Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2018 Aug 24;23:171–175. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.08.004

Gender-related differences in addiction: a review of human studies

Yasmin Zakiniaeiz 1, Marc N Potenza 2,3,4,5,6,7,8
PMCID: PMC11784943  NIHMSID: NIHMS2011638  PMID: 39896826

Abstract

Men typically report greater substance use and gambling than women, but the gender gap has been closing in recent years. Men and women engage in drug and gambling behaviors for different reasons and respond differently to drugs and gambling. Telescoping — a phenomenon in which women engage in drug use and/or gambling behaviors at a later age but progress faster to disordered engagement — was initially observed in alcohol and later in opioid, cannabinoid, cocaine, and gambling disorders. Biological and sociocultural gender-related factors may impact withdrawal symptoms and treatment responses among men and women. Further investigation of the neurobiological underpinnings of gender-related differences among addiction populations is required.

Introduction

Sex/gender differences (hereafter referred to as ‘gender-related differences,’ with the understanding of the American Psychiatric Association’s [1] definitions of sex as a person’s biological status such as male or female, and gender as the attitudes, feelings and behaviors associated with biological sex) in addiction have been widely described. Addiction is defined here as chronic, compulsive use of a drug or engagement in a behavior despite negative consequences. Generally, men report greater substance use and gambling than women, but the gender gap has been closing in recent years [2]. Drug use/gambling prevalence rates from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) 2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) [3••] and selected gender-related difference findings are highlighted in Table 1. According to the NSDUH, 7.5% of the population meet Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) criteria for alcohol or any illicit substance and 0.4% meet DSM criteria for gambling disorder (GD) [4]; however, reports of clinically addicted individuals in this national survey (among others) did not stratify by gender. Some studies haves shown that women engage in drug use or gambling behaviors later than men but progress to addiction more rapidly than men, a gender-related phenomenon known as telescoping. Telescoping was initially observed in alcohol [5] and later in opioids [6], cannabinoids [6], cocaine [7], and gambling [8] disorders. Studies have provided mixed support for this phenomenon. Men are more likely to use drugs recreationally, whereas women are more likely to be prescribed drugs as medication. Nonetheless, women with addictions often experience a greater stigma and less social support than men [9••]. Examination of gender-related differences (and similarities) is crucial for informing effective policy, prevention and treatment efforts. This review focuses on the current state of biological, psychological and behavioral gender-related differences (and similarities) ranging from prevalence rates to treatment outcomes in clinical populations for the following drug and behavioral addiction subtypes: alcohol, psychostimulants (mainly cocaine and amphetamine), cannabinoids, gambling, nicotine, and opioids.

Table 1.

Percent of individuals in the US reporting drug use/gambling in 2016 (ages 12 years and older) (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Service Administration’s National Survey on Drug Use and Health (SAMHSA’s NSDUH) [3••]) and selected gender-related difference findings

Lifetime prevalence Selected gender-related differences
Male Female
Alcohol 82.4 78.2 Women compared to men demonstrate a ‘telescoped’ progression to addiction and alcohol-related physiological diseases.
Cigarettes 61.9 53.2 Women have poorer responses to nicotine replacement therapies than men.
Cocaine 17.9 11.2 Subjective effects of cocaine vary by menstrual cycle phase in cocaine-dependent women.
Gamblingb 82.4 76.5 Men wager on strategic forms of gambling while women wager on nonstrategic forms.
Heroin 2.5 1.2 Men report more use than women, but withdrawal, severity and treatment outcomes are similar.
Cannabis 48.0 40.2 Females are more sensitive to the behavioral and physiological effects of cannabis than males.
Methamphetamine 6.5 4.3 Methamphetamine withdrawal symptoms, relapse rates and treatment outcomes do not vary by sex.
All Illicit Drugsa 52.3 44.9
a

All Illicit Drug Use includes the misuse of prescription medications or the use of cannabis, cocaine (including crack), heroin, hallucinogens, inhalants, or methamphetamine.

b

Percent of individuals in the US reporting drug any gambling in the past year in 2013 (age 18 and older) [29].

