Abstract
Stromal fibroblasts regulate critical signaling gradients along the intestinal crypt-villus axis1 and provide a niche that supports adjacent epithelial stem cells. Here we report that Pdgfra-expressing fibroblasts secrete ligands that promote a regenerative-like state in the intestinal mucosa during early WNT-mediated tumorigenesis. Using a mouse model of WNT-driven oncogenesis and single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of mesenchyme cell populations, we revealed a dynamic reprogramming of Pdgfra+ fibroblasts that facilitates WNT-mediated tissue transformation. Functional assays of potential mediators of cell-to-cell communication between these fibroblasts and the oncogenic epithelium revealed that TGFB signaling is notably induced in Pdgfra+ fibroblasts in the presence of oncogenic epithelium, and TGFB was essential to sustain regenerative-like growth of organoids ex vivo. Genetic reduction of Cdx2 in the β-catenin mutant epithelium elevated the fetal-like/regenerative transcriptome and accelerated WNT-dependent onset of oncogenic transformation of the tissue in vivo. These results demonstrate that Pdgfra+ fibroblasts are activated during WNT-driven oncogenesis to promote a regenerative state in the epithelium that precedes and facilitates formation of tumors.
Keywords: Colon cancer, fetal-like, regenerative, reprogramming, intestinal stroma, WNT signaling, TGFB signaling
Introduction
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide.2 Morphogenesis and homeostasis of the adult mammalian intestine require strict tuning of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway because elevated WNT signaling drives the initiation and progression of most human and mouse intestinal cancers.3–8 Canonical WNT signals stabilize the dual signaling/adhesion protein β-catenin. In the absence of a WNT ligand, cytosolic β-catenin is targeted for proteosome degradation by a dynamic multiprotein destruction complex. WNT signaling inhibits beta-catenin proteolysis, followed by its translocation and accumulation in the cell nucleus, where it transactivates target genes.9,10 While signaling changes in the epithelium have been studied in depth, any resulting changes in the underlying stroma during oncogenesis are less clear, owing to the complexity of sub-epithelial cellular heterogeneity. Recent studies begin to uncover details about how stroma-derived ligands, such as prostaglandins, might support tumor-initiating epithelial stem cells.11
Fibroblasts preserve organ architecture and can exhibit activated states in response to tissue perturbations.12 Across tumors of different origin, fibroblasts give rise to specialized cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) with antigen-presenting (apCAFs), inflammatory (iCAFs), or myofibroblastic (myCAFs) properties, each with different outcomes on tumorigenesis.13 Intestinal fibroblasts also execute myriad functions that reflect their complex heterogeneity, such as determination of epithelial cell fates and priming of immune cells.14 Mesenchymal fibroblasts are a critical source of Wnts, among other intestinal stem cell (ISC) niche factors that maintain intestinal crypt homeostasis.1,15–21 The largest subset, which expresses Pdgfra, impacts decisions on proliferation versus differentiation of ISCs by generating a BMP gradient along the stem and differentiated cell compartments.1,22. Fibroblasts expressing high or low Pdgfra have unique transcriptional and functional profiles in homeostasis and diseased tissue.1,11,23 Based on their significant role in tissue physiology, it is important to understand the function of these cells in tumorigenesis.
In response to various forms of epithelial damage, a gene signature that was first described for its enrichment in fetal intestinal organoid cultures marks regenerative crypt epithelial cells.24–28 In this regenerative state, dedifferentiation of Lgr5-negative cells is sustained by a YAP/TAZ gene signature that coincides with markers of late fetal intestinal organoids.29 Transcriptional reprogramming to this regenerative state is also invoked during initiation and spread of colorectal tumors.30,31 In advanced stages, metastatic tumor cells carry the most primitive undifferentiated state, associated with loss of intestinal identity.31 Accumulation of oncogenic mutations in tumor cells can drive WNT-independent growth by TGFB-mediated “lineage reversion”.32 Accordingly, human CRCs of the CMS4 type, characterized by high stromal infiltration and TGFB activation33, harbor a large population of Clusterin-expressing cells with a YAP-activated signature attributed to ISC revival (revSCs).34–36 Screening of patient-derived organoid (PDOs) co-cultures with stromal and fibroblast cells has shown that CAF signaling promotes this revival state to induce cancer chemoresistance37.
Here we report that conditional activation of WNT signaling via β-catenin gain-of-function promptly induces a revival-like transcriptional state accompanied by a YAP-associated gene signature. This oncogenic state appears to be supported by regenerative ligands produced by Pdgfra-hi and Pdgfra-lo fibroblasts in response to the onset of β-catenin-mediated hypertrophy. In enteroid-fibroblast co-cultures, elevated expression of these regenerative markers depends on paracrine TGFB signaling within the fibroblasts. Pdgfra-lo cells secreted pro-regenerative ligands in two different mouse models of WNT-driven intestinal tumors. Finally, compound mouse mutants reveal that partial loss of CDX2, which elevates the fetal/regenerative program, accelerates the oncogenic effects of mutant β-catenin.
RESULTS
Delayed transformation and initial preservation of differentiation ability in cells with oncogenic mutations in the WNT pathway
A notable delay separates the onset of oncogenic Ctnnb1 mutation and the consequent transformation of epithelial morphology. Monitoring this transformation over time in β-cateninGOF/+;Villin-CreERT2 mice7,38 (Fig. 1A), we found that morphology typical of pre-cancerous lesions did not appear until approximately 14 days after expression of mutant β-cateninGOF. At this 2-week time point, crypt cells displayed a hematoxylin-rich appearance and increased cellular density compared to control animals. Over the next 2 weeks, this cellular morphology, previously described as a “crypt progenitor-cell” (CPC) phenotype39, expanded into the region normally occupied by intestinal villi until by 28 days post-induction of the β-cateninGOF mutation, when almost all of the duodenal mucosa was populated by crypt-progenitor-like epithelium (Fig. 1A, S1A). Epithelial transformation was most pronounced in the duodenum and decreased progressively towards the colon (Fig. S1B–C), though the delay in transformation was also observed in the colon, using a colon-specific Cre transgene (Fig S1B). This delay suggested that β-cateninGOF mutant cells differentiate normally over at least the first 2 weeks;. alternatively, mutant cells might loiter in the crypts without differentiation, allowing the CPC zone to expand gradually. To resolve these possibilities, we initiated the β-cateninGOF mutation in Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells using the Lgr5-CreERT2-GFP allele40 and followed mutant cells using the ROSA-LSL-tdTomato lineage tracing allele.41 Five to 7 days post-tamoxifen treatment, tdTomato-labeled cells appeared on the villi in both control and β-cateninGOF/+ mutant intestines, with no difference between genotypes in the distance that labeled cells had traversed (Fig1B–C). These data suggest that ISCs harboring a single β-cateninGOF mutant allele retain normal differentiation and migration rates.
Figure 1. There is a delay in tissue transformation following oncogenic mutations activating the WNT pathway.
(A) Histology (H&E) depicts a latency in tissue transformation upon WNT signaling activation. Red bar indicates degree of transformation as the expansion of crypt-progenitor zone with increasing days of activation of single mutant β-catenin allele in the proximal duodenum using the Villin-CreERT2 driver.
(B) Lineage tracing of β-catenin mutant stem cells in the proximal duodenum of control or β-cateninGOF/+; Lgr5-creERT2 mice for 7 days reveals unperturbed luminal migration rates despite an elevated level of WNT signaling (n = 5 per group).
(C) Quantitation of traced Td-tomato+ Lgr5+ cells in villus compartment per genotype at day 5 after expression of a β-cateninGOF mutant allele using the Lgr5-CreERT2 transgene (n = 5 per group).
(D) Dual pulse labeling of β-catenin mutant stem cells with BrdU and EdU on day 17 of WNT-mediated tissue transformation show the continuing capacity of these mutant cells to differentiate. β-cateninGOF/+; Villin-creERT2 mice mice were injected with BrdU (48h pre-harvest) and EdU (1 h pre-harvest) to identify differentiated (red) and actively proliferating (green) cells (n = 3 biological replicates).
(E) RNA-seq analysis of primary crypt epithelium shows activation of regenerative and fetal-like gene signatures in control vs β-cateninGOF/+ crypt cells at day 4, or day 8–10 post-induction of a single mutant β-catenin allele.
*Scale bars: 50 µm.
To determine whether cells in the expanded CPC zone 15 days post-treatment with tamoxifen could still differentiate and transit into occupy overtly normal villus epithelium, we injected mice with BrdU on day 15 and euthanized them 2 days later, thus marking cells that were in S-phase 48 h earlier. Additional EdU labeling 1 h before euthanasia marked cells actively cycling at the time of tissue harvest. Cells exhibiting differentiated villus morphology 17 days post-induction of the β-cateninGOF allele lacked EdU labeling (green), indicating that they were post-mitotic, but they carried the BrdU label, indicating that they were proliferative 2 days earlier (Fig. 1D). Consistent with a differentiated state, these BrdU+/EdU− cellls expressed the differentiation marker Alkaline Phosphatase (Fig. S1D). To investigate the molecular changes associated with β-cateninGOF activation, we examined bulk transcriptomes of epithelium isolated 4 days and 8–10 days after tamoxifen treatment. Increased β-catenin activity was associated with decreased markers of Lgr5+ ISCs and elevated expression of genes associated with epithelial regeneration following intestinal damage and with fetal versus adult intestinal organoids28,42 (Fig. 1E). A YAP signaling signature, a known mediator of intestinal regeneration and cancer progression,29 was also induced. In contrast, an intestine-specific WNT signaling signature43 lessened by day 8 after induction of the β-cateninGOF allele (Fig. S1E).
