ABSTRACT
Genetic rescue, or the translocation of individuals among populations to augment gene flow, can help ameliorate inbreeding depression and loss of adaptive potential in small and isolated populations. Genetic rescue is currently under consideration for an endangered butterfly in Canada, the Half‐moon Hairstreak ( Satyrium semiluna ). A small, unique population persists in Waterton Lakes National Park, Alberta, isolated from other populations by more than 400 km. However, whether genetic rescue would actually be helpful has not been evaluated. Here, we generate the first chromosome‐level genome assembly and whole‐genome resequence data for the species. We find that the Alberta population maintains extremely low genetic diversity and is genetically very divergent from the nearest populations in British Columbia and Montana. Runs of homozygosity suggest this is due to a long history of inbreeding, and coalescent analyses show that the population has been small and isolated, yet stable, for up to 40k years. When a population like this maintains its viability despite inbreeding and low genetic diversity, it has likely undergone purging of deleterious recessive alleles and could be threatened by the reintroduction of such alleles via genetic rescue. Ecological niche modelling indicates that the Alberta population also exhibits environmental associations that are atypical of the species. Together, these evolutionary and ecological divergences suggest that population crosses may result in outbreeding depression. We therefore infer that genetic rescue has a relatively unique potential to be harmful rather than helpful for this population at present. However, because of its reduced adaptive potential, the Alberta population may still benefit from future genetic rescue as climate and habitat conditions change. Proactive experimental population crosses should therefore be completed to assess reproductive compatibility and progeny fitness.
Keywords: conservation genomics, conservation translocation, inbreeding depression, niche divergence, whole‐genome sequencing
1. Introduction
Quantifying whole‐genome genetic diversity and patterns of differentiation within endangered species is an integral part of modern conservation practice (Kardos et al. 2021). This is particularly true for small and isolated populations, which are often characterised by high inbreeding, low genetic diversity and low adaptive potential (Lande 1988; Saccheri et al. 1998; Kyriazis et al. 2023). The evolutionary dynamics of these populations are of ever‐increasing relevance to conservation, particularly as anthropogenic habitat fragmentation continues to break apart naturally connected populations (Haddad et al. 2015; Schlaepfer et al. 2018; MacDonald et al. 2021; MacDonald, Shaffer, and Sperling 2024). It is often uncertain whether small, isolated, but ecologically important populations will persist without intervention, or if deleterious genetic processes, primarily inbreeding depression, will lead to their extinction (Keller and Waller 2002; Charlesworth and Willis 2009; Hedrick and García‐Dorado 2016; Whitla et al. 2023).
Inbreeding is a significant threat to small populations due mainly to the stochastic homozygous expression of deleterious recessive alleles, although loss of heterozygote advantage and epistasis can also be important (Charlesworth and Willis 2009; Hedrick and García‐Dorado 2016). Following Kyriazis et al. (2023), we define ‘inbreeding load’ as the quantity of deleterious recessive alleles in an individual or population that are masked in heterozygous form (Hedrick and García‐Dorado 2016) and ‘genetic load’ as the realised reduction in fitness when these alleles are expressed in homozygous form (Kirkpatrick and Jarne 2000; Bertorelle et al. 2022). If an effective population size is sufficiently small, random mating among related individuals can quickly convert inbreeding load into genetic load and become a primary determinant of extinction risk (Kyriazis, Wayne, and Lohmueller 2021). Additionally, drift may overwhelm purifying selection against weakly deleterious alleles (i.e., with selection coefficients << 1/(2N e )), allowing them to become fixed (Kimura, Maruyama, and Crow 1963; Lynch, Conery, and Burger 1995; Robinson et al. 2022). This ‘fixed load’ results in permanent reductions in fitness unless new alleles are introduced (Charlesworth 2018). A viable conservation practice used to reduce inbreeding depression and fixed load is genetic rescue, which aims to increase genetic diversity by (re‐)establishing gene flow between isolated populations (Storfer 1999; Weeks et al. 2011; Ralls et al. 2020). Genetic rescue and related forms of population crosses have effectively alleviated inbreeding depression in a number of well‐known taxa, such as the Scandinavian wolf ( Canis lupus ; Vila et al. 2003), Florida panther ( Puma concolor coryi ; Pimm, Dollar, and Bass Jr 2006), greater prairie chicken ( Tympanuchus cupido ; Mussmann et al. 2017), African lion ( Panthera leo ; Trinkel et al. 2008), Glanville Fritillary butterfly (Melitea cinxia; Mattila et al. 2012), and jellyfish tree (Medusagyne oppositifolia; Finger et al. 2011) (and see review by Clarke, Smith, and Cullingham 2024). Theoretically, genetic rescue can also increase the standing genetic diversity of a population, increasing its adaptive potential to survive future environmental changes (Willi, Van Buskirk, and Hoffmann 2006; Mable 2019). Although real‐world examples of genetic rescue actually increasing the adaptive potential of wild populations are lacking, it remains an important consideration and motivator for translocations.
Despite clear benefits, translocations also entail the theoretical risk of introducing new inbreeding load into already threatened populations (Hedrick et al. 2014, 2019). In small and isolated populations, a principal consequence of inbreeding is the reduced fitness and demographic loss of individuals due to the homozygous expression of deleterious recessive alleles. However, the reduced fitness or death of these individuals also reduce the frequency of those recessive alleles and thus the consequences of future inbreeding—a process known as genetic purging (Glémin 2003; Xue et al. 2015; Hedrick and García‐Dorado 2016; Robinson et al. 2016, 2018; Grossen et al. 2020; López‐Cortegano, Moreno, and García‐Dorado 2021; Pérez‐Pereira et al. 2021; Kleinman‐Ruiz et al. 2022; Mooney et al. 2023; Pečnerová et al. 2024). If purging has occurred, genetic rescue may reintroduce inbreeding load to the detriment of the recipient population. Theory suggests that small to moderate population sizes are optimal for purging, wherein gradual, continuous inbreeding is sufficient to consistently expose genetic load to purifying selection without compromising population viability (Day, Bryant, and Meffert 2003; Glémin 2003; García‐Dorado 2012; Pekkala et al. 2012; Robinson et al. 2016, 2018; Kyriazis, Wayne, and Lohmueller 2021; Pérez‐Pereira et al. 2021). However, what constitutes an optimal population size depends on both the genetic diversity and demographic history of a population (Caballero, Bravo, and Wang 2017; Mable 2019; Robinson et al. 2022). Adding further confusion, inbreeding load, genetic load and the process of purging have proven extremely difficult to quantify in nature, most often relying on simulations with varying interpretations (Leberg and Firmin 2008; Ralls et al. 2020; Kyriazis et al. 2023). Notwithstanding, it remains the case that heathy, resilient populations with a long history of complete isolation, high homozygosity, and no signs of inbreeding depression have likely purged much of their inbreeding/genetic load (Robinson et al. 2016, 2018, 2022; Pečnerová et al. 2024). Although these populations may also harbour a fixed load, their demographic health and resiliency indicate that any associated fitness consequences are insufficient to compromise population viability. From this perspective, small populations with very long histories of isolation may not immediately benefit from, and may even be harmed by, genetic rescue (Hedrick et al. 2014, 2019; Robinson et al. 2016, 2018; López‐Cortegano, Moreno, and García‐Dorado 2021; Kyriazis, Wayne, and Lohmueller 2021; Kyriazis et al. 2023; Mooney et al. 2023).
Another risk associated with genetic rescue is outbreeding depression, defined as reductions in the fitness of translocated individuals' progeny due to the inheritance of maladapted phenotypes or the disruption of favourable gene combinations (Templeton 1986; Tallmon, Luikart, and Waples 2004; Edmands 2007; McBride and Singer 2010). According to Frankham et al. (2011), the probability of outbreeding depression is substantial when donor and recipient populations exhibit at least one of the following attributes: (1) they are different species; (2) they exhibit fixed chromosomal differences; (3) they have experienced no gene flow over the last 500 years; or (4) they inhabit different environments. In wild populations, attribute 4—inhabiting different environments—is particularly important because it implies divergent adaptation to different ecological/environmental conditions (Nosil 2012; MacDonald et al. 2020; Campbell et al. 2022; Grether, Finneran, and Drury 2024). Even if populations show little neutral genetic differentiation, translocating individuals across gradients of selection can result in a substantial loss of fitness, as has been shown in Edith's Checkerspot butterfly ( Euphydryas editha ; Singer and McBride 2010; McBride and Singer 2010; review in Parmesan et al. 2023). However, even though crosses among divergent populations result in overall genomic homogenisation, important alleles associated with local adaptation may not always be eliminated by gene flow (e.g., Fitzpatrick et al. 2020). Further, there are counter‐cases wherein crossing divergent populations results in increased fitness; a phenomenon known heterosis or hybrid vigour (Darwin 1859; Birchler, Auger, and Riddle 2003; Lippman and Zamir 2007). Clearly, there is a need to evaluate the risks of outbreeding depression on a case‐by‐case basis, carefully considering the ecology and evolution of the populations in question.
In this study, we applied whole‐genome resequencing and ecological niche modelling to an endangered butterfly, the Half‐moon Hairstreak ( Satyrium semiluna Klots, 1930, family: Lycaenidae). Our goals were to quantify patterns of genetic diversity and differentiation within the species at its northern range limit, as well as to infer the demographic history and assess niche divergence of a small, isolated population of critical conservation concern. The range of S. semiluna spans the southern interior of British Columbia and southwestern Alberta, Canada, south to the eastern slopes of the Californian Sierra Nevada, and east to eastern Wyoming and northern Texas in the USA. While the species is ‘apparently secure’ across its USA and global range (COSEWIC 2006, 2022; Environment and Climate Change Canada 2016; NatureServe Network 2024), less than 1% of the species' range is in Canada, where it is listed as federally endangered. All but one of the Canadian populations occur in south central British Columbia, with an aggregate abundance qualitatively estimated to be between 5,000 and 15,000 individuals (COSEWIC 2006, 2022). These populations, as well as those throughout the USA, inhabit steppe‐like habitats dominated by big sagebrush ( Artemisia tridentata ). Approximately 400 km to the east, there exists a single S. semiluna population that persists on a ~300 ha alluvial fan (Blakiston Fan) in Waterton Lakes National Park, Alberta (COSWEIC 2006, 2022). This population's small size and considerable isolation, as well as habitat degredation associated with the ongoing spread of non‐native spotted knapweed (Centaurea stoebe), were primary motivators for federal listing of S. semiluna in Canada. The habitat occupied by this population is also unique for the species, described as prairie/grassland dominated by sedges, grasses and herbaceous plant species with few shrubs. Larval host plant associations also vary. British Columbia and many Pacific Northwest populations have been observed to feed on silky lupine ( Lupinus sericeus ), whereas the Alberta population feeds only on silvery lupine ( Lupinus argenteus ), despite silky lupine being readily available at Blakiston Fan.
