Skip to main content
International Journal of Women's Dermatology logoLink to International Journal of Women's Dermatology
letter
. 2025 Feb 3;11(1):e195. doi: 10.1097/JW9.0000000000000195

Prevalence of skin diseases in women with endometriosis: a cross-sectional study

Paula Hitomi Sakiyama a,*, Caio Cesar Silva de Castro b,c, Helena Zenedin Marchioro c,d, Cristiane Gisselda Gobo e, Filipe Silva Linhares e, Hélio Amante Miot f
PMCID: PMC11789918  PMID: 39902065

What is known about this subject in regard to women and their families?

  • Endometriosis is a chronic estrogen-dependent disorder with unclear pathogenesis, although the immune system and inflammatory response are directly involved in its development.

  • Despite the increasing population prevalence of endometriosis in modern times and its potential shared pathophysiological mechanisms with some dermatoses associated with immunological, inflammatory, and hormonal factors, to date, no study has investigated the co-occurrence of endometriosis and inflammatory dermatoses.

What is new from this article as messages for women and their families?

  • Chronic urticaria, alopecia areata, and psoriasis are more prevalent in women with endometriosis than in women without the disease.

  • The co-occurrence of endometriosis and these inflammatory skin diseases highlights the importance of recognizing associated comorbidities and providing comprehensive care for the overall health of these patients.

Dear Editor,

Endometriosis is a chronic estrogen-dependent disorder with a rising incidence in the last few decades among women of reproductive age. Despite its uncertain pathogenesis, immune and inflammatory dysfunctions have been proposed as critical factors for its development.1

Similar to endometriosis, certain dermatoses are influenced by inflammatory, immunological, and hormonal factors. However, there is limited research investigating these associations. In this study, our objective is to assess the frequency of skin conditions among women with endometriosis, in comparison to those without the condition.

A cross-sectional study was conducted by including 835 adults with endometriosis, recruited from Internet groups, and by nonrandom sampling at a gynecology outpatient clinic; 39 were interviewed in person. As a comparison group, we included 309 women selected among patients who consecutively attended the gynecology clinic due to other complaints, companions in consultations, and employees of the hospital. The protocol was approved by the institution’s research ethics committee (#4,891,506), and informed consent of all participants was obtained.

The noninclusion criteria for the endometriosis group were >55 years and diagnostic not confirmed by a gynecologist. Women aged >55 years, with signs and/or symptoms of endometriosis, or who underwent regular follow-up at the institution’s dermatology clinic, were not included in the comparison group.

The participants were asked about current dermatoses (self-reported on the Internet and confirmed by a dermatologist in the endometriosis subjects interviewed in person, and in the whole comparison group). The effect size of the associations was represented by the prevalence ratio and its 95% confidence interval, estimated by a generalized linear model (robust Poisson regression), adjusted for age, body composition, skin color, and education. Significance was set as P < .05.

The demographic data of the sample are presented in Table 1, and the clinical data of individuals with endometriosis are in Supplementary Table 1, http://links.lww.com/IJWD/A63.

Table 1.

Demographic data from 835 adults with endometriosis and 309 women without the disease

Variables Endometriosis Women without endometriosis P value
Age, years, n (%) .326
 18–30 years 218 (26.1%) 106 (34.3%)
 31–40 years 397 (47.5%) 112 (36.2%)
 41–55 years 220 (26.5%) 91 (29.4%)
Self-declared color, n (%) .165
 White 498 (59.6%) 186 (60.2%)
 Brown 258 (30.9%) 93 (30.1%)
 Black 64 (7.7%) 18 (5.8%)
 Yellow (Amerindian and Asian) 15 (1.8%) 12 (3.9%)
Education, n (%) .002
 Did not study/elementary school 25 (3.0%) 25 (8.1%)
 Entered high school 210 (25.1%) 83 (26.9%)
 Entered higher education 600 (71.9%) 201 (65.0%)
Body composition, n (%) .363
 Underweight (slim) 53 (6.3%) 16 (5.2%)
 Within weight (normal) 363 (43.5%) 173 (56.0%)
 Overweight (heavy) 362 (43.4%) 74 (23.9%)
 Very overweight (obese) 57 (6.8%) 46 (14.9%)

Boldface indicates P < .05.

Chronic urticaria (CU), alopecia areata (AA), and psoriasis were more prevalent in individuals with endometriosis (Table 2), compared with women without the disease. Among the endometriosis group, 71.7% reported some dermatosis: 55.8% confirmed by a dermatologist, 7.3% by a general practitioner, and 36.9% not established by a physician (self-diagnosis).

Table 2.

Prevalence of skin diseases in 835 adults with endometriosis and 309 women without the disease

Variables Endometriosis Women without endometriosis PRa P valuea
Skin diseases
 Acne 422 (50.5%) 146 (47.2%) 1.1 (0.9–1.2) .337
 Alopecia areata 39 (4.7%) 3 (1.0%) 4.6 (1.4–15.2) .012
 Atopic dermatitis 93 (11.1%) 22 (7.1%) 1.5 (1.0–2.3) .079
 Hidradenitis suppurativa 4 (0.5%) 1 (0.3%) 1.6 (0.2–13.4) .662
 Lichen planus 7 (0.8%) 1 (0.3%) 1.8 (0.2–17.1) .589
 Lupus erythematosus 4 (0.5%) 0 (-) 3.3 (0.1–27.7) .141
 Melasma 167 (20.0%) 72 (23.3%) 0.9 (0.7–1.1) .295
 Psoriasis 27 (3.2%) 2 (0.6%) 4.8 (1.2–19.5) .029
 Rosacea 45 (5.4%) 14 (4.5%) 1.1 (0.6–1.9) .838
 Chronic urticariab 44 (5.3%) 2 (0.6%) 7.5 (1.8–31.1) .006
 Vitiligo 7 (0.8%) 3 (1%) 0.8 (0.2–3.5) .816

Boldface indicates P < .05.

