Table 3.

Effects of Randomization to DRA vs Conventional TRA on Vascular Access Crossover Across Tertiles of Anthropometric Measures

	Unadjusted OR (95% CI)	P Value for Interaction	Adjusted OR (95% CI)	P Value for Interaction
Body weight
1st tertile DRA vs conventional TRA (n = 456)	2.60 (1.18-5.76)	0.704	2.72 (1.22-6.04)	0.645
2nd tertile DRA vs conventional TRA (n = 418)	2.66 (0.83-8.48)		2.91 (0.91-9.32)
3rd tertile DRA vs conventional TRA (n = 429)	1.66 (0.72-3.84)		1.67 (0.72-3.87)
Body height
1st tertile DRA vs conventional TRA (n = 443)	2.95 (1.38-6.31)	0.080	3.07 (1.43-6.58)	0.072
2nd tertile DRA vs conventional TRA (n = 447)	3.79 (1.24-11.59)		3.81 (1.24-11.67)
3rd tertile DRA vs conventional TRA (n = 411)	0.86 (0.33-2.28)		0.86 (0.32-2.26)
BMI
1st tertile DRA vs conventional TRA (n = 434)	2.48 (1.02-6.08)	0.840	2.56 (1.04-6.30)	0.794
2nd tertile DRA vs conventional TRA (n = 454)	1.76 (0.69-4.49)		1.77 (0.69-4.54)
3rd tertile DRA vs conventional TRA (n = 413)	2.44 (1.06-5.60)		2.65 (1.14-6.14)
BSA
1st tertile DRA vs conventional TRA (n = 436)	2.50 (1.16-5.39)	0.392	2.62 (1.21-5.67)	0.338
2nd tertile DRA vs conventional TRA (n = 433)	3.89 (1.08-13.97)		4.13 (1.14-14.89)
3rd tertile DRA vs conventional TRA (n = 432)	1.43 (0.61-3.33)		1.41 (0.60-3.29)

Abbreviations as in Table 2.