The historical size of the Alberta population is unknown, but qualitatively estimated to have been between 2,000 and 10,000 individuals (COSWEIC 2006). Historical surveys suggest that this population fluctuates in density, with rough estimates ranging from 20.1 individuals/ha in 2004 (Kondla 2004; COSEWIC 2006, 2022) to 62.9 individuals/ha in 2008 (Z. G. MacDonald, J. R. Dupuis, J. R. N. Glasier, R. Sissons, A. Moehrenschlager, H. B. Shaffer, F. A. H. Sperling, unpublished data). In 2017, a precipitous decline was recorded, with only 1.5 individuals/ha observed. This decline continued in 2018 with 0.5 individuals/ha, following an intense wildfire in the fall of 2017 (Eisenberg et al. 2019) that burned approximately 50% of S. semiluna habitat. While the cause of this decline is not known, the population has since partially recovered, with density estimates for 2021, 2022, and 2023 of 30.6, 8.1, and 7.9 individuals/ha, respectively (Z. G. MacDonald, J. R. Dupuis, J. R. N. Glasier, R. Sissons, A. Moehrenschlager, H. B. Shaffer, F. A. H. Sperling, unpublished data). In truth, lack of standardised survey methods and effort across years renders estimates of population size and trends approximate at best. However, experts still generally agree that the Alberta population is small, likely completely isolated and unique in its habitat associations (Environment and Climate Change Canada 2016).
Translocation of individuals from the nearest populations in either British Columbia or Montana is currently being considered by Parks Canada as an option to bolster genetic diversity, reduce potential inbreeding, and increase the population size at Blakiston Fan. To better inform whether this conservation intervention is warranted, we generated a chromosome‐level reference genome for S. semiluna , representing the first high‐quality assembly for the subfamily Theclinae, and whole‐genome resequencing data for 15 individuals collected from Alberta, British Columbia, and Montana populations. These data were used to quantify patterns of genomic diversity and differentiation within and among populations, as well as infer each population's inbreeding and demographic history. We also used ecological niche modelling to quantify niche divergence within the species, further assessing whether population crosses are likely to result in outbreeding depression. Together, these analyses demonstrate how a substantial amount of information can be gleaned from whole‐genome resequencing of a small sample of individuals—a critical consideration when working with endangered species—and the utility of integrating genomic data with ecological modelling to inform genetic rescue decisions.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Sampling
We collected a total of 19 adult S. semiluna using aerial nets throughout the summer of 2021, preferentially collecting worn individuals when possible to minimise impacts on populations. Eight individuals were collected from Blakiston Fan, Alberta, four from Richter Pass, British Columbia, three from Anarchist Mountain, British Columbia and four near Red Lodge, Montana. The two British Columbia collection locations were separated by approximately 17 km and individuals from both are generally treated here as a single population. All specimen metadata are reported in Supporting Information. Specimens from Waterton Lakes National Park were collected under the Parks Canada Agency Research and Collection Permit: WL‐2021‐39,020. Specimens collected in British Columbia were collected on private land with landowner permissions, Nature Conservancy Canada Research Permit No. NCC_BC_2021_SS001 and Nature Trust of British Columbia #3461.
2.2. Reference Genome Sequencing and Assembly
Four of the eight Alberta individuals were used to generate a chromosome‐level reference genome for S. semiluna . Genome sequencing and assembly was accomplished using a combination of PacBio HiFi long‐read sequencing (Pacific BioSciences, Menlo Park, California, USA) and Omni‐C proximity ligation (Dovetail Genomics, Scotts Valley, California, USA). We opted to build a reference genome based on the homogametic sex to maximise the probability of successfully sequencing and assembling the Z chromosome. Detailed methods for sequencing and assembly are provided in Supporting Information and data are available under NCBI BioProject PRJNA907836. Default parameters/settings were used for all analyses unless specified.
To assess completeness of our reference genome, we ran BUSCO v5.2.2 (Manni et al. 2021) using default parameters and the lepidoptera_odb10 lineage dataset, composed of 5286 genes. We also quantified and classified repetitive content, including transposable elements, endogenous retroviruses and repeat motifs, using RepeatMasker v4.1.4 (Smit, Hubley, and Green 2015). A library of repetitive elements for Lepidoptera was compiled using Dfam v3.6 (Hubley et al. 2016). HMMER (nhmmscan v3.3.2; hmmer.org) was used to search the reference sequence against this library using default settings, including categorisation of simple repeats. Methods for identifying the Z chromosome in our assembly using BUSCO genes are available in Supporting Information.
2.3. Whole‐Genome Resequencing
Short‐read, whole‐genome resequencing was completed on 15 individuals. We extracted genomic DNA from thoracic tissue using DNeasy Kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer's protocol with the addition of a bovine pancreatic ribonuclease A treatment (RNaseA, 4 μL at 100 mg/mL; Sigma‐Aldrich Canada Co., Canada). Following extraction, genomic DNA was ethanol‐precipitated and stored in purified water (50 μL Millipore) at −20°C. PCR‐free whole‐genome library preparation was completed using an Ultra II FS DNA Library Prep Kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), followed by paired‐end, 150‐bp sequencing on an Illumina NovaSeq S1 300 flowcell (total output 1600 M read pairs, 500 Gb), aiming for ~20× coverage per sample, at the Centre for Health Genomics and Informatics, University of Calgary.
2.4. Short‐Read Processing, Alignment and Genotyping
We processed raw reads using a pipeline based on recommendations from Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) Best Practices Guides (Van der Auwera and O'Connor 2020). After trimming adapter sequences and individual indexes, we aligned reads to our S. semiluna reference genome using BWA‐MEM2 (Vasimuddin et al. 2019). Following removal of duplicate reads in BAM files using MarkDuplicates (Picard), alignments were passed to GATK's HaplotypeCaller, which assembles local de‐novo haplotypes on an individual‐by‐individual basis, generating a GVCF file for each individual. GVCF files were then used in GATK's GenotypeGVCFs for joint genotyping of all individuals, using the ‘‐all‐sites’ option. From the resulting multisample VCF file, we removed loci occurring on small, unassembled scaffolds (< 1 Mb) and the Z chromosome, leaving only loci that occur on assembled autosomes. Filtering was completed using VCFtools 0.1.14 (Danecek et al. 2011), including the removal of indels, sites with > 2 alleles and sites with less than 99.9% accuracy (Phred scores < 30). We then applied an individual‐specific read depth filter, removing loci with depths less than five or exceeding the 99th percentile of each individual. Finally, we removed loci with more than 25% missing data across all individuals. Unless otherwise specified, a final VCF file including only variant sites (single nucleotide polymorphisms; SNPs) was used in subsequent analyses.
2.5. Genetic Divergence and Population Structure
To assess genetic divergence among collection locations, we first estimated Weir and Cockerham's F ST (Weir and Cockerham 1984) using VCFtools. We also estimated d xy, the average number of nucleotide differences between individuals from two different populations (Nei and Li 1979), using pixy (Korunes and Samuk 2021). Estimation of d xy was completed using a window size of 10 kb and included both variant and invariant sites to avoid bias caused by interpopulation variation in the amount of missing data (Korunes and Samuk 2021). Following pixy recommendations, average d xy was estimated by summing raw counts and recomputing differences/comparisons ratios, rather than averaging summary statistics across windows.
Population genetic structure was further assessed using a combination of principal component analysis (PCA) on genomic data using the R package adegenet v.2.1.1 (Jombart 2008) and the model‐based clustering program structure 2.3.4 (Pritchard, Stephens, and Donnelly 2000). For both analyses, we used a sliding window to thin SNPs to a maximum density of 1 per 10 kb to minimise physical linkage, which has been documented to decay to baseline within 1–10 kb in Heliconius butterflies (Martin et al. 2013) and near baseline within 100–200 bp in the Monarch butterfly ( Danaus plexippus ; Zhan et al. 2014). For structure analyses, 10 independent runs were completed for each value of K = 1–4 using the admixture model and correlated allele frequencies. We used standard settings: the burn‐in period and number of Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) repetitions were set to 100,000 and 1,000,000, respectively; location priors were set to collection localities (n = 4) to inform the MCMC algorithm without biasing the model; and the alpha prior (relative admixture levels between populations) was set to 1 divided by the number of assumed populations (3; Alberta, British Columbia, and Montana). We also ran structure hierarchically, taking discrete clusters identified at K = 2 (membership based on admixture proportion > 0.8) and rerunning them independently. In all runs, the optimal value of K was inferred using both the ΔK method (Evanno, Regnaut, and Goudet 2005) and the rate of change in the likelihood of K from 1–4 (Pritchard, Stephens, and Donnelly 2000).
2.6. Genetic Diversity and Runs of Homozygosity
Following Kyriazis et al. (2023), we estimated heterozygosity as the proportion of heterozygous sites for each individual in nonoverlapping 1‐Mb windows across the autosomal genome, allowing visualisation of variation in heterozygosity both within and among individuals. We also estimated population π, the average number of nucleotide differences between individuals in the same population (Nei and Li 1979) using pixy.
We quantified runs of homozygosity (ROH) for each individual using BCFtools/RoH (Narasimhan et al. 2016), relying on genotype calls (−G30 flag) and alternate allele frequencies estimated using all individuals. The proportion of an individual's genome contained within ROH (F ROH) is often used as a relative estimate of the prevalence of inbreeding. When millions of SNPs are analysed (as is the case here), short ROH can be identified, meaning F ROH can serve as both a measure of both historical and recent inbreeding, with the added benefit distinguishing between the two based on the distribution and abundance of run lengths (Kardos, Qvarnström, and Ellegren 2017; Kardos et al. 2018). ROH calls were categorised as short (0.1 – < 0.25 Mb), medium (0.25 – < 0.5 Mb), long (0.5 – < 1 Mb), or very long (> 1 Mb). F ROH was estimated as the total length of all ROH calls > 0.1 Mb divided by 1,187,570,293, the cumulative length of assembled autosomes within our S. semiluna reference genome. In theory, this statistic approximates the proportion of the genome for which both copies of the region are identical by descent, a product of either recent inbreeding (long ROH) or historical inbreeding (short ROH).
We also used VCFtools to estimate an inbreeding coefficient as F HOM = (𝑂−𝐸)/(𝑁−𝐸), where O is the observed number of homozygous SNPs in a sample, E is the expected number of homozygous SNPs based on allele frequencies across all individuals and Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, and N is the total number of SNPs per individual. This is effectively a measure of homozygosity relative to Hardy–Weinberg expectations. In contrast to F ROH, which is bounded between 0 and 1, F HOM exhibits higher variance and can take on negative values, which indicate excess heterozygosity relative to Hardy–Weinberg expectations (Kardos, Nietlisbach, and Hedrick 2018).
2.7. Demographic History and Effective Population Size
Historical fluctuations in N e were estimated from 2.5 mya until 5 kya using the pairwise sequentially Markovian coalescent (PSMC) model (Li and Durbin 2011). PSMC relies on coalescence‐based expectations to estimate demographic history from single, unphased diploid genomes. Historical fluctuations in N e for the Alberta, British Columbia and Montana populations were estimated using each of the 15 individuals independently. We set the generation time to 1 year, as S. semiluna is known to be univoltine, and the mutation rate to 2.9 × 10–9 mutations per year, based on the best estimate for Heliconius melpomene (Keightley et al. 2015). Methods used to generate a consensus sequence for each individual and parameters used for PSMC are available in Supporting Information.
PSMC cannot estimate contemporary N e or recent demographic changes, e.g., within the last 10,000 years in humans (Li and Durbin 2011). To estimate contemporary N e, we used currentNe (Santiago et al. 2023), which relies on linkage disequilibrium among SNPs for multiple individuals sampled from a single population. Using both simulations and comparisons to other methods, Santiago et al. (2023) demonstrated that this method provides reliable estimates and confidence intervals, even when sample sizes are relatively small. If the locations of SNPs are known, currentNe provides N e estimates based on LD between SNP pairs located on different chromosomes for maximum accuracy. Inputs for currentNe were generated by subsetting our VCF file by population and then randomly selecting ~2 million biallelic SNPs with no missing data (the maximum number of SNPs permitted by the software).
2.8. Niche Analyses and Prediction of Suitable Habitat
To quantify the ecological and environmental niche of S. semiluna and predict suitable habitat across the central and northern extent of the species' range, we generated ecological niche models using MaxEnt software (Phillips, Anderson, and Schapire 2006) implemented via the R package dismo v1.3–3 (Hijmans et al. 2011). This approach uses machine‐learning maximum entropy modelling to quantify ecological and environmental associations using occurrence records and geographic information system (GIS) predictor variables. To define to modelling extent, we generated a rectangle around the collection locations of our sequenced individuals buffered by 200 km (Phillips and Dudík 2008; Fourcade et al. 2014). This encompassed the central and northern extent of the species' range. Occurrence records used for model parametrization included the collection locations of sequenced individuals and all research‐grade S. semiluna iNaturalist observations within the study area (downloaded from the Global Biodiversity Information Facility; GBIF.org 2023). We used iNaturalist occurrence records due to their relatively high reliability of identification (‘research grade’), consistency in geographical accuracy, and large abundance (Beninde et al. 2023). Removing occurrence records with reported accuracy > 100m and retaining only one record per predictor raster cell (described below) resulted in 78 records for model training. Following MacDonald et al. (2022), predictor variables included terrain ruggedness (based on elevation variation), heat load (based on terrain slope and aspect), land cover (12 categories), and environmental conditions. Terrain ruggedness and heat load indices were estimated using the R packages raster (Hijmans and Van Etten 2016) and spatialEco (Evans 2021), respectively. Land cover GIS data were acquired from the Commission for Environmental Cooperation (Commision for Environmental Cooperation, n.d.), generated using 2020 Landsat satellite imagery. We included 17 environmental variables of interest, generated by the AdaptWest Project (2022) using ClinateNA v7.30 software (Wang et al. 2016) (see Supporting Information for variable list). We did not remove correlated variables or perform variable reduction via PCA (e.g., in MacDonald et al. 2022), as MaxEnt model training is generally robust to predictor collinearity and accounts for redundant variables (Feng et al. 2019). Collinearity has been shown to be problematic only in terms of model transfer; e.g., making predictions across space or time to different environmental conditions (Guisan and Thuiller 2005; Elith and Leathwick 2009; Peterson et al. 2011). All predictor variable rasters were reprojected to an equal‐area projection (Lambert Azimuthal Equal Area) at 1‐km resolution, matching the native projection and resolution of the AdaptWest environmental dataset. Five different MaxEnt models were run, each withholding a different 20% of occurrences for model evaluation using area under the receiver operating characteristic curce (AUCROC). Each model was trained using 10,000 random background points, all feature classes, and a regularization parameter of 1.0. We then predicted habitat suitbaility across the modelling extent using MaxEnt's ‘clog‐log’ output.
To assess niche divergence of the Alberta population relative to all others in the modelling extent, we generated another MaxEnt model using the same methods as above, but this time omitting the Alberta population from model training. We then predicted habitat suitability at all S. semiluna occurrence record locations including the Alberta population. If the predicted suitability value of the Alberta population was substantially lower than all other S. semiluna occurrences, we inferred that the Alberta population is unique in its ecological/environmental associations and exhibits niche divergence (Neal, Johnson, and Shaffer 2018; Campbell et al. 2022). We also compared how the values of ‘important variables’ (determined using a MaxEnt mean permutational importance threshold of 5%) differed between the Alberta population and all other occurrences. We extracted values of important variables for the Alberta population and all other occurrences and then conducted PCA on extracted values to see if the Alberta population clustered within or outside other occurrences.
3. Results
3.1. Reference Genome Sequencing and Assembly
We assembled the first reference genome for S. semiluna (Blakiston Fan, Alberta, Canada) using a combination of PacBio HiFi long‐read sequencing and Omni‐C proximity ligation. The final assembly consisted of 1,246,961,827 bp organised into 86 scaffolds with an N50 of 56.2 Mb and an N90 39.2 Mb, respectively (Figure 1). Additional assembly statistics, an off‐target and microbial contigs blob plot, k‐mer profiles, Hi‐Rise contiguity plots and a Hi‐C contact map showing the high contiguity of this genome can be found in Supporting Information. Twenty‐three putative chromosomes, including the Z (identified using BUSCO genes; 52.8 Mb), ranged in length from 29.0 to 77.6 Mb and together contained 99.5% of the total sequence length. Of the 5286 BUSCO genes from the lepidoptera_odb10 database, 95.9%, 1.2% and 0.5% were found in the reference genome to be complete, fragmented and missing, respectively.
FIGURE 1.

Snail plot showing quality metrics for the Satyrium semiluna genome assembly (Challis et al. 2020). The circle's circumference represents the size of the assembly (~1.2 Gb). The radius represents the longest scaffold (with its length indicated by the red wedge relating to the circumference) measured on a log scale (with 10 Mb tick on a vertical axis) and N50 and N90 metrics are displayed in different colours. N50 and N90 measure the length of the shortest scaffold in the group of the longest scaffolds that together contain > 50% and > 90% of the total genome length and are shown in dark and light orange arcs, respectively. Other scaffolds are ordered by size moving clockwise and drawn in grey. The central light purple spiral represents the cumulative scaffold count. The dark and light blue area around the outside of the circle represent the GC and AT content, respectively, at 0.1% intervals. Of the 5286 BUSCO genes from the lepidoptera_odb10 database, 95.9%, 1.2% and 0.5% were found to be complete, fragmented and missing, respectively (Manni et al. 2021). Adult and larval individuals from the endangered population at Blakiston Fan, Alberta, Canada, are pictured (photographs by JRNG). This snail plot was generated using BlobToolKit (https://github.com/blobtoolkit/blobtoolkit).
RepeatMasker analyses identified a total of 718.1 Mb of repetitive sequence within the reference genome, comprising 57.6% of its total length. Categorisation of this repetitive sequence into retro‐elements, DNA transposons, rolling‐circles, small RNA, satellites and simple repeats is reported in Supporting Information.
3.2. Sequence Processing and Genotyping
We completed whole‐genome resequencing of 15 S. semiluna individuals on an Illumina NovaSeq platform, aiming for a mean coverage of ~20× per sample. Across all individuals, a total of > 1.4 billion paired‐end, 150‐bp reads were sequenced, passed Illumina filters and were aligned to our S. semiluna reference genome. Sequence coverage of individuals ranged from 14.2× – 28.1×, with a mean of 19.1× (see Supporting Information for read‐counts per individual). Joint genotyping resulted in a multisample VCF file consisting of 41,083,914 variants across the 15 individuals and a final post‐filtering VCF file containing 23,889,641 SNPs. This post‐filtering dataset was used in all subsequent analyses unless otherwise specified.
3.3. Population Structure
Pairwise F ST values indicated substantial differentiation among the Alberta, British Columbia and Montana populations: Alberta vs. British Columbia = 0.424; Alberta vs. Montana = 0.292; British Columbia vs. Montana = 0.322. There was no measurable divergence between individuals collected from the two British Columbia locations (~17 km apart), indicated by a negative F ST estimate (−0.004) that should be functionally interpreted as zero. Estimates of d xy generally aligned with those of F ST: Alberta vs. British Columbia = 0.009; Alberta vs. Montana = 0.005; British Columbia vs. Montana = 0.008.
Using a thinned set of 108,283 physically unlinked SNPs, PCA cleanly separated Alberta, British Columbia and Montana individuals into discrete clusters (Figure 2a). PC1, which accounts for over a third of the total genomic variation, separated populations from west (British Columbia) and east (Alberta, Montana) of the Rocky Mountains/continental divide, PC2 (11% of the variation) separated Alberta and Montana, and individuals from British Columbia were spread along PC3 (6.5%) generally according to collection location. We further quantified population structure and degree of admixture using the model‐based clustering program structure (Pritchard, Stephens, and Donnelly 2000). Our first structure runs including all individuals identified an optimal value of K = 2, with Alberta/Montana individuals forming one group and British Columbia individuals a second, with virtually no admixture. Subsequent runs including only Alberta and Montana individuals identified an optimal value of K = 2, separating the populations into two distinct clusters, again with virtually no admixture.
FIGURE 2.

Population genetic structure of Satyrium semiluna , using (a) principal component analysis (PCA) and (b) model‐based clustering with the program structure. For PCA, every point represents a sequenced individual (n = 15), colour coded according population. Our structure analyses addressing K = 1–4 found an optimal value of K = 2 when all individuals were analysed together, splitting Alberta and Montana from British Columbia. Hierarchical runs on the Alberta and Montana individuals together identified an optimal value of K = 2 with virtually no admixture.
