaloid amides from Piper. Braz J Med Biol Res 39:801–807. 10.1590/S0100-879X2006000600014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Chung HS, Shin JC (2007) Characterization of antioxidant alkaloids and phenolic acids from anthocyanin-pigmented rice (Oryza sativa cv. Heugjinjubyeo). Food Chem 104:(4)1670-77. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.03.020
- 44.Naz S, Ahmad S, Rasool SA, Sayeed SA, Siddiqi R (2006) Antibacterial activity directed isolation of compounds from Onosma Hispidum. Microbiol Res 161:(1):43–48. 10.1016/j.micres.2005.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Salehi B, Quispe C, Chamkhi I, El Omari N, Balahbib A, Sharifi-Rad J, Bouyahya A, Akram M, Iqbal M, Docea AO (2021) Pharmacological properties of chalcones: a review of preclinical including molecular mechanisms and clinical evidence. Front Pharmacol 11:592654. 10.3389/fphar.2020.592654 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Testai L, Piragine E, Piano I, Flori L, Da Pozzo E, Miragliotta V, Pirone A, Citi V, Di Cesare Mannelli L, Brogi S (2020) The Citrus Flavonoid Naringenin protects the myocardium from ageing-dependent dysfunction: potential role of SIRT1. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2020(14650207). 10.1155/2020/4650207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47.Zhang L, Xu X, Jiang T, Wu K, Ding C, Liu Z, Zhang X, Yu T, Song C (2018) Citrus aurantium naringenin prevents osteosarcoma progression and recurrence in the patients who underwent osteosarcoma surgery by improving antioxidant capability. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2018:(1)8713263. 10.1155/2018/8713263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 48.Fidelis QC, Faraone I, Russo D, Aragão Catunda-Jr FE, Vignola L, de Carvalho MG, de Tommasi N, Milella L (2019) Chemical and Biological insights of Ouratea hexasperma (A. St.-Hil.) Baill.: a source of bioactive compounds with multifunctional properties. Nat Prod Res 33:(10):1500–1503. 10.1080/14786419.2017.1419227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lim R, Barker G, Wall CA, Lappas M (2013) Dietary phytophenols curcumin, naringenin and apigenin reduce infection-induced inflammatory and contractile pathways in human placenta, foetal membranes and myometrium. Mol Hum Reprod 19:(7)451– 62. 10.1093/molehr/gat015. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 50.Michaelis M, Sithisarn P, Cinatl J Jr (2014) Effects of flavonoid-induced oxidative stress on anti-H5N1 influenza a virus activity exerted by baicalein and biochanin A. BMC Res Notes 7:1–6. 10.1186/1756-0500-7-384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 51.Villa-Rodriguez JA, Kerimi A, Abranko L, Tumova S, Ford L, Blackburn RS, Rayner C, Williamson G (2018) Acute metabolic actions of the major polyphenols in chamomile: an in vitro mechanistic study on their potential to attenuate postprandial hyperglycaemia. Sci Rep 8:15471 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bangar SP, Chaudhary V, Sharma N, Bansal V, Ozogul F, Lorenzo JM (2023) Kaempferol: a flavonoid with wider biological activities and its applications. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 63:(28)9580– 604. 10.1080/10408398.2022.2067121 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 53.Mohammed HA, Sulaiman GM, Albukhaty S, Al-Saffar AZ, Elshibani FA, Ragab EA (2023) Chrysin, the Flavonoid molecule of antioxidant interest. ChemistrySelect 8:48e202303306. 10.1002/slct.202303306 [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rasul A, Millimouno FM, Ali Eltayb W, Ali M, Li J, Li X (2013) Pinocembrin: a novel natural compound with versatile pharmacological and biological activities. Biomed Res Int 2013:(1)379850. 10.1155/2013/379850 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 55.Bacanlı M, Başaran AA, Başaran N (2018) Galangin as a plant phenolic and usage in health and disease. Polyphenols: prevention and treatment of human disease, 2rd edn. Elsevier pp, pp 433–438. 10.1016/B978-0-12-813008-7.00034-5
