Table 2. Performance (in percentage) for entity prediction task on ICEWS14 and ICEWS18 with time-aware metrics.
The best performance is highlighted in bold.
| Model | ICEWS14 | ICEWS18 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRR | H@1 | H@3 | H@10 | MRR | H@1 | H@3 | H@10 | |
| RGCRN (2018) | 38.48 | 28.52 | 42.85 | 58.10 | 28.02 | 18.62 | 31.59 | 46.44 |
| RE-NET (2020) | 39.86 | 30.11 | 44.04 | 58.21 | 29.78 | 19.73 | 32.55 | 48.46 |
| CyGNet (2021) | 37.65 | 27.43 | 42.63 | 57.90 | 27.12 | 17.21 | 30.97 | 46.85 |
| xERTE (2021) | 40.79 | 32.70 | 45.67 | 57.30 | 29.31 | 21.03 | 33.51 | 46.48 |
| TITer (2021) | 41.73 | 32.74 | 46.46 | 58.44 | 29.98 | 22.05 | 33.46 | 44.83 |
| RE-GCN (2021) | 42.00 | 31.63 | 47.20 | 61.65 | 30.58 | 21.01 | 34.34 | 48.75 |
| CEN (2022) | 42.20 | 32.08 | 47.46 | 61.31 | 31.50 | 21.79 | 35.44 | 50.59 |
| TiRGN (2022) | 44.04 | 33.83 | 48.95 | 63.84 | 33.66 | 23.19 | 37.99 | 54.22 |
| CENET (2023) | 32.42 | 24.56 | 35.41 | 48.13 | 26.40 | 17.68 | 29.37 | 43.79 |
| The proposed TRCL | 45.07 | 34.71 | 50.22 | 65.37 | 33.78 | 23.26 | 38.20 | 54.39 |