Skip to main content
. 2024 Dec 11;10:e2577. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2577

Table 10. Evaluation metrics—SVM implementation of Urdu POS tagging.

POS tag Precision Recall F1-score Support
APNA 0.47 0.49 0.48 122
AUXA 0.66 0.71 0.69 444
AUXM 0.69 0.73 0.71 105
AUXP 0.75 0.82 0.78 104
AUXT 0.76 0.85 0.80 860
CC 0.59 0.66 0.62 655
CD 0.49 0.57 0.53 389
FF 1.00 0.50 0.67 2
FR 0.45 0.56 0.50 9
INJ 0.33 0.27 0.30 11
JJ 0.42 0.34 0.38 1,229
NEG 0.50 0.59 0.54 215
NN 0.67 0.72 0.69 6,621
NNP 0.72 0.66 0.69 1,722
OD 0.39 0.46 0.42 93
PDM 0.45 0.40 0.42 498
PRD 0.24 0.31 0.27 16
PRE 0.00 0.00 0.00 4
PRF 0.56 0.50 0.53 18
PRP 0.55 0.46 0.50 972
PRR 0.53 0.57 0.55 147
PRS 0.27 0.22 0.24 78
PSP 0.78 0.84 0.81 4,361
PU 0.99 0.99 0.99 1,450
Q 0.43 0.34 0.38 307
QM 0.00 0.00 0.00 5
RB 0.40 0.29 0.34 218
SC 0.71 0.75 0.73 515
SCK 0.58 0.53 0.56 75
SCP 0.46 0.32 0.38 128
VALA 0.43 0.45 0.44 88
VBF 0.66 0.53 0.59 2,019
VBI 0.62 0.53 0.57 375
Accuracy 0.68 23,855
Macro avg 0.53 0.51 0.52 23,855
Weighted avg 0.67 0.68 0.68 23,855