Abstract
Organoids are three-dimensional (3D) cell cultures derived from human pluripotent stem cells or adult stem cells that recapitulate the cellular heterogeneity, structure, and function of human organs. These microstructures are invaluable for biomedical research due to their ability to closely mimic the complexity of native tissues while retaining human genetic material. This fidelity to native organ systems positions organoids as a powerful tool for advancing our understanding of human biology and for enhancing preclinical drug testing. Recent advancements have led to the successful development of a variety of organoid types, reflecting a broad range of human organs and tissues. This progress has expanded their application across several domains, including regenerative medicine, where organoids offer potential for tissue replacement and repair; disease modeling, which allows for the study of disease mechanisms and progression in a controlled environment; drug discovery and evaluation, where organoids provide a more accurate platform for testing drug efficacy and safety; and microecological research, where they contribute to understanding the interactions between microbes and host tissues. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the historical development of organoid technology, highlights the key achievements and ongoing challenges in the field, and discusses the current and emerging applications of organoids in both laboratory research and clinical practice.
Keywords: organoids, induced pluripotent stem cells, microbiota, regenerative medicine, disease modeling
Graphical Abstract.
Introduction
Over the past hundred years, animal models and two-dimensional (2D) cell lines have played crucial roles in biomedical research, leading to significant breakthroughs in understanding developmental processes, disease mechanisms, and drug effects. Despite their contributions, these models have notable limitations that impact their effectiveness. Cell lines, while practical and cost-efficient, are inherently limited by their simplistic, single-layer structure. This approach fails to accurately mimic the complex three-dimensional (3D) environments and cell–cell interactions present in living organisms. Consequently, important aspects of cell behavior, such as heterogeneity and in vivo characteristics, are lost during in vitro culture1,2. Animal models, though more reflective of human physiology, face their own set of challenges. They are often affected by confounding variables, practical constraints, and differences between species, which can limit their accuracy and applicability to human health. These limitations highlight the need for continued refinement and development of research models to better simulate and understand complex biological systems3,4.
In recent years, organoid models have revolutionized biomedical research. The term “organoid” originally came from studies of dermoid cysts 5 and was first used in the 1960s to describe organ cultures where cells aggregate to form structures similar to organs6,7. This early research focused on understanding organ formation and development 8 . Despite their promise, early organoid cultures faced significant challenges. Researchers lacked a deep understanding of how the stem cell environment influences self-renewal and differentiation. As a result, organoid cultures often required large numbers of starting cells, had low viability in vitro, and could not be sustained for long periods 9 . These issues limited their practical applications. A major breakthrough came in 2009 when Sato et al. successfully cultured intestinal organoids from intestinal stem cells (ISCs) without the need for stromal cells. This advancement marked the beginning of a new era in organoid research 10 . Today, scientists have successfully developed 3D organoids that mimic a range of organs, including the colon11–13, esophagus14,15, pancreas16,17, liver18,19, prostate20,21, and mammary gland22,23, as well as corresponding tumor organoids.
As organoid technology has matured, it has developed into distinct research areas. In 2014, Lancaster et al. precisely defined organoids as collections of organ-specific cell types derived from stem cells or progenitors, which self-organize through cell sequencing and spatially restricted lineage differentiation, mimicking processes in the body 6 . This review aims to explore various types of organoids and their origins, offering a comprehensive overview of their main categories. We evaluate their potential applications in regenerative medicine, disease modeling, drug discovery, toxicity assessment, and microecology, while also addressing the current limitations and challenges that need to be addressed. As a leading innovation in biomedical research, organoids are opening new avenues for scientific exploration with their distinctive advantages.
Organoid Models Derived From Different Tissues and Cells
The development of organoids in vitro represents a major advancement in biomedical research, driven by our growing understanding of stem cell biology and tissue regeneration. This journey began in 1907 when Henry Van Peters Wilson demonstrated that sponge cells could regenerate an entire organism through self-organization 24 (Fig. 1). This early work laid the foundation for studying biological regeneration in the laboratory. Following Wilson’s discovery, researchers conducted dissociation-reaggregation experiments with cells from amphibian pronephros and chicken embryos 7 . These experiments showed that cells could be reassembled into different types of organs, advancing our knowledge of cell behavior and tissue formation. In 1964, Malcolm Steinberg proposed the differential adhesion hypothesis, explaining how cells sort and arrange themselves based on their adhesive properties. This theory provided crucial insights into cell organization and supported the development of stem cell research. A significant milestone occurred in 1981 with the successful isolation of pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) from mouse embryos. This achievement opened new possibilities in stem cell research and regenerative medicine25,26. In 1998, scientists further advanced the field by isolating and culturing human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) from blastocysts, marking a new era in studying human development and disease 27 . The development of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) in 2006 was another breakthrough. By reprogramming adult cells to become pluripotent, researchers could create patient-specific stem cells without the ethical issues associated with embryonic cells28–30. Today, organoid research leverages these advancements to recreate the stem cell microenvironment in the lab. This approach allows scientists to guide stem cells into forming specific organs, enhancing our ability to study tissue development, model diseases, test drugs, and explore regenerative medicine. This progression from early experiments to modern techniques highlights the significant strides made in mimicking complex biological systems in vitro.
Figure 1.
Timeline of organoid development. The key milestones in organoid technology are presented chronologically from left to right, with each point highlighting a significant advancement in the field.
Stem cells are fundamental to the creation of organoids, as they can differentiate into various cell types necessary for organ development and can self-renew within tissues. Organoids can be generated from different types of stem cells, including ESCs, iPSCs, and adult stem cells (ASCs)8,31,32. The choice of stem cell type significantly influences the characteristics of the resulting organoids. Currently, organoids are often derived from specific types of stem cells. For instance, optic cups 33 and cerebral organoids34,35 are predominantly generated from PSCs, including both ESCs and iPSCs. In contrast, mesodermal kidney organoids are also mainly derived from PSCs36,37. Organoids originating from the surface ectodermal lineage are usually produced from ASCs or isolated adult tissues38–41. In addition, organoids of endodermal lineage can be derived from both PSCs and ASCs.
ESCs are pluripotent and can develop into various cell types due to their ability to differentiate. Despite their potential, the clinical application of ESCs is constrained by ethical concerns surrounding their use from early embryos. Creating organoids from ESCs involves several essential steps. First, researchers must identify the biological signals that guide organ development 8 . Understanding these signals helps replicate the conditions needed for ESCs to transform into specific organ structures. Next, a 3D culture system is used to support ESC growth. This system mimics the natural environment within the body, allowing ESCs to organize into structures that resemble actual organs. Initially, ESCs form clusters known as embryoid bodies (EBs), which serve as a precursor to organoids. By adding specific signaling factors and adjusting the culture conditions, researchers can guide these clusters to develop into more complex organ structures 6 . Notable studies have demonstrated this potential. For instance, Eiraku et al. 34 showed that mouse ESCs cultured in a 3D system could develop into structures similar to the cerebral cortex, including components such as the olfactory bulb and medulla oblongata. Similarly, Taguchi et al. 37 used Wnt signaling to cultivate kidney organoids from mouse ESCs, resulting in structures with functional glomeruli and renal tubules. These advances highlight the significant promise of ESCs in organ development research. As technology progresses, it is anticipated that ESC-derived organoids will achieve complete physiological functions, offering valuable insights into organ development and potential clinical applications.
iPSCs are PSCs obtained by reprogramming transcription factors (Oct4, Sox2, Klf4, and C-Myc) into differentiated somatic cells. This groundbreaking method, developed by Shinya Yamanaka in 2006, offers a less ethically controversial alternative to ESCs because iPSCs do not involve embryos. iPSCs share similar gene expression profiles and developmental potential with ESCs and are valuable for human disease modeling, drug development, and cell therapy. To create organoids from iPSCs, somatic cells are first collected and reprogrammed into iPSCs through the introduction of specific transcription factors. The subsequent culture and induction processes closely resemble those used for ESC-derived organoids 42 . Significant advancements have been made in iPSC-derived organoids. Lancaster et al. 35 successfully developed human brain organoids from iPSCs obtained from patients with microcephaly, revealing insights into early neuronal differentiation. Qian et al. 43 used iPSCs to create organoids that model neurodevelopmental disorders caused by the Zika virus, providing a platform to study complex human brain development and hereditary neurological diseases. Also in 2017, Lancaster et al. 44 combined iPSC technology with bioengineering to produce brain organoids of varying sizes, enhancing capabilities for high-throughput analysis and drug testing. Mansour et al. 45 transplanted iPSC-derived brain organoids into mouse brains, observing the growth of axons, functional blood vessels, and mature neurons and glial cells, thereby establishing a model for studying brain tissue vascularization and potential regenerative treatments.
ASCs are precursor cells found in organs that, while not fully differentiated, are essential for tissue renewal and repair. They can differentiate into one or two closely related cell types and form organoids that closely resemble their tissue of origin46,47. To develop these organoids, ASCs are extracted from adult tissues and cultured in 3D environments with specific signaling factors that mimic the natural conditions of organ development 48 . A notable breakthrough came in 2009 when Sato et al. 10 identified Lgr5+ ISCs that can self-organize into intestinal organoids, demonstrating their ability to migrate and differentiate along the crypt-villus axis. In 2014, Simmini et al. 49 found that the protein Cdx2 is crucial for maintaining the physiological function of these intestinal organoids; without it, the organoids’ genetic characteristics are disrupted, making them valuable for studying disease mechanisms. Compared to ESCs and iPSCs, ASCs provide a more direct and specific method for creating organoids, offering significant potential for researching both normal tissue functions and pathological processes.
Different Types of Organoids
Gastrointestinal Organoids
The gastrointestinal (GI) system plays crucial roles in digestion, absorption, excretion, and protection 50 . It originates from the endoderm, which develops into an epithelial tube. This tube then differentiates into three distinct regions: the foregut, midgut, and hindgut. The foregut forms essential structures including the oral cavity, pharynx, respiratory tract, pancreas, stomach, and liver. The midgut gives rise to the small intestine and the ascending colon, while the hindgut develops into the remaining sections of the colon and the rectum. GI organoids are engineered to model these different parts of the GI system. This allows for comprehensive studies of their development and function.
A significant breakthrough in GI organoids was achieved by Hariro Sato and his team in 2009, who developed the first intestinal organoid model 10 . This model utilized Lgr5+ ASCs from mouse intestinal crypts, embedded in an extracellular matrix (ECM) and provided with key growth factors like R-spondin-1, epidermal growth factor (EGF), and the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) inhibitor Noggin. Building on this progress, researchers introduced the first gastric organoid culture system a year later 51 . This system used Lgr5+ stem cells from antrum glands and was supplemented with fibroblast growth factor 10 (FGF10) and the hormone gastrin to facilitate the growth of gastric organoids.
However, the initial organoid models only replicated epithelial cells of the stomach or intestine. To create a more accurate cell culture model that includes multiple cell types and germ layers, researchers developed intestinal and gastric organoids from PSCs in 2011 52 and 2014 53 , respectively. Notably, gastric organoids can now be directly derived from human gastric samples54,55. These PSC-derived organoids contain mesenchymal cells, unlike the earlier models that were based on ASCs and lacked this feature56,57. Despite this advancement, these models still fall short by missing other cell types like nerve and immune cells. To address these gaps, recent research has focused on new techniques such as co-culture 58 , biomaterial-based methods59,60, and 3D bioprinting 61 , to enhance the development and functionality of gastric and intestinal organoids.
Liver Organoids
The liver, situated in the right upper abdomen, performs crucial biological functions including metabolism, detoxification, and synthesis of proteins, and it possesses remarkable regenerative abilities following severe injury 62 . Liver development begins with the formation of the liver bud from the epithelial tissue of the foregut endoderm. This initial structure gives rise to hepatoblasts, which are precursor cells that differentiate into two main cell types: hepatocytes, the primary functional cells of the liver, and biliary epithelial cells, which line the bile ducts 63 . Concurrently, the surrounding ectomesenchyme contributes to the formation of mesoderm-derived hepatic fibroblasts and stellate cells, which play roles in liver structure and function.
