Table 2. Number and appearance ratio (%) of the pistil per flower in ‘Sanenashi’ and ‘Kosui’ for 2 years.
| Sample | Year | No. of flowers | No. of pistil | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||
| ‘Sanenashi’ | 2011 | 1076 | 10 | (0.9%) | 110 | (10.2%) | 380 | (35.3%) | 414 | (38.5%) | 127 | (11.8%) | 35 | (3.3%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) |
| 2010 | 1213 | 2 | (0.2%) | 90 | (7.4%) | 738 | (60.8%) | 331 | (27.3%) | 47 | (3.9%) | 5 | (0.4%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | |
| Mean | 1144 | 6 | (0.5%) | 100 | (8.7%) | 559 | (48.9%) | 372.5 | (32.6%) | 87 | (7.6%) | 20 | (1.7%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | |
| ‘Kosui’ | 2011 | 285 | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 2 | (0.7%) | 24 | (8.4%) | 40 | (14.0%) | 91 | (31.9%) | 93 | (32.6%) | 28 | (9.8%) | 6 | (2.1%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 1 | (0.4%) |
| 2010 | 153 | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 2 | (1.3%) | 15 | (9.8%) | 38 | (24.8%) | 74 | (48.4%) | 23 | (15.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 1 | (0.7%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | |
| Mean | 219 | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 2 | (0.9%) | 19.5 | (8.9%) | 39 | (17.8%) | 82.5 | (37.7%) | 58 | (26.5%) | 14 | (6.4%) | 3.5 | (1.6%) | 0 | (0.0%) | 0.5 | (0.2%) | |