Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 8;14:100631. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2024.100631

Table 4.

Comparison of 4D flow parameters between Fontan patients with inter-ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony versus without inter-ventricular dyssynchrony.

4D flow parameters Fontan with inter-ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony (n = 15)* Fontan without inter-ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony (n = 9) P
Blood flow components
Direct flow, % 34 (29, 39) 29 (25, 37) 0.272
Retained inflow, % 18 (17, 21) 12 (8, 25) 0.814
Delayed ejection flow, % 17 (12, 23) 17 (14, 23) 0.859
Residual volume, % 27 (24, 32) 33 (27, 40) 0.162
KE indexed to EDV
Average KEiEDV, µJ/ml 7.0 (5.0,9.7) 6.3 (4.4, 8.1) 0.682
Peak systolic KEiEDV, µJ/ml 11.3 (9.9, 15.1) 13.4 (10.4, 19.4) 0.347
Systolic KEiEDV, µJ/ml 6.7 (5.2, 7.5) 7.1 (4.7, 9.7) 0.861
Diastolic KEiEDV, µJ/ml 7.8 (4.6, 9.3) 5.3 (4.0, 6.8) 0.181
Peak E-wave KEiEDV, µJ/ml 14.0 (9.2, 16.7) 11.2 (9.0, 12.1) 0.131
Peak A-wave KEiEDV, µJ/ml 9.8 (4.6, 13.9) 7.3 (5.7, 10.7) 0.432
KEiEDV E/A ratio 1.44 (1.01, 2.66) 1.38 (1.11, 2.06) 0.788

Data were reported as median (25th percentile, 75th percentile). KEiEDV = kinetic energy normalized to end-diastolic volume (EDV). Inter-ventricular dyssynchrony assessed by difference in time to maximal displacement between RV free wall and LV lateral wall (i.e. ≥33 ms by 95th percentile from controls). *One case was excluded due to poor image quality.