3.4. Genetic Diversity and Runs of Homozygosity
Mean heterozygosity of Alberta individuals (0.083) was roughly one third that of British Columbia individuals (0.216) and half that of Montana individuals (0.154) (Figure 3a,b). Dividing the total number of heterozygous sites per individual by the total number of loci sequenced gives the following means per population: Alberta = 0.0016; British Columbia = 0.0040; Montana = 0.0030. Heterozygosity within populations was generally consistent across individuals (Supporting Information). Similarly, estimates of population π suggested that the genetic diversity of the Alberta population (0.003) was lower than both the British Columbia (0.008) and Montana populations (0.005).
FIGURE 3.

Analyses of zygosity in Satyrium semiluna. (a) Heterozygosity for three example individuals, estimated as the average of heterozygous/homozygous loci within nonoverlapping 1 Mb windows across the autosomal genome. The first individual (teal) is from an endangered population in Alberta, isolated from all other populations by more than 400 km. The second individual is from British Columbia (purple) and the third from Montana (dark blue). (b) Mean heterozygosity for all sequenced individuals (n = 15), estimated by averaging values across all 1 Mb windows. Dividing the total number of heterozygous sites per individual by the total number of loci sequenced gives the following mean estimates per population: Alberta = 0.0016; British Columbia = 0.0040 and Montana = 0.0030. (c) Cumulative length of runs of homozygosity (ROH) for each individual, categorised as short (0.1 – < 0.25 Mb), medium (0.25 – < 0.5 Mb), long (0.5 – < 1 Mb), or very long (> 1 Mb). An estimate of inbreeding, F ROH, calculated as the total length of all ROH calls > 0.1 Mb divided by the cumulative length of the autosomal genome, is reported above each individual's bar. This statistic approximates the proportion of a genome for which both copies of region are identical by descent, a product of either historical inbreeding (short ROH) or recent inbreeding (long ROH).
ROH were observed to be 5–70 times more prevalent in Alberta individuals than British Columbia and Montana individuals (Figure 3b). This indicates that inbreeding has been far more prevalent in the Alberta population (mean F ROH = 0.192) than the British Columbia (mean F ROH = 0.006) or Montana (mean F ROH = 0.033) populations. In Alberta individuals, short ROH (0.1 – < 0.25 Mb) were most common, with some medium ROH (0.25 – < 0.5 Mb) and very few long ROH (0.5 – < 1 Mb) present. This is consistent with a long history of high inbreeding. However, no very long ROH (> 1 Mb), which are generally interpreted as evidence of substantial recent inbreeding (i.e., within the past ~10 generations), were present. In contrast, British Columbia and Montana individuals had far fewer ROH, suggesting little or no historical or recent inbreeding within these populations. A second inbreeding coefficient provided similar relative estimates of inbreeding, with the Alberta population far more inbred (mean F HOM = 0.622) than the British Columbia (mean F HOM = 0.019) and Montana (mean F HOM = 0.305) populations.
3.5. Demographic History and Effective Population Size
PSMC analyses suggested that the three populations differed substantially in their demographic history, particularly in the more recent past (Figure 4). From 2.5 mya to about 250 kya, all populations shared a similar demographic history of gradually increasing N e. At 250 kya, British Columbia continued a rapid, two‐fold increase in N e until 100 kya, when N e began declining until 30–40 kya. Around 150 kya, the Alberta population, and to a lesser extent the Montana population, experienced an increase in N e, followed by a sharp decline at 100 kya until 30–40 kya. From 30 to 40 kya onwards, British Columbia and Montana both experienced increases in N e, while the Alberta population flatlined between 1,000 and 5,000 individuals from 40 to 5 kya. The sharp increase in N e from ~10 kya onwards observed in analyses of multiple British Columbia individuals indicates that populations occurring west of the continental divide likely expanded and experienced broad‐scale connectivity following the end of the Younger Dryas (Clement and Peterson 2008). PSMC curves did not systematically differ between individuals collected from the two British Columbia locations.
FIGURE 4.

Pairwise Sequentially Markovian Coalescent (PSMC) analyses from 2.5 mya until 5 kya of three Satyrium semiluna populations using whole‐genome data. The estimated effective population size (N e) is shown on the y‐axis and coalescent time in years before present on the x‐axis. Four individuals (teal lines) are from an endangered population in Waterton Lakes National Park, Alberta, Canada, isolated from all other populations by more than 400 km. Seven individuals are from two locations in British Columbia, Canada (purple lines), and four individuals from a single location in Montana, USA (dark blue lines). Most interestingly, from 30 to 40 kya onwards, British Columbia and Montana both experienced increases in N e, while the Alberta population flatlined between 1,000 and 5,000 individuals from 40 to 5 kya.
To estimate contemporary N e, we used currentNe (Santiago et al. 2023), which relies on linkage disequilibrium among SNPs for multiple individuals sampled from a single population. Estimates of contemporary N e using LD between pairs of SNPs located on different chromosomes varied widely among populations. In all cases, currentNe converged and provided estimates of N e with both 50% and 90% confidence intervals:
Alberta N e = 487.11; 50% CI = 154.57, 1535.05; 90% CI = 29.65, 8001.68.
British Columbia N e = 755.20; 50% CI = 270.17, 2111.01; 90% CI = 61.53, 9264.72.
Montana N e = 14920.04; 50% CI = 2503.76, 88,909.16; 90% CI = 191.97, 11,160,397.45.
3.6. Niche Analyses and Prediction of Suitable Habitat
Our ecological niche models predicted S. semiluna occurrences with a high accuracy, reflected in a mean AUCROC score of 0.94. Suitable habitat was relatively sparse within the central and northern range of S. semiluna (Figure 5a). The relative contribution of each environmental variable, estimated using both mean permutational importance and percent contribution, are reported in Supporting Information. Mean summer precipitation (June to August) was the single most important variable, with mean permutation importance and percent contribution values more than double those of mean autumn precipitation (September to November), the next most important variable.
FIGURE 5.

(a) Habitat suitability across the central and northern extent of the range of Satyrium semiluna , predicted by MaxEnt models trained using the collection locations of sequenced individuals and research‐grade iNaturalist occurrence records. Predictors included various geographical, land cover, and environmetnal variables (see Methods and Supporting Information for variable list). (b) Predicted habitat suitability values for the location of the endangered Alberta population (Blakiston Fan) and all research‐grade iNaturalist occurrence records. These predicted values were generated using a model trained using occurrence data with the Alberta population omitted. Blakiston Fan had a predicted suitability value of 0.003, indicating ecological and environmental conditions at this site are very atypical for the species. (c) Principal component analysis (PCA) on the extracted values of all important predictor variables (mean permutational importance > 5%). Each point represents an occurence record. The Alberta population exhibited substantial divergence on PC3, for which mean summer precipitation had the highest loading.
Omitting the Alberta population in model training resulted in increased predictive power (AUCROC = 0.97). Overall, this predicted habitat suitability surface was very similar to the one produced when all occurrences were included in model training (Pearson r = 0.94). Using this model, predicted suitability for all non‐Alberta occurrences remained high (mean = 0.77, SD = 0.27), while that of the Alberta population was essentially zero (Blakiston Fan = 0.003) (Figure 5b). Four other S. semiluna occurrences also had very low predicted suitability values (< 0.15). This is generally expected for any semi‐vagile species that may occasionally wander outside suitable habitat. For these four locations, values of all important predictor variables (mean permutational importance > 5%) were very different from those of the Alberta population, indicating that they are not ecological/environmental matches. Together, these suggest that the Alberta population is associated with ecological and environmental conditions that are atypical of the species, equating to niche divergence. PCA on the extracted values of important predictor variables (mean permutational importanc> 5%) indicates that ecological and environmental associations of the Alberta population did not fall within the range of other populations, again suggesting niche divergence (Figure 5c). This divergence was apparent on PC3, for which mean summer precipitation had by far the highest loading.
4. Discussion
Genetic rescue is a viable conservation practice that can ameliorate genetic erosion, inbreeding depression, and loss of adaptive potential in small and isolated populations (Ingvarsson 2001; Pimm, Dollar, and Bass Jr. 2006; Trinkel et al. 2008; Finger et al. 2011; Mattila et al. 2012; Mussmann et al. 2017; Frankham et al. 2017; Clarke, Smith, and Cullingham 2024). In most outbreeding species, positive effects of enhanced population connectivity and gene flow have become a null expectation (Frankham et al. 2017, 2019; Ralls et al. 2018, 2020). We generally support this view, particularly when considering populations recently fragmented through anthropogenic activities. Still, conservation practitioners have been reluctant to implement genetic rescue, both because of inherent risks (and associated responsibility) involved in active interventions and because genetic/genomic factors are often simply ignored in conservation planning (Shafer et al. 2015; Frankham et al. 2019; Liddell, Sunnucks, and Cook 2021). In this study, we highlight how whole‐genome data can be quickly generated for an endangered species with no previous genomic resources and used to evaluate conservation strategies, including genetic rescue.
Key data necessary for this assessment included a well‐assembled reference genome and whole‐genome sequence data for both recipient and potential donor populations. We produced the first high‐quality reference genome for S. semiluna and the subfamily Theclinae. At 1.25 Gb, this genome is almost double the size of the next largest scaffold‐ or chromosome‐level genome available for the family Lycaenidae, and one of the largest for any butterfly (further discussion on genome size in Supporting Information). Our analyses of millions of SNPs across the genomes of 15 individuals confirm that the Alberta population is very divergent from the geographically nearest populations in British Columbia (F ST = 0.40) and Montana (F ST = 0.28). Genetic diversity, defined here as the mean of individual heterozygosity, was on average 2.5 times higher in British Columbia individuals and 1.9 times higher in Montana individuals than in Alberta individuals. Runs of homozygosity (ROH) were 30.4 and 5.9 times more prevalent in Alberta individuals than in British Columbia and Montana individuals, and inferences of inbreeding based on F ROH suggest that that more than 20% of Alberta individuals' genomes were devoid of SNP diversity and identical by descent. Overall, the Alberta population shows signs of genomic flatlining (Robinson et al. 2016; Mooney et al. 2023) and a high level of inbreeding, similar to observations in Channel Island foxes (Robinson et al. 2016, 2018), Ethiopian wolves (Mooney et al. 2023), Isle Royale grey wolves (Kardos et al. 2018; Robinson et al. 2019), Isle Royale moose (Kyriazis et al. 2023), and Muskox (Pečnerová et al. 2024). (See Supporting Information for ROH estimates with repetitive sequences masked.) However, unlike many of these large mammal populations, the absence of long ROH (e.g., > 1 Mb) in the Alberta S. semiluna population suggests that reduced genetic diversity is primarily a product of a long history of inbreeding, rather than a recent, sustained bottleneck (Stoffel et al. 2021). A somewhat similar observation was made for Ethiopian wolves, consistent with a long history of small population sizes (Mooney et al. 2023). This information, combined with the absence of admixture among populations (Figure 2b), suggests that the Alberta population has been both small and isolated for a very long time.
Whether isolated populations will persist without intervention, or if genetic processes will lead to their inexorable extinction, is largely thought to hinge on contemporary population size (Franklin 1980; Soulé 1980; Lande and Barrowclough 1987; Frankham, Bradshaw, and Brook 2014; Frankham et al. 2017; but see Robinson et al. 2022). We estimated the contemporary N e of the Alberta population to be approximately 487 individuals based on linkage disequilibrium among SNPs in four individuals. Repeat transect surveys completed in 2022 and 2023 resulted in estimates of 8.1 and 7.9 adult individuals/ha respectively. Assuming all ~300 ha of Blakiston Fan are uniform in habitat quality yields a census estimate of 2,430 and 2,370 individuals, respectively. While an assumption of habitat uniformity is likely invalid, these estimates fall within the low end of the historical population estimate of 2,000–10,000 individuals (COSEWIC 2006). Our estimate of N e is lower than survey population estimates, which is expected because not all individuals contribute to the breeding pool (Frankham 1995). Between the two measures, N e is generally regarded as the more important statistic for conservation management. For example, according to the widely‐debated 50/500 rules, a minimum N e of 50 individuals is necessary to avoid inbreeding and 500 individuals to avoid potentially deleterious levels of genetic drift (Franklin 1980; Soulé 1980; Lande and Barrowclough 1987). Based on these thresholds, the Alberta population could theoretically maintain its genetic diversity in isolation. However, more modern theory and evidence suggests that a minimum N e of 100 individuals is required to limit inbreeding depression to 10% over five generations and 1000 individuals for retaining evolutionary potential (Frankham, Bradshaw, and Brook 2014). Managers might therefore doubt that the Alberta population is of sufficient size for long‐term persistence. However, population monitoring suggests that the Alberta population not only continues to persist, but is also capable of recovery from population crashes, as was observed within the last decade.
It is generally assumed that as the genetic diversity in small and isolated populations declines over time, the benefits of genetic rescue will increase (Frankham et al. 2017; Ralls et al. 2018). However, as the aforementioned authors point out, this conclusion is largely drawn from plant and animal populations fragmented within the last ~500 years (Frankham et al. 2017; Ralls et al. 2018). When considering populations recently fragmented by anthropogenic activities, we might expect successful purging to be exceedingly rare because any population that becomes small and isolated would need to survive the substantial mortality associated with recessive variants drifting to high frequency and being culled from the population in selection against homozygous individuals. Therefore, for these populations, facilitating gene flow via genetic rescue is almost certainly a better conservation strategy than holding out for genetic purging (Ralls et al. 2020). However, the process of genetic purging may still be an important consideration in conservation. Many small, extant populations with a very long history of isolation (i.e., fragmented before widespread anthropogenic disturbance) likely represent those rare survivors that successfully purged a large portion of their deleterious recessive alleles, aiding in their persistence and rendering present‐day inbreeding less problematic (Robinson et al. 2016, 2018, 2022; Pečnerová et al. 2024). PSMC analyses suggest that the Alberta S. semiluna population has been both small (< 5000 individuals) and likely isolated for up to 40 k years before present. Due to the relatively small number of individuals sequenced and lacking a phased genomic data and recombination map, inferring more recent changes in historical N e is not possible (Beichman, Huerta‐Sanchez, and Lohmueller 2018; Nadachowska‐Brzyska et al. 2021; Gargiulo et al. 2024). Increased sampling of populations may result in more robust estimates of contemporary N e . For example, our high contemporary N e estimates for the Montana population were surprising and deserve further scrutiny. This remains an important knowledge gap that future research should address. Still, we can draw several meaningful inferences from our historical N e analyses, which encompass the last glacial maximum (20–26 kya). During this period, the Rocky Mountain Foothills of Alberta, adjacent to Blakiston Fan, were likely glaciated by a continental (Laurentide) ice sheet (Jackson and Little 2004). It is unclear the extent to which the area now known as Blakiston Fan was glaciated. However, southwestern Alberta and the surrounding area is thought to have been rich in small and isolated glacial refugia (Dyke, Moore, and Robertson 2003; Shafer et al. 2010). Based on both patterns of genetic differentiation and PSMC analyses, we infer that at either Blakiston Fan or another locality east of the continental divide, a small population of S. semiluna , with descendants now occupying Blakiston Fan, persisted in isolation through the last glacial maximum. We observed no evidence that this isolated population had any gene flow with populations to the south, beyond the Laurentide ice sheet, indicated by both its consistently small N e through this period and lack of admixture with other populations. Based on this best‐available information, we infer that historical gene flow has not played a role in long‐term persistence of the Alberta population.
Long histories of isolation have important consequences not only for patterns of genetic diversity and differentiation, but also ecological diversity and differentiation. Our ecological niche modelling suggests that the Alberta population exhibits environmental associations that are very atypical of the species, equating to niche divergence. Mean summer precipitation, the most important variable for predicting occurrences of S. semiluna , was not highly correlated with other predictor variables (|r| < 0.70). PCA indicated that summer precipitation also most differentiated the Alberta population from all others investigated. Based on AdaptWest/ClimateNA data, Blakiston Fan receives a total average rainfall of ~200 mm over the summer months, while other S. semiluna occurrences included in our analyses range from 32 to 154 mm (mean = 71 mm). Four other occurrences observed to exhibit low suitability (Figure 3b) ranged in summer precipitation from 55 to 120 mm, indicating they are not similar to Blakiston Fan. Whether these observations represent actual populations or vagrant individuals is unclear and requires future investigation. Regardless, based on the observed associations, we infer that the Alberta population is uniquely adapted to substantially wetter summers relative to all other populations in the central and northern extent of the species' range. Based on two of the four criteria provided by Frankham et al. (2011)—populations have exchanged no genes in the last 500 years and inhabit different environments—we predict that outbreeding depression would be a likely outcome if the Alberta population was crossed with any others. We hope that this prediction can be tested experimentally with ex situ population crosses to quantitatively evaluate population compatibility and the fitness of hybrid progeny.
Host association is another axis of niche divergence requiring investigation. In 2021, 2022 and 2023, surveyors searched for S. semiluna larvae on both L. argenteus and L. sericeus at Blakiston fan with approximately equal effort, searching about 10,000 individual plants per species per year. A total of 380 larvae were observed over those 3 years, all on L. argenteus and none on L. sericeus (Z. G. MacDonald, J. R. Dupuis, J. R. N. Glasier, R. Sissons, A. Moehrenschlager, H. B. Shaffer, F. A. H. Sperling, unpublished data). While we have not completed ovipositional choice experiments, it is reasonable to infer that females would at least occasionally oviposit on L. sericeus in nature if it was at all preferred, given its availability at Blakiston Fan. In contrast, in British Columbia, L. sericeus is the only lupine species available in S. semiluna habitat and it is readily used by populations there. In Montana, both L. argenteus and L. sericeus have been reported in S. semiluna habitat on iNaturalist, suggesting that both species are available. However, host associations of these populations are currently unknown and require investigation. Representing yet another possible axis of niche divergence, we (J. R. N. Glasier) recently noted that larvae of the Alberta population share a mutualistic relationship with a single species of ant, Lasius ponderosae. In British Columbia, we observed that L. ponderosae is not present in S. semiluna habitat, and that S. semiluna larvae instead associate with Formica sp. and Camponotus sp. Populations in California have been observed to associate with these genera as well (Runquist 2012). The importance of these relationships (obligate vs. facultative), as well as the extent and specificity of myrmecophilia across the range of S. semiluna , is not known, but may be important for future evaluations of genetic rescue.
Our recommendation at this time is that genetic rescue is an inappropriate strategy for the conservation of the Alberta S. semiluna population. However, this recommendation is contingent on the continued absence of substantial inbreeding depression. In another butterfly, M. cinxia, inbreeding depression in a small and isolated island population was observed in the form of reduced egg viability (Mattila et al. 2012). Egg viability was restored when inbred individuals were hybridised with those of other, genetically diverse populations. This demonstrates that genetic rescue could be an important part of recovery strategies for butterflies. However, it is important to note that this island M. cinxia population and Alberta S. semiluna population differ in their duration of isolation by many orders of magnitude (~75 vs. 40 k years). Reduced fitness attributed to inbreeding depression within the M. cinxia island population is evidence in itself that genetic purging had not occurred, at least for the traits investigated, and that the population was much more likely to benefit rather than suffer from genetic rescue. Inbreeding depression has never been explicitly investigated in S. semiluna , but we have several lines of evidence to suggest that it is not substantial. Even when estimates of population density plummeted to 1.5 individuals/ha in 2017 and 0.5 individuals/ha in 2018, the population partially recovered to pre‐crash levels in just a few years, peaking at 30.6 individuals/ha in 2021. If the Alberta population's pre‐crash inbreeding load was substantial, this bottleneck would have resulted in a high genetic load and reduced population recovery (Roelke, Martenson, and O'Brien 1993; Westemeier et al. 1998), possibly ending in an extinction vortex (Gilpin and Soule 1986). This has not been observed.
Genetic rescue is a proven means for ameliorating inbreeding depression, bolstering genetic diversity, and restoring individual fitness and population viability in the majority of cases in which it has been assessed (Frankham et al. 2011, 2017). Our conclusions from this study should not challenge genetic rescue as an effective management strategy. Deliberate augmentation of gene flow and mixing of lineages are inevitabilities if we wish to preserve populations fragmented through recent anthropogenic activities. Our primary emphasis here is on biological outcomes—if genetic rescue will enhance survivability, we endorse it. However, if interventions are not needed and may be harmful, as in the case under consideration here, we hope managers will proceed with caution. In addition, we note that a desire to maintain ecological or evolutionary purity or identity also comes into play. To guide its decision‐making process, Parks Canada implements a concept of ‘ecological integrity’, defined as ‘a condition that is determined to be characteristic of its natural region…’ (Canada National Parks Act 2000). If the genetic composition of a particular population is assessed to be characteristic of a natural region, then genetic rescue may be viewed as a threat to ecological integrity. However, aiming above all else to preserve the purity/identity of populations under the guidance of ecological integrity may risk their extinction. We argue that evolutionary or ecological divergences among populations should only affect decisions to attempt genetic rescue insofar as they influence population viability. Parmesan et al. (2023) convey that evolutionary biologists are generally partial to hybridisations among divergent populations, recognising a large set of benefits. In contrast, conservation practitioners often oppose intentional admixture because it jeopardises the purity/identity of existing groups. Even within our S. semiluna conservation working groups, we observe this divergence in perspectives. Both are valid, and the tension between these two schools of thought is as much about conservation aesthetics as it is conservation science. We hope that this case study on S. semiluna contributes to evidence‐based evaluations of genetic rescue, considering multiple perspectives, and prioritising population viability and species persistence.
