Skip to main content
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology logoLink to International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
. 2025 Jan 27;75(1):006648. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006648

Desulfosporosinus paludis sp. nov., an acidotolerant sulphate-reducing bacterium isolated from moderately acidic fen soil

Stefan Dyksma 1,*, Meina Neumann-Schaal 2,3, Mathias Müsken 4, Michael Pester 1,3,5
PMCID: PMC11771766  PMID: 39869511

Abstract

An obligately anaerobic, spore-forming sulphate-reducing bacterium, strain SB140T, was isolated from a long-term continuous enrichment culture that was inoculated with peat soil from an acidic fen. Cells were immotile, slightly curved rods that stained Gram-negative. The optimum temperature for growth was 28 °C. Strain SB140T grew at pH 4.0–7.5 with an optimum pH of 6.0–7.0 using various electron donors and electron acceptors. Yeast extract, sugars, alcohols and organic acids were used as electron donors for sulphate reduction. SB140T additionally used elemental sulphur and nitrate as electron acceptors but not sulphite, thiosulphate or iron(III) provided as ferrihydrite and fumarate. The 16S rRNA gene sequence placed strain SB140T in the genus Desulfosporosinus of the phylum Bacillota. The predominant cellular fatty acids were iso-C15 : 0 (52.6%) and 5,7 C15 : 2 (19.9%). The draft genome of SB140T (5.42 Mbp in size) shared 77.4% average nucleotide identity with the closest cultured relatives Desulfosporosinus acididurans M1T and Desulfosporosinus acidiphilus SJ4T. On the basis of phenotypic, phylogenetic and genomic characteristics, SB140T was identified as a novel species within the genus Desulfosporosinus, for which we propose the name Desulfosporosinus paludis sp. nov. The type strain is SB140T (=DSM 117342T=JCM 39521T).

Keywords: acidophile, fens, freshwater wetlands, sulphate reduction, sulphur cycle

Introduction

Sulphate reduction is a globally important process that drives organic matter mineralization in anoxic environments [1]. The metabolic potential for sulphate reduction has been encountered in representatives across 19 bacterial and 2 archaeal phyla [2]. Most sulphate-reducing bacteria (SRB) are dependent on low-molecular-weight fermentation products that are derived from the breakdown of organic polymers [1]. Nevertheless, many SRB have the metabolic flexibility to utilize alternative electron acceptors, disproportionate sulphur compounds, ferment and interact in syntrophic associations [1,3]. SRB can provide important ecosystem services in low-sulphate environments such as freshwater wetlands by their potential to attenuate methane emissions due to direct competition with methanogenic Archaea [4]. Members of the genus Desulfosporosinus are widespread in freshwater wetlands worldwide [5] and have been identified as potential keystone species in peat soil from an acidic fen where they substantially contributed to overall sulphate reduction and carbon mineralization activity [6]. Three representatives of the genus Desulfosporosinus were so far isolated from acidic environments and validly described: Desulfosporosinus acidiphilus isolated from acidic mine drainage [7], Desulfosporosinus acididurans isolated from acidic river sediments [8] and Desulfosporosinus metallidurans from a microbial mat of an acidic puddle at a gold mining site [9]. In the present study, we characterize a novel acidotolerant Desulfosporosinus bacterium, isolated from a moderately acidic (pH 4–5) fen.

Enrichment and isolation

Strain SB140T was isolated from a continuously operated bioreactor [10] that was inoculated with peat soil from an acidic fen located in the Fichtel Mountains, Bavaria, Germany (50°08′38″N, 11°51′41″E). Enrichment and isolation were carried out exclusively in a liquid medium. The initial enrichment was set up with the medium used for bioreactor operation, which was composed of KH2PO4 0.1 g l−1, (NH4)2SO4 0.066 g l−1, MgSO4×7 H2O 0.123 g l−1, CaCl2×2 H2O 0.02 g l−1, glucose monohydrate 0.1 g l−1, pectin 0.5 g l−1, trace element solution according to medium DSM141 [11] (Leibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures) 1 ml l−1, 20× vitamin solution according to DSM141 0.5 ml l−1 and MES hydrate 1.95 g l−1 [10] using the bioreactor content as inoculum (1%). To specifically enrich spore-forming bacteria, a fraction (1 ml) from the initial sulphate-reducing enrichment culture was pasteurized (80 °C, 20 min) and subsequently transferred to anoxic medium DSM1250 supplemented with KH2PO4 (0.1 g l−1) and fructose (5 mM) without reducing agents. Phosphate buffer in the medium was replaced by MES hydrate (1.95 g l−1), and the pH was adjusted to 5.5. Strain SB140T was isolated using dilution-to-extinction cultivation at 20 °C.

Phylogeny and genomic analysis

DNA was extracted using the AllPrep PowerViral DNA/RNA kit (Qiagen, Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The Ligation Sequencing Kit SQK-LSK114 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) was used for library preparation. Sequencing was performed on a MinION with a Flongle flow cell (FLO-FLG114, Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK), assembled with Flye (version 2.9.2) and annotated with MetaERG [12] and RAST [13]. Similar to other Desulfosporosinus species [9,14], strain SB140T had multiple rRNA operons. Nine gene copies each that encode the 5S, 16S and 23S rRNA genes were identified in its genome. Sequence similarities of its 16S rRNA genes were 99.4–100.0%. The sequence with the highest number of identical copies found in the genome (n=4) was used as a representative for the reconstruction of the 16S rRNA gene phylogeny (Fig. 1). The 16S rRNA gene and genome sequence of strain SB140T were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers PP188640 and CP144211, respectively. Sequences were aligned with MAFFT (E-INS-i) [15], and tree calculation was performed with IQ-TREE 2 (version 2.2.0.3) using ultrafast bootstraps (n=1000) after automatic substitution model selection (TPM3+I+I+R4) [16]. Phylogenetic reconstruction placed strain SB140T within the genus Desulfosporosinus with D. acididurans (96.7% 16S rRNA gene identity) and D. acidiphilus (96.0% identity) as close relatives (Fig. 1). To confirm the phylogenetic placement of strain SB140T, a phylogenomic tree was constructed based on 120 single-copy marker genes extracted and aligned with GTDBtk [17]. Tree calculation was performed with IQ-TREE 2 using ultrafast bootstraps (n=1000) after automatic substitution model selection (Q.plant+F+R4). Strain SB140T formed a monophyletic cluster with D. acididurans and D. acidiphilus, as well as with some metagenome-assembled genomes that have been recovered from acidic environments (Fig. 2). Digital DNA–DNA hybridization values were highest between SB140T and D. acidiphilus (23.2%, formula d4) as revealed by using the TYGS platform [18]. The highest genome-wide average nucleotide identity (ANI) [19] was shared with Candidatus (Ca.) Desulfosporosinus nitroreducens (84.5%), an N2O-reducing Desulfosporosinus sp. described in an acidic co-culture [20]. ANI values to Desulfosporosinus strains previously described from the same fen, such as the isolate Desulfosporosinus sp. Sb-LF [21] or the metagenome-assembled genome of Ca. Desulfosporosinus infrequens SbF1A [22], were only 75.0 and 74.6%, respectively. The ANI values between SB140T and the two validly described acidophilic representatives D. acididurans and D. acidiphilus were 77.4% and the strain shared 73.2% ANI with the type species Desulfosporosinus orientis. In addition, average amino acid identity values (Fig. S1, available in the online Supplementary Material) were all above the threshold for genus delineation within the family Desulfitobacteria (65.3%) [23], which confirmed that strain SB140T belongs to the genus Desulfosporosinus.

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of strain SB140T and related species of the genus Desulfosporosinus. Desulfitobacterium metallireducens DSM 15288T (AF297871) was used as an outgroup. Black dots denote bootstrap support ≥90%. The scale bar represents 5% sequence divergence.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 2. Phylogenomic reconstruction of the genus Desulfosporosinus based on the concatenated alignment of 120 single-copy bacterial marker proteins. Desulfitobacterium metallireducens DSM 15288T (GCF 000231405) was used as an outgroup. Black dots denote bootstrap support ≥90%. The scale bar represents 10% sequence divergence.

Fig. 2.

The draft genome size of strain SB140T was 5 424 553 bp on a single contig with a G+C content of 42.26 mol%, which is comparable to other Desulfosporosinus species [14]. A total of 66 tRNAs and 5132 protein-coding genes were predicted with MetaERG. All genes of the Wood–Ljungdahl pathway (WLP) were identified in the genome of SB140T, similar to other genome-sequenced Desulfosporosinus species [14,22, 24,26]. This pathway exerts multiple functions in anaerobic bacteria, such as providing an electron sink for redox balancing in acetogens growing on various substrates [27], allowing syntrophic and SRB to utilize acetate as a carbon and energy source [28,29] or being an important carbon fixation pathway [30]. An NiFe group 1 a hydrogenase for hydrogen oxidation was also encoded in the genome, indicating that the WLP may be used for autotrophic growth. The genome further contained all genes necessary for the utilization of, e.g. formate, butyrate, pyruvate and lactate, as well as all genes of the complete canonical sulphate reduction pathway (sat; aprAB-qmoAB; dsrABCDMKJOP). The genomic potential for nitrous oxide reduction (nosZ gene) in strain SB140T was shared by Ca. D. nitroreducens and few other validly described Desulfosporosinus species (D. nitroreducens, D. youngiae and D. meridiei), suggesting a potentially important function as scavengers of the greenhouse gas N2O in anoxic environments.

Phenotypic characterization and physiology

Morphology and motility were observed using phase-contrast microscopy and scanning electron microscopy as described recently [31]. Cells appeared as slightly curved rods, 2.9–5.8 µm long and 0.7–1.4 µm wide (Fig. 3). Subterminal endospores were occasionally observed. Gram-stain was performed according to a standard protocol [32]. Cells stained Gram-negative, similar to other representatives of the genus Desulfosporosinus [7,9]. Subpolar flagella were observed (Fig. 3), although the cells were not motile.

Fig. 3. Phase-contrast (a) and scanning electron microscopy image (b) of strain SB140T cultivated for 6 days at 28 °C with fumarate and sulphate. The scale bars represent 10 and 1 µm, respectively.

Fig. 3.

Growth experiments to test for temperature, pH and NaCl optimum were performed in triplicates in 25 ml culture tubes with the modified medium DSM1250 used for isolation, supplemented with glucose (5 mM) as substrate. In all growth experiments, growth was determined by following OD (measured at 600 nm) over time. Growth was tested in the range 4–37 °C. The optimum temperature (28 °C) was used to test growth at different pH (3.0–8.5) and NaCl concentrations (0–3% w:v). Strain SB140T grew between 0 and 1% NaCl and between pH 4.0 and 7.5 (Table 1). The optimum pH for growth (pH 6–7) revealed that strain SB140T was acidotolerant [33], unlike its closest acidophilic relatives, D. acididurans and D. acidiphilus. No growth was observed at pH 3.0 and pH 8.5. The following electron donors were tested in duplicate cultures with sulphate as an electron acceptor: H2, lactate, pyruvate, malate, citrate, fumarate, succinate, benzoate, formate, acetate, propionate, butyrate, glucose, fructose, xylose, methanol, ethanol, propanol, glycerol and yeast extract. In addition to OD600 measurements, sulphide production was determined using the methylene blue method [34]. Strain SB140T grew on a wide range of organic substrates (Table 1) with sulphate as an electron acceptor. Propionate did not support the growth of the strain, consistent with the lack of methylmalonyl-CoA pathway genes for propionate oxidation in its genome. Moreover, no growth was observed with formate, acetate, malate, citrate and benzoate. Autotrophic growth with H2/CO2 without acetate was possible. In the medium to test for alternative electron acceptors and fermentation, the amount of MgSO4×7 H2O was reduced to 0.01 g l−1 and (NH4)2SO4 was replaced by 0.1 g l−1 NH4Cl. Strain SB140T fermented lactate, pyruvate, fumarate, fructose and yeast extract. Weak fermentative growth was also observed with glucose, methanol and glycerol. Ethanol was not fermented but served as an electron donor for sulphate reduction. Ethanol was therefore used as a substrate to test growth with the following alternative electron acceptors: elemental sulphur, thiosulphate, sulphite, nitrate, fumarate and Fe(III) (provided as ferrihydrite). Strain SB140T did not use sulphite, thiosulphate and Fe(III) as electron acceptors. The products of fermentation and sulphate respiration were analysed using ion chromatography as follows. Anions were separated in a SykroGel AX300 column (Sykam, Germany) using 5 mM NaCO3 as an eluent. Organic acids were separated in a SykroGel EX450 column (Sykam, Germany) using 7% acetonitrile and 0.7 mM perfluorobutanoic acid as eluent. Both anions and organic acids were quantified using a conductivity detector. Substrates were incompletely oxidized to acetate and acetate was also a major fermentation product. Microaerobic growth with 1% O2 in the headspace was not possible.

Table 1. Comparison of the major characteristics that differentiate strain SB140T (1) from its closest phylogenetic relatives D. acididurans M1T (2), D. acidiphilus SJ4T (3) and D. metallidurans OLT (4) and D. orientis Singapore IT, representing the type species of the genus.

Data were obtained from Sánchez-Andrea et al. [8] for strain M1T, from Alazard et al. [7] for strain SJ4T unless otherwise indicated and from Panova et al. [9] for strain OLT. Data for strain Singapore IT were obtained from Klemps et al. [39], Stackebrandt et al. [40], Robertson et al. [41] and Ramamoorthy et al. [42].

Characteristics 1 2∗ 3† 4‡
Type strain SB140T M1T SJ4T OLT Singapore IT
Isolation source Acidic fen Acidic river sediment Acid mine drainage sediment Acidic puddle at gold mine tailings Soil
Cell size (µm) 2.9–5.8×0.7–1.4 3–5×0.7 4–7×0.8–1.0 2–3×0.50–0.53 3–5×0.7–1,0¶
Endospore position Subterminal Subterminal Subterminal Subterminal Subterminal to terminal
Motility Variable +
Temperature range, optimum (°C) 20–28, 28 15–40, 30 25–40, 30 4–37, 28 30–42, 30–37
pH range, optimum 4.0–7.5, 6–7 3.8–7, 5.5 3.6–5.6, 5.2 4–7, 5.5 5.6–7.4, 6.4–7.0
NaCl range, optimum (%) 0–1, 0.1 0–1.5, 0.6 0–0.6 0–6, 0–0.1 0–<5∗∗
Major respiratory quinones MK-7 MK-7 nd nd MK-7¶
Electron donors with sulphate
H2/CO2 + + + + +
Lactate + + (+) + +
Pyruvate + + +∗ + +¶,∗∗, ††
Malate + + −∗∗
Citrate −∗
Succinate + −∗, ††
Fumarate + + +∗∗, ††
Benzoate nd −∗,∗∗, ††
Formate + + +
Acetate (+) ∗,∗∗, ††
Propionate + −∗∗, ††
Butyrate + + +††
Glucose + + (+) + -††
Fructose + + + + -¶,∗∗
Xylose + + nd −∗
Methanol + (+) nd +∗∗, ††
Ethanol + + + +∗∗, ††
1-Propanol + + +
2-Propanol + nd nd nd nd
Glycerol + + + + −††, +∗
Yeast extract + + -, +∗ nd +††
Electron acceptors with glycerol∗,†,§, lactate† or ethanol‡‡
Sulphate + + + + +
Elemental sulphur + + -, +∗ +∗∗, ††
Thiosulphate + +∗ + +∗,,∗∗, ††
Sulphite + +∗∗,††
Fumarate + −, +
Fe(III) + +∗,∗∗, ††
Nitrate + + (+)∗ + −∗∗
Fermentation in the absence of sulphate
Lactate + + +
Pyruvate + + + −, (+)∗
Fumarate + + (+)∗ nd +∗
Formate nd +∗
Glucose (+) nd + −, +∗
Fructose + nd nd nd
Methanol (+) nd
Ethanol nd −∗, +¶
Glycerol (+) -∗ nd +∗
Yeast extract + + -∗ nd nd

nd, not determined; +, growth; (+), weak growth; −, no growth.

*Data from Sánchez-Andrea et al., 2015.

†Data from Alazard et al., 2010 unless otherwise indicated.

‡Data from Panova et al., 2021.

§Data from Klemps et al., 1985.

¶Data from Stackebrandt et al., 1997.

∗∗Data from Robertson et al., 2001.

††Data from Ramamoorthy et al., 2006.

‡‡This study.

Chemotaxonomy

For chemotaxonomic comparison, strain SB140T and D. acididurans M1T were grown in the modified, MES-buffered medium DSM1250 with glycerol as a substrate. Respiratory quinones were purified from wet biomass obtained from cultures in the late exponential growth phase and analysed by HPLC as described earlier [35]. Similar to D. acididurans [8], the major menaquinone of strain SB140T was MK-7 (>99%) with a minor presence of MK-8. Cellular fatty acids were extracted, methylated and analysed as fatty acid methyl esters using a combined approach of gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID) for quantification and gas chromatography with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) for identification, followed by specific derivatization methods for the determination of double bond positions [35,36]. The dominant fatty acids that constitute more than 5% of the total fatty acids of strain SB140T were C15 : 0 (5.5%), iso-C15 : 0 (52.6%) and 5,7 C15 : 2 (19.9%) (Table 2). For the 5,7 C15 : 2 fatty acid, the data indicate that one of the double bonds is not in cis isomerism as expected in conjugated dienoic fatty acids, but this could not be further resolved due to the lack of authentic standards of the isomers. A detailed cellular fatty acid profile is provided as Supplementary material.

Table 2. Cellular fatty acid composition of strain SB140T and its closest phylogenetic relatives D. acididurans M1T and D. acidiphilus SJ4T in comparison to the acidophilic D. metallidurans OLT and D. orientis Singapore IT, representing the type species of the genus.

Numbers depicted in the table are percentages of total fatty acids. Major cellular fatty acids that constitute more than 5% of the total fatty acids in at least one strain are shown. Major cellular fatty acids (>5%) of individual strains are indicated in bold. Please note that different methodological approaches were used to determine cellular fatty acids. The strains SB140T, M1T, SJ4T and Singapore IT were grown with glycerol and sulphate. Strain OLT was grown with lactate and sulphate. A detailed fatty acid profile of strain SB140T and the closest relative strain M1T, as determined in this study, is provided in Table S1.

Fatty acid SB140T M1T SJ4T OLT Singapore IT
C14 : 0 2.3 3.6 15.7 7.5 2.6
C15 : 0 5.5 nd nd nd
iso-C15 : 0 52.6 31.1 28.1
5,7 C15 : 2 19.9 2.8 nd 1.7
C16 : 1 cis9 1.2 2.1 3.6 39.0 5.9
C16 : 0 0.6 10.7 18.7 12.1 43.8
C16 : 0 DMA 0.2 9.4 10.8 8.1 6.3
C17 : 0 cyc 12.1 4.2 1.4 0.3
iso-C17 : 1 cis9 5.9 nd nd nd nd
C18 : 1 cis11 DMA 1.6 nd 17.1
C18 : 1 cis11 0.7 2.5 12.5

–, not detected; nd, not determined or not reported.

Strain M1T and Singapore IT, data from Sánchez-Andrea et al., 2015.

Strain SJ4T, data from Alazard et al., 2010.

Strain OLT, data from Panova et al., 2021.

Conclusion

The phylogenetic, physiological and chemotaxonomic results showed that the new isolate SB140T represents a new species within the genus Desulfosporosinus. Representatives of the genus Desulfosporosinus form a monophyletic clade within the family Desulfitobacteriaceae and are distinct from representatives of the related genus Desulfitobacterium by their ability to perform sulphate reduction. Desulfosporosinus spp. are further characterized by their ability to grow chemoautrotrophically on CO2 and H2, their incomplete oxidation of organic substrates to acetate and CO2 and by representing strictly anaerobic, rod-shaped, mesophilic, endospore-forming bacteria. All Desulfosporosinus spp. possess MK-7 as the main respiratory quinone [8,9, 37, 38]. Strain SB140T fulfils all these criteria to be placed into the genus Desulfosporosinus. Strain SB140T differs from all other described Desulfosporosinus spp. by its inability to utilize thiosulphate. Furthermore, it differs from its closest phylogenetic relatives D. acididurans M1T and D. acidiphilus SJ4T by ANI values of 77.4% and the utilization of succinate with sulphate as an electron acceptor. This was further supported by the fatty acid pattern of strain SB140T, which contained 5,7 C15 : 2 as the second most dominant fatty acid (19.9%) in comparison to its close relatives (<2.8%), while it contained only negligible quantities of C16 : 0 (0.6%) and C16 : 0 DMA (0.2%) in comparison to its closest relatives (>8%) (Table 2).

Description of Desulfosporosinus paludis sp. nov.

Desulfosporosinus paludis sp. nov. (pa.lu′dis. L. gen. n. paludis, of a swamp, of a marsh, of a bog).

Cells are immotile, slightly curved rods, 0.7–1.4 µm in width and 2.9–5.8 µm in length. Subterminal endospores are produced occasionally. The temperature range for growth is 20–28 °C, with an optimum at 28 °C. No growth occurred at 10 °C and 37 °C. Neutrophilic, with an optimum growth at pH 6–7. Growth occurs at pH 4.0–7.5, but not at pH 3 and pH 8.5. The upper limit for salt tolerance is 1% (w:v). Sulphate reduction is observed with H2, lactate, pyruvate, fumarate, succinate, butyrate, glucose, fructose, xylose, methanol, ethanol, propanol, glycerol and yeast extract as electron donors. Sulphate, elemental sulphur and nitrate are used as electron acceptors. Fermentation of lactate, pyruvate, fumarate, fructose and yeast extract is positive. The following substrates are not used as electron donors: formate, acetate, propionate, malate, citrate and benzoate. Menaquinone MK-7 is the major respiratory quinone and the dominant cellular fatty acids are iso-C15 : 0 (52.6%) and 5,7 C15 : 2 (19.9%).

The type strain SB140T (=DSM 117342T=JCM 39521T) was isolated from a continuous enrichment culture that was inoculated with peat soil from an acidic fen (Fichtel Mountains, Bavaria, Germany). Based on the genome sequence, the G+C content of the type strain is 42.3 mol%. The GenBank accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene and the genome sequence of strain SB140T are PP188640 and CP144211, respectively.

supplementary material

Uncited Supplementary Material 1.
ijsem-75-06648-s001.pdf (504.1KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006648

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge Petra Büsing, Anika Wasner, Anja Frühling, Gesa Martens and Ina Brentrop for excellent technical support.

Abbreviations

AAI

average amino acid identity

ANI

average nucleotide identity

dDDH

digital DNA–DNA hybridization

SRB

sulphate-reducing bacteria

Footnotes

Funding: SD and MP were both financially supported by the Leibniz Institute DSMZ and the DFG (PE2147/3-1 to MP).

Author contributions: M.P. took a sampling of peat soil. S.D. conducted the experiments and data analyses. M.N.S. determined the cellular fatty acid composition and respiratory quinones. M.M. performed scanning electron microscopy. S.D. wrote the manuscript and M.P. edited and approved the manuscript.

Accession No: The 16S rRNA gene sequence of Desulfosporosinus paludis SB140T can be accessed under the GenBank accession number PP188640. The genome sequence of strain SB140T has been deposited in GenBank under accession number CP144211.

Contributor Information

Stefan Dyksma, Email: stefan.dyksma@dsmz.de.

Meina Neumann-Schaal, Email: meina.neumann-schaal@dsmz.de.

Mathias Müsken, Email: mathias.muesken@helmholtz-hzi.de.

Michael Pester, Email: Michael.Pester@dsmz.de.

References

  • 1.Rabus R, Venceslau SS, Wöhlbrand L, Voordouw G, Wall JD, et al. In: Advances in Microbial Physiology. Poole RK, editor. Vol. 66. 2015. A Post-Genomic View of the Ecophysiology, Catabolism and Biotechnological Relevance of Sulphate-Reducing Prokaryotes; pp. 55–321. vol. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Diao M, Dyksma S, Koeksoy E, Ngugi DK, Anantharaman K, et al. Global diversity and inferred ecophysiology of microorganisms with the potential for dissimilatory sulfate/sulfite reduction. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2023;47:fuad058. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuad058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Schink B. Energetics of syntrophic cooperation in methanogenic degradation. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1997;61:262–280. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.61.2.262-280.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pester M, Knorr K-H, Friedrich MW, Wagner M, Loy A. Sulfate-reducing microorganisms in wetlands - fameless actors in carbon cycling and climate change. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:72. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00072. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hausmann B, Knorr K-H, Schreck K, Tringe SG, Glavina Del Rio T, et al. Consortia of low-abundance bacteria drive sulfate reduction-dependent degradation of fermentation products in peat soil microcosms. ISME J. 2016;10:2365–2375. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pester M, Bittner N, Deevong P, Wagner M, Loy A. A “rare biosphere” microorganism contributes to sulfate reduction in a peatland. ISME J. 2010;4:1591–1602. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2010.75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Alazard D, Joseph M, Battaglia-Brunet F, Cayol J-L, Ollivier B. Desulfosporosinus acidiphilus sp. nov.: a moderately acidophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from acid mining drainage sediments. Extremophiles. 2010;14:305–312. doi: 10.1007/s00792-010-0309-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sánchez-Andrea I, Stams AJM, Hedrich S, Ňancucheo I, Johnson DB. Desulfosporosinus acididurans sp. nov.: an acidophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from acidic sediments. Extremophiles. 2015;19:39–47. doi: 10.1007/s00792-014-0701-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Panova IA, Ikkert O, Avakyan MR, Kopitsyn DS, Mardanov AV, et al. Desulfosporosinus metallidurans sp. nov., an acidophilic, metal-resistant sulfate-reducing bacterium from acid mine drainage. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71:004876. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dyksma S, Pester M. Oxygen respiration and polysaccharide degradation by a sulfate-reducing acidobacterium. Nat Commun. 2023;14:6337. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-42074-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Koblitz J, Halama P, Spring S, Thiel V, Baschien C, et al. MediaDive: the expert-curated cultivation media database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51:D1531–D1538. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dong X, Strous M. An integrated pipeline for annotation and visualization of metagenomic contigs. Front Genet. 2019;10:999. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pester M, Brambilla E, Alazard D, Rattei T, Weinmaier T, et al. Complete genome sequences of Desulfosporosinus orientis DSM765T, Desulfosporosinus youngiae DSM17734T, Desulfosporosinus meridiei DSM13257T, and Desulfosporosinus acidiphilus DSM22704T. J Bacteriol. 2012;194:6300–6301. doi: 10.1128/JB.01392-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:3059–3066. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Minh BQ, Schmidt HA, Chernomor O, Schrempf D, Woodhams MD, et al. IQ-TREE 2: new models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol Biol Evol. 2020;37:1530–1534. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:1925–1927. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2182. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10210-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2017;110:1281–1286. doi: 10.1007/s10482-017-0844-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.He G, Chen G, Xie Y, Swift CM, Ramirez D, et al. Sustained bacterial N2O reduction at acidic pH. Nat Commun. 2024;15:4092. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48236-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hausmann B, Pjevac P, Huemer M, Herbold CW, Pester M, et al. Draft genome sequence of Desulfosporosinus sp. Strain Sb-LF, Isolated from an acidic peatland in Germany. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2019;8:00428–19. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00428-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hausmann B, Pelikan C, Rattei T, Loy A, Pester M. Long-term transcriptional activity at zero growth of a cosmopolitan rare biosphere member. mBio. 2019;10:e02189-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02189-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Riesco R, Trujillo ME. Update on the proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2024;74:006300. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Abicht HK, Mancini S, Karnachuk OV, Solioz M. Genome sequence of Desulfosporosinus sp. OT, an acidophilic sulfate-reducing bacterium from copper mining waste in Norilsk, Northern Siberia. J Bacteriol. 2011;193:6104–6105. doi: 10.1128/JB.06018-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Petzsch P, Poehlein A, Johnson DB, Daniel R, Schlömann M, et al. Genome sequence of the moderately acidophilic sulfate-reducing firmicute Desulfosporosinus acididurans (strain M1T) Genome Announc. 2015;3:e00881-15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00881-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mardanov AV, Panova IA, Beletsky AV, Avakyan MR, Kadnikov VV, et al. Genomic insights into a new acidophilic, copper-resistant Desulfosporosinus isolate from the oxidized tailings area of an abandoned gold mine. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2016;92:fiw111. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiw111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Schuchmann K, Müller V. Energetics and application of heterotrophy in acetogenic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:4056–4069. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00882-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Schnürer A, Svensson BH, Schink B. Enzyme activities in and energetics of acetate metabolism by the mesophilic syntrophically acetate-oxidizing anaerobe Clostridium ultunense. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1997;154:331–336. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(97)00350-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Amann J, Lange D, Schüler M, Rabus R. Substrate-dependent regulation of carbon catabolism in marine sulfate-reducing Desulfobacterium autotrophicum HRM2. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;18:74–84. doi: 10.1159/000277655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fuchs G. Alternative pathways of carbon dioxide fixation: insights into the early evolution of life? Annu Rev Microbiol. 2011;65:631–658. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-090110-102801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Vieira S, Pascual J, Boedeker C, Geppert A, Riedel T, et al. Terricaulis silvestris gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel prosthecate, budding member of the family Caulobacteraceae isolated from forest soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:4966–4977. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Coico R. Gram staining. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2006:A–3C. doi: 10.1002/9780471729259.mca03cs00. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Barrie Johnson D, Hallberg KB. In: Advances in Microbial Physiology. Poole RK, editor. Academic Press; 2008. Carbon, iron and sulfur metabolism in acidophilic micro-organisms; pp. 201–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cline JD. Spectrophotometric determination of hydrogen sulfide in natural waters1. Limnol Oceanogr. 1969;14:454–458. doi: 10.4319/lo.1969.14.3.0454. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Vieira S, Huber KJ, Neumann-Schaal M, Geppert A, Luckner M, et al. Usitatibacter rugosus gen. nov., sp. nov. and Usitatibacter palustris sp. nov., novel members of Usitatibacteraceae fam. nov. within the order Nitrosomonadales isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71:004631. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sasser M. Tech Note 101. Microbial ID, Inc; 1990. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hippe H, Stackebrandt E. Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2015. Desulfosporosinus; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vandieken V, Niemann H, Engelen B, Cypionka H. Marinisporobacter balticus gen. nov., sp. nov., Desulfosporosinus nitroreducens sp. nov. and Desulfosporosinus fructosivorans sp. nov., new spore-forming bacteria isolated from subsurface sediments of the Baltic Sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67:1887–1893. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Klemps R, Cypionka H, Widdel F, Pfennig N. Growth with hydrogen, and further physiological characteristics of Desulfotomaculum species. Arch Microbiol. 1985;143:203–208. doi: 10.1007/BF00411048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Stackebrandt E, Sproer C, Rainey FA, Burghardt J, Pauker O, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Desulfotomaculum: evidence for the misclassification of Desulfotomaculum guttoideum and description of Desulfotomaculum orientis as Desulfosporosinus orientis gen. nov., comb. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1997;47:1134–1139. doi: 10.1099/00207713-47-4-1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Robertson WJ, Bowman JP, Franzmann PD, Mee BJ. Desulfosporosinus meridiei sp. nov., a spore-forming sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from gasolene-contaminated groundwater. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2001;51:133–140. doi: 10.1099/00207713-51-1-133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ramamoorthy S, Sass H, Langner H, Schumann P, Kroppenstedt RM, et al. Desulfosporosinus lacus sp. nov., a sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from pristine freshwater lake sediments. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006;56:2729–2736. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63610-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Uncited Supplementary Material 1.
ijsem-75-06648-s001.pdf (504.1KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006648

Articles from International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Society for General Microbiology and the International Union of Microbiological Societies

RESOURCES