- 56.Zhang P, Tang Y, Li N-G, Zhu Y, Duan J-A (2014) Bioactivity and chemical synthesis of caffeic acid phenethyl ester and its derivatives. Molecules 19(10):16458–16476. 10.3390/molecules191016458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Strant M, Yücel B, Topal E, Puscasu AM, Margaoan R, Varadi A (2019) Use of royal jelly as functional food on human and animal health. Hayvansal Üretim 60(2):131–144. 10.29185/hayuretim.513449 [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zhou L, Guan Z, Chen C, Zhu Q, Qiu S, Liu Y, Li M, Zeng W, Wang H, Gao Y (2023) The successful treatment of Enterocytozoon Bieneusi Microsporidiosis with Nitazoxanide in a patient with B-ALL: a Case Report. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:1072463. 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1072463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Han B, Pan G, Weiss LM (2021) Microsporidiosis in humans. Clin Microbiol Rev 34(4). e00010-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 60.Zulhendri F, Chandrasekaran K, Kowacz M, Ravalia M, Kripal K, Fearnley J, Perera CO (2021) Antiviral, antibacterial, antifungal, and antiparasitic properties of propolis: a review. Foods 10(6):1360. 10.3390/foods10061360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Yang J, Pi A, Yan L, Li J, Nan S, Zhang J, Hao Y (2022) Research progress on therapeutic effect and mechanism of propolis on wound healing. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2022:(1)5798941. 10.1155/2022/5798941 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Dilokthornsakul W, Kosiyaporn R, Wuttipongwaragon R, Dilokthornsakul P (2022) Potential effects of propolis and honey in COVID-19 prevention and treatment: a systematic review of in silico and clinical studies. J Integr Med 20:(2):114–125. 10.1016/j.joim.2022.01.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Yildirim A, Duran GG, Duran N, Jenedi K, Bolgul BS, Miraloglu M, Muz M (2016) Antiviral activity of hatay propolis against replication of herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2. Medical science monitor. Med Sci Monit 22:422. 10.12659/msm.897282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Al-Hariri M (2019) Immune’s-boosting agent: Immunomodulation potentials of propolis. J Family Community Med 26:(1):57–60. 10.12659/msm.897282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Magnavacca A, Sangiovanni E, Racagni G, Dell’Agli M (2022) The antiviral and immunomodulatory activities of propolis: an update and future perspectives for respiratory diseases. Med Res Rev 42:(2):897–945. 10.1002/med.21866 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Wolska K, Górska A, Antosik K, Ługowska K (2019) Immunomodulatory effects of Propolis and its components on Basic Immune Cell functions. J Pharm Sci 81:(4). 10.36468/pharmaceutical-sciences.548
- 67.Ferrucci V, Miceli M, Pagliuca C, Bianco O, Castaldo L, Izzo L, Cozzolino M, Zannella C, Oglio F, Polcaro A (2024) Modulation of innate immunity related genes resulting in prophylactic antimicrobial and antiviral properties. J Transl Med 22(1):574. 10.1186/s12967-024-05378-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Sartori G, Pesarico AP, Pinton S, Dobrachinski F, Roman SS, Pauletto F, Rodrigues LC, Prigol M (2012) Protective effect of brown Brazilian propolis against acute vaginal lesions caused by herpes simplex virus type 2 in mice: involvement of antioxidant and anti-inflammatory mechanisms. Cell Biochem Funct 30:(1):1–10. 10.1002/cbf.1810 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Alotaibi A, Ebiloma GU, Williams R, Alenezi S, Donachie A-M, Guillaume S, Igoli JO, Fearnley J, De Koning HP, Watson DG (2019) European propolis is highly active against trypanosomatids including Crithidia fasciculata. Sci rep 9(1):11364. 