Skip to main content
. 2005 Jun 14;4:16. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-4-16

Table 5.

Comparisons of crude and adjusted mortality clustering

Mortality clustera Crude Adjusted b Adjusted c

RR p-value RR p-value RR p-value
Male colon cancer

MC1 1.14 <0.001 * 1.10 <0.001
MC2 1.13 <0.001 1.14 <0.001 1.15 <0.001
MC3 1.10 0.002 * *
MC4 1.18 0.015 * *
MC5 1.51 0.02 1.39 0.009 *

Male lung cancer

MC1 1.17 <0.001 1.11 <0.001 1.16 <0.001
MC2 1.12 <0.001 1.08 <0.001 1.10 <0.001
MC3 1.22 <0.001 * *
MC4 1.13 <0.001 1.12 <0.001 1.08 <0.001
MC5 1.66 <0.001 1.61 0.004 1.65 <0.001
MC6 1.08 <0.001 1.13 <0.001 1.09 0.007
MC7 1.13 0.03 1.08 0.02 1.13 <0.001

Female breast cancer

MC1 1.30 <0.001 * 1.22 <0.001
MC2 1.12 <0.001 * *
MC3 1.13 0.01 1.19 <0.001 1.16 <0.001
MC4 1.22 0.045 * *

aMortality cluster (MC) of municipalities with high mortality was identified by the spatial scan statistic: Figures 2-4. bAdjusted for relative risk of societal indices and population density.

cAdjusted for relative risk of societal cluster. *Cluster was not detected.