Table 3.
Characteristics of attitude studies
| Author(s)
|
Country
|
Setting
|
Inclusion criteria
|
Question on attitude to screening
|
Age range of sample
|
Ethnicity of sample
|
Socioeconomic status of sample
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asking women | |||||||
| Friedman et al (1992)12 | USA | Primary care divisions of one private and one public hospital | All female and male primary care patients aged ⩾18 with ability to understand English | Attitude to physicians screening for DV, where perpetrator is member of household or immediate family or any relative | 52% aged ⩽50 | 55% white, 30% African-American, 6% hispanic, 4% Caribbean, 5% other | 52% >high school education |
| Caralis and Musialowski (1997)13 | USA | Primary care (ambulatory clinics) | All female patients who came daily during designated 4 hour time blocks | Attitude to doctors routinely screening for DV in their practices, where perpetrator is partner or relative | 34-66 | 26% black, 16% hispanic, 58% non-hispanic or white | 33% <$10 000 pa, 9% >$25 000 pa; 40% employed, 30% retired, 8% homemaker; 41% high school graduate, 19% college or beyond |
| Gielen et al (2000)14 | USA | Primary care (HMO provider) | Female patients aged 21-55 at time of recruitment, enrolled with HMO from 1995 through 1997, who had completed an initial telephone screening interview to ascertain DV status | Policy preferences for routine screening for partner abuse, including attitude to doctors and nurses asking all women at all visits about physical and sexual abuse | 55% aged ⩽40 | 41% white (abused); 55% white (non-abused) | 34% graduates (abused), 54% graduates (non-abused); 40% income ⩾$50 000 pa (abused), 57% income ⩾$50 000 pa (non-abused) |
| McNutt et al (1999)15 | USA | Family practice and domestic violence programmes | Female English speaking patients aged 18-44 having an obstetrics and gynaecology, general physical or other extended examination | Attitude to doctors screening all women for DV, where perpetrator is partner | From age range 18-24 to 35-44 | 47% white, 41% African-American, 12% other | Not stated |
| Non-residential women attending support groups or an individual appointment at four DV programmes, or women residents of shelter attending group meetings | From age range 18-24 to ⩾45 | 54% white, 21% African-American, 25% other | |||||
| Asking health professionals | |||||||
| Friedman et al (1992)12 | USA | Primary care divisions of one private and one public hospital | Primary care attending physicians | Attitude to physicians screening for DV at annual examination, where perpetrator is member of household or immediate family or any relative | Not stated | Not stated | Not stated |
| Ellis (1999)16 | USA | Emergency department | Registered nurses in a level 1 trauma centre | Attitude to nurses screening all women for current and past DV, where perpetrator is partner | 24-59 | Not stated | All educated to at least diploma level |
DV=domestic violence; HMO=health maintenance organisation.