10.1038/s41598-019-47840-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Omar R, Igoli JO, Zhang T, Gray AI, Ebiloma GU, Clements CJ, Fearnley J, Edrada Ebel R, Paget T, De Koning HP (2017) The chemical characterization of Nigerian propolis samples and their activity against Trypanosoma Brucei. Scie Rep 7(1):923. 10.1038/s41598-017-01038-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Siheri W, Zhang T, Ebiloma GU, Biddau M, Woods N, Hussain MY, Clements CJ, Fearnley J, Ebel RE, Paget T (2016) Chemical and antimicrobial profiling of propolis from different regions within Libya. PLoS ONE 11:5e0155355. 10.1371/journal.pone.0155355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Lin Y-C, Boone M, Meuris L, Lemmens I, Van Roy N, Soete A, Reumers J, Moisse M, Plaisance S, Drmanac R (2014) Genome dynamics of the human embryonic kidney 293 lineage in response to cell biology manipulations. Nat Commun 5:(1):4767. 10.1038/ncomms5767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Sy-Go JPT, Wegehaupt AK, Sethi S, Lieske JC, D’Costa MR (2022) Microsporidium infection–Associated Acute kidney Injury in a patient with HIV. Kidney Med 4:(1)100390. 10.1016/j.xkme.2021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 74.Çetinkaya Ü, Charyyeva A, Gürbüz E (2018) Evaluation of the reproductive potential of Encephalitozoon Intestinalis in four different cell line. Mikrobiyoloji Bulteni 52(4):390–400. 10.5578/mb.67383 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Kasiotis KM, Anastasiadou P, Papadopoulos A, Machera K (2017) Revisiting Greek propolis: chromatographic analysis and antioxidant activity study. PLoS ONE 12:(1)e0170077. 10.1371/journal.pone.0170077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 76.Kasote DM, Pawar MV, Bhatia RS, Nandre VS, Gundu SS, Jagtap SD, Kulkarni MV (2017) HPLC, NMR based chemical profiling and biological characterisation of Indian propolis. Fitoterapia 122:52–60. 10.1016/j.fitote.2017.08.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Shi H, Yang H, Zhang X, Yu L (2012) Identification and quantification of phytochemical composition and anti-inflammatory and radical scavenging properties of methanolic extracts of Chinese propolis. J Agric Food Chem 60(50):12403–12410. 10.1021/jf3042775 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Fonseca-Silva F, Canto-Cavalheiro MM, Menna-Barreto RF, Almeida-Amaral EE (2015) Effect of Apigenin on Leishmania amazonensis is associated with reactive oxygen species production followed by mitochondrial dysfunction. J Nat Prod 78:(4)880– 84. 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.5b00011 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 79.Sen G, Mukhopadhyay S, Ray M, Biswas T (2008) Quercetin interferes with iron metabolism in Leishmania donovani and targets ribonucleotide reductase to exert leishmanicidal activity. J Antimicrob Chemother 61:(5):1066–1075. 10.1093/jac/dkn053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Del Aguila C, Izquierdo F, Granja A, Hurtado C, Fenoy S, Fresno M, Revilla Y (2006) Encephalitozoon Microsporidia modulates p53-mediated apoptosis in infected cells. Int J Parasitol 36:(8)869– 76. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2006.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed]
- 81.da Silva Bortoleti BT, Tomiotto-Pellissier F, Gonçalves MD, Miranda-Sapla MM, Assolini JP, Carloto AC, Lima DM, Silveira GF, Almeida RS, Costa IN (2019) Caffeic acid has antipromastigote activity by apoptosis-like process; and anti-amastigote by TNF-α/ROS/NO production and decreased of iron availability. Phytomedicine 57:262–270. 10.1016/j.phymed.2018.12.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Ozdal T, Ceylan FD, Eroglu N, Kaplan M, Olgun EO, Capanoglu E (2019) Investigation of antioxidant capacity, bioaccessibility and LC-MS/MS phenolic profile of Turkish propolis. Food Res Int 122:528–536. 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.05.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Alfarrayeh I, Pollák E, Czéh Á, Vida A, Das S, Papp G (2021) Antifungal and anti-biofilm effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester on different Candida species. Antibiotics 10:(11)1359. 10.3390/antibiotics10111359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 84.Bankova V, Popov S, Marekov N (1983) A study on flavonoids of propolis. J Nat Prod 46:(4)471– 74. 10.1021/np50028a007
- 85.Burnham AJ, De Jong E, Jones JA, Lehman HK (2020) North American propolis extracts from Upstate New York decrease Nosema ceranae (Microsporidia) spore levels in honey bees (Apis mellifera). Front Microbiol 11:1719. 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01719 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Mura A, Pusceddu M, Theodorou P, Angioni A, Floris I, Paxton RJ, Satta A (2020) Propolis consumption reduces Nosema ceranae infection of European honey bees (Apis mellifera). Insects 11(2):124. 10.3390/insects11020124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Barua N, Aziz MAI, Tareq AM, Sayeed MA, Alam N, ul Alam N, Uddin MA, Lyzu C, Emran TB (2020) In vivo and in vitro evaluation of pharmacological activities of Adenia trilobata (Roxb). Biochem Biophys Rep 23:100772. 10.1016/j.bbrep.2020.100772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Devequi-Nunes D, Machado BAS, Barreto GA, Rebouças Silva J, da Silva DF, da Rocha JLC, Brandão HN, Borges VM, Umsza-Guez MA (2018) Chemical characterization and biological activity of six different extracts of propolis through conventional methods and supercritical extraction. PLoS ONE 13:12e0207676. 10.1371/journal.pone.0207676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Bakkaloğlu Z, Arıcı M (2019) Farklı çözücülerle propolis ekstraksiyonunun toplam fenolik içeriği, antioksidan kapasite ve antimikrobiyal aktivite üzerine etkileri. Akademik Gıda 17(4):538–545. 10.24323/akademik-gida.667272 [Google Scholar]
- 90.Ahmad S, Campos MG, Fratini F, Altaye SZ, Li J (2020) New insights into the biological and pharmaceutical properties of royal jelly. Int J Mol Sci 21:(2):382. 10.1155/2017/1259510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Pasupuleti VR, Sammugam L, Ramesh N, Gan SH (2017) Honey, propolis, and royal jelly: a comprehensive review of their biological actions and health benefits. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2017:(1)1259510. 10.1155/2017/1259510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 92.Shen L, Zhang W, Jin F, Zhang L, Chen Z, Liu L, Parnell LD, Lai C-Q, Li D (2010) Expression of recombinant AccMRJP1 protein from royal jelly of Chinese honeybee in Pichia pastoris and its proliferation activity in an insect cell line. J Agric Food Chem 58:(16):9190–9197. 10.1021/jf1007133 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Ma C, Ahmat B, Li J (2022) Effect of queen cell numbers on royal jelly production and quality. Curr Res Food Sci 5:1818–1825. 10.1016/j.crfs.2022.10.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Alkhaibari AM, Alanazi AD (2022) Insecticidal, antimalarial, and antileishmanial effects of royal jelly and its three main fatty acids, trans-10‐hydroxy‐2‐decenoic acid, 10‐hydroxydecanoic acid, and sebacic acid. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2022:(1)7425322. 10.1155/2022/7425322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Mahmoudi M, Saberi S, Manouchehri P, Mohebali M, Parsaeian M, Hesari Z, Seratnahaei M, Behrouzfar H, Zahraei-Ramazani A (2022) Therapeutic effects of propolis, royal jelly, ostrich oil, and Aloe vera on cutaneous leishmaniasis lesions in a laboratory model. Microbiol Metab Biotechnol 5(1):1–11. 10.22104/armmt.2023.5903.1079 [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
• The study is the first to evaluate the effect of PROP and RJ on E. intestinalis.• All concentrations evaluated in the study showed a significant inhibitory effect on the growth of E. intestinalis spores compared to the control group.• PROP and RJ are promising products for the development of alternative treatments against microsporidial infections.





