Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 7;11:e2593. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2593

Table 7. Comparison with other methods.

Models mAP@0.5/% AR Para/106 GFLOPs F1-score/% FPS
Faster R-CNN 73.2 52.1 28.3 940.9 60 11
Cascade R-CNN 54.8 61.2 87.9 110.6 56.4 24
SSD 72.7 54 26.2 62.7 61 76
EfficientDet 49.8 44.8 3.8 5.2 46 27
YOLOv3-tiny 76.1 68.5 8.7 13.0 71.2 220
YOLOv5n 80.6 76.1 1.7 4.2 77.1 218
YOLOv5s 85.2 82.6 7.02 15.8 83 156
YOLOv8n 84.2 77.9 3.0 8.1 80.3 243
YOLOv8n-BIFPN 84.5 80.5 3.0 8.1 81.3 238
YOLOv8n-GhostConv 83.6 81.4 2.8 7.7 80.5 256
YOLOv8n-CondConv 84.9 78.5 3.0 7.8 81.4 231
YOLOv8n-DWConv 85.6 78 3.0 7.9 81.8 237
OBC-YOLOv8 86 81.1 3.2 8.0 81.9 222