Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 24;104(4):e41356. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041356

Table 1.

Main characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis.

Included studies studies design Treatment group Control group Sample size Age, years Sex (male/female) Line
1 Adhoute 2022 Retrospective multicenter study Regorafenib Cabozantinib 58:28 68:68 53/5:24/4 Second-line therapy
2 Bang 2021 Retrospective study Regorafenib physician’s choice 99:99 / / Second-line therapy
3 Bruix 2017 RCT Regorafenib Placebo 379:194 64:62 333/46:171/23 Second-line therapy
4 Finn 2018 RCT Regorafenib Placebo 379:194 64:62 333/46:171/23 Second-line therapy
5 Casadei-gardini 2021 Retrospective Study Regorafenib Cabozantinb 278:331 / 222/46:264/67 Second-line therapy
6 Choi 2020 Retrospective study Regorafenib Nivolumab 223:150 58.5 ± 9.4:56.9 ± 10 202/21:125/25 Second-line therapy
7 Iavarone 2021 Retrospective Study Regorafenib Best supportive care (BSC) 36:45 60:61 27/9:38/7 Second-line therapy
8 Kuo 2021 Retrospective study Regorafenib Nivolumab 58:32 63.4 ± 10.7:62.2 ± 10.1 44/14:23/9 Second-line therapy
9 Lee 2020 Retrospective cohort study Regorafenib Nivolumab 102:48:00 62:61 83/54:39/9 Second-line therapy
10 Lee 2024 Retrospective cohort study Regorafenib Nivolumab 137:52:00 63:59:00 120/17:45/7 Second-line therapy