Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 26;12:100647. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100647

Table 3.

Methodological evaluation of the guidelines included in this study.

Study Standardized Scores in Various Domains (%)
≥ 60% ≥ 30% Quality
Evaluation
Domain 1:
Scopes and objects
Domain 2:
Stakeholder
Participant
Domain 3:
Rigour of development
Domain4:
Clarity of guidelines
Domain 5:
Applicability
Domain 6:
Editorial
Independence
EAU25 92.6% 88.9% 82.6% 74.1% 63.9% 66.7% 6 6 A
WHO26 87.0% 83.3% 80.1% 72.2% 80.5% 61.1% 6 6 A
Gacci et al.27 81.5% 79.6% 75.7% 77.8% 66.7% 75.0% 6 6 A
EAU28 94.4% 83.4% 79.2% 83.3% 81.9% 80.1% 6 6 A
NICE29 83.3% 63.0% 69.4% 77.8% 61.1% 55.6% 5 6 B
NICE30 88.9% 74.1% 70.1% 83.3% 66.7% 52.8% 5 6 B
Stangel-Wojcikiewic et al.31 64.8% 59.3% 62.5% 66.7% 69.4% 52.8% 4 6 B
Huang et al.32 87.0% 74.1% 87.5% 88.9% 47.2% 0 4 6 B