Alcohol

Men generally drink more than women but the gender gap is closing as shown by analyses of recent birth cohorts [10]. While several studies have shown alcohol addiction in women compared to men is ‘telescoped,’ these women were already enrolled in treatment, and some studies also reported no evidence of the telescoping effect [11]. In addition to potentially more rapid progression to addiction, data have also shown that women progress more rapidly than men to alcohol-related diseases such as liver disease, neurotoxicity, cardiomyopathy and peripheral neuropathy; see [12••] for review. This may in part be due to differences in alcohol metabolism as alcohol dehydrogenase, the enzyme that catabolizes alcohol, is found in much higher concentrations in the stomach of males compared to females [13], although other factors (e.g. distribution volumes) warrant consideration.

There are mixed findings in gender-related differences reported on ratings of craving among alcohol-dependent individuals. With respect to alcohol withdrawal, men are more likely to experience more severe symptoms such as anxiety, insomnia and delirium tremens [14]; however, this study and other studies have not consistently controlled for amounts of alcohol consumed. In alcohol-dependent individuals, men and women show similar abstinence durations and relapse rates [12••].

Psychostimulants

Generally, men report greater use of psychostimulants (cocaine, amphetamine, methamphetamine) than women [3••]. Cocaine laboratory self-administration in humans has demonstrated gender-related differences; men compared to women report experiencing more euphoric and dysphoric experiences and assign high monetary values to a second dose of the cocaine [15]. Subjective mental and physical ‘good drug’ effects of cocaine have been reported to be higher in women as compared to men, and menstrual-cycle-phase-dependent have been observed, with greater effects during the follicular phase than the luteal phase [16]. Men also report higher reinforcing effects of amphetamine compared to women; however, the doses of amphetamine have not been consistently weight-adjusted [17]. With regard to craving, women show greater cue-induced cocaine craving as compared to men while stress-induced cocaine craving was similar across genders; however, these responses vary with menstrual cycle phases [18]. Currently, there is little or no evidence of gender-related differences in withdrawal symptoms, relapse rates and treatment outcomes with respect to psychostimulants [12••].

Cannabinoids

Sex differences have been consistently documented among individuals who use cannabis; see [19] for review. According to the NSDUH, males are more likely to use cannabis than females and begin using at earlier ages [3••]. Similar to alcohol, studies have shown the progression to cannabis-use disorder is ‘telescoped’ in women [20]. Mixed findings describe gender-related differences in subjective reports of ‘high’ due to cannabis and Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) alone [21,22], which may be partially due to differences in tobacco-smoking comorbidity and/or dosing strategies. Data suggest that men experience greater cannabis-induced analgesia relative to women [23].

Females, compared to males, are more sensitive to the behavioral and physiological effects of cannabis and cannabis-like substances [24], such as fatigue, drowsiness and psychomotor suppression; however, the amount of cannabis per bodyweight was not been consistently controlled. It is possible that cannabinoid metabolism is responsible for some gender-related differences. For example, one preclinical study showed that female rats compared to male rats had higher brain levels of a THC metabolite [25]. However, in humans, metabolite levels in plasma following THC exposure has been shown to be both higher [26] and lower [27] in females compared to males. Treatment-seeking women endorse more severe cannabis withdrawal symptoms than treatment-seeking men [28]. While gender-related differences have been reported in the use, subjective effects and metabolism of cannabis, the neural and molecular bases for these differences remain poorly understood.

Gambling

Gambling occurs in 82.4% of men and 76.5% of women [29], and lifetime prevalence rates for GD are 0.6% for men and 0.2% for women. Historically, social norms have more strongly opposed gambling in women as compared to men [30]; however, this may be changing over time. Common forms of gambling vary by gender [31,32]. For example, men tend to participate in strategic forms (wagering on cards, sports and horse racing), while women tend to participate in nonstrategic forms (wagering on slot machines and bingo). Women also report gambling due to feelings of sadness, loneliness, and/or boredom whereas men report being triggered by viewing gambling-related stimuli [33]. Both genders report similar family histories and rates of legal difficulties due to gambling [33].

