Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 21;15:1467811. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1467811

Table 6.

Evaluation of T-LSTM with an attention mechanism for different K-values.

K-value Accuracy (%) Precision (%) Recall (%) F1 score (%)
1 94.39 ± 2.79 95.55 ± 2.10 96.18 ± 1.85 96.27 ± 1.77
2 94.12 ± 2.73 96.89 ± 1.43 97.27 ± 1.31 97.08 ± 1.37
3 96.65 ± 1.66 97.52 ± 1.12 96.81 ± 1.54 96.81 ± 1.50
4 96.89 ± 2.37 97.37 ± 1.19 96.94 ± 1.47 96.62 ± 1.60
5 99.98 ± 0.01 99.76 ± 0.12 99.89 ± 0.05 99.82 ± 0.09
6 97.28 ± 1.35 96.31 ± 1.72 97.86 ± 1.01 97.19 ± 1.31
7 97.11 ± 1.43 97.28 ± 1.24 96.93 ± 1.88 97.49 ± 1.16
8 97.41 ± 1.28 96.94 ± 1.56 96.19 ± 1.85 96.56 ± 1.63
9 96.57 ± 1.70 96.64 ± 1.56 95.51 ± 2.19 95.83 ± 1.19
10 96.76 ± 1.61 97.25 ± 1.25 97.77 ± 1.06 97.77 ± 1.02
Average 96.71 ± 1.63 97.15 ± 1.30 97.13 ± 1.38 97.14 ± 1.34

Bold*, indicates best values and its corresonding deviation.