Table 3.
men (N = 836): OR$ (95% CI) | |||||
depression | anxiety | somatisation | chronic fatigue | psychotropic | |
Effort-reward imbalance1 | *** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
T1 yes-T2 no | 1.2 (0.5–2.9) | 0.8 (0.3–2.1) | 1.5 (0.7–3.4) | 1.4 (0.7–3.1) | 1.5 (0.6–4.1) |
T1 no-T2 yes | 4.6 (2.3–9.2) | 3.7 (1.7–7.8) | 4.1 (2.0–8.5) | 3.4 (1.7–6.7) | 3.2 (1.5–7.0) |
T1 yes-T2 yes | 2.8 (1.3–5.7) | 2.3 (1.1–4.8) | 2.0 (0.9–4.4) | 1.8 (0.9–3.6) | 3.4 (1.5–7.7) |
Overcommitment | ** | ** | * | n.s. | n.s. |
yes | 2.4 (1.4–4.1) | 2.5 (1.5–4.4) | 1.8 (1.1–3.1) | 1.2 (0.8–2.0) | 1.1 (0.6–2.1) |
women (N = 700): OR$ (95% CI) | |||||
depression | anxiety | somatisation | chronic fatigue | psychotropic | |
Effort-reward imbalance1 | *** | ** | ** | *** | * |
T1 yes-T2 no | 1.3 (0.5–3.2) | 1.1 (0.4–3.1) | 1.6 (0.5–4.5) | 1.2 (0.5–3.1) | 1.0 (0.3–3.0) |
T1 no- T2 yes | 3.2 (1.6–6.4) | 2.3 (1.1–4.8) | 3.5 (1.7–7.2) | 2.0 (0.9–4.1) | 2.7 (1.3–5.6) |
T 1 yes-T2 yes | 4.6 (2.3–9.0) | 4.5 (2.1–9.8) | 3.6 (1.6–8.2) | 7.1 (3.4–14.5) | 1.4 (0.5–3.5) |
Overcommitment | * | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s |
yes | 1.8 (1.0–3.0) | 1.6 (0.9–2.9) | 0.8 (0.4–1.4) | 1.1 (0.6–2.0) | 1.4 (0.7–2.6) |
1reference group: effort-reward imbalance T1 0, T2 0 : OR = 1.0
$ adjusted for age, education, threat from global economy, job dissatisfaction, workplace instability
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001