Similar to alcohol, most studies report that GD in women is ‘telescoped’ compared to men [8,30,34]. However, a recently published large twin-study not only did not find evidence of this effect, but showed that men were ‘telescoped’ compared to women [35]. While precise reasons for telescoping are currently unknown, it has been hypothesized to relate to anxiety comorbidity in women and alcohol use in men; however, recent findings suggest that these may not be the case [34,36,37]. The telescoping effect and its causes remain controversial in GD. With respect to GD treatment, women are more likely to seek treatment compared to men, which may in part be due to co-occurring psychiatric disorders [30,3840]. Comorbidities of anxiety, depression and alcohol-use disorders with GD may exacerbate gambling-related symptoms across both genders [41,42]. Currently, there is no evidence for gender-related differences in treatment effectiveness for GD.

Nicotine

There is a large body of work demonstrating gender-related differences in tobacco-smoking behaviors [43]. Cigarette-smoking prevalence rates are higher among men than woman worldwide; however, the gap is narrowing in the US. Around 16.7% of adult men in the US smoke, whereas 13.6% of adult women smoke [44]. The comparable rates between adult men and women could be in part due to tobacco marketing of cigarette use promoting curbed appetite, weight loss, and independence in women [45]. Women metabolize nicotine and cotinine (a nicotine metabolite) faster than men in part due to estrogen [46]. Faster metabolism for women may explain why women typically experience more adverse effects related to nicotine than men [47] and why women experience worse treatment outcomes.

Clinical studies, particularly a series of studies by Perkins et al., showed that men are better able to detect nicotine from de-nicotinized cigarettes than women, suggesting that men are able to distinguish the physiological effects of nicotine better than women [48,49]. Further, Perkins and colleagues have shown that women experience greater relief from craving than men from a de-nicotinized inhaler [50]. These results suggest that women may be more reinforced by the non-nicotine conditioned stimuli (e.g. sensory cues) than the nicotine itself. Data suggest that women are more reactive to nicotine-associated cues and stress, which may, in part, contribute to a greater predisposition to relapse, especially following stress [51,52], and a poorer response to nicotine-replacement strategies than men [48]. Preclinical studies also support the clinical findings demonstrating gender-related differences in responses to nicotine [53]. Altogether, these findings suggest a potential underlying sexual dimorphism. While literature has shown distinct gender-related differences in smoking motivation, smoking behavior and treatment efficacy, the neural and molecular bases for these differences remain poorly understood.

Opioids

Generally, men report more frequent heroin use and use in greater quantities than women; however, the rate of heroin use among women is rapidly on the rise: from 2005 to 2012, past-year heroin use nearly doubled among women [3••]. In terms of route of opioid administration, men are more likely to inject heroin, but nonmedical prescription opioid use has demonstrated mixed findings between genders. Gender-specific factors have predicted opioid use. For example, among men only alcohol and illicit drug use predicted opioid use and among women only tobacco smoking and psychological stress predicted opioid use [54]. The role of sex hormones on opioid self-administration is currently largely unknown. Similar to psychostimulants, heroin withdrawal symptoms, dependence severity and treatment outcomes (specifically methadone-maintained outpatient treatment) are comparable between sexes [12••].

Conclusions

In summary, men generally engage in drug use and gambling more than woman. Drug use and gambling behaviors vary by gender with respect to motivation, urges, and subjective and physiological effects, which may be explained by biological and sociocultural differences. Women are more likely to seek treatment for substance-use or GDs; however, they often encounter greater stigma and less social support compared to men. Comorbidity with other substance addictions, GD, anxiety disorders and/or depression may complicate clinical courses across both genders. One important caveat of the aforementioned gender-related differences described in the current review is a lack of controlling for differences in body weight and drug dose. Consideration of sex as a biological variable in both drug and non-drug addictions is crucial for understanding the neurobiological bases of these addictions and designing gender-appropriate treatment. Knowledge of gender-related differences (and similarities) is needed to help reduce health disparities in treatment availability and treatment outcomes.