PR, prevalence ratio.

a

Values adjusted for age, education, body composition, and color.

b

Urticaria for more than 6 weeks.

The sensitivity analysis, including only the 614 endometriosis subjects with dermatosis established by a physician (Supplementary Table 2, http://links.lww.com/IJWD/A64), and another with 408 endometriosis cases identified through surgery (Supplementary Table 3, http://links.lww.com/IJWD/A65), ratified the findings of the main study.

Increases in serum levels of some inflammatory cytokines have been described in patients with endometriosis (eg, IL-6, IL-17, TNFα), as well as in dermatoses, such as CU, AA, and psoriasis, which could explain an underlying pathophysiological pathway to such associations identified in our sample.1

A higher frequency of CU is identified among women, suggesting a role for estrogen in its pathogenesis.2 In endometriosis, estrogen is a determinant for the development of lesions, and it can also influence humoral immunity.1,3 CU may also be exacerbated by drugs used in endometriosis, such as analgesics, anti-inflammatories, and hormone therapies. Although the effect of hormonal therapy on CU is uncertain, there are cases of CU related to the perimenstrual period in a cyclical way, representing a hypersensitivity reaction called autoimmune progesterone dermatitis, for which a developmental mechanism related to prior exposure to exogenous progesterone is hypothesized.4

Other studies have suggested an association between endometriosis with AA, psoriasis with psoriatic arthritis, lupus erythematosus, allergic diseases, and nondermatological conditions such as cardiovascular diseases.58

This research has limitations related to information bias regarding self-reported skin diseases on the Internet and the lack of exploration of less prevalent dermatoses in the population.

Further studies should explore the timeline of onset between endometriosis and these inflammatory dermatoses, as well as the impact of coexisting conditions on treatment outcomes and how disease severity affects concurrent disorders. Additionally, it is important to investigate the systemic effects of cytokines on these patients, assessing their potential as biomarkers for diagnosis, disease severity, and therapeutic targets. Finally, research should examine the influence of hormonal disturbances associated with endometriosis on the pathogenesis of these dermatoses.

In conclusion, CU, AA, and psoriasis are more prevalent in people with endometriosis than in women without the disease. The high prevalence of these conditions highlights the importance of recognizing associated comorbidities and providing comprehensive care for the overall health of these patients.

Conflicts of interest

The authors made the following disclosures: C.C.S.C.: Advisory Board – Janssen, Aché, Novartis, Sun-Pharma, Pfizer, and Knight Therapeutics; Speaker – Janssen, Aché, Sanofi, Novartis, and Abbvie; Clinical trial – Janssen, Aché, Sanofi, and Abbvie. The other authors have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

None.

Study approval

This study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institution’s Research Ethics committee on August 7, 2021 (#4,891,506) – Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná. The study was performed following the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Author contributions

PHS, CCSC, HZM, HAM: Participated in study conception and design, and analysis and interpretation of data. PHS, CCSC, HZM, CGG, FSL, HAM: Participated in acquisition of data and critical review of the manuscript. PHS, HAM: Participated in statistical analysis and drafting of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Patient consent

Informed consent forms were acquired from all participants.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the participants who provided consent to participate in the study and publish their results. The authors would also like to thank the team of the Gynecology Service at Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná who contributed to the patient-selection process.

Supplementary data

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found at http://links.lww.com/IJWD/A63, http://links.lww.com/IJWD/A64, and http://links.lww.com/IJWD/A65.

Supplementary Material

jw9-11-e195-s001.pdf (240.9KB, pdf)
jw9-11-e195-s002.pdf (352.5KB, pdf)
jw9-11-e195-s003.pdf (373.2KB, pdf)

Footnotes

Published online 3 February 2025

References

  • 1.Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med 2020;382:1244–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Criado RFJ, Criado PR, Baldavira N, Cardial D, Gimenez-Arnau AM, Filho CDM. What lessons can we learn? Clinical and epidemiological retrospective analysis of 267 patients with urticaria in a Brazilian tertiary center. An Bras Dermatol 2021;96:436–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Moulton VR. Sex hormones in acquired immunity and autoimmune disease. Front Immunol 2018;9:2279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nguyen T, Ahmed A R. Autoimmune progesterone dermatitis: update and insights. Autoimmun Rev 2016;15:191–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dai YX, Tai YH, Chang YT, Chen TJ, Chen MH. Increased risk of alopecia areata among patients with endometriosis: a longitudinal study in Taiwan. Dermatologica Sinica 2021;39:41–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Harris HR, Korkes KMN, Li T, et al. Endometriosis, psoriasis, and psoriatic arthritis: a prospective cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 2022;191:1050–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yoshii E, Yamana H, Ono S, Matsui H, Yasunaga H. Association between allergic or autoimmune diseases and incidence of endometriosis: a nested case-control study using a health insurance claims database. Am J Reprod Immunol 2021;86:e13486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Teng SW, Horng HC, Ho CH, Yen MS, Chao HT, Wang PH; Taiwan Association of Gynecology Systematic Review Group. Women with endometriosis have higher comorbidities: analysis of domestic data in Taiwan. J Chin Med Assoc 2016;79:577–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

jw9-11-e195-s001.pdf (240.9KB, pdf)
jw9-11-e195-s002.pdf (352.5KB, pdf)
jw9-11-e195-s003.pdf (373.2KB, pdf)

Articles from International Journal of Women's Dermatology are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES