Table 6.
Evaluation of T-LSTM with an attention mechanism for different K-values.
| K-value | Accuracy (%) | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | F1 score (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 94.39 ± 2.79 | 95.55 ± 2.10 | 96.18 ± 1.85 | 96.27 ± 1.77 |
| 2 | 94.12 ± 2.73 | 96.89 ± 1.43 | 97.27 ± 1.31 | 97.08 ± 1.37 |
| 3 | 96.65 ± 1.66 | 97.52 ± 1.12 | 96.81 ± 1.54 | 96.81 ± 1.50 |
| 4 | 96.89 ± 2.37 | 97.37 ± 1.19 | 96.94 ± 1.47 | 96.62 ± 1.60 |
| 5 | 99.98 ± 0.01 | 99.76 ± 0.12 | 99.89 ± 0.05 | 99.82 ± 0.09 |
| 6 | 97.28 ± 1.35 | 96.31 ± 1.72 | 97.86 ± 1.01 | 97.19 ± 1.31 |
| 7 | 97.11 ± 1.43 | 97.28 ± 1.24 | 96.93 ± 1.88 | 97.49 ± 1.16 |
| 8 | 97.41 ± 1.28 | 96.94 ± 1.56 | 96.19 ± 1.85 | 96.56 ± 1.63 |
| 9 | 96.57 ± 1.70 | 96.64 ± 1.56 | 95.51 ± 2.19 | 95.83 ± 1.19 |
| 10 | 96.76 ± 1.61 | 97.25 ± 1.25 | 97.77 ± 1.06 | 97.77 ± 1.02 |
| Average | 96.71 ± 1.63 | 97.15 ± 1.30 | 97.13 ± 1.38 | 97.14 ± 1.34 |
Bold*, indicates best values and its corresonding deviation.