Funding

The study was supported by the National Institutes of Health grant numbers: R01 DA039136, R21 DA040138, R01 DA035058. Y. Zakiniaeiz was supported by the Interdepartmental Neuroscience Training Program at Yale University (T32NS4122813), Gruber Science Foundation Fellowship, National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (NSF-GRFP) and the Neuroimaging Sciences Training Program at Yale University (T32DA022975). Dr Potenza was supported by the National Center for Responsible Gaming, the Connecticut Council on Problem Gambling, the Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, R01 DA039136, R01 DA035058, and R21 DA040138. The funding agencies did not have input into the content of this manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report that they have no financial conflicts of interest with respect to the content of this manuscript. Dr Potenza has received financial support or compensation for the following: Dr Potenza has consulted for and advised Ironwood, Lundbeck, INSYS, Shire, RiverMend Health, Opiant/Lightlake Therapeutics and Jazz Pharmaceuticals; has received research support from the NIH, Veteran’s Administration, Mohegan Sun Casino, the National Center for Responsible Gaming, and Pfizer pharmaceuticals; has participated in surveys, mailings or telephone consultations related to drug addiction, impulse control disorders or other health topics; has consulted for and/or advised legal and gambling entities on issues related to impulse control disorders; provides clinical care in the Connecticut Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services Problem Gambling Services Program; has performed grant reviews for the NIH and other agencies; has edited journals; has given academic lectures in grand rounds, CME events and other clinical or scientific venues; and has generated books or book chapters for publishers of mental health texts. The other authors reported no biomedical financial interests or other potential conflicts of interest.

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:

• of special interest

•• of outstanding interest

  • 1.American Psychological Association: Guidelines for psychological practice with lesbian, gay, and bisexual clients. Am Psychol 2012, 67:10–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Degenhardt L, Chiu W-T, Sampson N, Kessler RC, Anthony JC, Angermeyer M, Bruffaerts R, De Girolamo G, Gureje O, Huang Y, Karam A, Kostyuchenko S, Lepine JP, Mora MEM, Neumark Y, Ormel JH, Pinto-Meza A, Posada-Villa J, Stein DJ, Takeshima T, Wells JE: Toward a global view of alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, and cocaine use: findings from the who world mental health surveys. PLoS Med 2008, 5:e141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.••.Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality: In 2016 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Detailed Tables. Edited by Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. 2017. Rockville, MD. [Google Scholar]; This recent report from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration importanlty describes key substance use indicators and current trajectories.
  • 4.Grant B, Moore T, Shepard J, Kaplan K: In Source and Accuracy Statement: Wave 1 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). Edited by N.I.o.A.A.a. Alcoholism. 2003. Bethesda, MD. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Piazza NJ, Vrbka JL, Yeager RD: Telescoping of alcoholism in women alcoholics. Int J Addict 1989, 24:19–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hernandez-Avila CA, Rounsaville BJ, Kranzler HR: Opioid-, cannabis- and alcohol-dependent women show more rapid progression to substance abuse treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend 2004, 74:265–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Brady KT, Randall CL: Gender differences in substance use disorders. Psychiatr Clin N Am 1999, 22:241–252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ladd GT, Petry NM: Gender differences among pathological gamblers seeking treatment. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2002, 10:302–309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.••.Becker Jill B, Mcclellan M, Reed Beth G: Sociocultural context for sex differences in addiction. Addict Biol 2016, 21:1052–1059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This review highlights sociocultural differences that may impact gender-related differences in addictions.
  • 10.Keyes KM, Grant BF, Hasin DS: Evidence for a closing gender gap in alcohol use, abuse, and dependence in the United States population. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008, 93:21–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Keyes KM, Martins SS, Blanco C, Hasin DS: Telescoping and gender differences in alcohol dependence: new evidence from two national surveys. Am J Psychiatry 2010, 167:969–976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.••.Riley AL, Hempel BJ, Clasen MM: Sex as a biological variable: drug use and abuse. Physiol Behav 2018, 187:79–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This recent review details the gender-related differences in drug use, motivation, craving and relapse among drug addictions.
  • 13.Baraona E, Abittan Chaim S, Dohmen K, Moretti M, Pozzato G, Chayes Zev W, Schaefer C, Lieber Charles S: Gender differences in pharmacokinetics of alcohol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2006, 25:502–507. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Erol A, Karpyak VM: Sex and gender-related differences in alcohol use and its consequences: contemporary knowledge and future research considerations. Drug Alcohol Depend 2015, 156:1–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Evans SM, Haney M, Foltin RW: The effects of smoked cocaine during the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle in women. Psychopharmacology 2002, 159:397–406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Evans SM, Haney M, Fischman MW, Foltin RW: Limited sex differences in response to “binge” smoked cocaine use in humans. Neuropsychopharmacology 1999, 21:445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Vansickel AR, Stoops WW, Rush CR: Human sex differences in D-amphetamine self-administration. Addiction (Abingdon, England) 2010, 105:727–731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sinha R, Fox H, Hong K-I, Sofuoglu M, Morgan PT, Bergquist KT: Sex steroid hormones, stress response, and drug craving in cocaine-dependent women: implications for relapse susceptibility. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2007, 15:445–452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.•.Calakos KC, Bhatt S, Foster DW, Cosgrove KP: Mechanisms underlying sex differences in cannabis use. Curr Addict Rep 2017, 4:439–453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This review details the biological and physiological gender-related differences in cannabis exposure and cannabis use disorder.
  • 20.Khan SS, Secades-Villa R, Okuda M, Wang S, Pérez-Fuentes G, Kerridge BT, Blanco C: Gender differences in cannabis use disorders: results from the national epidemiologic survey of alcohol and related conditions. Drug Alcohol Depend 2013, 130:101–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wardle MC, Marcus BA, De Wit H: A preliminary investigation of individual differences in subjective responses to d-amphetamine, alcohol, and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol using a within-subjects randomized trial. PLOS ONE 2015, 10: e0140501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Haney M: Opioid antagonism of cannabinoid effects: differences between marijuana smokers and nonmarijuana smokers. Neuropsychopharmacology 2006, 32:1391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cooper ZD, Haney M: Sex-dependent effects of cannabis-induced analgesia. Drug Alcohol Depend 2016, 167:112–120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Craft RM: Sex differences in behavioral effects of cannabinoids. Life Sci 2005, 77:2471–2478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wiley JL, Burston JJ: Sex differences in δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol metabolism and in vivo pharmacology following acute and repeated dosing in adolescent rats. Neurosci Lett 2014, 576:51–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Klumpers LE, Cole DM, Khalili-Mahani N, Soeter RP, Te Beek ET, Rombouts Sa RB, Van Gerven JMA: Manipulating brain connectivity with δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol: a pharmacological resting state fmri study. Neuroimage 2012, 63:1701–1711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jones Alan W, Holmgren A, Kugelberg Fredrik C: Driving under the influence of cannabis: a 10-year study of age and gender differences in the concentrations of tetrahydrocannabinol in blood. Addiction 2008, 103:452–461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Herrmann ES, Weerts EM, Vandrey R: Sex differences in cannabis withdrawal symptoms among treatment-seeking cannabis users. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2015, 23:415–421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Welte JW, Barnes GM, Tidwell M-CO, Hoffman JH, Wieczorek WF: Gambling and problem gambling in the United States: changes between 1999 and 2013. J Gambl Stud 2015, 31:695–715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Potenza MN, Steinberg MA, McLaughlin SD, Wu R, Rounsaville BJ, O’malley SS: Gender-related differences in the characteristics of problem gamblers using a gambling helpline. Am J Psychiatry 2001, 158:1500–1505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Potenza MN, Maciejewski PK, Mazure CM: A gender-based examination of past-year recreational gamblers. J Gambl Stud 2006, 22:41–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Grant JE, Odlaug BL, Chamberlain SR, Schreiber LRN: Neurocognitive dysfunction in strategic and non-strategic gamblers. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2012, 38:336–340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Grant JE, Kim SW: Gender differences in pathological gamblers seeking medication treatment. Compr Psychiatry 2002, 43:56–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Grant JE, Odlaug BL, Mooney ME: Telescoping phenomenon in pathological gambling: association with gender and comorbidities. J Nerv Ment Dis 2012, 200:996–998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.•.Slutske WS, Piasecki TM, Deutsch AR, Statham DJ, Martin NG: Telescoping and gender differences in the time course of disordered gambling: evidence from a general population sample. Addiction (Abingdon, England) 2015, 110:144–151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study notably contradicts prior literature that lent support to the telescoping effect in gambling disorder.
  • 36.Tavares H, Martins SS, Lobo DSS, Silveira CM, Gentil V, Hodgins DC: Factors at play in faster progression for female pathological gamblers: an exploratory analysis. J Clin Psychiatry 2003, 64:433–438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Odlaug BL, Marsh PJ, Kim SW, Grant JE: Strategic vs nonstrategic gambling: characteristics of pathological gamblers based on gambling preference. Ann Clin Psychiatry 2011, 23:105–112. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Desai RA, Potenza MN: Gender differences in the associations between past-year gambling problems and psychiatric disorders. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2008, 43:173–183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Martins SS, Tavares H, Da Silva Lobo DS, Galetti AM, Gentil V: Pathological gambling, gender, and risk-taking behaviors. Addict Behav 2004, 29:1231–1235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Husky MM, Michel G, Richard J-B, Guignard R, Beck F: Gender differences in the associations of gambling activities and suicidal behaviors with problem gambling in a nationally representative french sample. Addict Behav 2015, 45:45–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Parhami I, Mojtabai R, Rosenthal RJ, Afifi TO, Fong TW: Gambling and the onset of comorbid mental disorders: a longitudinal study evaluating severity and specific symptoms. J Psychiatr Pract 2014, 20:207–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Quigley L, Yakovenko I, Hodgins DC, Dobson KS, El-Guebaly N, Casey DM, Currie SR, Smith GJ, Williams RJ, Schopflocher DP: Comorbid problem gambling and major depression in a community sample. J Gambl Stud 2015, 31:1135–1152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Perkins KA, Donny E, Caggiula AR: Sex differences in nicotine effects and self-administration: review of human and animal evidence. Nicotine Tob Res 1999, 1:301–315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Center for Disease Control and Prevention: Current Cigarette Smoking Among Adults in the United States. 2015.
  • 45.Amos A, Haglund M: From social taboo to “torch of freedom”: the marketing of cigarettes to women. Tob Control 2000, 9:3–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Johnstone E, Benowitz N, Cargill A, Jacob R, Hinks L, Day I, Murphy M, Walton R: Determinants of the rate of nicotine metabolism and effects on smoking behavior. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2006, 80:319–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sofuoglu M, Mooney M: Subjective responses to intravenous nicotine: greater sensitivity in women than in men. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2009, 17:63–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Perkins KA, Jacobs L, Sanders M, Caggiula AR: Sex differences in the subjective and reinforcing effects of cigarette nicotine dose. Psychopharmacology 2002, 163:194–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Perkins KA, Gerlach D, Vender J, Meeker J, Hutchison S, Grobe J: Sex differences in the subjective and reinforcing effects of visual and olfactory cigarette smoke stimuli. Nicotine Tob Res 2001, 3:141–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.•.Perkins KA, Karelitz JL: Sex differences in acute relief of abstinence-induced withdrawal and negative affect due to nicotine content in cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res 2015, 17:443–448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This study importantly describes findings that potentially explain why women have greater difficulty maintaining tobacco-smoking cessation than men.
  • 51.Rupprecht LE, Smith TT, Schassburger RL, Buffalari DM, Sved AF, Donny EC: Behavioral mechanisms underlying nicotine reinforcement. Curr Top Behav Neurosci 2015, 24:19–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cosgrove KP, Esterlis I, Sandiego C, Petrulli R, Morris ED: Imaging tobacco smoking with pet and spect. In The Neuropharmacology of Nicotine Dependence. Edited by Balfour JKD, 1–17. Munafò RM. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2015: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Isiegas C, Mague SD, Blendy JA: Sex differences in response to nicotine in C57Bl/6:129SvEv mice. Nicotine Tob Res 2009, 11:851–858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Back SE, Payne RL, Simpson AN, Brady KT: Gender and prescription opioids: findings from the national survey on drug use and health. Addict Behav 2010, 35:1001–1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES