Table 3.
Methodological evaluation of the guidelines included in this study.
Study | Standardized Scores in Various Domains (%) |
≥ 60% | ≥ 30% | Quality Evaluation |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Domain 1: Scopes and objects |
Domain 2: Stakeholder Participant |
Domain 3: Rigour of development |
Domain4: Clarity of guidelines |
Domain 5: Applicability |
Domain 6: Editorial Independence |
||||
EAU25 | 92.6% | 88.9% | 82.6% | 74.1% | 63.9% | 66.7% | 6 | 6 | A |
WHO26 | 87.0% | 83.3% | 80.1% | 72.2% | 80.5% | 61.1% | 6 | 6 | A |
Gacci et al.27 | 81.5% | 79.6% | 75.7% | 77.8% | 66.7% | 75.0% | 6 | 6 | A |
EAU28 | 94.4% | 83.4% | 79.2% | 83.3% | 81.9% | 80.1% | 6 | 6 | A |
NICE29 | 83.3% | 63.0% | 69.4% | 77.8% | 61.1% | 55.6% | 5 | 6 | B |
NICE30 | 88.9% | 74.1% | 70.1% | 83.3% | 66.7% | 52.8% | 5 | 6 | B |
Stangel-Wojcikiewic et al.31 | 64.8% | 59.3% | 62.5% | 66.7% | 69.4% | 52.8% | 4 | 6 | B |
Huang et al.32 | 87.0% | 74.1% | 87.5% | 88.9% | 47.2% | 0 | 4 | 6 | B |