The genomic and ecological analyses presented here led to the designation of the Alberta S. semiluna population as a distinct designatable unit under Canada's Species at Risk Act and support management without genetic intervention. However, flatlined genetic diversity likely translates to low adaptive potential, and climate change is a harsh reality. If the Alberta S. semiluna population is ever observed to become maladapted to changing environmental or habitat conditions, intentional admixture with other S. semiluna populations may introduce beneficial genetic variation and bolster adaptive potential (Ralls et al. 2020). As with all endangered species, the need for genetic rescue must be continuously evaluated, both as new information becomes available and as circumstances change.
Author Contributions
All authors collectively conceived the study design. Fieldwork was completed by J.R.N.G. Lab work was completed by Z.G.M. and F.A.H.S. Reference genome curation and individual genotyping were completed by Z.G.M. and J.R.D. Analyses were completed by Z.G.M. with assistance from J.R.D. and input from all authors. Writing was led by Z.G.M. with assistance from all authors.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Open Research Badges
This article has earned an Open Data badge for making publicly available the digitally‐shareable data necessary to reproduce the reported results. These data are available on NCBI and Dryad.
Supporting information
Appendix S1.
Acknowledgements
We wish to acknowledge Lacey Hébert and Llewellyn Haines for fieldwork support, Steve Kohler for providing Montana specimens, Natasha Lloyd for logistical and permit support, Janet Sperling for assistance with lab work, including DNA barcoding of specimens to confirm species‐level identifications, Eric Runquist for consultation, members of the UCLA Shaffer lab for analysis comments and critiques, the Waterton Lakes National Park Ecological Restoration Team for leading habitat restoration programs and assisting population monitoring and the Half‐moon Hairstreak Conservation committee for discussions on impacts of this research.
Handling Editor: Benjamin Sibbett
Funding: This work was supported by Calgary Zoo Foundation & Parks Canada, GC‐1341; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, PDF‐578319‐2023, RGPIN‐2018‐04920; UCLA La Kretz Center for California Conservation Science, 2021; USDA‐NIFA HATCH, ProjectKY008091.
Zachary G. MacDonald and Julian R. Dupuis should be considered co‐first authors.
Data Availability Statement
All genomic short‐read data produced and analyzed in this study are available on NCBI (BioProject: PRJNA1194186). Our reference genome for Satyrium semiluna is also available on NCBI (BioProject: PRJNA907836). A final vcf file including all single nucleotide polymorphisms used in our analyses is available on Dryad (DOI: https://10.5061/dryad.hmgpnk9tx).
References
- AdaptWest Project . 2022. “Gridded Current and Projected Climate Data for North America at 1 km Resolution, Generated Using the ClimateNA v7.30 Software (T. Wang Et al. 2022).” adaptwest.databasin.org.
- Beichman, A. C. , Huerta‐Sanchez E., and Lohmueller K. E.. 2018. “Using Genomic Data to Infer Historic Population Dynamics of Nonmodel Organisms.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 49: 433–456. [Google Scholar]
- Beninde, J. , Delaney T. W., Gonzalez G., and Shaffer H. B.. 2023. “Harnessing iNaturalist to Quantify Hotspots of Urban Biodiversity: The Los Angeles Case Study.” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 11: 983371. [Google Scholar]
- Bertorelle, G. , Raffini F., Bosse M., et al. 2022. “Genetic Load: Genomic Estimates and Applications in Non‐model Animals.” Nature Reviews Genetics 23, no. 8: 492–503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Birchler, J. A. , Auger D. L., and Riddle N. C.. 2003. “In Search of the Molecular Basis of Heterosis.” Plant Cell 15, no. 10: 2236–2239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caballero, A. , Bravo I., and Wang J.. 2017. “Inbreeding Load and Purging: Implications for the Short‐Term Survival and the Conservation Management of Small Populations.” Heredity 118, no. 2: 177–185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Campbell, E. O. , MacDonald Z. G., Gage E. V., Gage R. V., and Sperling F. A.. 2022. “Genomics and Ecological Modelling Clarify Species Integrity in a Confusing Group of Butterflies.” Molecular Ecology 31, no. 8: 2400–2417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Challis, R. , Richards E., Rajan J., Cochrane G., and Blaxter M.. 2020. “BlobToolKit–Interactive Quality Assessment of Genome Assemblies. G3: Genes, Genomes.” Genetics 10, no. 4: 1361–1374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charlesworth, B. 2018. “Mutational Load, Inbreeding Depression and Heterosis in Subdivided Populations.” Molecular Ecology 27, no. 24: 4991–5003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Charlesworth, D. , and Willis J. H.. 2009. “The Genetics of Inbreeding Depression.” Nature Reviews Genetics 10, no. 11: 783–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clarke, J. G. , Smith A. C., and Cullingham C. I.. 2024. “Genetic Rescue Often Leads to Higher Fitness as a Result of Increased Heterozygosity Across Animal Taxa.” Molecular Ecology 33: e17532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clement, A. C. , and Peterson L. C.. 2008. “Mechanisms of Abrupt Climate Change of the Last Glacial Period.” Reviews of Geophysics 46, no. 4: 204. [Google Scholar]
- Commission for Environmental Cooperation . n.d. “North American Environmental Atlas: Land cover 30m 2020.” Retrieved November 21, 2023. http://www.cec.org/north‐american‐environmental‐atlas/land‐cover‐30m‐2020/.
- Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) . 2006. “COSEWIC assessment and status report of Half‐moon Hairstreak Satyrium semiluna in Canada.” Ottawa, ON. vi + 26 pp. Retrieved from www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status_e.cfm.
- Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) . 2022. “COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Half‐moon Hairstreak Satyrium semiluna Okanagan‐Similkameen and population Waterton Lakes population in Canada.” Ottawa, xvi + 66 pp. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/environment‐climate‐change/services/species‐risk‐public‐registry.html.
- Danecek, P. , Auton A., Abecasis G., et al. 2011. “The Variant Call Format and VCFtools.” Bioinformatics 27, no. 15: 2156–2158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. London: John Murray. [Google Scholar]
- Day, S. B. , Bryant E. H., and Meffert L. M.. 2003. “The Influence of Variable Rates of Inbreeding on Fitness, Environmental Responsiveness, and Evolutionary Potential.” Evolution 57, no. 6: 1314–1324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dyke, A. S. , Moore A., and Robertson L.. 2003. Deglaciation of North America. Canada: Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. [Google Scholar]
- Edmands, S. 2007. “Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Evaluating the Relative Risks of Inbreeding and Outbreeding for Conservation and Management.” Molecular Ecology 16, no. 3: 463–475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eisenberg, C. , Anderson C. L., Collingwood A., et al. 2019. “Out of the Ashes: Ecological Resilience to Extreme Wildfire, Prescribed Burns, and Indigenous Burning in Ecosystems.” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7: 436. [Google Scholar]
- Elith, J. , and Leathwick J. R.. 2009. “Species Distribution Models: Ecological Explanation and Prediction Across Space and Time.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40: 677–697. [Google Scholar]
- Environment and Climate Change Canada . 2016. “Recovery Strategy for the Half‐Moon Hairstreak ( Satyrium semiluna ) in Canada.” In Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series, 24–33. Ottawa 2 parts: Environment and Climate Change Canada. [Google Scholar]
- Evanno, G. , Regnaut S., and Goudet J.. 2005. “Detecting the Number of Clusters of Individuals Using the Software STRUCTURE: A Simulation Study.” Molecular Ecology 14, no. 8: 2611–2620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Evans, J. S. 2021. “spatialEco.” R Package Version 1.3‐6. https://github.com/jeffreyevans/spatialEco.
- Feng, X. , Park D. S., Liang Y., Pandey R., and Papeş M.. 2019. “Collinearity in Ecological Niche Modeling: Confusions and Challenges.” Ecology and Evolution 9, no. 18: 10365–10376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Finger, A. , Kettle C. J., Kaiser‐Bunbury C. N., et al. 2011. “Back From the Brink: Potential for Genetic Rescue in a Critically Endangered Tree.” Molecular Ecology 20, no. 18: 3773–3784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fitzpatrick, S. W. , Bradburd G. S., Kremer C. T., Salerno P. E., Angeloni L. M., and Funk W. C.. 2020. “Genomic and Fitness Consequences of Genetic Rescue in Wild Populations.” Current Biology 30, no. 3: 517–522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fourcade, Y. , Engler J. O., Rödder D., and Secondi J.. 2014. “Mapping Species Distributions With MAXENT Using a Geographically Biased Sample of Presence Data: A Performance Assessment of Methods for Correcting Sampling Bias.” PLoS One 9, no. 5: e97122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frankham, R. 1995. “Effective Population Size/Adult Population Size Ratios in Wildlife: A Review.” Genetics Research 66, no. 2: 95–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frankham, R. , Ballou J. D., Eldridge M. D., et al. 2011. “Predicting the Probability of Outbreeding Depression.” Conservation Biology 25, no. 3: 465–475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frankham, R. , Ballou J. D., Ralls K., et al. 2019. A Practical Guide for Genetic Management of Fragmented Animal and Plant Populations. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Frankham, R. , Ballou J. D., Ralls K., et al. 2017. Genetic Management of Fragmented Animal and Plant Populations. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Frankham, R. , Bradshaw C. J., and Brook B. W.. 2014. “Genetics in Conservation Management: Revised Recommendations for the 50/500 Rules, Red List Criteria and Population Viability Analyses.” Biological Conservation 170: 56–63. [Google Scholar]
- Franklin, I. R. 1980. Evolutionary Change in Small Populations. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. [Google Scholar]
- García‐Dorado, A. 2012. “Understanding and Predicting the Fitness Decline of Shrunk Populations: Inbreeding, Purging, Mutation, and Standard Selection.” Genetics 190, no. 4: 1461–1476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gargiulo, R. , Decroocq V., González‐Martínez S. C., et al. 2024. “Estimation of Contemporary Effective Population Size in Plant Populations: Limitations of Genomic Datasets.” Evolutionary Applications 17, no. 5: e13691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- GBIF.org . 2023. “GBIF Occurrence Download.” 10.15468/dl.nuuwu4. [DOI]
- Gilpin, M. E. , and Soulé M. E.. 1986. “Minimum viable populations: processes of extinction.” In Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, edited by Soulé M. E., 19–34. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates. [Google Scholar]
- Glémin, S. 2003. “How Are Deleterious Mutations Purged? Drift Versus Nonrandom Mating.” Evolution 57, no. 12: 2678–2687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grether, G. F. , Finneran A. E., and Drury J. P.. 2024. “Niche Differentiation, Reproductive Interference, and Range Expansion.” Ecology Letters 27, no. 1: e14350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grossen, C. , Guillaume F., Keller L. F., and Croll D.. 2020. “Purging of Highly Deleterious Mutations Through Severe Bottlenecks in Alpine Ibex.” Nature Communications 11, no. 1: 1001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Guisan, A. , and Thuiller W.. 2005. “Predicting Species Distribution: Offering More Than Simple Habitat Models.” Ecology Letters 8, no. 9: 993–1009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Haddad, N. M. , Brudvig L. A., Clobert J., et al. 2015. “Habitat Fragmentation and Its Lasting Impact on Earth's Ecosystems.” Science Advances 1, no. 2: e1500052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hedrick, P. W. , and García‐Dorado A.. 2016. “Understanding Inbreeding Depression, Purging, and Genetic Rescue.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 31, no. 12: 940–952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hedrick, P. W. , Peterson R. O., Vucetich L. M., Adams J. R., and Vucetich J. A.. 2014. “Genetic Rescue in Isle Royale Wolves: Genetic Analysis and the Collapse of the Population.” Conservation Genetics 15: 1111–1121. [Google Scholar]
- Hedrick, P. W. , Robinson J. A., Peterson R. O., and Vucetich J. A.. 2019. “Genetics and Extinction and the Example of Isle Royale Wolves.” Animal Conservation 22, no. 3: 302–309. [Google Scholar]
- Hijmans, R. J. , Phillips S., Leathwick J., and Elith J.. 2011. “Package ‘dismo’.” R Package Version 1.3‐3. http://cran.r‐project.org/web/packages/dismo/index.html.
- Hijmans, R. J. , and Van Etten J.. 2016. “raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling.” R Package Version 2.5‐8. https://cran.r‐project.org/web/packages/raster/raster.pdf.
- Hubley, R. , Finn R. D., Clements J., et al. 2016. “The Dfam Database of Repetitive DNA Families.” Nucleic Acids Research 44, no. D1: D81–D89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ingvarsson, P. K. 2001. “Restoration of Genetic Variation Lost—the Genetic Rescue Hypothesis.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16, no. 2: 62–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jackson, L. E. , and Little E. C.. 2004. “A Single Continental Glaciation of Rocky Mountain Foothills, South‐Western Alberta, Canada.” In Developments in Quaternary Sciences, vol. 2, 29–38. Netherlands: Elsevier. [Google Scholar]
- Jombart, T. 2008. “Adegenet: A R Package for the Multivariate Analysis of Genetic Markers.” Bioinformatics 24: 1403–1405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kardos, M. , Åkesson M., Fountain T., et al. 2018. “Genomic Consequences of Intensive Inbreeding in an Isolated Wolf Population.” Nature Ecology & Evolution 2, no. 1: 124–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kardos, M. , Armstrong E. E., Fitzpatrick S. W., et al. 2021. “The Crucial Role of Genome‐Wide Genetic Variation in Conservation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, no. 48: e2104642118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kardos, M. , Nietlisbach P., and Hedrick P. W.. 2018. “How Should We Compare Different Genomic Estimates of the Strength of Inbreeding Depression?” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, no. 11: E2492–E2493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kardos, M. , Qvarnström A., and Ellegren H.. 2017. “Inferring Individual Inbreeding and Demographic History From Segments of Identity by Descent in Ficedula Flycatcher Genome Sequences.” Genetics 205, no. 3: 1319–1334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keightley, P. D. , Pinharanda A., Ness R. W., et al. 2015. “Estimation of the Spontaneous Mutation Rate in Heliconius Melpomene.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 32, no. 1: 239–243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Keller, L. F. , and Waller D. M.. 2002. “Inbreeding Effects in Wild Populations.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17, no. 5: 230–241. [Google Scholar]
- Kimura, M. , Maruyama T., and Crow J. F.. 1963. “The Mutation Load in Small Populations.” Genetics 48, no. 10: 1303–1312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirkpatrick, M. , and Jarne P.. 2000. “The Effects of a Bottleneck on Inbreeding Depression and the Genetic Load.” American Naturalist 155, no. 2: 154–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kleinman‐Ruiz, D. , Lucena‐Perez M., Villanueva B., et al. 2022. “Purging of Deleterious Burden in the Endangered Iberian Lynx.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, no. 11: e2110614119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kondla, N. G. 2004. “Waterton Lakes National Park Sooty Hairstreak survey, 2004. Report prepared for Parks Canada Agency.” 24.
- Korunes, K. L. , and Samuk K.. 2021. “Pixy: Unbiased Estimation of Nucleotide Diversity and Divergence in the Presence of Missing Data.” Molecular Ecology Resources 21, no. 4: 1359–1368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kyriazis, C. C. , Beichman A. C., Brzeski K. E., et al. 2023. “Genomic Underpinnings of Population Persistence in Isle Royale Moose.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 40, no. 2: msad021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kyriazis, C. C. , Wayne R. K., and Lohmueller K. E.. 2021. “Strongly Deleterious Mutations Are a Primary Determinant of Extinction Risk due to Inbreeding Depression.” Evolution Letters 5, no. 1: 33–47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lande, R. 1988. “Genetics and Demography in Biological Conservation.” Science 241: 1455–1460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lande, R. , and Barrowclough G. F.. 1987. “Effective Population Size, Genetic Variation, and Their Use in Population Management.” Viable Populations for Conservation 87: 87–124. [Google Scholar]
- Leberg, P. L. , and Firmin B. D.. 2008. “Role of Inbreeding Depression and Purging in Captive Breeding and Restoration Programmes.” Molecular Ecology 17, no. 1: 334–343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li, H. , and Durbin R.. 2011. “Inference of Human Population History From Individual Whole‐Genome Sequences.” Nature 475, no. 7357: 493–496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liddell, E. , Sunnucks P., and Cook C. N.. 2021. “To Mix or Not to Mix Gene Pools for Threatened Species Management? Few Studies Use Genetic Data to Examine the Risks of Both Actions, but Failing to Do So Leads Disproportionately to Recommendations for Separate Management.” Biological Conservation 256: 109072. [Google Scholar]
- Lippman, Z. B. , and Zamir D.. 2007. “Heterosis: Revisiting the Magic.” Trends in Genetics 23, no. 2: 60–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- López‐Cortegano, E. , Moreno E., and García‐Dorado A.. 2021. “Genetic Purging in Captive Endangered Ungulates With Extremely Low Effective Population Sizes.” Heredity 127, no. 5: 433–442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lynch, M. , Conery J., and Burger R.. 1995. “Mutation Accumulation and the Extinction of Small Populations.” American Naturalist 146, no. 4: 489–518. [Google Scholar]
- Mable, B. K. 2019. “Conservation of Adaptive Potential and Functional Diversity: Integrating Old and New Approaches.” Conservation Genetics 20, no. 1: 89–100. [Google Scholar]
- MacDonald, Z. G. , Deane D. C., He F., et al. 2021. “Distinguishing Effects of Area Per Se and Isolation From the Sample‐Area Effect for True Islands and Habitat Fragments.” Ecography 44, no. 7: 1051–1066. [Google Scholar]
- MacDonald, Z. G. , Dupuis J. R., Davis C. S., Acorn J. H., Nielsen S. E., and Sperling F. A.. 2020. “Gene Flow and Climate‐Associated Genetic Variation in a Vagile Habitat Specialist.” Molecular Ecology 29, no. 20: 3889–3906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacDonald, Z. G. , Shaffer H. B., and Sperling F. A. H.. 2024. “Impacts of Land Use and Climate Change on Natural Populations: The Butterfly Perspective.” Chapter 8.” In Case Studies in Eco Health, edited by Cork S. and Whiteside D.. Sheffield, U.K: 5m Books Ltd. [Google Scholar]
- MacDonald, Z. G. , Snape K. L., Roe A. D., and Sperling F. A.. 2022. “Host Association, Environment, and Geography Underlie Genomic Differentiation in a Major Forest Pest.” Evolutionary Applications 15, no. 11: 1749–1765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Manni, M. , Berkeley M. R., Seppey M., Simão F. A., and Zdobnov E. M.. 2021. “BUSCO Update: Novel and Streamlined Workflows Along With Broader and Deeper Phylogenetic Coverage for Scoring of Eukaryotic, Prokaryotic, and Viral Genomes.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 38, no. 10: 4647–4654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Martin, S. H. , Dasmahapatra K. K., Nadeau N. J., et al. 2013. “Genome‐Wide Evidence for Speciation With Gene Flow in Heliconius Butterflies.” Genome Research 23, no. 11: 1817–1828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mattila, A. L. , Duplouy A., Kirjokangas M., Lehtonen R., Rastas P., and Hanski I.. 2012. “High Genetic Load in an Old Isolated Butterfly Population.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, no. 37: E2496–E2505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McBride, C. S. , and Singer M. C.. 2010. “Field Studies Reveal Strong Postmating Isolation Between Ecologically Divergent Butterfly Populations.” PLoS Biology 8, no. 10: e1000529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mooney, J. A. , Marsden C. D., Yohannes A., Wayne R. K., and Lohmueller K. E.. 2023. “Long‐Term Small Population Size, Deleterious Variation, and Altitude Adaptation in the Ethiopian Wolf, a Severely Endangered Canid.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 40, no. 1: msac277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mussmann, S. M. , Douglas M. R., Anthonysamy W. J. B., et al. 2017. “Genetic Rescue, the Greater Prairie Chicken and the Problem of Conservation Reliance in the Anthropocene.” Royal Society Open Science 4, no. 2: 160736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nadachowska‐Brzyska, K. , Dutoit L., Smeds L., Kardos M., Gustafsson L., and Ellegren H.. 2021. “Genomic Inference of Contemporary Effective Population Size in a Large Island Population of Collared Flycatchers (Ficedula albicollis).” Molecular Ecology 30, no. 16: 3965–3973. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Narasimhan, V. , Danecek P., Scally A., Xue Y., Tyler‐Smith C., and Durbin R.. 2016. “BCFtools/RoH: A Hidden Markov Model Approach for Detecting Autozygosity From Next‐Generation Sequencing Data.” Bioinformatics 32, no. 11: 1749–1751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- NatureServe Network . 2024. Biodiversity location data [Web application]. Arlington, Virginia: NatureServe Explorer; Retrieved October 18, 2024, from: https://explorer.natureserve.org/. [Google Scholar]
- Neal, K. M. , Johnson B. B., and Shaffer H. B.. 2018. “Genetic Structure and Environmental Niche Modeling Confirm Two Evolutionary and Conservation Units Within the Western Spadefoot ( Spea hammondii ).” Conservation Genetics 19: 937–946. [Google Scholar]
- Nei, M. , and Li W. H.. 1979. “Mathematical Model for Studying Genetic Variation in Terms of Restriction Endonucleases.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 76, no. 10: 5269–5273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nosil, P. 2012. Ecological Speciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Parmesan, C. , Singer M. C., Wee B., and Mikheyev S.. 2023. “The Case for Prioritizing Ecology/Behavior and Hybridization Over Genomics/Taxonomy and Species' Integrity in Conservation Under Climate Change.” Biological Conservation 281: 109967. [Google Scholar]
- Pečnerová, P. , Lord E., Garcia‐Erill G., et al. 2024. “Population Genomics of the muskox'resilience in the Near Absence of Genetic Variation.” Molecular Ecology 33, no. 2: e17205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pekkala, N. , Emily Knott K., Kotiaho J. S., and Puurtinen M.. 2012. “Inbreeding Rate Modifies the Dynamics of Genetic Load in Small Populations.” Ecology and Evolution 2, no. 8: 1791–1804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pérez‐Pereira, N. , Pouso R., Rus A., et al. 2021. “Long‐Term Exhaustion of the Inbreeding Load in Drosophila melanogaster .” Heredity 127, no. 4: 373–383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peterson, A. T. , Soberón J., Pearson R. G., et al. 2011. Ecological Niches and Geographic Distributions. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Phillips, S. J. , Anderson R. P., and Schapire R. E.. 2006. “Maximum Entropy Modeling of Species Geographic Distributions.” Ecological Modelling 190, no. 3–4: 231–259. [Google Scholar]
- Phillips, S. J. , and Dudík M.. 2008. “Modeling of Species Distributions With Maxent: New Extensions and a Comprehensive Evaluation.” Ecography 31, no. 2: 161–175. [Google Scholar]
- Pimm, S. L. , Dollar L., and Bass O. L. Jr. 2006. “The Genetic Rescue of the Florida Panther.” Animal Conservation 9, no. 2: 115–122. [Google Scholar]
- Pritchard, J. K. , Stephens M., and Donnelly P.. 2000. “Inference of Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data.” Genetics 155, no. 2: 945–959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ralls, K. , Ballou J. D., Dudash M. R., et al. 2018. “Call for a Paradigm Shift in the Genetic Management of Fragmented Populations.” Conservation Letters 11, no. 2: e12412. [Google Scholar]
- Ralls, K. , Sunnucks P., Lacy R. C., and Frankham R.. 2020. “Genetic Rescue: A Critique of the Evidence Supports Maximizing Genetic Diversity Rather Than Minimizing the Introduction of Putatively Harmful Genetic Variation.” Biological Conservation 251: 108784. [Google Scholar]
- Robinson, J. A. , Brown C., Kim B. Y., Lohmueller K. E., and Wayne R. K.. 2018. “Purging of Strongly Deleterious Mutations Explains Long‐Term Persistence and Absence of Inbreeding Depression in Island Foxes.” Current Biology 28, no. 21: 3487–3494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson, J. A. , Kyriazis C. C., Nigenda‐Morales S. F., et al. 2022. “The Critically Endangered Vaquita Is Not Doomed to Extinction by Inbreeding Depression.” Science 376, no. 6593: 635–639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson, J. A. , Ortega‐Del Vecchyo D., Fan Z., et al. 2016. “Genomic Flatlining in the Endangered Island Fox.” Current Biology 26, no. 9: 1183–1189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robinson, J. A. , Räikkönen J., Vucetich L. M., et al. 2019. “Genomic Signatures of Extensive Inbreeding in Isle Royale Wolves, a Population on the Threshold of Extinction. Science.” Advances 5, no. 5: eaau0757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roelke, M. E. , Martenson J. S., and O'Brien S. J.. 1993. “The Consequences of Demographic Reduction and Genetic Depletion in the Endangered Florida Panther.” Current Biology 3, no. 6: 340–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Runquist, E. B. 2012. Patterns and Mechanisms of Divergence in Butterflies Across Spatial Scales. Davis: University of California. [Google Scholar]
- Saccheri, I. , Kuussaari M., Kankare M., Vikman P., Fortelius W., and Hanski I.. 1998. “Inbreeding and Extinction in a Butterfly Metapopulation.” Nature 392, no. 6675: 491–494. [Google Scholar]
- Santiago, E. , Caballero A., Köpke C., and Novo I.. 2023. “Estimation of the Contemporary Effective Population Size From SNP Data While Accounting for Mating Structure.” Molecular Ecology Resources 24, no. 1: e13890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schlaepfer, D. R. , Braschler B., Rusterholz H. P., and Baur B.. 2018. “Genetic Effects of Anthropogenic Habitat Fragmentation on Remnant Animal and Plant Populations: A Meta‐Analysis.” Ecosphere 9, no. 10: e02488. [Google Scholar]
- Shafer, A. B. , Cullingham C. I., Côté S. D., and Coltman D. W.. 2010. “Of Glaciers and Refugia: A Decade of Study Sheds New Light on the Phylogeography of Northwestern North America.” Molecular Ecology 19, no. 21: 4589–4621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shafer, A. B. , Wolf J. B., Alves P. C., et al. 2015. “Genomics and the Challenging Translation Into Conservation Practice.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 30, no. 2: 78–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singer, M. C. , and McBride C. S.. 2010. “Multitrait, Host‐Associated Divergence Among Sets of Butterfly Populations: Implications for Reproductive Isolation and Ecological Speciation.” Evolution 64, no. 4: 921–933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smit, A. F. A. , Hubley R., and Green P.. 2015. “RepeatMasker Open‐4.0.” http://www.repeatmasker.org.
- Soulé, M. E. 1980. “Thresholds for Survival: Maintaining Fitness and Evolutionary Potential.” In Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary‐Ecological Perspective, edited by Soulé M. E. and Wilcox B. M., 151–170. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates. [Google Scholar]
- Stoffel, M. A. , Johnston S. E., Pilkington J. G., and Pemberton J. M.. 2021. “Genetic Architecture and Lifetime Dynamics of Inbreeding Depression in a Wild Mammal.” Nature Communications 12, no. 1: 2972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Storfer, A. 1999. “Gene Flow and Endangered Species Translocations: A Topic Revisited.” Biological Conservation 87, no. 2: 173–180. [Google Scholar]
- Tallmon, D. A. , Luikart G., and Waples R. S.. 2004. “The Alluring Simplicity and Complex Reality of Genetic Rescue.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19, no. 9: 489–496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Templeton, A. R. 1986. “Coadaptation and Outbreeding Depression.” In Conservation Biology the Science of Scarcity and Diversity, edited by Soule M. E., 105–116. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates. [Google Scholar]
- Trinkel, M. , Ferguson N., Reid A., et al. 2008. “Translocating Lions Into an Inbred Lion Population in the Hluhluwe‐iMfolozi Park, South Africa.” Animal Conservation 11, no. 2: 138–143. [Google Scholar]
- Van der Auwera, G. A. , and O'Connor B. D.. 2020. Genomics in the Cloud: Using Docker, GATK, and WDL in Terra. 1st ed. Sebastopol, California: O'Reilly Media. [Google Scholar]
- Vasimuddin, M. , Misra S., Li H., and Aluru S.. 2019. “Efficient Architecture‐Aware Acceleration of BWA‐MEM for Multicore Systems.” In 2019 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS) (pp. 314‐324).
- Vila, C. , Sundqvist A. K., Flagstad Ø., et al. 2003. “Rescue of a Severely Bottlenecked Wolf ( Canis lupus ) Population by a Single Immigrant.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 270, no. 1510: 91–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang, T. , Hamann A., Spittlehouse D., and Carroll C.. 2016. “Locally Downscaled and Spatially Customizable Climate Data for Historical and Future Periods for North America.” PLoS One 11, no. 6: e0156720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weeks, A. R. , Sgro C. M., Young A. G., et al. 2011. “Assessing the Benefits and Risks of Translocations in Changing Environments: A Genetic Perspective.” Evolutionary Applications 4, no. 6: 709–725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weir, B. S. , and Cockerham C. C.. 1984. “Estimating F‐Statistics for the Analysis of Population Structure.” Evolution 38: 1358–1370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Westemeier, R. L. , Brawn J. D., Simpson S. A., et al. 1998. “Tracking the Long‐Term Decline and Recovery of an Isolated Population.” Science 282, no. 5394: 1695–1698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whitla, R. , Hens K., Hogan J., et al. 2023. “The Last Days of Aporia crataegi (L.) in Britain: Evaluating Genomic Erosion in an Extirpated Butterfly.” Molecular Ecology 33: e17518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Willi, Y. , Van Buskirk J., and Hoffmann A. A.. 2006. “Limits to the Adaptive Potential of Small Populations.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 37: 433–458. [Google Scholar]
- Xue, Y. , Prado‐Martinez J., Sudmant P. H., et al. 2015. “Mountain Gorilla Genomes Reveal the Impact of Long‐Term Population Decline and Inbreeding.” Science 348, no. 6231: 242–245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhan, S. , Zhang W., Niitepold K., et al. 2014. “The Genetics of Monarch Butterfly Migration and Warning Colouration.” Nature 514, no. 7522: 317–321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Appendix S1.
Data Availability Statement
All genomic short‐read data produced and analyzed in this study are available on NCBI (BioProject: PRJNA1194186). Our reference genome for Satyrium semiluna is also available on NCBI (BioProject: PRJNA907836). A final vcf file including all single nucleotide polymorphisms used in our analyses is available on Dryad (DOI: https://10.5061/dryad.hmgpnk9tx).