Taken together, these data indicate that β-cateninGOF mutant cells with a transformed morphology can still transition into a post-mitotic state with overt features of differentiation. Even after acquiring the mutation, ISCs and cells with the CPC phenotype can differentiate normally. Moreover, epithelial cells with elevated β-catenin signaling express transcripts characteristic of ISC regeneration after epithelial injury. The delay between Wnt activation and tissue transformation additionally suggests that other signals, potentially emanating from the stroma, contribute to the transformation.
Stromal fibroblasts express pro-regenerative ligands in response to epithelial oncogene activation
Single-cell technologies have made diverse intestinal mesenchyme cell populations accessible to study1,23,44. To appreciate changes in non-epithelial cells in response to epithelial WNT activation, we conducted scRNA-seq early during oncogenic transformation. In β-cateninGOF/GOF;Villin-CreERT2 mice, tissue transformation and exacerbated cell proliferation were evident within 5 days of tamoxifen treatment (Fig. 2A–B). We collected intestines from control and experimental mice at different times post-treatment, removed smooth muscle and epithelial cells, and dissociated the remaining stroma into single cells for scRNA-seq (Fig. 2B), following methods described previously.1 All stromal cell constituents were detected as expected,1 including robust populations of immune and endothelial cells and fibroblasts (Fig. 2C–D). Cells from each isolation exhibited similar scRNA-seq quality metrics (Fig. S2A). On the background of a merged uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP – Fig. 2E), fibroblasts marked by Pdgfra expression were distributed asymmetrically, with control cells populating the right edge of the merged single-cell cluster and those isolated from the β-cateninGOF mice populating the left edge. This observation implies that epithelial β-catenin activation induces transcriptional changes in underlying fibroblasts (Fig. 2E–F, S2B–C). Pdgfra-hi sub-epithelial myofibroblasts, also called telocytes, line the epithelium with long cytoplasmic projections, while Pdgfra-lo cells sit deeper in the stroma and have been stratified into CD81+ and CD81− populations1; CD81+ trophocytes support epithelial growth in vivo and in vitro.1 Comparing these Pdgfra+ clusters with public datasets of fibroblast classification revealed transcripts associated with fibrotic and inflammatory cancer-associated fibroblasts45,46 in both Pdgfra cell clusters derived from β-cateninGOF mice (Fig S2D). These transcripts increased over time after β-cateninGOF activation (Fig. S2D). The sum of these findings prompted us to investigate whether stromal cells, and which subpopulation, might influence the speed of oncogenic transformation.
Figure 2. Survey of mesenchymal cell populations during WNT-mediated tissue transformation reveals a transcriptomic shift in Pdgfra+ fibroblasts.
(A) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) of Ki67 and Histology (H&E) depicts rapid onset of jejunum tissue transformation across a time course of homozygous activation of mutant β-catenin using the Villin-CreERT2 transgene. Duodenum samples were used for scRNA-seq (n = 3 biological replicates). Scale bars: 50 µm.
(B) Experimental schematic for the isolation of mesenchymal cells during WNT-mediated tissue transformation.
(C) UMAP depicts cell populations of the intestinal stroma. UMAP is a composite of all cells from 5 experimental samples (2 control and 3 mutants).
(D) Dotplot indicates expected marker gene expression to identify mesenchyme cell types.
(E-F) UMAP depicts an asymmetric distribution, particularly in Pdgfra-lo and Pdgfra-hi mesenchyme clusters (enlarged in F), indicating a transcriptomic shift in response to epithelial activation of β-cateninGOF.
Pdgfra-lo fibroblasts direct transcriptional reprogramming of oncogenic epithelium
Primary cultures of Pdgfra-lo cells1 mirrored the properties of their in vivo counterparts, including GFP expression when cultured from Pdgfra-H2B-eGFP mice and the ability to support growth of spherical organoids without the addition of growth factors typically required to support enteroid monocultures47 (Fig. 3A – B). Co-culture of these Pdgfra-lo cells with control or β-cateninGOF enteroids induced spherical morphology and rapid expansion in size (Fig 3B). Enteroids growing in routine conditions that mimic homeostasis47 grow as branched structures, while spheroid growth is more typical of high-WNT conditions and regenerative states.48,49 In these co-cultures, we therefore examined expression of transcripts associated with homeostatic or restorative states. Regenerative markers Clu and Anxa1 were consistently elevated in both control and β-cateninGOF enteroids under co-culture, while markers of normal crypt based columnar (CBC) cells were significantly diminished (Fig. 3C, Fig. S3A). Concordant with our in vivo findings (Fig. 1E), basal expression of regenerative markers was elevated in β-cateninGOF enteroid monocultures (Fig. 3C). Given that Pdgfra-lo fibroblasts appeared to sustain “regeneration-like” growth of both wild type and β-cateninGOF enteroids, we measured expression changes in potential ligands that mediate homeostatic vs regenerative states. WNT2B, GREM1, and RSPO3 are such ligands, responsible for proper localization of normal Lgr5+ ISCs in the crypt base50,51. Transcripts for these pro-ISC ligands were downregulated in both control and β-cateninGOF enteroid co-cultures (Fig. 3D). Among potential ligands that mediate ISC regeneration after injury,11,34,52,53 Ereg, Il11, Ptgs2, and Tgfb1 were all elevated in Pdgfra+ mesenchymal cells following exposure to β-cateninGOF epithelium (Fig. 3E). Sequencing of RNAs in FACS-sorted Pdgfra-H2B-GFP expressing cells from the co-cultures (Fig S3B) confirmed that Ereg, Tgfb1, Il11, and Ptgs2 were indeed elevated in wild type Pdgfra+ mesenchymal cells co-cultured with β-cateninGOF enteroids (Fig. 3F). Primary unfractionated mesenchymal cells freshly isolated from β-cateninGOF mutant intestines confirmed induction of these pro-regenerative ligands and independent whole-thickness intestinal samples confirmed induction of Ereg and Il11 (Fig. 3G–H). Thus, oncogenic epithelium reproducibly induced pro-regenerative characteristics in Pdgfra-lo fibroblasts.
Figure 3. Stromal Pdgfra+ cells are a key source of ligands known to promote epithelial regeneration.
(A) Schematic of co-culture experiments. Control or β-cateninGOF enteroids at passage 1 were co-plated with passaged Pdgfra-lo cells in Matrigel droplets for 7 days in -ENR media.
(B) Pdgfra-lo cells promote hyperproliferative growth of control and β-cateninGOF enteroids that resemble fetal enteroids instead of branched structures. Scale bar = 200µm.
(C) qRT-PCR analysis shows increased expression of epithelial regeneration markers in control and β-cateninGOF enteroids grown in co-culture with Pdgfra-lo cells (n = 4 biological replicates, Mann–Whitney U-test, p < 0.05*).
(D) ISC niche signals are downregulated in Pdgfra-lo cells co-cultured with control or β-cateninGOF enteroids (n = 7 biological replicates, one way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test, p < 0.0001****, p < 0.001***, p < 0.01** and p < 0.05*).
(E) Pro-regeneration ligands are elevated in Pdgfra-lo cells co-cultured with β-cateninGOF enteroids. (n = 7 biological replicates, one way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test, p < 0.05*).
(F) RNA-seq analysis of fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) of Pdgfra-H2B-GFPcells confirm elevated expression of Ereg, Tgfβ−1, Il11 and Ptgs2 transcripts in Pdgfra-lo cells co-cultured with β-cateninGOF enteroids over 7 days (n = 3 biological replicates for Pdgfra-lo monocultures, n = 3 control enteroid-cocultures and n = 2 biological replicates for β-cateninGOF co-cultures, one way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test, p < 0.001*** , and p < 0.01** ).
(G) qRT-PCR data indicating upregulation of Ereg and Il11 in whole tissue samples derived from β-cateninGOF mice after 4 days of tamoxifen injection (n = 3 biological replicates, Mann–Whitney U-test, p < 0.01** and p < 0.05*).
(H) qRT-PCR of primary unfractionated mesenchyme isolated from β-cateninGOF mice show increased expression of pro-regeneration ligands (n = 3 biological replicates, Mann–Whitney U-test, p < 0.01** and p < 0.05*).
(I) Violin plots showing increased expression levels per single cell for Ereg, Tgfβ−1, Il11 and Ptgs2 in Pdgfra-hi and Pdgfra-lo cells in a time course of β-catenin activation using β-cateninGOF mice.
(J) Heatmap indicate sustained activation of Tgfβ1 and Il11 identified by RNA-seq analysis of Pdgfra-lo CD81+ cells isolated from ApcKO mice.
Pdgfra-lo cells derived from β-cateninGOF/+ mutant mice were also consistently less efficient in supporting growth of wild-type enteroids than Pdgfra-lo cells isolated from healthy controls (Fig. S3C). We considered that this suppression of wild-type organoid growth might reflect elevated expression of BMP ligands and negative WNT regulators after Pdgfra-lo fibroblasts are exposed to oncogenic epithelium (Fig. S3D). These pro-differentiation signals are likely tolerated better by cells harboring oncogenic mutations compared to wild-type stem cells. Indeed, high levels of BMP2, a pro-differentiation ligand,54 did not affect long term viability of β-cateninGOF enteroids, but caused wild-type enteroids to collapse (Fig. S3E); this difference could confer a competitive advantage for mutant over normal epithelium. Additionally, re-examination of our scRNA-seq data revealed induction of regeneration-associated transcripts in both Pdgfra-expressing stromal cell populations (Fig. 3I). Thus, although Pdgfra-hi cells are not readily amenable to co-culture assays, they do acquire a transcriptional shift similar to that of Pdgfra-lo cells in response to oncogenic epithelial exposure.
To validate Pdgfra-lo cell expression of regenerative genes in another genetic model of acute WNT activation, we examined their gene expression changes in response to depletion of Apcf/f (a conditional mutant 55) in the epithelium using the Villin-CreERT2 driver. As in the β-cateninGOF model of WNT hyperactivation, RNAseq analysis of Pdgfra-lo CD81+ cells sorted 4 days after Apc inactivation in epithelial cells showed induction of Ereg, Tgfb1, Il11, and Ptgs2 transcripts, and on the 6th day, Il11 and Tgfb1 remained elevated in these cells (Fig. 3J). Together, these findings reveal that Pdgfra-lo stromal cells respond rapidly to oncogene activation in the overlying epithelium by suppressing homeostatic growth and expressing genes that ordinarily promote ISC regeneration.
Epiregulin is dispensable for WNT-driven tissue transformation
CellChat, an algorithm that uses curated literature to match receptor-ligand pairs between cell types in scRNA-seq datasets,56 imputed that the EREG-EGFR signaling pathway was notably active between Pdgfra+ and mutant β-cateninGOF epithelial cells compared to control epithelial cells. Signaling was predicted to occur mainly from Pdgfra+ cells towards the transformed epithelium, with additional autocrine and paracrine signaling between Pdgfra-hi and Pdgfra-lo cells (Fig. 4A). In a survey of known EGF-family ligands, Epiregulin (Ereg) was the most notably induced in Pdgfra+ cells in response to epithelial β-cateninGOF activation (Fig. 4B–C); the Egfr receptor, which enables EPIREGULIN signal transduction,57 was also elevated in Pdgfra+ cells exposed to WNT-transformed epithelium (Fig S4A–B). Fluorescent RNA in situ hybridization in control and β-cateninGOF mutant intestines gave modest Ereg signal in control intestines and notably increased signals in stromal and epithelial cells of mutant animals (Fig. 4D). To test the role of EREG in promoting enteroid growth and tumorigenesis, we co-cultured control or β-cateninGOF enteroids with control or Eregnull mesenchyme isolated from Ereg knockout mice.58 Eregnull Pdgfra+ cells did not impact the growth or morphology of co-cultured enteroids (Fig. 4SC) or change expression of regenerative genes (Fig. 4SD). Nor was the rate of tissue transformation or induction of regenerative markers altered in β-cateninGOF/+;Ereg−/− mice versus β-cateninGOF/+; Ereg+/+ controls (Fig. 4E–G). Epithelial Ereg loss also did not result in overt defects, and Eregnull crypts yielded healthy branched enteroids with differentiation potential similar to control crypts (Fig. S4E–F). Addition of EREG to enteroid cultures devoid of EGF did not alter homeostatic growth (Fig. S4G) or affect regenerative growth of primary and passaged β-cateninGOF enteroids (Fig.S4H–I). Altogether, these findings identify EREG as a dispensable factor in early oncogenic, WNT-driven expansion of the crypt-progenitor zone in our model.
Figure 4. Ereg expression is induced in stromal fibroblasts in response to oncogenic change in the epithelium and is dispensable for tissue transformation.
(A) Chord diagram derived from scRNA-seq data predicts that the Epiregulin ligand is utilized by Pdgfra+ mesenchyme cells to communicate with each other and the epithelium.
(B-C) Dotplot of scRNA-seq data showing that Ereg expression is predominantly higher than other EGFR ligands in Pdgfra-hi and Pdgfra-lo cells across a time-course of β-cateninGOF activation.
(D) RNAscope localized Ereg transcripts relative to Pdgfrα immunostaining and E-cadherin immunostaining (epithelial marker). Upregulation of Ereg is distinctively observed in Pdgfra cells and in certain regions of β-cateninGOF epithelium (n = 3 biological replicates). Scale bar = 50 µm.
(E) Histology (H&E) of indicated mutant mouse duodenum shows that Ereg is dispensable to tissue transformation in the proximal duodenum of β-cateninGOF/+ mice after 17 days of tamoxifen injection (n = 3 biological replicates).
(F-G) qRT-PCR data indicate an equivalent induction of fetal-like intestine markers in transformed primary epithelium isolated from β-cateninGOF/+; Villin-CreERT2 and Tgfbr2KO;β-cateninGOF/+; Villin-CreERT2 mice (n = 3 biological replicates, one way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test, p < 0.01** and p < 0.05*).
Elevated TGFB signaling promotes regeneration-like behavior in early tumorigenesis
Tgfbr2 and Cald1, genes related to stromal TGFB activation were among the top genes upregulated in both Pdgfra-Lo and Pdgfra-hi cells in response to sustained epithelium WNT activation (Fig. 5A, Fig. S5A), and Tgfbr2 transcripts were particularly induced in Pdgfra+ cells compared to other stromal populations (Fig. 5A). TGFβ−1 drives the regenerative response to epithelial injury27 and may act on epithelial and mesenchyme cell populations27. To test for TGFB effects in stromal fibroblasts, we first defined a “TGFβ−1-induced stromal fibroblast gene signature” by treating cultures of primary Pdgfra-lo-H2B-GFP cells with exogenous TGFβ−1 and conducting RNA-seq (Fig. 5B–C, Fig. S5B). In parallel, we used Tgfbr2KO cells to measure any non-canonical TGFB1-induced activities, but few were observed (Fig. S5B). TGFβ−1 induced expression of regenerative ligands, such as Wnt5a and Tgfb1 itself, while the BMP antagonist Grem1, which supports homeostatic stem cell activity,50 was repressed, indicating that Pdgfra-lo-H2B-GFP cells can be reprogrammed to support regenerative epithelial growth (Fig. S5C). We also observed activation of Cald1 and Igfbp7, classic markers of TGFB activation in cancer associated fibroblasts59 (Fig. S5C). All these transcriptional changes reflect canonical TGFB signaling, as they were not observed in Tgfbr2 knockout Pdgfra-lo-H2B-GFP cells (Fig. S5B–C). In our scRNA-seq data, Pdgfra-lo cells upregulated this newly defined TGFβ1-induced stromal fibroblast gene signature after β-catenin hyperactivation in the gut epithelium (Fig. 5C, Fig. S5A); among TGFβ family members, Tgfb1 was notably induced (Fig. S5D). Genes upregulated in Pdgfra-lo cells exposed to oncogenic epithelium in vivo or those co-cultured with β-cateninGOF enteroids and then analyzed by bulk RNA-seq were also significantly correlated with the TGFB1-induced gene signature (Fig. 5D–E). These data show that TGFB activity is enhanced in Pdgfra+ cells following oncogenesis in vivo and can be recreated ex vivo. Thus, TGFB1 signaling may support both oncogenic transformation and the regenerative marker gene expression observed during early oncogenesis (Fig. 5C–E). To test these possibilities, we turned to enteroid monocultures and enteroid – Pdgfra-lo cell co-cultures.
Figure 5. TGFB ligands induce stromal fibroblasts to express pro-regenerative ligands.
(A) UMAP of all mesenchyme cell clusters indicates high Tgfbr2 expression in Pdgfra-expressing cells. Violin plots indicate higher expression of Tgfbr2 in both Pdgfra-hi and Pdgfra-lo cell populations after activation of ß-cateninGOF in the epithelium.
(B) To define a TGFB1-gene signature (stromal fibroblasts), RNA-seq was conducted on Pdgfra-lo cells treated with either vehicle or recombinant TGFB1 (10 ng/mL) for 72 hours (also see Fig. S4A–B).
(C) UMAP of Pdgfra mesenchyme cell clusters indicating an enrichment of a TGFB1 gene signature (stromal fibroblasts) in both Pdgfra-hi and Pdgfra-lo cell populations after epithelial ß-cateninGOF activation.
(D-E) GSEA analysis showing enrichment of a TGFB1 gene signature (stromal fibroblasts) in Pdgfra-lo cells in vivo after exposure to oncogenic epithelium (D, differential gene expression analysis via scRNAseq), or in vitro (E with Pdgfra-lo cells sorted from co-cultures with ß-cateninGOF enteroids via bulk RNA-seq).
(F) Depletion of epithelial Tgfbr2 does not impact enteroid growth after passage and it prevents spheroid morphology normally induced by activation of the ß-cateninGOF mutant allele in enteroids. Primary organoids were derived from tamoxifen-injected mice and their growth was monitored up to six days of the first passage. (n = 3 biological replicates). Scale bar = 1000 µm.
(G) qRT-PCR analysis of primary organoids at day 6 derived from control, ß-cateninGOF; Villin-creERT2 and Tgfbr2KO; ß-cateninGOF; Villin-creERT2 mice to test for stem cell markers (n = 3 biological replicates, one way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test, p < 0.0001**** and p < 0.05*)
(H) qRT-PCR data shows that fetal/regenerative reprogramming is inhibited in Tgfbr2KO; ß-cateninGOF; Villin-creERT2 mice (n = 3 biological replicates, one way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test, p < 0.0001****, p < 0.01** and p < 0.05*)
(I) Enteroid monocultures are viable after treatment with SB525334 TGFBR2 inhibitor (10 µM) over 5 days. However, susceptibility to SB525334 is observed in co-cultures of Pdgfra+ cells with control or ß-cateninGOF enteroids in -ENR media, indicating dependency of TGFB signaling in epithelial growth sustained by mesenchyme (n = 3 biological replicates). Scale bar = 1000 µm.
(J-K) Genetic inactivation of Tgfbr2 in enteroids does not prevent growth of enteroids in a co-culture setting. However, genetic inactivation of Tgfbr2 in Pdgfra-lo cells significantly reduced spheroid growth of enteroids in co-cultures even when the ß-cateninGOF mutant allele is active in the enteroids (n = 4 biological replicates). Scale bar = 1000 µm.
Monoallelic β-cateninGOF mutation triggers spherical enteroid growth.60 Although TGFB signaling is dispensable to sustain homeostatic enteroid growth in standard ENR (EGF, NOGGIN, RSPONDIN1) cultures,48 Tgfbr2 receptor deletion in enteroids reversed β-cateninGOF-induced spheroid growth (Fig. 5F), with Tgfbr2KO;β-cateninGOF/+ enteroids taking on the branched morphology typical of homeostatic growth (Fig. 5F). Like β-cateninGOF/+ controls, Tgfbr2KO;β-cateninGOF/+ enteroids showed elevated expression of homeostatic stem cell markers, but did not activate regeneration markers (Fig. 5G–H). Thus, TGFB signaling is required to facilitate β-catenin-mediated regenerative reprogramming and, in the absence of mesenchyme, β-cateninGOF/+ enteroids can autonomously invoke a regeneration-like state in a Tgfbr2-dependent manner (Fig 5H).
We further explored TGFB1 activity in the context of enteroid-fibroblast co-cultures, which occur in the absence of ENR factors. We co-cultured control and β-cateninGOF/+ enteroids with Pdgfra-lo cells and used genetic and pharmacologic approaches to block TGFB signaling. Both control and β-cateninGOF/+ enteroids co-cultured with Pdgfra-lo cells failed to grow when TGFBR was inhibited with 10 uM SB525334 (Fig. 5I). These TGFBR inhibitor concentrations did not affect growth in standard enteroid conditions,48 highlighting a specific dependency for TGFB1 signaling to mediate mesenchyme-supported epithelial growth (Fig. 5I). Genetic inactivation of Tgfbr2 in Pdgfra-lo cells also hampered growth of co-cultured organoids, while enteroids lacking Tgfbr2 were unaffected in co-cultures, further indicating a role for TGFB1 signaling in stromal support of epithelial expansion (Fig. 5J–K). Thus, TGFB1 not only induces a regenerative phenotype in enteroid cultures (Fig. S5E), it also exerts a large influence on Pdgfra+ cell reprogramming to promote regenerative growth. Indeed, treatment of Pdgfra-lo cells with TGFB1 induced expression of pro-regenerative ligands such as Il11 and Ptgs2 (Fig. S5F). Importantly, while treatment with TGFBR1 inhibitor blocked growth of enteroid co-cultures, it did not compromise Pdgfra-lo cell viability (Fig. S5G). Together, these experiments indicate that TGFB1 signaling, which is elevated during early oncogenesis, plays a critical role in stromal fibroblasts to support a regeneration-like state in the overlying epithelium.
The fetal-associated regenerative program accelerates oncogenic transformation
In response to constitutive Wnt signaling by APC inactivation, intestinal epithelial cells were recently reported to express a fetal-like/regenerative program during the onset of colorectal cancer.30 Consistent with activation of a regenerative state in the β-cateninGOF model, we observed YAP accumulation in intestinal crypts and increased expression of SOX9 throughout the transformed epithelium (Fig. 6A). β-cateninGOF crypt epithelium also increased expression of regeneration markers (Fig. 6B). To test whether the fetal-like/regenerative state is important during early transformation, we reduced levels of CDX2, a transcription factor that acts as a barrier to that state; CDX2 loss from the adult epithelium correlates with activation of genes selectively elevated in fetal enteroids49,61–63. To reduce CDX2 levels in the context of oncogenic transformation, we generated β-cateninGOF/+;Cdx2f/+;Villin-CreERT2 mice (homozygous Cdx2 loss is lethal). Following tamoxifen induction, expansion of crypt progenitors was accelerated on the Cdx2f/+ background, suggesting that the fetal-like/regenerative state is important in early tumorigenesis (Fig. 6C). In conjunction with sustained β-cateninGOF/+ expression, the decrease in Cdx2 levels was sufficient to reduce expression of the ISC marker Olfm4 and promote tissue dysplasia (Fig. S6A). RNA-seq analysis of the corresponding epithelia (control, ß-cateninGOF/+ and Cdx2f/+;ß-cateninGOF/+) confirmed that the fetal-enriched and revival gene sets were elevated upon heterozygous Cdx2 loss-of-function (Fig.6D), as was the YAP signaling signature characteristic of ISC regeneration (Fig. S6B). Thus, activation of a fetal-like/YAP/regenerative transcriptional program appears to facilitate the speed of oncogenic Wnt-driven transformation.
Figure 6. Regenerative-type growth markers are elevated in transformed tissue and loss of CDX2 leads to increased regenerative growth and faster tissue transformation in the β-cateninGOF/+ model.
(A) Increased YAP and SOX9 immunostaining after 4 days of β-cateninGOF expression in the epithelium. Basal levels of YAP and SOX9 expression are localized to intestinal crypts in control mice (n = 3 biological replicates). Scale bar = 50 µm.
(B) qRT-PCR analysis indicates a regenerative response in β-cateninGOF crypts as evidenced by upregulation of Anxa1, Ascl2, Clu and Ly6a transcripts (n = 3 biological replicates, Mann–Whitney U-test, p < 0.01** and p < 0.05*).
(C) Loss of one Cdx2 allele allows for an increased rate of tissue transformation. Rate of transformation was measured using proximal duodenum from control, β-cateninGOF/+ or Cdx2f/+; β-cateninGOF/+ mice. Unpaired t-test was performed on measurements between 15 and18 days post tamoxifen to show a difference in tissue transformation between mutants (p = 0.0051). Each point on graph represents one biological replicate. Histology (H&E) of representative samples with a red bar that highlights representative expansion of crypt-progenitor cell (CPC) zone, which was quantified as fraction of CPC to full villi length. Scale bar = 50µm.
(D) GSEA analysis using bulk RNA-seq of intestinal crypts show an enrichment of fetal intestine and revival stem cell gene signatures in β-cateninGOF/+ mice, which is further exacerbated by partial deletion of Cdx2 in Cdx2f/+; β-cateninGOF/+ mice. Intestinal crypts were collected 8–10 days after β-cateninGOF expression.
Discussion
Stromal fibroblasts are an important source of ligands that mediate adaptation of the cellular niche. Intestinal fibroblasts have been proposed to fall under four categories of Pdgfra+ expressing cells: small intestinal crypt fibroblasts (siCF1 and siCF2), villus fibroblasts (VF) and villus tip fibroblasts (VTF).14 Here, we have carried out a single-cell survey of mesenchyme cell populations of mice small intestine in response to aberrant β-catenin activation in the epithelium.
Activation of the canonical WNT pathway in colorectal cancer can be mediated by loss of function of negative regulators of the pathway in epithelial cells, known as non-ligand dependent activation of the pathway, or by ligand dependent activation of the pathway, such as stromal upregulation of R-spondins.64 Downstream activation of canonical WNT signaling in intestinal stem cells via APC inactivation can lead to the onset of a Sox9-mediated aberrant stem cell state.30 In a similar manner, APC loss of function in intestinal organoids (benign adenoma model) induces an oncofetal regression in a subset of stem cells mediated by a decreased activity of the Retinoid X Receptor (RXR) and reduced chromatin accessibility by CDX2 and HNF4.65 In agreement with these studies, we found that activating mutations of β-catenin promotes activation of regenerative gene signatures in epithelial cells despite relatively normal differentiation potential of the mutant β-catenin epithelium. Although different crypt progenitors can revert to an earlier uncommitted state, it remains to be determined if there is a specific cell of origin for the regenerative-state in early initiation of CRC tumors. Additionally, there may be multiple modes of activating the regenerative state, for example, SOX17 can initiate a fetal program in early tumorigenesis to prevent activation of the adaptive immune system.66
A prolonged and sustained increase of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in the intestinal epithelium promotes a hyperplastic growth previously defined as a crypt progenitor cell (CPC) phenotype.39,67 Expression of a single allele of mutant β-catenin is sufficient to drive transformation of the small intestinal epithelium but not of the colon mucosa due to higher levels of E-cadherin in this compartment.67 E-cadherin is an important adhesion molecule that mediates cell-to-cell contacts,68 and loss of E-cadherin promotes a regenerative cell state during dissemination of colon cancer cells.69 Similar to previous studies, we found that the degree of WNT-mediated tissue transformation is highest in the proximal small intestine; thus, our analysis of regenerative-like cellular states was restricted to this region. Nonetheless, using a colon-specific Cre, we detected elevated cell proliferation in the proximal colon after 60 days of inducing mutant β-catenin expression. Further work will elucidate whether E-cadherin perturbations play a role in regulating abnormal cellular plasticity in tumor initiation.
Stromal fibroblasts are an important component of the tumor niche that can support tumor cell plasticity, which is an emergent hallmark of cancer stemness.70 In colorectal cancer, heterogeneous subpopulations of cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) can exhibit tumor-promoting or tumor-retarding properties.71 Multiple studies have proposed the origin of CAFs from four different sources: activation of resident fibroblasts, circulating bone marrow-derived mesenchyme stem cells, differentiation from epithelial or endothelial cells, and even transdifferentiation of pericytes.72 TGFB activity in CAFs is associated with poor prognosis of colorectal cancer patients. In the stromal compartment, CAFs are the main producers of TGFB, which is used to create immune-suppressive conditions in the tumor microenvironment.73 The investigations described here show that TGFB signaling is induced in Pdgfra+ fibroblasts in response to the initial transformation of the WNT-hyperactive epithelium. Activation of TGFB signaling is associated with expression of pro-regeneration ligands that could enhance the oncogenic WNT-induced regenerative state of the intestinal epithelium. Moreover, these fibroblasts activate inflammatory and fibrotic genetic programs that can impinge on the tumor microenvironment of CRC initiation. Mechanistically, we find that Pdgfra+ fibroblasts require TGFB activity to sustain the regenerative-type growth of wild type and β-catenin mutant enteroids. Although enteroids harboring a β-catenin mutation can induce the regenerative program in the absence of a stromal component, TGFB activity is required to maintain the regenerative state in culture. β-catenin mutant enteroids do not require intrinsic activation of the TGFB pathway to maintain the regenerative state when co-cultured with TGFB-activated Pdgfra+ fibroblasts. Taken together, we propose that TGFB activity in PDGFRA+ fibroblasts plays an important role in creating a tumor niche that favors early activation of regenerative and developmental programs in the oncogenic epithelium, and that the early activation of regenerative growth accelerates the initial stages of tumorigenesis.
Materials and Methods Animals
Animal protocols and experiments were regulated by Rutgers Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Mice strains used in this study are listed in Table S1. Mice 6 weeks of age were treated with tamoxifen (Sigma T5648) at 50 mg/kg/day for 4 consecutive days by intraperitoneal injection, except for lineage tracing experiments in which a single of tamoxifen injection was administered at 100 mg/kg/day. Male and female mice were given equal consideration in experimental design, and littermates were used when available for matched experimental sets.
Histology
Freshly harvested tissue was collected and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde solution overnight at 4°C, and paraffin sections (5µm-thickness) were generated. For paraffin embedding, duodenum or jejunum tissues were dehydrated with increasing concentrations of an ethanol series and processed with xylene/paraffin before embedding. For cryo-embedding, the proximal one-third of duodenum was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C, washed in cold PBS, and equilibrated in 20% sucrose before freezing in OCT compound (catalog no. 4583; Tissue-Tek). For immunohistochemistry, antigen retrieval was performed with 10 mM sodium citrate buffer. Primary antibody incubation was performed overnight at 4°C in all cases. Primary antibodies used in the study are listed on Table S2. Slides were developed using 0.05% DAB and 0.015% hydrogen peroxide in 0.1 M Tris after incubation with corresponding secondary antibody and ABC-Vectastain HRP Kit (Vector Labs). Slides were counterstained with hematoxylin.
Intestinal crypt isolation
Dissected intestine was flushed with cold PBS, cut into 0.5 cm open fragments, and incubated with 3mM EDTA/PBS at 4°C for 5 minutes, 10 minutes and 25 minutes (replacing with fresh EDTA/PBS for every step). Tissue was then manually agitated to release epithelium, which was filtered through a 70 µm cell strainer to separate crypts from villi. Crypts were pelleted by centrifugation at 200 g for 5 minutes at 4°C and rinsed with cold PBS before collection in TRIZOL for bulk RNA-seq or resuspension in Matrigel for enteroid cultures.
Enteroid cultures
Crypts isolated from proximal duodenum were cultured in BME-R1 Matrigel (R&D, Cat no. 3433-005-R1). 80–100 crypts were plated for each 25 μl droplet of Matrigel. Enteroids were cultured in in previously established ENR medium.47 For treatments, enteroids were cultured with proper vehicle control or TGFB1 (Peprotech, Cat no. 100–21) at a final concentration of 2 ng/mL, BMP2 (R&D 355-BM) at a final concentration of 100 – 400 ng/mL, (16,16-dimethyl PGE2 (Cayman, Cat no. 14750) dissolved in ethanol at a final concentration of 10 µM, EREG (R&D Systems, Cat. no. 1068-EP-050) dissolved in 0.1% BSA at a final concentration range of 1 ng/mL – 1 µg/mL, IL-11 (Peprotech, Cat. No. 220–11) at a final concentration of 0.4 µg/mL, SB525334 (Selleckchem Catalog No. S1476) dissolved in DMSO at a final concentration of 10 µM. Enteroids were imaged using an AxioVert 200M inverted microscope (Zeiss) with a Retiga-SRV CCD (Qlmaging), or Agilent BioTek Cytation C10 Cell Imaging Multimode Reader.
Co-culture assays and FACS cell sorting
Duodenum-derived enteroids, control or β-cateninGOF, were co-cultured with 50,000 Pdgfra-lo cells and plated in 20ul Matrigel droplets in culture medium lacking EGF, R-SPONDIN1 and NOGGIN. Culture media was replaced every day for optimal growth conditions. Pdgfra-lo controls were seeded in Matrigel without organoids. After 7 days of coculture, enteroids and Pdgfra-lo cells were physically and enzymatically separated from Matrigel using Recovery Cell Solution (Corning 354253). Then, Matrigel-free enteroid and Pdgfra-lo cells were dissociated into single cells by incubating with TrypLE (Gibco 12604013) at 37°C. Cells were then washed twice with 1% BSA/PBS and filtered with a 40-μm cell strainer. For cell sorting, cells were incubated in 1% BSA/PBS with 200 U/ml of DNase I. GFP+ cells were sorted with Beckman Coulter Astrios EQ High Speed Cell Sorter according to the described culture conditions. Dead cells were eliminated using 0.5 μg/ml DAPI. Kaluza analysis 2.1.3 software was used for FACS data analysis. For treatments, co-cultures were treated daily with SB525334 (Selleckchem Catalog No. S1476) dissolved in DMSO at a final concentration of 10 µM.
Mesenchyme cell isolation
For single cell RNA-seq, mesenchyme cells were derived from proximal small intestine from control or β-cateninGOF mice using as previously described.1 For Pdgfra-lo primary monocultures or enteroid co-cultures, mesenchyme cells were isolated as previously described44 with minor modifications. Briefly, freshly harvested intestine was flushed with cold PBS, cut into 2 cm open fragments, followed by two incubation steps under constant rotation with pre-digestion buffer (HBSS containing 10% FBS, 10 mM HEPES and 5 mM EDTA) at 37°C for 20 minutes twice. Next, tissues were rinsed with wash buffer (HBSS containing 2% FBS, 10 mM HEPES), and incubated with pre-warmed digestion buffer (RPMI medium containing 10% FBS, 1% P/S, 15 mM HEPES, 25 U/mL of collagenase IV (Worthington LS004186), 100 U/mL of DNase I (Sigma D4513), 0.3 g/100 mL of Dispase II (Gibco 17105041)) and rotated at 37°C for 30 minutes. Suspension of digested tissue was vortexed vigorously for 20 seconds every 10 minutes to release single cells. Cell solution was passed through a 40 μm cell strainer and cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 400 g for 5 minutes at 4 °C and resuspended in RPMI medium containing 10% FBS. Cells were cultured in Advanced DMEM/F12 (Gibco 12634–010) medium, containing 10% FBS (Gibco 26140–095), 1% penicillin and streptomycin (Invitrogen 15140–122), 1% HEPES (Gibco 15630–080) and 1% Glutamax (Gibco 35050–061).
RNAscope in situ hybridization and immunofluorescence
RNAscope in situ hybridization and immunofluorescence for RNA localization were conducted using RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent Reagent Kit v2 Assay (ACD 323110) as previously described (Holloway et al., 2021). Mice intestines were dissected and fixed as swiss rolls for 24 h in 10% normal buffered formalin at room temperature followed by a methanol series dehydration steps and rehydration with 70% ethanol before addition of paraffin. 5 μm paraffin sections were generated, baked for 1 h at 60°C, deparaffinized and pretreated with hydrogen peroxide (ACD kit) for 10 minutes, antigen retrieval (ACD 322000) for 15 minutes and protease plus treatment (ACD kit) for 30 minutes. Probe used was Mm-Ereg (437981-C2) and diluted in multiplex TSA buffer (ACD 322809). After RNAscope, sections were co-stained with mouse-anti-Ecadherin (BD Transduction Labs 6101, diluted 1:1000) and goat anti-PDGFRa (R&D systems AF1062, diluted 1:200). Secondary antibodies were donkey anti-goat IgG (Jackson ImmunoLabs 715-585-147) and donkey anti-mouse IgG (Biotium 20827) both diluted at 1:500. Slides were mounted with Prolong Gold and imaged on a Nikon AXR confocal microscope.
RNA extraction and qRT-PCR
For enteroid monocultures, Pdgfra-lo cell monocultures, or enteroid co-cultures, Matrigel droplets containing enteroids, pdgfra-lo cells or both were homogenized in Trizol (Invitrogen 15596018), followed by RNA extraction with the QIAGEN RNeasy Micro Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Freshly harvested crytps or whole tissue snips were also homogenized in Trizol an RNA was extracted following manufacturer’s instructions. For qRT-PCR, cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis SuperMix (Invitrogen 18080–400). qRT-PCR analysis was conducted with customized gene-specific primers (sequences available upon request) and SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, 4309155). The 2−ΔΔCt method was applied to calculate the fold change of relative transcript level using proper internal controls.
Single Cell RNA-seq analysis
For each sample, data was cleansed in Cell Ranger74 (v6.0.0) to remove low quality reads and unrelated sequences, and data was aligned to the mouse reference genome (mm10). Cells with greater than 1 percent mitochondrial counts were removed as well in this process. Matrices from single-cell counts were processed and analyzed through Scanpy75 (v1.8.2) and custom Python scripts on Google Colab. Barcodes were filtered first on Cell Ranger (v6.0.0) to include only cells with greater than 10,000 transcripts. Doublet filtering utilizing the Sam Wolock Scrublet76 routine was then used to remove neotypic doublets in each sample. This technique simulates doublets to create a k-nearest neighbor classifier and run a PCA to then remove likely doublets. Low complexity transcriptomes were filtered from the data by removing all barcodes with less than 100 expressed genes. Transcript UMI counts were stored in a transcripts x cell table which was total counts normalized and then log normalized. Afterwards, the top 2000 highly variable genes were selected. The data was scaled at the end to unit variance and zero mean. The single cell data was projected into a 50-dimensional principal component analysis (PCA) subspace. A (k = 20) nearest-neighbor graph was created using Euclidean distance and from the neighbor graph, clustering was performed utilizing the Leiden (Traag et al, 2019) community detection algorithms. Cells were represented in a uniform manifold approximation and projection plane, and cell clusters were defined via canonical marker gene composition.
Processing of Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data with Seurat
For the goal of identifying candidate cell-cell communications using Cell Chat, Seurat was used to pre-process data. The day three mutant sample was not utilized for Seurat analysis due to a gene expression profile representing a transition state from control to mutant. Matrices from single-cell counts were processed and analyzed through Seurat77 (v4.0) and custom R scripts. Unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) were counted for each gene in a cell and cells were sorted by their barcodes. To remove possible doublets, cells with greater than 6,500 genes/feature counts were removed and to remove low-quality cells, cells with less than 200 genes/feature counts were removed. Gene expression measurements for each cell were then log normalized. The top 2000 highly variable genes were selected afterwards. The data was scaled so mean expression across cells was 0 and variance was constant at one. PCA was performed on the scaled data. To determine the dimensionality of the dataset and reduce technical noise, the JackStraw78 procedure was utilized to construct a ‘null distribution’ of feature scores to identify principal components with the strongest enrichment (ones with low p-values). An elbow plot was run alongside this to confirm the number of dimensions. Two analysis runs of Seurat were performed, for control and mutant samples. A k-nearest neighbor graph was created based on the Euclidean distance in the PCA dimensions (23 for mutant, 29 for control) of the data. Clustering was then performed utilizing the Louvain79 algorithm. Cells were projected into a two-dimensional tSNE plane, and cell clusters were found through their marker gene composition. Gene expression data matrix and cell labels for each sample created by Seurat were loaded into CellChat56 (v1.1.3) to create a CellChat object. The CellChatDB mouse literature-supported ligand-receptor interactions database was utilized in the analysis which consisted of 59.9% paracrine/autocrine signaling interactions, 21.4% extracellular matrix (ECM)-receptor interactions, and 18.7% cell-cell contact interactions. The data was preprocessed to infer cell state-specific communications through identification of overly expressed ligands or receptors in cell groups and reciprocal ligand-receptor over expression. Inference of cell-cell communication networks was then performed by giving each interaction in the preprocessed data a probability value and then modeling the probabilities utilizing gene expression in combination with prior known ligand-receptor interactions using the law of mass action. Communication probability on a signaling pathway level is then found by amalgamating all the probabilities of ligand-receptor interactions within each pathway.
Quantification and statistical analysis
The data is presented as mean ± SEM, and statistical comparisons were generated using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test with the GraphPad Prism version 8.0.2, Student’s t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test at p < 0.0001∗∗∗∗, p < 0.001∗∗∗ p < 0.01∗∗ or p < 0.05∗.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
M.P.V. is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH R01 CA190558). M.P.V. and J.R.S. are supported by the Intestinal Stem Cell Consortium from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) of the NIH under grant number U01 DK103141. K.D.W. is supported by a grant from the NIH (R01 DK121166). The authors acknowledge the Office of Advanced Research Computing (OARC) at Rutgers University for providing access to the Amarel cluster and associated research computing resources that have contributed to the results reported here. The research was also supported by flow cytometry/cell sorting core facility at Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences Institute (EOHSI) at Rutgers University. This work benefited from the Cancer Center Support Grant (CCSG, P30CA072720) from the National Cancer Institute.
Footnotes
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Declaration of Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
- 1.McCarthy N., Manieri E., Storm E.E., Saadatpour A., Luoma A.M., Kapoor V.N., Madha S., Gaynor L.T., Cox C., Keerthivasan S., et al. (2020). Distinct Mesenchymal Cell Populations Generate the Essential Intestinal BMP Signaling Gradient. Cell Stem Cell 26, 391–402 e395. 10.1016/j.stem.2020.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dekker E., Tanis P.J., Vleugels J.L.A., Kasi P.M., and Wallace M.B. (2019). Colorectal cancer. Lancet 394, 1467–1480. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32319-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Theodosiou N.A., and Tabin C.J. (2003). Wnt signaling during development of the gastrointestinal tract. Dev Biol 259, 258–271. 10.1016/s0012-1606(03)00185-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Morin P.J., Sparks A.B., Korinek V., Barker N., Clevers H., Vogelstein B., and Kinzler K.W. (1997). Activation of beta-catenin-Tcf signaling in colon cancer by mutations in beta-catenin or APC. Science 275, 1787–1790. 10.1126/science.275.5307.1787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fearon E.R., and Vogelstein B. (1990). A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell 61, 759–767. 10.1016/0092-8674(90)90186-i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cancer Genome Atlas N. (2012). Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancer. Nature 487, 330–337. 10.1038/nature11252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Harada N., Tamai Y., Ishikawa T., Sauer B., Takaku K., Oshima M., and Taketo M.M. (1999). Intestinal polyposis in mice with a dominant stable mutation of the beta-catenin gene. EMBO J 18, 5931–5942. 10.1093/emboj/18.21.5931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Han T., Schatoff E.M., Murphy C., Zafra M.P., Wilkinson J.E., Elemento O., and Dow L.E. (2017). R-Spondin chromosome rearrangements drive Wnt-dependent tumour initiation and maintenance in the intestine. Nat Commun 8, 15945. 10.1038/ncomms15945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stamos J.L., and Weis W.I. (2013). The beta-catenin destruction complex. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 5, a007898. 10.1101/cshperspect.a007898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gammons M., and Bienz M. (2018). Multiprotein complexes governing Wnt signal transduction. Curr Opin Cell Biol 51, 42–49. 10.1016/j.ceb.2017.10.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Roulis M., Kaklamanos A., Schernthanner M., Bielecki P., Zhao J., Kaffe E., Frommelt L.S., Qu R., Knapp M.S., Henriques A., et al. (2020). Paracrine orchestration of intestinal tumorigenesis by a mesenchymal niche. Nature 580, 524–529. 10.1038/s41586-020-2166-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Buechler M.B., Pradhan R.N., Krishnamurty A.T., Cox C., Calviello A.K., Wang A.W., Yang Y.A., Tam L., Caothien R., Roose-Girma M., et al. (2021). Cross-tissue organization of the fibroblast lineage. Nature 593, 575–579. 10.1038/s41586-021-03549-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Caligiuri G., and Tuveson D.A. (2023). Activated fibroblasts in cancer: Perspectives and challenges. Cancer Cell 41, 434–449. 10.1016/j.ccell.2023.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Brugger M.D., and Basler K. (2023). The diverse nature of intestinal fibroblasts in development, homeostasis, and disease. Trends Cell Biol 33, 834–849. 10.1016/j.tcb.2023.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Farin H.F., Van Es J.H., and Clevers H. (2012). Redundant sources of Wnt regulate intestinal stem cells and promote formation of Paneth cells. Gastroenterology 143, 1518–1529 e1517. 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Greicius G., Kabiri Z., Sigmundsson K., Liang C., Bunte R., Singh M.K., and Virshup D.M. (2018). PDGFRalpha(+) pericryptal stromal cells are the critical source of Wnts and RSPO3 for murine intestinal stem cells in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115, E3173–E3181. 10.1073/pnas.1713510115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kabiri Z., Greicius G., Madan B., Biechele S., Zhong Z., Zaribafzadeh H., Edison Aliyev, J., Wu Y., Bunte R., et al. (2014). Stroma provides an intestinal stem cell niche in the absence of epithelial Wnts. Development 141, 2206–2215. 10.1242/dev.104976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Stzepourginski I., Nigro G., Jacob J.M., Dulauroy S., Sansonetti P.J., Eberl G., and Peduto L. (2017). CD34+ mesenchymal cells are a major component of the intestinal stem cells niche at homeostasis and after injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114, E506–E513. 10.1073/pnas.1620059114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shoshkes-Carmel M., Wang Y.J., Wangensteen K.J., Toth B., Kondo A., Massasa E.E., Itzkovitz S., and Kaestner K.H. (2018). Subepithelial telocytes are an important source of Wnts that supports intestinal crypts. Nature 557, 242–246. 10.1038/s41586-018-0084-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Valenta T., Degirmenci B., Moor A.E., Herr P., Zimmerli D., Moor M.B., Hausmann G., Cantu C., Aguet M., and Basler K. (2016). Wnt Ligands Secreted by Subepithelial Mesenchymal Cells Are Essential for the Survival of Intestinal Stem Cells and Gut Homeostasis. Cell Rep 15, 911–918. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Degirmenci B., Valenta T., Dimitrieva S., Hausmann G., and Basler K. (2018). GLI1-expressing mesenchymal cells form the essential Wnt-secreting niche for colon stem cells. Nature 558, 449–453. 10.1038/s41586-018-0190-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kraiczy J., McCarthy N., Malagola E., Tie G., Madha S., Boffelli D., Wagner D.E., Wang T.C., and Shivdasani R.A. (2023). Graded BMP signaling within intestinal crypt architecture directs self-organization of the Wnt-secreting stem cell niche. Cell Stem Cell 30, 433–449 e438. 10.1016/j.stem.2023.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kinchen J., Chen H.H., Parikh K., Antanaviciute A., Jagielowicz M., Fawkner-Corbett D., Ashley N., Cubitt L., Mellado-Gomez E., Attar M., et al. (2018). Structural Remodeling of the Human Colonic Mesenchyme in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Cell 175, 372–386 e317. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Malagola E., Vasciaveo A., Ochiai Y., Kim W., Zheng B., Zanella L., Wang A.L.E., Middelhoff M., Nienhuser H., Deng L., et al. (2024). Isthmus progenitor cells contribute to homeostatic cellular turnover and support regeneration following intestinal injury. Cell 187, 3056–3071 e3017. 10.1016/j.cell.2024.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Palikuqi B., Rispal J., Reyes E.A., Vaka D., Boffelli D., and Klein O. (2022). Lymphangiocrine signals are required for proper intestinal repair after cytotoxic injury. Cell Stem Cell 29, 1262–1272 e1265. 10.1016/j.stem.2022.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ayyaz A., Kumar S., Sangiorgi B., Ghoshal B., Gosio J., Ouladan S., Fink M., Barutcu S., Trcka D., Shen J., et al. (2019). Single-cell transcriptomes of the regenerating intestine reveal a revival stem cell. Nature 569, 121–125. 10.1038/s41586-019-1154-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Chen L., Dupre A., Qiu X., Pellon-Cardenas O., Walton K.D., Wang J., Perekatt A.O., Hu W., Spence J.R., and Verzi M.P. (2023). TGFB1 Induces Fetal Reprogramming and Enhances Intestinal Regeneration. bioRxiv. 10.1101/2023.01.13.523825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yui S., Azzolin L., Maimets M., Pedersen M.T., Fordham R.P., Hansen S.L., Larsen H.L., Guiu J., Alves M.R.P., Rundsten C.F., et al. (2018). YAP/TAZ-Dependent Reprogramming of Colonic Epithelium Links ECM Remodeling to Tissue Regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 22, 35–49 e37. 10.1016/j.stem.2017.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Viragova S., Li D., and Klein O.D. (2024). Activation of fetal-like molecular programs during regeneration in the intestine and beyond. Cell Stem Cell 31, 949–960. 10.1016/j.stem.2024.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bala P., Rennhack J.P., Aitymbayev D., Morris C., Moyer S.M., Duronio G.N., Doan P., Li Z., Liang X., Hornick J.L., et al. (2023). Aberrant cell state plasticity mediated by developmental reprogramming precedes colorectal cancer initiation. Sci Adv 9, eadf0927. 10.1126/sciadv.adf0927. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Moorman A.R., Cambuli F., Benitez E.K., Jiang Q., Xie Y., Mahmoud A., Lumish M., Hartner S., Balkaran S., Bermeo J., et al. (2023). Progressive plasticity during colorectal cancer metastasis. bioRxiv. 10.1101/2023.08.18.553925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Han T., Goswami S., Hu Y., Tang F., Zafra M.P., Murphy C., Cao Z., Poirier J.T., Khurana E., Elemento O., et al. (2020). Lineage Reversion Drives WNT Independence in Intestinal Cancer. Cancer Discov 10, 1590–1609. 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-1536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Guinney J., Dienstmann R., Wang X., de Reynies A., Schlicker A., Soneson C., Marisa L., Roepman P., Nyamundanda G., Angelino P., et al. (2015). The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer. Nat Med 21, 1350–1356. 10.1038/nm.3967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gregorieff A., Liu Y., Inanlou M.R., Khomchuk Y., and Wrana J.L. (2015). Yap-dependent reprogramming of Lgr5(+) stem cells drives intestinal regeneration and cancer. Nature 526, 715–718. 10.1038/nature15382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Vasquez E.G., Nasreddin N., Valbuena G.N., Mulholland E.J., Belnoue-Davis H.L., Eggington H.R., Schenck R.O., Wouters V.M., Wirapati P., Gilroy K., et al. (2022). Dynamic and adaptive cancer stem cell population admixture in colorectal neoplasia. Cell Stem Cell 29, 1213–1228 e1218. 10.1016/j.stem.2022.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tape C.J. (2024). Plastic persisters: revival stem cells in colorectal cancer. Trends Cancer 10, 185–195. 10.1016/j.trecan.2023.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ramos Zapatero M., Tong A., Opzoomer J.W., O’Sullivan R., Cardoso Rodriguez F., Sufi J., Vlckova P., Nattress C., Qin X., Claus J., et al. (2023). Trellis tree-based analysis reveals stromal regulation of patient-derived organoid drug responses. Cell 186, 5606–5619 e5624. 10.1016/j.cell.2023.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.el Marjou F., Janssen K.P., Chang B.H., Li M., Hindie V., Chan L., Louvard D., Chambon P., Metzger D., and Robine S. (2004). Tissue-specific and inducible Cre-mediated recombination in the gut epithelium. Genesis 39, 186–193. 10.1002/gene.20042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sansom O.J., Reed K.R., Hayes A.J., Ireland H., Brinkmann H., Newton I.P., Batlle E., Simon-Assmann P., Clevers H., Nathke I.S., et al. (2004). Loss of Apc in vivo immediately perturbs Wnt signaling, differentiation, and migration. Genes Dev 18, 1385–1390. 10.1101/gad.287404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Barker N., van Es J.H., Kuipers J., Kujala P., van den Born M., Cozijnsen M., Haegebarth A., Korving J., Begthel H., Peters P.J., and Clevers H. (2007). Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature 449, 1003–1007. 10.1038/nature06196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Madisen L., Zwingman T.A., Sunkin S.M., Oh S.W., Zariwala H.A., Gu H., Ng L.L., Palmiter R.D., Hawrylycz M.J., Jones A.R., et al. (2010). A robust and high-throughput Cre reporting and characterization system for the whole mouse brain. Nat Neurosci 13, 133–140. 10.1038/nn.2467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wang Y., Chiang I.L., Ohara T.E., Fujii S., Cheng J., Muegge B.D., Ver Heul A., Han N.D., Lu Q., Xiong S., et al. (2019). Long-Term Culture Captures Injury-Repair Cycles of Colonic Stem Cells. Cell 179, 1144–1159 e1115. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Van der Flier L.G., Sabates-Bellver J., Oving I., Haegebarth A., De Palo M., Anti M., Van Gijn M.E., Suijkerbuijk S., Van de Wetering M., Marra G., and Clevers H. (2007). The Intestinal Wnt/TCF Signature. Gastroenterology 132, 628–632. 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.08.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kim J.E., Fei L., Yin W.C., Coquenlorge S., Rao-Bhatia A., Zhang X., Shi S.S.W., Lee J.H., Hahn N.A., Rizvi W., et al. (2020). Single cell and genetic analyses reveal conserved populations and signaling mechanisms of gastrointestinal stromal niches. Nat Commun 11, 334. 10.1038/s41467-019-14058-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Tsukui T., Wolters P.J., and Sheppard D. (2024). Alveolar fibroblast lineage orchestrates lung inflammation and fibrosis. Nature 631, 627–634. 10.1038/s41586-024-07660-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Becker W.R., Nevins S.A., Chen D.C., Chiu R., Horning A.M., Guha T.K., Laquindanum R., Mills M., Chaib H., Ladabaum U., et al. (2022). Single-cell analyses define a continuum of cell state and composition changes in the malignant transformation of polyps to colorectal cancer. Nat Genet 54, 985–995. 10.1038/s41588-022-01088-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Sato T., Vries R.G., Snippert H.J., van de Wetering M., Barker N., Stange D.E., van Es J.H., Abo A., Kujala P., Peters P.J., and Clevers H. (2009). Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature 459, 262–265. 10.1038/nature07935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sato T., Stange D.E., Ferrante M., Vries R.G., Van Es J.H., Van den Brink S., Van Houdt W.J., Pronk A., Van Gorp J., Siersema P.D., and Clevers H. (2011). Long-term expansion of epithelial organoids from human colon, adenoma, adenocarcinoma, and Barrett’s epithelium. Gastroenterology 141, 1762–1772. 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.07.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mustata R.C., Vasile G., Fernandez-Vallone V., Strollo S., Lefort A., Libert F., Monteyne D., Perez-Morga D., Vassart G., and Garcia M.I. (2013). Identification of Lgr5-independent spheroid-generating progenitors of the mouse fetal intestinal epithelium. Cell Rep 5, 421–432. 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Davis H., Irshad S., Bansal M., Rafferty H., Boitsova T., Bardella C., Jaeger E., Lewis A., Freeman-Mills L., Giner F.C., et al. (2015). Aberrant epithelial GREM1 expression initiates colonic tumorigenesis from cells outside the stem cell niche. Nat Med 21, 62–70. 10.1038/nm.3750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Harnack C., Berger H., Antanaviciute A., Vidal R., Sauer S., Simmons A., Meyer T.F., and Sigal M. (2019). R-spondin 3 promotes stem cell recovery and epithelial regeneration in the colon. Nat Commun 10, 4368. 10.1038/s41467-019-12349-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Nishina T., Deguchi Y., Kawauchi M., Xiyu C., Yamazaki S., Mikami T., and Nakano H. (2023). Interleukin 11 confers resistance to dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mice. iScience 26, 105934. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.105934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Chen L., Qiu X., Dupre A., Pellon-Cardenas O., Fan X., Xu X., Rout P., Walton K.D., Burclaff J., Zhang R., et al. (2023). TGFB1 induces fetal reprogramming and enhances intestinal regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 30, 1520–1537 e1528. 10.1016/j.stem.2023.09.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Beumer J., Puschhof J., Yengej F.Y., Zhao L., Martinez-Silgado A., Blotenburg M., Begthel H., Boot C., van Oudenaarden A., Chen Y.G., and Clevers H. (2022). BMP gradient along the intestinal villus axis controls zonated enterocyte and goblet cell states. Cell Rep 38, 110438. 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Shibata H., Toyama K., Shioya H., Ito M., Hirota M., Hasegawa S., Matsumoto H., Takano H., Akiyama T., Toyoshima K., et al. (1997). Rapid colorectal adenoma formation initiated by conditional targeting of the Apc gene. Science 278, 120–123. 10.1126/science.278.5335.120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Jin S., Guerrero-Juarez C.F., Zhang L., Chang I., Ramos R., Kuan C.H., Myung P., Plikus M.V., and Nie Q. (2021). Inference and analysis of cell-cell communication using CellChat. Nat Commun 12, 1088. 10.1038/s41467-021-21246-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Harris R.C., Chung E., and Coffey R.J. (2003). EGF receptor ligands. Exp Cell Res 284, 2–13. 10.1016/s0014-4827(02)00105-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lee D., Pearsall R.S., Das S., Dey S.K., Godfrey V.L., and Threadgill D.W. (2004). Epiregulin is not essential for development of intestinal tumors but is required for protection from intestinal damage. Mol Cell Biol 24, 8907–8916. 10.1128/MCB.24.20.8907-8916.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Calon A., Lonardo E., Berenguer-Llergo A., Espinet E., Hernando-Momblona X., Iglesias M., Sevillano M., Palomo-Ponce S., Tauriello D.V., Byrom D., et al. (2015). Stromal gene expression defines poor-prognosis subtypes in colorectal cancer. Nat Genet 47, 320–329. 10.1038/ng.3225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Drost J., van Jaarsveld R.H., Ponsioen B., Zimberlin C., van Boxtel R., Buijs A., Sachs N., Overmeer R.M., Offerhaus G.J., Begthel H., et al. (2015). Sequential cancer mutations in cultured human intestinal stem cells. Nature 521, 43–47. 10.1038/nature14415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.San Roman A.K., Aronson B.E., Krasinski S.D., Shivdasani R.A., and Verzi M.P. (2015). Transcription factors GATA4 and HNF4A control distinct aspects of intestinal homeostasis in conjunction with transcription factor CDX2. J Biol Chem 290, 1850–1860. 10.1074/jbc.M114.620211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Verzi M.P., Shin H., He H.H., Sulahian R., Meyer C.A., Montgomery R.K., Fleet J.C., Brown M., Liu X.S., and Shivdasani R.A. (2010). Differentiation-specific histone modifications reveal dynamic chromatin interactions and partners for the intestinal transcription factor CDX2. Dev Cell 19, 713–726. 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Gao N., White P., and Kaestner K.H. (2009). Establishment of intestinal identity and epithelial-mesenchymal signaling by Cdx2. Dev Cell 16, 588–599. 10.1016/j.devcel.2009.02.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kleeman S.O., and Leedham S.J. (2020). Not All Wnt Activation Is Equal: Ligand-Dependent versus Ligand-Independent Wnt Activation in Colorectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 12. 10.3390/cancers12113355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Mzoughi S., Schwarz M., Wang X., Demircioglu D., Ulukaya G., Mohammed K., Tullio F.D., Company C., Dramaretska Y., Leushacke M., et al. (2023). A Mutation-driven oncofetal regression fuels phenotypic plasticity in colorectal cancer. bioRxiv. 10.1101/2023.12.10.570854. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Goto N., Westcott P.M.K., Goto S., Imada S., Taylor M.S., Eng G., Braverman J., Deshpande V., Jacks T., Agudo J., and Yilmaz O.H. (2024). SOX17 enables immune evasion of early colorectal adenomas and cancers. Nature 627, 636–645. 10.1038/s41586-024-07135-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Huels D.J., Ridgway R.A., Radulescu S., Leushacke M., Campbell A.D., Biswas S., Leedham S., Serra S., Chetty R., Moreaux G., et al. (2015). E-cadherin can limit the transforming properties of activating beta-catenin mutations. EMBO J 34, 2321–2333. 10.15252/embj.201591739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Gumbiner B.M. (1996). Cell adhesion: the molecular basis of tissue architecture and morphogenesis. Cell 84, 345–357. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81279-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ganesh K., Basnet H., Kaygusuz Y., Laughney A.M., He L., Sharma R., O’Rourke K.P., Reuter V.P., Huang Y.H., Turkekul M., et al. (2020). L1CAM defines the regenerative origin of metastasis-initiating cells in colorectal cancer. Nat Cancer 1, 28–45. 10.1038/s43018-019-0006-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Loh J.J., and Ma S. (2024). Hallmarks of cancer stemness. Cell Stem Cell 31, 617–639. 10.1016/j.stem.2024.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Kobayashi H., Enomoto A., Woods S.L., Burt A.D., Takahashi M., and Worthley D.L. (2019). Cancer-associated fibroblasts in gastrointestinal cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 16, 282–295. 10.1038/s41575-019-0115-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Abudukelimu S., de Miranda N., and Hawinkels L. (2024). Fibroblasts in Orchestrating Colorectal Tumorigenesis and Progression. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol 17, 821–826. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2024.01.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Batlle E., and Massague J. (2019). Transforming Growth Factor-beta Signaling in Immunity and Cancer. Immunity 50, 924–940. 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Zheng G.X., Terry J.M., Belgrader P., Ryvkin P., Bent Z.W., Wilson R., Ziraldo S.B., Wheeler T.D., McDermott G.P., Zhu J., et al. (2017). Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat Commun 8, 14049. 10.1038/ncomms14049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Wolf F.A., Angerer P., and Theis F.J. (2018). SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol 19, 15. 10.1186/s13059-017-1382-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Wolock S.L., Lopez R., and Klein A.M. (2019). Scrublet: Computational Identification of Cell Doublets in Single-Cell Transcriptomic Data. Cell Syst 8, 281–291 e289. 10.1016/j.cels.2018.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Satija R., Farrell J.A., Gennert D., Schier A.F., and Regev A. (2015). Spatial reconstruction of single-cell gene expression data. Nat Biotechnol 33, 495–502. 10.1038/nbt.3192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Chung N.C., and Storey J.D. (2015). Statistical significance of variables driving systematic variation in high-dimensional data. Bioinformatics 31, 545–554. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Traag V.A., Waltman L., and van Eck N.J. (2019). From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. Sci Rep 9, 5233. 10.1038/s41598-019-41695-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.