Research into liver regeneration has demonstrated its impressive capabilities since as early as 1960 7 . Early experiments demonstrated that isolated embryonic liver tissue could reassemble in the lab and form functional bile ducts. Advances continued with the creation of liver organoids from ASCs, specifically Lgr5+ cells. These organoids could develop into mature liver cells when cultured in 3D environments using Matrigel 64 . Further studies identified that bile duct-derived progenitor cells could also be used to generate liver organoids. These organoids had the ability to differentiate into both liver cells and bile duct cells 65 . By 2018, researchers successfully expanded human and mouse liver cells in 3D cultures, showing high efficiency in transplantation experiments66,67. To address the limited growth potential of mature liver cells, scientists have turned to generating liver organoids from hESCs, which have higher proliferation rates 68 . In addition, new methods are being explored to improve the vascularization of liver organoids using human iPSCs 69 . Overall, these advances in liver organoid technology are expected to enhance organ modeling, liver transplantation, and drug testing70,71.
Brain Organoids
The vertebrate central nervous system originates from the neuroectoderm 72 , a specialized tissue that initially forms the neural plate. This plate then folds and fuses to create the neural tube, an epithelial structure with an internal fluid-filled chamber, which eventually evolves into the brain ventricles. During development, the neural tube divides into four major regions: the forebrain, midbrain, hindbrain, and spinal cord. The forebrain develops into key brain structures, including the neocortex, hippocampus, and various components of the ventral telencephalon, such as the amygdala and hypothalamus. The midbrain contributes to the formation of the tectum, while the hindbrain gives rise to the cerebellum, pons, medulla, and brainstem.
The development of the brain is a highly intricate process and has been a central focus of scientific research due to its complexity. However, ethical issues and limitations in model complexity mean that animal models and 2D cell cultures often fail to create suitable brain models 73 . In contrast, brain organoids are capable of replicating several key aspects of early human brain development, including molecular, cellular, structural, and functional dimensions 6 . Early studies utilizing chicken neural progenitor cells (NPCs) demonstrated that these cells could self-organize into clusters of neuroepithelial cells around neural tube-like cavities, indicating a natural propensity for self-organization in brain development 74 . Similarly, NPCs have shown the ability to aggregate and form neurospheres in suspension cultures. These neurospheres can further differentiate into neurons and astrocytes 75 , highlighting their potential for modeling brain development. Advances in technology have allowed researchers to build more sophisticated brain models. For example, neural aggregates can be derived from PSCs in the form of EBs 76 . Notably, PSCs have facilitated the creation of neural rosettes, where NPCs are arranged around a central lumen, resembling the structure of the neural tube 77 . These rosettes can be further differentiated into various mature cell types characteristic of different brain regions78–82. Despite these advancements, most current models remain based on 2D cultures or simple aggregations, which often fail to capture the full complexity of brain development and function.
To overcome this limitation, Watanabe and his team made significant advancements in brain research by developing 3D culture systems using mouse or human stem cells to better replicate the complex architecture of brain tissues 83 . Initially, they created forebrain tissue using 2D cultures, but transitioning to 3D aggregate cultures allowed for the formation of more intricate structures that closely mimic the development of the dorsal forebrain 83 . They further refined this method to enable the neuronal layer to self-organize in a manner similar to early cortical development and sustain cultivation for up to 112 days 84 . Building on this foundation, Lancaster et al. developed 3D cerebral organoid models incorporating various brain regions, marking a significant improvement over earlier models. By manipulating growth factors such as Hedgehog, Fgf, Bmp, and Wnt85–87, they created organoids that represent different brain regions, such as the mesencephalon 88 , hippocampus 89 , and cerebellum 90 . In addition, the use of 3D printing technology has enabled the efficient and cost-effective generation of detailed brain structures from human iPSCs, providing valuable tools for studying brain development and function 43 .
Kidney Organoids
The kidney, a vital organ in the human body, comprises the nephron, which develops from the metanephric mesenchyme, and the collecting duct and ureter, which arise from the ureteric bud 91 . Its intricate structure includes over 25 specialized cell types, many of which are essential for eliminating harmful metabolites and maintaining homeostasis 92 . As a result, the kidney is particularly susceptible to toxins. Its unique function in urine concentration and its close integration with complex vascular networks contribute to its vulnerability to toxic effects 93 .
Early research on chicken embryo kidneys indicated that kidney tissue might have the ability to self-organize7,94. In 2013, scientists successfully developed ureteric bud organoids from human PSCs by culturing them with specific growth factors and then applying additional compounds to guide their development into ureteric bud cells 95 . The following year, researchers successfully generated kidney organoids from both mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) and human iPSCs 37 . Building on this progress, Takasato and colleagues improved this method by producing kidney organoids with well-organized nephrons, endothelial cells, and renal interstitium 36 . This breakthrough marked the first creation of complex kidney organoids containing both ureteric buds and metanephric mesenchyme, with transcriptional profiles closely resembling human fetal kidneys, thus validating their biological characteristics96,97.
In addition, researchers have recently made significant strides in the maturation of kidney organoids, achieving advancements in glomerular vascularization and renal tubular function. These improvements have brought kidney organoids closer to mimicking real kidney tissue in both structure and function98,99. This progress offers a valuable tool for modeling the complex kidney environment in vivo and for pharmacological screening. Notably, the activation of Notch signaling in these organoids has been shown to promote the differentiation of proximal tubules, underscoring the potential of organoids as effective platforms for drug screening 100 . In addition, kidney organoids have been used to assess the toxic effects of various compounds, including doxorubicin, interleukin-1β, aminoglycosides drug, and cisplatin, providing new avenues for drug development and toxicity testing97,101–104. Moreover, transplanted kidney organoids have demonstrated improved maturity and vascularization within host mice. This suggests that kidney organoids can serve as a promising source for autologous transplantation, offering new hope for treating kidney diseases105,106.
Lung Organoids
The lung, originating from the developing ventral pre-gut endoderm 107 , is a complex organ with conducting tubes that end in highly vascularized distal sacs for efficient gas exchange between air and blood. The airway epithelium consists of four major cell types: goblet cells, ciliated cells, club cells (or Clara cells), and basal cells 108 . In comparison, the alveolar epithelium, which covers over 99% of the lung’s inner surface, is primarily made up of two types of cells: alveolar epithelial cell type I (AECI), responsible for gas exchange, and alveolar epithelial cell type II (AECII), which secretes surfactants 109 .
In 1980, Yoshida et al. 110 endeavored to replicate lung function in vitro by culturing mouse lung organoids. They used tissue from full-term mouse embryos and a substrate of sterile porcine skin dermal collagen, observing various ductal structures. Three decades later, Kotton et al. advanced the field by deriving purified endoderm precursors from mESCs. They achieved this by precisely modulating transforming growth factor β (TGF-β)/BMP and BMP/FGF signaling pathways, successfully guiding these precursors to differentiate into primitive lung progenitors. Their work demonstrated the ability to replicate the lung-development process 111 , laying a crucial foundation for the creation of lung organoids.
In 2012, Rossant and colleagues generated lung organoids through human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) for the first time 112 . They developed mature airway epithelial cells through air-liquid interface culture, offering a new approach to model diseases like cystic fibrosis (CF). Following this, Huang et al. 113 and Dye et al. 114 and their teams created similar stepwise differentiation processes, successfully generating both airway and AECs from hiPSCs. Their work not only identified four types of airway epithelial cells but also included functional types AECI and AECII. Then, Chen et al. 115 produced lung bud organoids containing both pulmonary endoderm and mesoderm, enhancing our understanding of lung development. In addition, Sachs and team 116 cultivated airway organoids from lung cancer biopsy samples, which preserved the tumor’s genetic mutations and histopathological features, thereby offering valuable tools for drug screening.
The lungs possess a remarkable capacity for regeneration and repair, even after injury. This regenerative ability allows for the creation of lung-like tissues from adipose-derived stem cells (AdSCs) 117 . Basal stem cells in the airway can self-renew, while secretory club cells exhibit significant plasticity following injury, whereas AECIIs of the alveolar epithelium are able to replenish lost AECIIs and generate new AECIs after proliferative injury118–121. Leveraging this regenerative potential, researchers have successfully developed organoids from airway basal cells122,123, secretory club cells124,125, and AECIIs 126 in both mice and humans. These lung organoids are invaluable for studying respiratory diseases, as they effectively replicate lung functions such as gas exchange. One of the most significant applications of lung organoid models in recent years has been in the study of respiratory diseases caused by viral infections, particularly severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Recent research has shown that lung organoids serve as an essential tool for understanding the biological mechanisms underlying COVID-19 infection and the respiratory damage it causes127–129. These models have been instrumental in elucidating the cellular interactions between SARS-CoV-2 and the lung epithelium, providing important insights into viral replication, immune response, and the pathology of COVID-19. Furthermore, lung organoids are being actively utilized in drug-discovery efforts, aiding in the identification of potential therapeutic agents that may mitigate the disease’s impact on lung function 130 . The continued development and application of these organoid models hold great promise for advancing our understanding of lung diseases and improving therapeutic strategies for conditions like COVID-19 and beyond.
New Players in the Organoid Field
Advancements in scientific research have led to the successful development of various organ models, fueling new research opportunities. Skin, being one of the largest and most complex organs, presents unique challenges due to its disease diversity and differences in healing mechanisms between mice and humans. This makes human skin organoid models particularly valuable for scientific research and drug development 131 . The skin’s multi-layered structure includes the epidermis, dermis, and subcutaneous fat, along with accessory structures like hair follicles, sebaceous glands, and sweat glands, which are crucial for regulating body temperature and fluid retention, resisting external pressure, and regulating touch and pain sensation132,133. Compared with previous skin organoid models 134 , recent studies highlight the importance of creating complex human skin organoids that incorporate these accessory structures 135 . Researchers have developed a multi-stage culture strategy that emulates embryonic skin development, starting from PSCs and progressing to fully formed skin. By precisely regulating signaling pathways such as TGF-β and FGF, researchers can induce the growth and differentiation of skin cells, resulting in a detailed human skin model. This model features a keratinized epidermis and includes sensory neurons, dermal fibroblasts, adipose tissue, cartilage, melanocytes, and Schwann cells. These advanced skin organoids are pivotal for improving disease modeling and drug discovery for skin genetic disorders and skin cancer, as well as offering innovative transplant options for burn victims.
In recent years, muscle organoids have also emerged as a promising tool for investigating muscle development, regeneration, and disorders such as muscular dystrophies 136 . Advances in this field have led to the creation of more sophisticated skeletal muscle organoids that closely resemble the complex architecture of in vivo muscle tissue, including striated fibers and functional contractility. These improvements have been made possible by the development of 3D culture systems, innovative biomaterials, and the integration of muscle progenitor cells (myoblasts) into the organoid cultures. Notably, studies by Rao et al. 137 demonstrated the successful generation of human skeletal muscle tissues from engineering human PSCs, while Lin et al. 138 reported muscle organoids capable of functional contraction, providing a model for studying neuromuscular junctions. More recently, Shahriyari et al. 139 utilized muscle organoids to investigate the regenerative capacity of muscle in vitro, showing how they can serve as models for diseases like Duchenne muscular dystrophy. These muscle organoids not only offer a platform for disease modeling but also hold promise for drug screening and cell-based therapies in the context of muscle degenerative disorders.
In addition, a significant advancement in regenerative medicine is the creation of lacrimal gland organoids from ASCs 140 and PSC 141 . The lacrimal gland plays a crucial role in eye lubrication and protection by secreting tears in response to neurotransmitters released by parasympathetic nerves. Dysfunction in this gland can lead to various eye diseases. For example, the dysfunction of lacrimal gland will lead to a decrease in tear production, resulting in poor maintenance of ocular surface and increasing the risk of infection 142 . Furthermore, the disorder of tear secretion may cause dry eye disease, which can even lead to vision loss in severe cases 143 . Currently, treatments such as artificial tears, anti-inflammatory drugs, and punctal occlusion generally cannot prevent the atrophy of lacrimal gland, so there is a great demand for alternative treatment options. Recent research has successfully developed lacrimal gland organoids that not only mimic natural gland swelling but also produce secretions when stimulated with norepinephrine. The Pax6 gene has been identified as crucial for the differentiation of lacrimal duct cells. These organoids can form tear tube-like structures and have the potential to mature into fully functional lacrimal glands when transplanted into mice. Thus, lacrimal gland organoids hold promise as a tool for developing treatments for conditions like dry eye.
Application of Organoids
Regenerative Medicine
Currently, allogeneic transplantation remains a cornerstone of organ replacement therapy, but challenges such as donor matching and immune rejection limit its efficacy, and thousands of patients die each year while waiting for a transplant 144 . In this context, organoid technology presents a promising alternative due to its ability to self-expand and maintain genetic stability, making it an exciting tool for generating transplantable tissues and functional cell types in regenerative medicine. Recent advancements in organoid technology have shown significant promise. For example, researchers have demonstrated that mouse colon organoids can be effectively expanded in vitro and successfully transplanted into damaged mice 145 , where they remodel functional crypt units. Similarly, fetal progenitor-derived small intestinal organoids have exhibited the ability to integrate and function in vivo 146 . When intestinal organoids derived from PSCs were implanted under the kidney capsule of mice, they displayed good permeability and peptide uptake, highlighting their potential in treating conditions like short bowel syndrome 147 . At the same time, in 2022, a Japanese research team used intestinal organoids cultured from healthy intestinal mucosal stem cells of patients with ulcerative colitis to perform autologous transplantation 148 . Furthermore, combining organoids with synthetic or bioacellular (decellularized) scaffolds offers new possibilities for enhancing intestinal transplantation. This integration may improve the functionality and viability of transplanted tissues, opening up innovative pathways for treating GI diseases and other conditions149–151.
Liver organoids, including those derived from adult mice and PSCs, show significant promise in addressing liver failure. These organoids have demonstrated the ability to improve survival rates in various liver disease models, such as fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase mutant mice and tyrosine disease type I models, as well as in cases of chemical liver injury64,66. PSC-derived liver organoids have been particularly effective in treating acute liver failure, restoring liver function effectively 152 . In addition, engineered bile duct organoids have shown potential in reconstructing the extrahepatic bile duct tree, including repairing the gallbladder wall and bile duct epithelium 153 . This innovation offers a new approach for treating common bile duct diseases, expanding the possibilities for regenerative therapies in liver-related conditions. In addition, great progress has been made in the transplantation of various organs, including the retina154,155, pancreas 156 , brain 45 , and lungs 157 .
The promise of organoid technology in regenerative medicine is substantial, but it presents several safeties, ethical, and legal challenges that must be addressed before it can be applied clinically. First, it is essential to ensure that patients provide informed consent, fully understanding how their cells will be used and any potential implications of this use. Ownership and management of patient-derived organoids and the associated data must be clearly defined. This includes determining who owns the organoids and establishing protocols for how data will be handled, shared, and protected. Given the differences in medical regulations worldwide, it is important to create global standards for stem cell products and treatments to ensure safety and consistency. In addition, establishing ethical guidelines is crucial to address how closely organoids can be linked to their donors. Ensuring ethical practices in organoid development and use is vital. Finally, fostering open dialogue among scientists, policymakers, and the public is necessary to set appropriate boundaries for the clinical application of these technologies. This will help ensure that advancements are made responsibly and align with societal values.
Disease Modeling
Organoid culture represents a significant advancement over traditional single-cell culture models, especially in the field of disease modeling. The key advantage of organoids is their ability to accurately replicate the pathological processes at an organ level, providing a more realistic and comprehensive model of human diseases. Organoids derived from ASCs or iPSCs are particularly valuable for creating clinically relevant human disease models. These organoids effectively capture and translate specific disease characteristics, allowing for more precise studies of various conditions. They are extensively used in research on genetic diseases, host-pathogen interactions, and cancer, facilitating a deeper understanding of disease mechanisms and potentially leading to more effective treatments. Moreover, the ability of organoids to mimic complex tissue architecture and function enhances their utility in advancing medical research and therapeutic development.
Organoid technology has revolutionized the modeling of genetic and neurodegenerative diseases. CF is an autosomal recessive genetic disorder caused by mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) chloride channel 158 . In 2013, Dekkers et al. 159 utilized organoid technology to recreate this disease in vitro, successfully generating human intestinal organoids with the F508del CFTR mutation. Their innovative swelling assays demonstrated the significant responses of these CF organoids to CFTR modulators. Beyond CF, organoids have shown considerable promise in modeling neurological diseases. Their 3D structure enables accurate simulations of various conditions, including genetic brain disorders like microcephaly 35 and agyria 160 , as well as neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease. This capability provides a valuable platform for drug screening and the development of treatment strategies. In addition, Raja et al. 161 developed a scaffold-free 3D culture system that produced iPSC-derived brain organoids from familial Alzheimer’s patients. These organoids replicated typical Alzheimer’s pathology and validated the therapeutic potential of β- and γ-secretase inhibitors. Collectively, these findings underscore the advantages of 3D organoid culture systems for studying genetic diseases and advancing drug discovery.
Organoid technology has emerged as a powerful tool in infectious disease research, offering valuable models for studying host-pathogen interactions across various infectious agents, including viruses, bacteria, and protozoan parasites162–164. For instance, brain organoids have been employed to investigate the mechanisms of microcephaly associated with Zika virus infection. The infected organoids exhibited reduced size compared to controls, aligning with the pathological findings observed in affected patients43,165,166. Similarly, intestinal organoids serve as important models for studying infectious diseases. Researchers using human primary gut organoids have proposed that the human gut may act as an alternative infection route for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) 167 . In addition, small intestine organoids have been utilized to study norovirus, revealing that nidazolamide can inhibit norovirus replication by activating the cellular antiviral response 168 .
Moreover, organoids have emerged as invaluable tools in cancer research, enabling the in-depth study of a variety of tumors while preserving their inherent heterogeneity and complex tissue architecture. Their application spans across multiple cancer types, including colorectal169–171, liver18,172,173, pancreatic 174 , ovarian 175 , and gastric176–178 cancers. In these contexts, organoids facilitate the exploration of molecular mechanisms underlying tumor biology, provide a platform for assessing drug sensitivity, and aid in the development of personalized treatment strategies. This capacity to mimic the unique characteristics of individual tumors not only enhances our understanding of cancer progression but also significantly advances the field of precision medicine. By tailoring therapies based on the specific responses observed in organoid models, researchers can identify more effective treatment options, ultimately improving patient outcomes and paving the way for more targeted therapeutic approaches in oncology.
In summary, organoid culture systems significantly enhance research across genetic, infectious, and cancer diseases, injecting new vitality into medical science and fostering innovative therapeutic strategies. Organoid technology stands as a transformative advancement in disease modeling, accurately replicating human tissue and disease characteristics. This capability facilitates deeper insights into disease mechanisms, improves drug testing, and supports personalized treatments. Ultimately, organoids hold the promise of accelerating our understanding of complex diseases and pave the way for improved patient outcomes in precision medicine.
Drug Discovery and Toxicity Assessment
Careful drug screening and thorough evaluation of efficacy and toxicity are essential for effective clinical strategies. A drug’s efficacy serves as a key measure of its potential for widespread use, while its toxicity determines the safe range for administration. Compared to traditional animal models and 2D cell cultures, organoids provide a more accurate representation of organ structure and maintain the genetic diversity of original tissues 179 . This ability to closely mimic real organs enhances both the scope and detail of drug testing. Organoids allow for personalized assessments of how different patients may respond to various medications. By using organoids in research, scientists can significantly shorten the drug-development timeline and reduce costs, facilitating more efficient and targeted therapeutic solutions.
A new and exciting advancement in this area is the creation of organoid factories, which are specialized platforms designed for the high-throughput generation and culture of organoids. These innovative facilities offer a scalable solution for advancing organoid-based drug discovery and toxicity testing. According to recent research, organoid factories have the potential to revolutionize the drug discovery process by providing a consistent and reproducible source of organoids derived from a variety of tissues 180 . These factories utilize automated systems and advanced bioreactors to efficiently produce large quantities of organoids, which can then be used for drug screening, personalized medicine, and safety testing. The scalability provided by organoid factories can significantly accelerate the pace of research, allowing for high-throughput drug screening and better identification of promising therapeutic candidates. Furthermore, these platforms can integrate bioengineering and artificial intelligence technologies to optimize drug-testing processes, ultimately bridging the gap between laboratory research and clinical application.
In 2017, Broutier et al. 18 successfully targeted extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) inhibitors using human cancer organoids, paving the way for new cancer treatment approaches. Crespo et al. 181 also developed colonic organoids from patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and identified two compounds that significantly inhibited excessive organoid proliferation, with effects extending to wild-type organoids. Organoids have also been valuable in drug screening for neurological conditions. Cortical organoids infected with the Zika virus exhibit symptoms similar to congenital Zika syndrome, including neuronal layer atrophy and ventricular dilation43,166,182. Some studies have used virus-infected brain organoids to evaluate the effectiveness of antiviral drug candidates such as duramycin, ivermectin, and azithromycin183,184. In the area of GI organoids, high-throughput drug screening has shown remarkable advancements. Kozuka et al. 185 rapidly screened nearly 2,000 potential drug compounds by culturing mini colon organoids in 96-well plates, highlighting the efficiency of organoid models in drug research and development. Microplastics refer to plastic fragments and particles less than 5 mm in diameter. As the awareness of the hazards of microplastics is increasing, endometrial organoids have been used to investigate microplastic pollution and its potential impact on reproductive health 186 . In addition, researchers have realized the combination of bioengineering and artificial intelligence technologies with organoid technologies for more efficient drug screening and toxicity assessment187–189.
While the potential of organoids in drug research is immense, toxicity assessment and preclinical studies still grapple with substantial challenges. Many toxic reactions remain undetected until clinical trials, complicating the drug-development process. Organoid models, due to their physiological relevance, could serve as powerful platforms for early toxicity testing. By constructing long-term toxicity screening models that mimic human responses, researchers can gain deeper insights into drug safety profiles earlier in the development pipeline. This approach not only enhances the predictability of adverse reactions but also aligns more closely with human biology, reducing reliance on animal models. As we delve into this innovative strategy, the prospects for safer and more effective drug development become increasingly promising, potentially transforming the landscape of pharmaceutical research.
Host-Microbiota Interactions
Over 100 trillion microorganisms reside within and around the human body 190 , representing a complex and integral component of our biological ecosystem. An individual’s health is shaped not only by genetic factors but also by the delicate balance and activities of the microbiota. The GI tract is a major reservoir for these microbes, hosting around 1,000 different bacterial species that play essential roles in maintaining overall health and well-being191,192. In humans, both the stomach and gut are closely linked to the microbiota, with microorganisms typically found on the mucosal surfaces and lumen of the GI tract 193 . These microbes significantly influence the GI biology of the host. The gut microbiota can act as a natural barrier, helping to maintain the integrity of the intestinal lining and preventing the invasion of harmful pathogens. In addition, it plays a crucial role in immune regulation and competitive inhibition194,195. Research has demonstrated that the gut microbiota can significantly impact drug metabolism and effectiveness 196 . Often referred to as the “second genome” of the human body, the gut microbiota has a wide-ranging regulatory role in overall health. However, the precise relationship between host-microbe interactions and the development of GI diseases remains unclear197,198.
The advent of organoid technology has revolutionized the study of GI microecology. Researchers have discovered that co-culturing intestinal symbiotic bacteria, such as lactic acid bacteria, with GI organoids enhances organoid proliferation and differentiation into Paneth cells 199 . This technology effectively simulates host-microbe interactions in the gut, serving as a robust platform for developing intestinal microbial infection models. Current cutting-edge research is leveraging Lgr5+ ISC and hiPSC-derived intestinal organoid models to explore interactions between pathogens like Clostridium difficile, Salmonella typhimurium, enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli, and rotavirus with the intestinal epithelium 200 . For instance, Hou et al. 201 established a pioneering co-culture system incorporating Lactobacillus, intestinal lamina propria lymphocytes, and Lgr5+ ISC organoids, revealing that Lactobacillus stimulates the secretion of interleukin-22 (IL-22) from intestinal lymphocytes. In addition, studies have shown that human small intestinal organoids derived from Lgr5+ ISC can be infected with human norovirus, allowing for insights into the evolution, immunity, and pathogenesis of the virus 168 . Research has identified susceptibility factors for host infections and explored preventive measures. In specific experiments, microinjection of Clostridium difficile into small intestinal organoids derived from human iPSCs demonstrated downregulation of the sodium/hydrogen exchange factor 3 (NHE3), leading to diarrhea 202 . Similarly, microinjection of Salmonella typhimurium into these organoids revealed damage to the intestinal epithelial barrier and altered transcription profiles, showcasing the organoid model’s utility in studying the molecular mechanisms underlying Salmonella-associated enteritis 203 . Furthermore, organoids have been instrumental in investigating the pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infections. For example, McCracken and colleagues found that injecting Helicobacter pylori into gastric organoids resulted in the binding of GagA to the c-Met receptor on epithelial cells, causing their overexpression 53 . This research underscores the potential of organoid technology in developing effective treatments for GI infections.
In summary, organoids signify a groundbreaking development in biomedical research, providing various applications that greatly improve our understanding of human biology (Fig. 2). Organoids play a crucial role in regenerative medicine, enabling research into tissue regeneration and stem cell therapies. Their capability to accurately model diseases like cancer and serve as dependable platforms for drug discovery and toxicity testing highlights their significance. Moreover, organoids offer valuable insights into the interactions between human cells and microbiota, enhancing our understanding of their roles in health and disease. Overall, the versatility and adaptability of organoids make them essential tools in the quest for innovative therapeutic strategies, driving advancements in precision medicine and personalized healthcare. Their potential to bridge the gap between basic research and clinical application underscores their transformative impact on biomedical science.
Figure 2.

Applications of organoid technology. This schematic diagram illustrates the diverse applications of organoids across multiple fields, including regenerative medicine, genetic diseases, infectious diseases, cancer research, drug discovery, toxicity assessment, and host-microbiota interactions.
Conclusion and Prospectives
Since its birth, human organoid technology has demonstrated significant potential across diverse fields, from basic scientific research to biomedical applications. These organoids, derived from various stem cell types, differ in development, maturity, and complexity. They have successfully established unique culture systems, paving the way for advancements in disease modeling and drug screening. However, several challenges persist within current organoid frameworks. While researchers have made substantial progress in elucidating the survival and functional dynamics of organs such as the brain 45 , liver 204 , and bile duct 71 in animal models, critical issues remain. These include limitations in organoid maturity and cellular diversity, insufficient vascularization, and constraints in the composition of ECM. Overcoming these challenges is crucial for enhancing the effectiveness and applicability of organoids in both research and clinical settings (Fig. 3).
Figure 3.
Challenges and perspectives of organoid technologies. While organoids cannot fully replicate the structure and maturity of in vivo organs, advances are being made to create highly mature organoids by precisely controlling the substances required for their growth. Limitations arise from the absence of blood vessels and vascular structures, which restrict the size of organoids. Researchers are actively investigating strategies to enhance oxygenation and nutrient delivery, with the integration of vascular networks being a crucial step forward. In addition, identifying alternatives to animal-derived extracellular matrices could facilitate the clinical application of organoids. Co-culture techniques allow for the exploration of interactions among different cell populations over time and space. In the future, organoids are expected to evolve by integrating diverse emerging technologies to overcome current limitations.
Currently, organoids cultured in vitro do not accurately replicate the cell types and maturity of organs found in vivo, which makes it challenging to simulate the complex conditions of living tissues. This limitation arises mainly from the dynamic nature of cell development, which requires the precise release of various growth factors to support the differentiation of different cell types. To achieve the goal of creating highly mature organoids, researchers are focusing on overcoming these challenges. Significant progress has been made in brain organoid research, particularly using human PSCs that express the Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) protein. Researchers have successfully developed a system that allows for the controlled release of SHH, enabling precise regulation of its concentration over distance. This advancement marks an important step forward in the field, bringing us closer to the goal of creating more accurate organoid models 205 .
Most organoids produced today are limited in size, largely due to the absence of blood vessels and vascular structures, which are essential for adequate nutrient and oxygen uptake. Without a functional vascular system, organoids can suffer from insufficient supply, leading to necrotic cores in larger organoids 206 . To address this challenge, researchers are actively investigating various strategies to enhance oxygenation and nutrient delivery within organoids. A key approach is the introduction of a vascular network. This development not only improves the efficiency of nutrient and oxygen supply 45 but also provides critical signals that guide cell migration and differentiation during organoid development 207 .
In addition, the dependence on animal-derived ECM significantly hinders the clinical translation of organoid models. The most widely used gel, Matrigel, is derived from Engelbreth-Holm-Swarm (EHS) sarcoma and contains various ECM components, including laminin and collagen IV, along with growth factors like insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), EGF, and TGF-β. However, its complexity, characterized by thousands of proteins, results in batch variations and inconsistent mechanical properties, leading to unreliable experimental outcomes 208 . Moreover, the production of Matrigel involves growing tumors in mice, raising ethical concerns. To overcome these challenges, researchers are exploring alternative materials. Potential substitutes include de-cellularized ECM from organs, isolated ECM components, graphene oxide, and synthetic hydrogels. These alternatives aim to provide more consistent and ethically acceptable options for organoid culture, thereby enhancing their clinical applicability208–211.
At the same time, the inability to create multi-organ pathological models restricts the application of organoids in regenerative medicine. The human organoid system fundamentally mimics parts of the human body, rather than the whole body. However, this challenge can be partially addressed through co-culture methods. For instance, researchers have successfully co-cultured human stem cell–derived intestinal organoids with neural crest cells, facilitating interaction between different cell types 212 . At the same time, scientists have connected multiple organoids to study the communication between the liver, pancreas, and GI tract 213 . In addition, integrating organ chip technology has allowed scientists to develop 3D systems that enable connection and communication between multiple pre-formed “organs”214,215. This innovative approach enhances the potential for studying complex biological processes and diseases, paving the way for more effective regenerative therapies.
The future of organoid technology hinges on overcoming the limitations of individual approaches by integrating real-time imaging, gene editing, organ chip technology, bioprinting, and microfluidics216,217. For instance, Geyer et al. 218 utilized a microfluidics-based organoid system to study the effects of hypoxia on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, while Tran et al. 219 employed real-time imaging to screen 247 protease inhibitors that prevent cyst formation without hindering organoid growth. These innovations highlight the significant potential of organoid technology to enhance our understanding of complex biological processes. However, many of these applications are still in the exploratory phase, indicating that further research is necessary to fully realize their capabilities. As this field evolves, 3D organoid systems are expected to complement existing models, enriching the research landscape and strengthening the foundation for both basic and clinical studies. This integration of technologies promises to advance our knowledge of disease mechanisms and improve the development of targeted therapies, ultimately leading to more effective treatments and better patient outcomes.
Footnotes
Ethical Approval: This study was approved by our institutional review board.
Statement of Human and Animal Rights: This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.
Statement of Informed Consent: There are no human subjects in this article, and informed consent is not applicable.
The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Figures are drawn using Figdraw (https://www.figdraw.com).
Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This present work was funded by the grants of the National S&T Major Project of China (2023YFC2308400), the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (LQ24H090005), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2022ZFJH003), the Taishan Scholar Foundation of Shandong Province (tsqn202103119), and the Foundation of China’s State Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases (ZZ202316 and ZZ202319).
ORCID iD: Zongxin Ling
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9662-099X
References
- 1. Kamb A. What’s wrong with our cancer models? Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4(2):161–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Yao Q, Cheng S, Pan Q, Yu J, Cao G, Li L, Cao H. Organoids: development and applications in disease models, drug discovery, precision medicine, and regenerative medicine. MedComm (2020). 2024;5(10):e735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Scarano A, Khater AGA, Gehrke SA, Inchingolo F, Tari SR. Animal models for investigating osseointegration: an overview of implant research over the last three decades. J Funct Biomater. 2024;15(4):83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Kostic AD, Howitt MR, Garrett WS. Exploring host-microbiota interactions in animal models and humans. Genes Dev. 2013;27(7):701–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Smith E, Cochrane WJ. Cystic organoid teratoma: (report of a case). Can Med Assoc J. 1946;55(2):151–2. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Lancaster MA, Knoblich JA. Organogenesis in a dish: modeling development and disease using organoid technologies. Science. 2014;345(6194):1247125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Weiss P, Taylor AC. Reconstitution of complete organs from single-cell suspensions of chick embryos in advanced stages of differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1960;46(9):1177–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Clevers H. Modeling development and disease with organoids. Cell. 2016;165(7):1586–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Stoker AW, Streuli CH, Martins-Green M, Bissell MJ. Designer microenvironments for the analysis of cell and tissue function. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1990;2(5):864–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Sato T, Vries RG, Snippert HJ, van de Wetering M, Barker N, Stange DE, van Es JH, Abo A, Kujala P, Peters PJ, Clevers H. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature. 2009;459(7244):262–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Fujii M, Shimokawa M, Date S, Takano A, Matano M, Nanki K, Ohta Y, Toshimitsu K, Nakazato Y, Kawasaki K, Uraoka T, et al. A colorectal tumor organoid library demonstrates progressive loss of niche factor requirements during tumorigenesis. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18(6):827–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Sugimoto S, Kobayashi E, Fujii M, Ohta Y, Arai K, Matano M, Ishikawa K, Miyamoto K, Toshimitsu K, Takahashi S, Nanki K, et al. An organoid-based organ-repurposing approach to treat short bowel syndrome. Nature. 2021;592(7852):99–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Sprangers J, Zaalberg IC, Maurice MM. Organoid-based modeling of intestinal development, regeneration, and repair. Cell Death Differ. 2021;28(1):95–107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Li X, Francies HE, Secrier M, Perner J, Miremadi A, Galeano-Dalmau N, Barendt WJ, Letchford L, Leyden GM, Goffin EK, Barthorpe A, et al. Organoid cultures recapitulate esophageal adenocarcinoma heterogeneity providing a model for clonality studies and precision therapeutics. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Chen YH, Yang WH, Ni C. Using esophagus organoid to explore the role of c-Myc in esophageal cancer initiation. Yi Chuan. 2021;43(6):601–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Balak JRA, Juksar J, Carlotti F, Lo Nigro A, de Koning EJP. Organoids from the human fetal and adult pancreas. Curr Diab Rep. 2019;19(12):160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Schuth S, Le Blanc S, Krieger TG, Jabs J, Schenk M, Giese NA, Büchler MW, Eils R, Conrad C, Strobel O. Patient-specific modeling of stroma-mediated chemoresistance of pancreatic cancer using a three-dimensional organoid-fibroblast co-culture system. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2022;41(1):312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Broutier L, Mastrogiovanni G, Verstegen MM, Francies HE, Gavarró LM, Bradshaw CR, Allen GE, Arnes-Benito R, Sidorova O, Gaspersz MP, Georgakopoulos N, et al. Human primary liver cancer-derived organoid cultures for disease modeling and drug screening. Nat Med. 2017;23(12):1424–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Brooks A, Liang X, Zhang Y, Zhao CX, Roberts MS, Wang H, Zhang L, Crawford DHG. Liver organoid as a 3D in vitro model for drug validation and toxicity assessment. Pharmacol Res. 2021;169:105608. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Song H, Weinstein HNW, Allegakoen P, Wadsworth MH, II, Xie J, Yang H, Castro EA, Lu KL, Stohr BA, Feng FY, Carroll PR, et al. Single-cell analysis of human primary prostate cancer reveals the heterogeneity of tumor-associated epithelial cell states. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Elbadawy M, Abugomaa A, Yamawaki H, Usui T, Sasaki K. Development of prostate cancer organoid culture models in basic medicine and translational research. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(4):777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Sachs N, de Ligt J, Kopper O, Gogola E, Bounova G, Weeber F, Balgobind AV, Wind K, Gracanin A, Begthel H, Korving J, et al. A living biobank of breast cancer organoids captures disease heterogeneity. Cell. 2018;172(1–2):373–86.e10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Lagoutte E, Villeneuve C, Fraisier V, Krndija D, Deugnier MA, Chavrier P, Rossé C. A new pipeline for pathophysiological analysis of the mammary gland based on organoid transplantation and organ clearing. J Cell Sci. 2020;133(12):jcs242495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Wilson HV. A new method by which sponges may be artificially reared. Science. 1907;25(649):912–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Evans M. Origin of mouse embryonal carcinoma cells and the possibility of their direct isolation into tissue culture. J Reprod Fertil. 1981;62(2):625–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Martin GR. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78(12):7634–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, Jones JM. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science. 1998;282(5391):1145–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131(5):861–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126(4):663–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, Antosiewicz-Bourget J, Frane JL, Tian S, Nie J, Jonsdottir GA, Ruotti V, Stewart R, Slukvin II, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science. 2007;318(5858):1917–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Huch M, Koo BK. Modeling mouse and human development using organoid cultures. Development. 2015;142(18):3113–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Garreta E, Kamm RD, Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM, Lancaster MA, Weiss R, Trepat X, Hyun I, Montserrat N. Rethinking organoid technology through bioengineering. Nat Mater. 2021;20(2):145–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Eiraku M, Takata N, Ishibashi H, Kawada M, Sakakura E, Okuda S, Sekiguchi K, Adachi T, Sasai Y. Self-organizing optic-cup morphogenesis in three-dimensional culture. Nature. 2011;472(7341):51–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Eiraku M, Watanabe K, Matsuo-Takasaki M, Kawada M, Yonemura S, Matsumura M, Wataya T, Nishiyama A, Muguruma K, Sasai Y. Self-organized formation of polarized cortical tissues from ESCs and its active manipulation by extrinsic signals. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;3(5):519–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Lancaster MA, Renner M, Martin CA, Wenzel D, Bicknell LS, Hurles ME, Homfray T, Penninger JM, Jackson AP, Knoblich JA. Cerebral organoids model human brain development and microcephaly. Nature. 2013;501(7467):373–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Takasato M, Er PX, Becroft M, Vanslambrouck JM, Stanley EG, Elefanty AG, Little MH. Directing human embryonic stem cell differentiation towards a renal lineage generates a self-organizing kidney. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16(1):118–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Taguchi A, Kaku Y, Ohmori T, Sharmin S, Ogawa M, Sasaki H, Nishinakamura R. Redefining the in vivo origin of metanephric nephron progenitors enables generation of complex kidney structures from pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;14(1):53–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Linnemann JR, Miura H, Meixner LK, Irmler M, Kloos UJ, Hirschi B, Bartsch HS, Sass S, Beckers J, Theis FJ, Gabka C, et al. Quantification of regenerative potential in primary human mammary epithelial cells. Development. 2015;142(18):3239–51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Jamieson PR, Dekkers JF, Rios AC, Fu NY, Lindeman GJ, Visvader JE. Derivation of a robust mouse mammary organoid system for studying tissue dynamics. Development. 2017;144(6):1065–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Maimets M, Rocchi C, Bron R, Pringle S, Kuipers J, Giepmans BN, Vries RG, Clevers H, de Haan G, van Os R, Coppes RP. Long-term in vitro expansion of salivary gland stem cells driven by Wnt signals. Stem Cell Rep. 2016;6(1):150–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Ren W, Lewandowski BC, Watson J, Aihara E, Iwatsuki K, Bachmanov AA, Margolskee RF, Jiang P. Single Lgr5- or Lgr6-expressing taste stem/progenitor cells generate taste bud cells ex vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(46):16401–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Shi Y, Inoue H, Wu JC, Yamanaka S. Induced pluripotent stem cell technology: a decade of progress. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2017;16(2):115–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Qian X, Nguyen HN, Song MM, Hadiono C, Ogden SC, Hammack C, Yao B, Hamersky GR, Jacob F, Zhong C, Yoon KJ, et al. Brain-region-specific organoids using mini-bioreactors for modeling ZIKV exposure. Cell. 2016;165(5):1238–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Lancaster MA, Corsini NS, Wolfinger S, Gustafson EH, Phillips AW, Burkard TR, Otani T, Livesey FJ, Knoblich JA. Guided self-organization and cortical plate formation in human brain organoids. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(7):659–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Mansour AA, Gonçalves JT, Bloyd CW, Li H, Fernandes S, Quang D, Johnston S, Parylak SL, Jin X, Gage FH. An in vivo model of functional and vascularized human brain organoids. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(5):432–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Pleguezuelos-Manzano C, Puschhof J, van den Brink S, Geurts V, Beumer J, Clevers H. Establishment and culture of human intestinal organoids derived from adult stem cells. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2020;130(1):e106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Xu H, Jiao D, Liu A, Wu K. Tumor organoids: applications in cancer modeling and potentials in precision medicine. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15(1):58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Rookmaaker MB, Schutgens F, Verhaar MC, Clevers H. Development and application of human adult stem or progenitor cell organoids. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2015;11(9):546–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Simmini S, Bialecka M, Huch M, Kester L, van de Wetering M, Sato T, Beck F, van Oudenaarden A, Clevers H, Deschamps J. Transformation of intestinal stem cells into gastric stem cells on loss of transcription factor Cdx2. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Cheng LK, O’Grady G, Du P, Egbuji JU, Windsor JA, Pullan AJ. Gastrointestinal system. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2010;2(1):65–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Barker N, Huch M, Kujala P, van de Wetering M, Snippert HJ, van Es JH, Sato T, Stange DE, Begthel H, van den Born M, Danenberg E, et al. Lgr5(+ve) stem cells drive self-renewal in the stomach and build long-lived gastric units in vitro. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;6(1):25–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Spence JR, Mayhew CN, Rankin SA, Kuhar MF, Vallance JE, Tolle K, Hoskins EE, Kalinichenko VV, Wells SI, Zorn AM, Shroyer NF, et al. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into intestinal tissue in vitro. Nature. 2011;470(7332):105–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. McCracken KW, Catá EM, Crawford CM, Sinagoga KL, Schumacher M, Rockich BE, Tsai YH, Mayhew CN, Spence JR, Zavros Y, Wells JM. Modelling human development and disease in pluripotent stem-cell-derived gastric organoids. Nature. 2014;516(7531):400–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Bartfeld S, Bayram T, van de Wetering M, Huch M, Begthel H, Kujala P, Vries R, Peters PJ, Clevers H. In vitro expansion of human gastric epithelial stem cells and their responses to bacterial infection. Gastroenterology. 2015;148(1):126–36.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Schlaermann P, Toelle B, Berger H, Schmidt SC, Glanemann M, Ordemann J, Bartfeld S, Mollenkopf HJ, Meyer TF. A novel human gastric primary cell culture system for modelling Helicobacter pylori infection in vitro. Gut. 2016;65(2):202–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Brassard JA, Lutolf MP. Engineering stem cell self-organization to build better organoids. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;24(6):860–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. McCracken KW, Aihara E, Martin B, Crawford CM, Broda T, Treguier J, Zhang X, Shannon JM, Montrose MH, Wells JM. Wnt/β-catenin promotes gastric fundus specification in mice and humans. Nature. 2017;541(7636):182–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Schumacher MA, Aihara E, Feng R, Engevik A, Shroyer NF, Ottemann KM, Worrell RT, Montrose MH, Shivdasani RA, Zavros Y. The use of murine-derived fundic organoids in studies of gastric physiology. J Physiol. 2015;593(8):1809–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. DiMarco RL, Dewi RE, Bernal G, Kuo C, Heilshorn SC. Protein-engineered scaffolds for in vitro 3D culture of primary adult intestinal organoids. Biomater Sci. 2015;3(10):1376–85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Gjorevski N, Sachs N, Manfrin A, Giger S, Bragina ME, Ordóñez-Morán P, Clevers H, Lutolf MP. Designer matrices for intestinal stem cell and organoid culture. Nature. 2016;539(7630):560–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Brassard JA, Nikolaev M, Hübscher T, Hofer M, Lutolf MP. Recapitulating macro-scale tissue self-organization through organoid bioprinting. Nat Mater. 2021;20(1):22–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Almazroo OA, Miah MK, Venkataramanan R. Drug metabolism in the liver. Clin Liver Dis. 2017;21(1):1–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Zaret KS. From endoderm to liver bud: paradigms of cell type specification and tissue morphogenesis. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2016;117:647–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Huch M, Dorrell C, Boj SF, van Es JH, Li VS, van de Wetering M, Sato T, Hamer K, Sasaki N, Finegold MJ, Haft A, et al. In vitro expansion of single Lgr5+ liver stem cells induced by Wnt-driven regeneration. Nature. 2013;494(7436):247–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Huch M, Gehart H, van Boxtel R, Hamer K, Blokzijl F, Verstegen MM, Ellis E, van Wenum M, Fuchs SA, de Ligt J, van de Wetering M, et al. Long-term culture of genome-stable bipotent stem cells from adult human liver. Cell. 2015;160(1–2):299–312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Hu H, Gehart H, Artegiani B, Löpez-Iglesias C, Dekkers F, Basak O, van Es J, Chuva de Sousa Lopes SM, Begthel H, Korving J, van den Born M, et al. Long-term expansion of functional mouse and human hepatocytes as 3D organoids. Cell. 2018;175(6):1591–606.e19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Peng WC, Logan CY, Fish M, Anbarchian T, Aguisanda F, Álvarez-Varela A, Wu P, Jin Y, Zhu J, Li B, Grompe M, et al. Inflammatory cytokine TNFα promotes the long-term expansion of primary hepatocytes in 3D culture. Cell. 2018;175(6):1607–19.e15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Wang S, Wang X, Tan Z, Su Y, Liu J, Chang M, Yan F, Chen J, Chen T, Li C, Hu J, et al. Human ESC-derived expandable hepatic organoids enable therapeutic liver repopulation and pathophysiological modeling of alcoholic liver injury. Cell Res. 2019;29(12):1009–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Takebe T, Sekine K, Enomura M, Koike H, Kimura M, Ogaeri T, Zhang RR, Ueno Y, Zheng YW, Koike N, Aoyama S, et al. Vascularized and functional human liver from an iPSC-derived organ bud transplant. Nature. 2013;499(7459):481–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Shek D, Chen D, Read SA, Ahlenstiel G. Examining the gut-liver axis in liver cancer using organoid models. Cancer Lett. 2021;510:48–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Sampaziotis F, Muraro D, Tysoe OC, Sawiak S, Beach TE, Godfrey EM, Upponi SS, Brevini T, Wesley BT, Garcia-Bernardo J, Mahbubani K, et al. Cholangiocyte organoids can repair bile ducts after transplantation in the human liver. Science. 2021;371(6531):839–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Kelley KW, Pașca SP. Human brain organogenesis: toward a cellular understanding of development and disease. Cell. 2022;185(1):42–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Qian X, Song H, Ming GL. Brain organoids: advances, applications and challenges. Development. 2019;146(8):dev166074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Ishii K. Reconstruction of dissociated chick brain cells in rotation-mediated culture. Cytologia (Tokyo). 1966;31(1):89–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Reynolds BA, Weiss S. Generation of neurons and astrocytes from isolated cells of the adult mammalian central nervous system. Science. 1992;255(5052):1707–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Zhang SC, Wernig M, Duncan ID, Brüstle O, Thomson JA. In vitro differentiation of transplantable neural precursors from human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19(12):1129–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Elkabetz Y, Panagiotakos G, Al Shamy G, Socci ND, Tabar V, Studer L. Human ES cell-derived neural rosettes reveal a functionally distinct early neural stem cell stage. Genes Dev. 2008;22(2):152–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Kim JE, O’Sullivan ML, Sanchez CA, Hwang M, Israel MA, Brennand K, Deerinck TJ, Goldstein LS, Gage FH, Ellisman MH, Ghosh A. Investigating synapse formation and function using human pluripotent stem cell-derived neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(7):3005–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Li XJ, Zhang X, Johnson MA, Wang ZB, Lavaute T, Zhang SC. Coordination of sonic hedgehog and Wnt signaling determines ventral and dorsal telencephalic neuron types from human embryonic stem cells. Development. 2009;136(23):4055–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Seaberg RM, van der Kooy D. Adult rodent neurogenic regions: the ventricular subependyma contains neural stem cells, but the dentate gyrus contains restricted progenitors. J Neurosci. 2002;22(5):1784–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Fasano CA, Chambers SM, Lee G, Tomishima MJ, Studer L. Efficient derivation of functional floor plate tissue from human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;6(4):336–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 82. Li XJ, Du ZW, Zarnowska ED, Pankratz M, Hansen LO, Pearce RA, Zhang SC. Specification of motoneurons from human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2005;23(2):215–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Watanabe K, Ueno M, Kamiya D, Nishiyama A, Matsumura M, Wataya T, Takahashi JB, Nishikawa S, Nishikawa S, Muguruma K, Sasai Y. A ROCK inhibitor permits survival of dissociated human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(6):681–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Kadoshima T, Sakaguchi H, Nakano T, Soen M, Ando S, Eiraku M, Sasai Y. Self-organization of axial polarity, inside-out layer pattern, and species-specific progenitor dynamics in human ES cell-derived neocortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(50):20284–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Danjo T, Eiraku M, Muguruma K, Watanabe K, Kawada M, Yanagawa Y, Rubenstein JL, Sasai Y. Subregional specification of embryonic stem cell-derived ventral telencephalic tissues by timed and combinatory treatment with extrinsic signals. J Neurosci. 2011;31(5):1919–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Muguruma K, Nishiyama A, Ono Y, Miyawaki H, Mizuhara E, Hori S, Kakizuka A, Obata K, Yanagawa Y, Hirano T, Sasai Y. Ontogeny-recapitulating generation and tissue integration of ES cell-derived Purkinje cells. Nat Neurosci. 2010;13(10):1171–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Su HL, Muguruma K, Matsuo-Takasaki M, Kengaku M, Watanabe K, Sasai Y. Generation of cerebellar neuron precursors from embryonic stem cells. Dev Biol. 2006;290(2):287–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Jo J, Xiao Y, Sun AX, Cukuroglu E, Tran HD, Göke J, Tan ZY, Saw TY, Tan CP, Lokman H, Lee Y, et al. Midbrain-like organoids from human pluripotent stem cells contain functional dopaminergic and neuromelanin-producing neurons. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;19(2):248–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Sakaguchi H, Kadoshima T, Soen M, Narii N, Ishida Y, Ohgushi M, Takahashi J, Eiraku M, Sasai Y. Generation of functional hippocampal neurons from self-organizing human embryonic stem cell-derived dorsomedial telencephalic tissue. Nat Commun. 2015;6:8896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Muguruma K, Nishiyama A, Kawakami H, Hashimoto K, Sasai Y. Self-organization of polarized cerebellar tissue in 3D culture of human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Rep. 2015;10(4):537–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Zeng Z, Huang B, Parvez RK, Li Y, Chen J, Vonk AC, Thornton ME, Patel T, Rutledge EA, Kim AD, Yu J, et al. Generation of patterned kidney organoids that recapitulate the adult kidney collecting duct system from expandable ureteric bud progenitors. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Little MH, Combes AN. Kidney organoids: accurate models or fortunate accidents. Genes Dev. 2019;33(19–20):1319–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Barnett LMA, Cummings BS. Nephrotoxicity and renal pathophysiology: a contemporary perspective. Toxicol Sci. 2018;164(2):379–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Unbekandt M, Davies JA. Dissociation of embryonic kidneys followed by reaggregation allows the formation of renal tissues. Kidney Int. 2010;77(5):407–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Xia Y, Nivet E, Sancho-Martinez I, Gallegos T, Suzuki K, Okamura D, Wu MZ, Dubova I, Esteban CR, Montserrat N, Campistol JM, et al. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent cells to ureteric bud kidney progenitor-like cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2013;15(12):1507–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Takasato M, Er PX, Chiu HS, Maier B, Baillie GJ, Ferguson C, Parton RG, Wolvetang EJ, Roost MS, Sousa Chuva de Lopes SM, Little MH. Kidney organoids from human iPS cells contain multiple lineages and model human nephrogenesis. Nature. 2015;526(7574):564–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Hale LJ, Howden SE, Phipson B, Lonsdale A, Er PX, Ghobrial I, Hosawi S, Wilson S, Lawlor KT, Khan S, Oshlack A, et al. 3D organoid-derived human glomeruli for personalised podocyte disease modelling and drug screening. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Homan KA, Gupta N, Kroll KT, Kolesky DB, Skylar-Scott M, Miyoshi T, Mau D, Valerius MT, Ferrante T, Bonventre JV, Lewis JA, et al. Flow-enhanced vascularization and maturation of kidney organoids in vitro. Nat Methods. 2019;16(3):255–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Low JH, Li P, Chew EGY, Zhou B, Suzuki K, Zhang T, Lian MM, Liu M, Aizawa E, Rodriguez Esteban C, Yong KSM, et al. Generation of human PSC-derived kidney organoids with patterned nephron segments and a de novo vascular network. Cell Stem Cell. 2019;25(3):373–87.e9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Morizane R, Lam AQ, Freedman BS, Kishi S, Valerius MT, Bonventre JV. Nephron organoids derived from human pluripotent stem cells model kidney development and injury. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;33(11):1193–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Lemos DR, McMurdo M, Karaca G, Wilflingseder J, Leaf IA, Gupta N, Miyoshi T, Susa K, Johnson BG, Soliman K, Wang G, et al. Interleukin-1β activates a MYC-dependent metabolic switch in kidney stromal cells necessary for progressive tubulointerstitial fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;29(6):1690–705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Czerniecki SM, Cruz NM, Harder JL, Menon R, Annis J, Otto EA, Gulieva RE, Islas LV, Kim YK, Tran LM, Martins TJ, et al. High-throughput screening enhances kidney organoid differentiation from human pluripotent stem cells and enables automated multidimensional phenotyping. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;22(6):929–40.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Yousef Yengej FA, Jansen J, Rookmaaker MB, Verhaar MC, Clevers H. Kidney organoids and tubuloids. Cells. 2020;9(6):1326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Lawlor KT, Vanslambrouck JM, Higgins JW, Chambon A, Bishard K, Arndt D, Er PX, Wilson SB, Howden SE, Tan KS, Li F, et al. Cellular extrusion bioprinting improves kidney organoid reproducibility and conformation. Nat Mater. 2021;20(2):260–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. van den Berg CW, Ritsma L, Avramut MC, Wiersma LE, van den Berg BM, Leuning DG, Lievers E, Koning M, Vanslambrouck JM, Koster AJ, Howden SE, et al. Renal subcapsular transplantation of PSC-derived kidney organoids induces neo-vasculogenesis and significant glomerular and tubular maturation in vivo. Stem Cell Reports. 2018;10(3):751–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Bantounas I, Ranjzad P, Tengku F, Silajdžić E, Forster D, Asselin MC, Lewis P, Lennon R, Plagge A, Wang Q, Woolf AS, et al. Generation of functioning nephrons by implanting human pluripotent stem cell-derived kidney progenitors. Stem Cell Reports. 2018;10(3):766–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Morrisey EE, Hogan BL. Preparing for the first breath: genetic and cellular mechanisms in lung development. Dev Cell. 2010;18(1):8–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Deprez M, Zaragosi LE, Truchi M, Becavin C, Ruiz García S, Arguel MJ, Plaisant M, Magnone V, Lebrigand K, Abelanet S, Brau F, et al. A single-cell atlas of the human healthy airways. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(12):1636–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Alysandratos KD, Herriges MJ, Kotton DN. Epithelial stem and progenitor cells in lung repair and regeneration. Annu Rev Physiol. 2021;83:529–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Yoshida Y, Hilborn V, Freeman AE. Fine structural identification of organoid mouse lung cells cultured on a pigskin substrate. In Vitro. 1980;16(11):994–1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Longmire TA, Ikonomou L, Hawkins F, Christodoulou C, Cao Y, Jean JC, Kwok LW, Mou H, Rajagopal J, Shen SS, Dowton AA, et al. Efficient derivation of purified lung and thyroid progenitors from embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;10(4):398–411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Wong AP, Bear CE, Chin S, Pasceri P, Thompson TO, Huan LJ, Ratjen F, Ellis J, Rossant J. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into mature airway epithelia expressing functional CFTR protein. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30(9):876–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Huang SX, Islam MN, O’Neill J, Hu Z, Yang YG, Chen YW, Mumau M, Green MD, Vunjak-Novakovic G, Bhattacharya J, Snoeck HW. Efficient generation of lung and airway epithelial cells from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(1):84–91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Dye BR, Hill DR, Ferguson MA, Tsai YH, Nagy MS, Dyal R, Wells JM, Mayhew CN, Nattiv R, Klein OD, White ES, et al. In vitro generation of human pluripotent stem cell derived lung organoids. Elife. 2015;4:e05098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Chen YW, Huang SX, de Carvalho ALRT, Ho SH, Islam MN, Volpi S, Notarangelo LD, Ciancanelli M, Casanova JL, Bhattacharya J, Liang AF, et al. A three-dimensional model of human lung development and disease from pluripotent stem cells. Nat Cell Biol. 2017;19(5):542–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Sachs N, Papaspyropoulos A, Zomer-van Ommen DD, Heo I, Böttinger L, Klay D, Weeber F, Huelsz-Prince G, Iakobachvili N, Amatngalim GD, de Ligt J, et al. Long-term expanding human airway organoids for disease modeling. EMBO J. 2019;38(4):e100300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Archer F, Bobet-Erny A, Gomes M. State of the art on lung organoids in mammals. Vet Res. 2021;52(1):77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Rock JR, Onaitis MW, Rawlins EL, Lu Y, Clark CP, Xue Y, Randell SH, Hogan BL. Basal cells as stem cells of the mouse trachea and human airway epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(31):12771–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Barkauskas CE, Cronce MJ, Rackley CR, Bowie EJ, Keene DR, Stripp BR, Randell SH, Noble PW, Hogan BL. Type 2 alveolar cells are stem cells in adult lung. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(7):3025–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Desai TJ, Brownfield DG, Krasnow MA. Alveolar progenitor and stem cells in lung development, renewal and cancer. Nature. 2014;507(7491):190–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Rawlins EL, Okubo T, Xue Y, Brass DM, Auten RL, Hasegawa H, Wang F, Hogan BL. The role of Scgb1a1+ Clara cells in the long-term maintenance and repair of lung airway, but not alveolar, epithelium. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;4(6):525–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Butler CR, Hynds RE, Gowers KH, Lee Ddo H, Brown JM, Crowley C, Teixeira VH, Smith CM, Urbani L, Hamilton NJ, Thakrar RM, et al. Rapid expansion of human epithelial stem cells suitable for airway tissue engineering. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;194(2):156–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Hild M, Jaffe AB. Production of 3-D airway organoids from primary human airway basal cells and their use in high-throughput screening. Curr Protoc Stem Cell Biol. 2016;37:Ie.9.1–Ie.9.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Chen H, Matsumoto K, Brockway BL, Rackley CR, Liang J, Lee JH, Jiang D, Noble PW, Randell SH, Kim CF, Stripp BR. Airway epithelial progenitors are region specific and show differential responses to bleomycin-induced lung injury. Stem Cells. 2012;30(9):1948–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Salahudeen AA, Choi SS, Rustagi A, Zhu J, van Unen V, de la O SM, Flynn RA, Margalef-Català M, Santos AJM, Ju J, Batish A, et al. Progenitor identification and SARS-CoV-2 infection in human distal lung organoids. Nature. 2020;588(7839):670–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Gonzalez RF, Allen L, Gonzales L, Ballard PL, Dobbs LG. HTII-280, a biomarker specific to the apical plasma membrane of human lung alveolar type II cells. J Histochem Cytochem. 2010;58(10):891–901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Lamers MM, van der Vaart J, Knoops K, Riesebosch S, Breugem TI, Mykytyn AZ, Beumer J, Schipper D, Bezstarosti K, Koopman CD, Groen N, et al. An organoid-derived bronchioalveolar model for SARS-CoV-2 infection of human alveolar type II-like cells. EMBO J. 2021;40(5):e105912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Tiwari SK, Wang S, Smith D, Carlin AF, Rana TM. Revealing tissue-specific SARS-CoV-2 infection and host responses using human stem cell-derived lung and cerebral organoids. Stem Cell Reports. 2021;16(3):437–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Chiu MC, Li C, Liu X, Yu Y, Huang J, Wan Z, Xiao D, Chu H, Cai JP, Zhou B, Sit KY, et al. A bipotential organoid model of respiratory epithelium recapitulates high infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. Cell Discov. 2022;8(1):57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Spitalieri P, Centofanti F, Murdocca M, Scioli MG, Latini A, Di Cesare S, Citro G, Rossi A, Orlandi A, Miersch S, Sidhu SS, et al. Two different therapeutic approaches for SARS-CoV-2 in hiPSCs-derived lung organoids. Cells. 2022;11(7):1235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Zomer HD, Trentin AG. Skin wound healing in humans and mice: challenges in translational research. J Dermatol Sci. 2018;90(1):3–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Sun BK, Siprashvili Z, Khavari PA. Advances in skin grafting and treatment of cutaneous wounds. Science. 2014;346(6212):941–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Lee J, Bӧscke R, Tang PC, Hartman BH, Heller S, Koehler KR. Hair follicle development in mouse pluripotent stem cell-derived skin organoids. Cell Rep. 2018;22(1):242–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Sun H, Zhang YX, Li YM. Generation of skin organoids: potential opportunities and challenges. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:709824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Lee J, Rabbani CC, Gao H, Steinhart MR, Woodruff BM, Pflum ZE, Kim A, Heller S, Liu Y, Shipchandler TZ, Koehler KR. Hair-bearing human skin generated entirely from pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2020;582(7812):399–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Spitalieri P, Talarico RV, Murdocca M, Fontana L, Marcaurelio M, Campione E, Massa R, Meola G, Serafino A, Novelli G, Sangiuolo F, et al. Generation and neuronal differentiation of hiPSCs from patients with myotonic dystrophy type 2. Front Physiol. 2018;9:967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Rao L, Qian Y, Khodabukus A, Ribar T, Bursac N. Engineering human pluripotent stem cells into a functional skeletal muscle tissue. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Lin CY, Yoshida M, Li LT, Ikenaka A, Oshima S, Nakagawa K, Sakurai H, Matsui E, Nakahata T, Saito MK. IPSC-derived functional human neuromuscular junctions model the pathophysiology of neuromuscular diseases. JCI Insight. 2019;4(18):e124299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Shahriyari M, Islam MR, Sakib SM, Rinn M, Rika A, Krüger D, Kaurani L, Gisa V, Winterhoff M, Anandakumar H, Shomroni O, et al. Engineered skeletal muscle recapitulates human muscle development, regeneration and dystrophy. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022;13(6):3106–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Bannier-Hélaouët M, Post Y, Korving J, Trani Bustos M, Gehart H, Begthel H, Bar-Ephraim YE, van der Vaart J, Kalmann R, Imhoff SM, Clevers H. Exploring the human lacrimal gland using organoids and single-cell sequencing. Cell Stem Cell. 2021;28(7):1221–32.e7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Hayashi R, Okubo T, Kudo Y, Ishikawa Y, Imaizumi T, Suzuki K, Shibata S, Katayama T, Park SJ, Young RD, Quantock AJ, et al. Generation of 3D lacrimal gland organoids from human pluripotent stem cells. Nature. 2022;605(7908):126–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Conrady CD, Joos ZP, Patel BC. Review: the lacrimal gland and its role in dry eye. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:7542929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Yu K, Bunya V, Maguire M, Asbell P, Ying GS; Dry Eye Assessment and Management Study Research Group. Systemic conditions associated with severity of dry eye signs and symptoms in the dry eye assessment and management study. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(10):1384–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. Sykes M, Sachs DH. Progress in xenotransplantation: overcoming immune barriers. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022;18(12):745–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Yui S, Nakamura T, Sato T, Nemoto Y, Mizutani T, Zheng X, Ichinose S, Nagaishi T, Okamoto R, Tsuchiya K, Clevers H, et al. Functional engraftment of colon epithelium expanded in vitro from a single adult Lgr5⁺ stem cell. Nat Med. 2012;18(4):618–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Fordham RP, Yui S, Hannan NR, Soendergaard C, Madgwick A, Schweiger PJ, Nielsen OH, Vallier L, Pedersen RA, Nakamura T, Watanabe M, et al. Transplantation of expanded fetal intestinal progenitors contributes to colon regeneration after injury. Cell Stem Cell. 2013;13(6):734–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Watson CL, Mahe MM, Múnera J, Howell JC, Sundaram N, Poling HM, Schweitzer JI, Vallance JE, Mayhew CN, Sun Y, Grabowski G, et al. An in vivo model of human small intestine using pluripotent stem cells. Nat Med. 2014;20(11):1310–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Xiang T, Wang J, Li H. Current applications of intestinal organoids: a review. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2024;15(1):155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Finkbeiner SR, Freeman JJ, Wieck MM, El-Nachef W, Altheim CH, Tsai YH, Huang S, Dyal R, White ES, Grikscheit TC, Teitelbaum DH, et al. Generation of tissue-engineered small intestine using embryonic stem cell-derived human intestinal organoids. Biol Open. 2015;4(11):1462–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Kitano K, Schwartz DM, Zhou H, Gilpin SE, Wojtkiewicz GR, Ren X, Sommer CA, Capilla AV, Mathisen DJ, Goldstein AM, Mostoslavsky G, et al. Bioengineering of functional human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived intestinal grafts. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Schweinlin M, Wilhelm S, Schwedhelm I, Hansmann J, Rietscher R, Jurowich C, Walles H, Metzger M. Development of an advanced primary human in vitro model of the small intestine. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2016;22(9):873–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152. Nie YZ, Zheng YW, Ogawa M, Miyagi E, Taniguchi H. Human liver organoids generated with single donor-derived multiple cells rescue mice from acute liver failure. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;9(1):5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Sampaziotis F, Justin AW, Tysoe OC, Sawiak S, Godfrey EM, Upponi SS, Gieseck RL, III, de Brito MC, Berntsen NL, Gómez-Vázquez MJ, Ortmann D, et al. Reconstruction of the mouse extrahepatic biliary tree using primary human extrahepatic cholangiocyte organoids. Nat Med. 2017;23(8):954–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Lakowski J, Welby E, Budinger D, Di Marco F, Di Foggia V, Bainbridge JWB, Wallace K, Gamm DM, Ali RR, Sowden JC. Isolation of human photoreceptor precursors via a cell surface marker panel from stem cell-derived retinal organoids and fetal retinae. Stem Cells. 2018;36(5):709–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Santos-Ferreira T, Völkner M, Borsch O, Haas J, Cimalla P, Vasudevan P, Carmeliet P, Corbeil D, Michalakis S, Koch E, Karl MO, et al. Stem cell-derived photoreceptor transplants differentially integrate into mouse models of cone-rod dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57(7):3509–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Yoshihara E, O’Connor C, Gasser E, Wei Z, Oh TG, Tseng TW, Wang D, Cayabyab F, Dai Y, Yu RT, Liddle C, et al. Immune-evasive human islet-like organoids ameliorate diabetes. Nature. 2020;586(7830):606–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Weiner AI, Jackson SR, Zhao G, Quansah KK, Farshchian JN, Neupauer KM, Littauer EQ, Paris AJ, Liberti DC, Scott Worthen G, Morrisey EE, et al. Mesenchyme-free expansion and transplantation of adult alveolar progenitor cells: steps toward cell-based regenerative therapies. NPJ Regen Med. 2019;4:17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158. Myer H, Chupita S, Jnah A. Cystic fibrosis: back to the basics. Neonatal Netw. 2023;42(1):23–30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159. Dekkers JF, Wiegerinck CL, de Jonge HR, Bronsveld I, Janssens HM, de Winter-de Groot KM, Brandsma AM, de Jong NW, Bijvelds MJ, Scholte BJ, Nieuwenhuis EE, et al. A functional CFTR assay using primary cystic fibrosis intestinal organoids. Nat Med. 2013;19(7):939–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160. Bershteyn M, Nowakowski TJ, Pollen AA, Di Lullo E, Nene A, Wynshaw-Boris A, Kriegstein AR. Human iPSC-derived cerebral organoids model cellular features of lissencephaly and reveal prolonged mitosis of outer radial glia. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;20(4):435–49.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161. Raja WK, Mungenast AE, Lin YT, Ko T, Abdurrob F, Seo J, Tsai LH. Self-organizing 3D human neural tissue derived from induced pluripotent stem cells recapitulate Alzheimer’s disease phenotypes. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(9):e0161969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162. Heo I, Dutta D, Schaefer DA, Iakobachvili N, Artegiani B, Sachs N, Boonekamp KE, Bowden G, Hendrickx APA, Willems RJL, Peters PJ, et al. Modelling Cryptosporidium infection in human small intestinal and lung organoids. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3(7):814–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163. Hui KPY, Ching RHH, Chan SKH, Nicholls JM, Sachs N, Clevers H, Peiris JSM, Chan MCW. Tropism, replication competence, and innate immune responses of influenza virus: an analysis of human airway organoids and ex-vivo bronchus cultures. Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6(11):846–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164. van Dijk LLA, Rijsbergen LC, Rubio BT, Schmitz KS, Gommers L, Comvalius AD, Havelaar A, van Amerongen G, Schepp R, Lamers MM, GeurtsvanKessel CH, et al. Virus neutralization assays for human respiratory syncytial virus using airway organoids. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2024;81(1):267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165. Cugola FR, Fernandes IR, Russo FB, Freitas BC, Dias JL, Guimarães KP, Benazzato C, Almeida N, Pignatari GC, Romero S, Polonio CM, et al. The Brazilian Zika virus strain causes birth defects in experimental models. Nature. 2016;534(7606):267–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166. Garcez PP, Loiola EC, Madeiro da, Costa R, Higa LM, Trindade P, Delvecchio R, Nascimento JM, Brindeiro R, Tanuri A, Rehen SK. Zika virus impairs growth in human neurospheres and brain organoids. Science. 2016;352(6287):816–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167. Zhou J, Li C, Zhao G, Chu H, Wang D, Yan HH, Poon VK, Wen L, Wong BH, Zhao X, Chiu MC, et al. Human intestinal tract serves as an alternative infection route for Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Sci Adv. 2017;3(11):eaao4966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168. Ettayebi K, Crawford SE, Murakami K, Broughman JR, Karandikar U, Tenge VR, Neill FH, Blutt SE, Zeng XL, Qu L, Kou B, et al. Replication of human noroviruses in stem cell-derived human enteroids. Science. 2016;353(6306):1387–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169. Sato T, Stange DE, Ferrante M, Vries RG, Van Es JH, Van den Brink S, Van Houdt WJ, Pronk A, Van Gorp J, Siersema PD, Clevers H. Long-term expansion of epithelial organoids from human colon, adenoma, adenocarcinoma, and Barrett’s epithelium. Gastroenterology. 2011;141(5):1762–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170. Farin HF, Mosa MH, Ndreshkjana B, Grebbin BM, Ritter B, Menche C, Kennel KB, Ziegler PK, Szabó L, Bollrath J, Rieder D, et al. Colorectal cancer organoid-stroma biobank allows subtype-specific assessment of individualized therapy responses. Cancer Discov. 2023;13(10):2192–211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171. Toshimitsu K, Takano A, Fujii M, Togasaki K, Matano M, Takahashi S, Kanai T, Sato T. Organoid screening reveals epigenetic vulnerabilities in human colorectal cancer. Nat Chem Biol. 2022;18(6):605–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172. Yang H, Cheng J, Zhuang H, Xu H, Wang Y, Zhang T, Yang Y, Qian H, Lu Y, Han F, Cao L, et al. Pharmacogenomic profiling of intra-tumor heterogeneity using a large organoid biobank of liver cancer. Cancer Cell. 2024;42(4):535–51.e8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173. Ji S, Feng L, Fu Z, Wu G, Wu Y, Lin Y, Lu D, Song Y, Cui P, Yang Z, Sang C, et al. Pharmaco-proteogenomic characterization of liver cancer organoids for precision oncology. Sci Transl Med. 2023;15(706):eadg3358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174. Seino T, Kawasaki S, Shimokawa M, Tamagawa H, Toshimitsu K, Fujii M, Ohta Y, Matano M, Nanki K, Kawasaki K, Takahashi S, et al. Human pancreatic tumor organoids reveal loss of stem cell niche factor dependence during disease progression. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;22(3):454–67.e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175. Kopper O, de Witte CJ, Lõhmussaar K, Valle-Inclan JE, Hami N, Kester L, Balgobind AV, Korving J, Proost N, Begthel H, van Wijk LM, et al. An organoid platform for ovarian cancer captures intra- and interpatient heterogeneity. Nat Med. 2019;25(5):838–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176. Seidlitz T, Merker SR, Rothe A, Zakrzewski F, von Neubeck C, Grützmann K, Sommer U, Schweitzer C, Schölch S, Uhlemann H, Gaebler AM, et al. Human gastric cancer modelling using organoids. Gut. 2019;68(2):207–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177. Yan HHN, Siu HC, Law S, Ho SL, Yue SSK, Tsui WY, Chan D, Chan AS, Ma S, Lam KO, Bartfeld S, et al. A comprehensive human gastric cancer organoid biobank captures tumor subtype heterogeneity and enables therapeutic screening. Cell Stem Cell. 2018;23(6):882–97.e11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178. Lo YH, Kolahi KS, Du Y, Chang CY, Krokhotin A, Nair A, Sobba WD, Karlsson K, Jones SJ, Longacre TA, Mah AT, et al. A CRISPR/Cas9-engineered ARID1A-deficient human gastric cancer organoid model reveals essential and nonessential modes of oncogenic transformation. Cancer Discov. 2021;11(6):1562–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179. Schafer ST, Mansour AA, Schlachetzki JCM, Pena M, Ghassemzadeh S, Mitchell L, Mar A, Quang D, Stumpf S, Ortiz IS, Lana AJ, et al. An in vivo neuroimmune organoid model to study human microglia phenotypes. Cell. 2023;186(10):2111–26.e20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180. Novelli G, Spitalieri P, Murdocca M, Centanini E, Sangiuolo F. Organoid factory: the recent role of the human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) in precision medicine. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:1059579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181. Crespo M, Vilar E, Tsai SY, Chang K, Amin S, Srinivasan T, Zhang T, Pipalia NH, Chen HJ, Witherspoon M, Gordillo M, et al. Colonic organoids derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells for modeling colorectal cancer and drug testing. Nat Med. 2017;23(7):878–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182. Qian X, Nguyen HN, Jacob F, Song H, Ming GL. Using brain organoids to understand Zika virus-induced microcephaly. Development. 2017;144(6):952–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183. Watanabe M, Buth JE, Vishlaghi N, de la Torre-Ubieta L, Taxidis J, Khakh BS, Coppola G, Pearson CA, Yamauchi K, Gong D, Dai X, et al. Self-organized cerebral organoids with human-specific features predict effective drugs to combat Zika virus infection. Cell Rep. 2017;21(2):517–32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184. Zhou T, Tan L, Cederquist GY, Fan Y, Hartley BJ, Mukherjee S, Tomishima M, Brennand KJ, Zhang Q, Schwartz RE, Evans T, et al. High-content screening in hPSC-neural progenitors identifies drug candidates that inhibit Zika virus infection in fetal-like organoids and adult brain. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;21(2):274–83.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185. Kozuka K, He Y, Koo-McCoy S, Kumaraswamy P, Nie B, Shaw K, Chan P, Leadbetter M, He L, Lewis JG, Zhong Z, et al. Development and characterization of a human and mouse intestinal epithelial cell monolayer platform. Stem Cell Rep. 2017;9(6):1976–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186. Qin X, Cao M, Peng T, Shan H, Lian W, Yu Y, Shui G, Li R. Features, potential invasion pathways, and reproductive health risks of microplastics detected in human uterus. Environ Sci Technol. 2024;58(24):10482–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187. Kasendra M, Luc R, Yin J, Manatakis DV, Kulkarni G, Lucchesi C, Sliz J, Apostolou A, Sunuwar L, Obrigewitch J, Jang KJ, et al. Duodenum Intestine-Chip for preclinical drug assessment in a human relevant model. Elife. 2020;9:e50135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188. Zhang K, Xi J, Wang Y, Xue J, Li B, Huang Z, Zheng Z, Liang N, Wei Z. A microfluidic chip-based automated system for whole-course monitoring the drug responses of organoids. Anal Chem. 2024;96(24):10092–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189. Matthews JM, Schuster B, Kashaf SS, Liu P, Ben-Yishay R, Ishay-Ronen D, Izumchenko E, Shen L, Weber CR, Bielski M, Kupfer SS, et al. OrganoID: a versatile deep learning platform for tracking and analysis of single-organoid dynamics. PLoS Comput Biol. 2022;18(11):e1010584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190. Ansaldo E, Farley TK, Belkaid Y. Control of immunity by the microbiota. Annu Rev Immunol. 2021;39:449–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191. Rondanelli M, Giacosa A, Faliva MA, Perna S, Allieri F, Castellazzi AM. Review on microbiota and effectiveness of probiotics use in older. World J Clin Cases. 2015;3(2):156–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192. Islam MM, Mahbub NU, Islam MA. Gut microorganism-mediated neutralization of mycotoxins: a promising approach to combat fungal toxicity. Adv Gut Microbiome Res. 2024;2024(1):8448547. [Google Scholar]
- 193. Hao WL, Lee YK. Microflora of the gastrointestinal tract: a review. Methods Mol Biol. 2004;268:491–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194. Parker A, Lawson MAE, Vaux L, Pin C. Host-microbe interaction in the gastrointestinal tract. Environ Microbiol. 2018;20(7):2337–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195. Swanson HI. Drug metabolism by the host and gut microbiota: a partnership or rivalry? Drug Metab Dispos. 2015;43(10):1499–504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196. Enright EF, Gahan CG, Joyce SA, Griffin BT. The impact of the gut microbiota on drug metabolism and clinical outcome. Yale J Biol Med. 2016;89(3):375–82. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197. Kostic AD, Xavier RJ, Gevers D. The microbiome in inflammatory bowel disease: current status and the future ahead. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(6):1489–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198. Thursby E, Juge N. Introduction to the human gut microbiota. Biochem J. 2017;474(11):1823–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199. Shaffiey SA, Jia H, Keane T, Costello C, Wasserman D, Quidgley M, Dziki J, Badylak S, Sodhi CP, March JC, Hackam DJ. Intestinal stem cell growth and differentiation on a tubular scaffold with evaluation in small and large animals. Regen Med. 2016;11(1):45–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200. In JG, Foulke-Abel J, Estes MK, Zachos NC, Kovbasnjuk O, Donowitz M. Human mini-guts: new insights into intestinal physiology and host-pathogen interactions. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;13(11):633–42. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201. Hou Q, Ye L, Liu H, Huang L, Yang Q, Turner JR, Yu Q. Lactobacillus accelerates ISCs regeneration to protect the integrity of intestinal mucosa through activation of STAT3 signaling pathway induced by LPLs secretion of IL-22. Cell Death Differ. 2018;25(9):1657–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202. Engevik MA, Engevik KA, Yacyshyn MB, Wang J, Hassett DJ, Darien B, Yacyshyn BR, Worrell RT. Human Clostridium difficile infection: inhibition of NHE3 and microbiota profile. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2015;308(6):G497–509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203. Forbester JL, Goulding D, Vallier L, Hannan N, Hale C, Pickard D, Mukhopadhyay S, Dougan G. Interaction of salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium with intestinal organoids derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells. Infect Immun. 2015;83(7):2926–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204. Takeishi K, Collin de, l’Hortet A, Wang Y, Handa K, Guzman-Lepe J, Matsubara K, Morita K, Jang S, Haep N, Florentino RM, Yuan F, et al. Assembly and function of a bioengineered human liver for transplantation generated solely from induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Rep. 2020;31(9):107711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205. Cederquist GY, Asciolla JJ, Tchieu J, Walsh RM, Cornacchia D, Resh MD, Studer L. Specification of positional identity in forebrain organoids. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37(4):436–44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206. Bhaduri A, Andrews MG, Mancia Leon W, Jung D, Shin D, Allen D, Jung D, Schmunk G, Haeussler M, Salma J, Pollen AA, et al. Cell stress in cortical organoids impairs molecular subtype specification. Nature. 2020;578(7793):142–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207. Mansour AA, Schafer ST, Gage FH. Cellular complexity in brain organoids: current progress and unsolved issues. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2021;111:32–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208. Kozlowski MT, Crook CJ, Ku HT. Towards organoid culture without Matrigel. Commun Biol. 2021;4(1):1387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209. Hofer M, Lutolf MP. Engineering organoids. Nat Rev Mater. 2021;6(5):402–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210. Sulaksono HLS, Annisa A, Ruslami R, Mufeeduzzaman M, Panatarani C, Hermawan W, Ekawardhani S, Joni IM. Recent advances in graphene oxide-based on organoid culture as disease model and cell behavior—a systematic literature review. Int J Nanomedicine. 2024;19:6201–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211. Lingard E, Dong S, Hoyle A, Appleton E, Hales A, Skaria E, Lawless C, Taylor-Hearn I, Saadati S, Chu Q, Miller AF, et al. Optimising a self-assembling peptide hydrogel as a Matrigel alternative for 3-dimensional mammary epithelial cell culture. Biomater Adv. 2024;160:213847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212. Workman MJ, Mahe MM, Trisno S, Poling HM, Watson CL, Sundaram N, Chang CF, Schiesser J, Aubert P, Stanley EG, Elefanty AG, et al. Engineered human pluripotent-stem-cell-derived intestinal tissues with a functional enteric nervous system. Nat Med. 2017;23(1):49–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213. Koike H, Iwasawa K, Ouchi R, Maezawa M, Giesbrecht K, Saiki N, Ferguson A, Kimura M, Thompson WL, Wells JM, Zorn AM, et al. Modelling human hepato-biliary-pancreatic organogenesis from the foregut-midgut boundary. Nature. 2019;574(7776):112–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214. Zhang C, Zhao Z, Abdul Rahim NA, van Noort D, Yu H. Towards a human-on-chip: culturing multiple cell types on a chip with compartmentalized microenvironments. Lab Chip. 2009;9(22):3185–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215. Zhang YS, Aleman J, Shin SR, Kilic T, Kim D, Mousavi Shaegh SA, Massa S, Riahi R, Chae S, Hu N, Avci H, et al. Multisensor-integrated organs-on-chips platform for automated and continual in situ monitoring of organoid behaviors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(12):E2293–302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216. Liu YC, Ansaryan S, Tan J, Broguiere N, Lorenzo-Martín LF, Homicsko K, Coukos G, Lütolf MP, Altug H. Nanoplasmonic single-tumoroid microarray for real-time secretion analysis. Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024;11(34):e2401539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217. Kim J, Kim J, Jin Y, Cho SW. In situ biosensing technologies for an organ-on-a-chip. Biofabrication. 2023;15(4):2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218. Geyer M, Schreyer D, Gaul LM, Pfeffer S, Pilarsky C, Queiroz K. A microfluidic-based PDAC organoid system reveals the impact of hypoxia in response to treatment. Cell Death Discov. 2023;9(1):20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219. Tran T, Song CJ, Nguyen T, Cheng SY, McMahon JA, Yang R, Guo Q, Der B, Lindström NO, Lin DC, McMahon AP. A scalable organoid model of human autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease for disease mechanism and drug discovery. Cell Stem Cell. 2022;29(7):1083–101.e7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



