. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2024 Mar 15;28(6):1882–1897. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04282-6

Table 4.

Path-analysis results: direct associations (N = 409)

	OUTCOME
	FNE^a		CESD^b		ADH^c
	B	p-value	B	p-value	B	p-value

Class 1: Low Stigmas (Ref. group)
Class 2: Moderate SU stigma	4.927	0.03	7.619	0.007	− 5.086	0.30
Class 3: Higher HIV and lower SU stigma	2.511	0.01	2.175	0.24	− 6.755	0.19
Class 4: High SU and moderate HIV stigma	3.293	0.001	6.354	< 0.001	− 9.141	0.02
Class 5: High HIV and moderate SU stigma	8.063	< 0.001	6.203	0.03	2.474	0.27
FNE			0.583	< 0.001	− 0.248	0.03
CESD					− 0.228	0.002

B: Unstandardized linear regression coefficient; The model included intersectionality stigma classes, fear of negative evaluation (FNE), depression symptoms (CESD) as predictors of ART adherence (ADH). Model adjusted for covariates, including Age, Income, Marital status, Education, Race, Ethnicity, Drug use.

^a)

Fear of Negative Evaluation: Fig. 1, path a;

^b)

CESD, Depression symptoms: Fig. 1, path b;

^c)

Adherence: Fig. 1, path c