Skip to main content
Bioinformation logoLink to Bioinformation
. 2024 Sep 30;20(9):1022–1025. doi: 10.6026/9732063002001022

Assessment of maternal knowledge on neonatal danger signs

Mahalakshmi NB 1,*, Madhavi S 1,*, Rajendran K 2,*, Renuga R 1,*, Surya Surendran 1,*, Menaka J 1,*, Sivasubramanian N 3,*
PMCID: PMC11795489  PMID: 39917201

Abstract

Maternal knowledge of neonatal danger signs and subsequent healthcare-seeking behaviors are critical for early intervention and reducing neonatal mortality. This study aimed to assess these factors among mothers attending the Immunization Centre at KMCH Hospital, Coimbatore. A quantitative approach with a descriptive design was employed. Fifty mothers were selected via convenience sampling and administered a structured questionnaire. This tool encompassed socio-demographic variables, obstetric history, and a 30-item assessment on maternal knowledge of neonatal danger signs and healthcare-seeking behaviors. Findings revealed that while 80% of mothers exhibited moderate knowledge, only 16% demonstrated adequate knowledge of neonatal danger signs. Factors influencing healthcare-seeking behaviour included maternal education, family income and access to healthcare services. Comparative analysis with previous studies underscored consistent patterns of moderate knowledge but highlighted regional disparities in healthcare access and socio-economic impacts. The study emphasizes the critical need for targeted educational interventions to enhance maternal awareness of neonatal danger signs and promote early healthcare seeking. Improving maternal knowledge and behaviour could significantly mitigate neonatal morbidity and mortality rates in Coimbatore and similar settings. Future research should focus on sustained behaviour change and broader implementation of educational initiatives to improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes.

Keywords: Neonatal danger signs, maternal knowledge, healthcare-seeking behavior

Background:

The neonatal period, encompassing the first 28 days of life, is a critical time marked by high vulnerability to illness and death. Globally, neonatal mortality accounts for nearly 47% of all under-five child mortality, with approximately 2.4 million neonatal deaths reported in 2019 [1]. In India, the neonatal mortality rate (NMR) was 23 per 1,000 live births in 2018, highlighting the urgent need for improved neonatal care and early intervention strategies. Neonatal danger signs are vital clinical indicators of potentially life-threatening conditions requiring immediate medical attention [2]. These signs include symptoms such as stopped feeding, history of convulsions, fast breathing, severe chest in-drawing, no spontaneous movement, fever, low body temperature, jaundice, pus discharge from the umbilicus, cyanosis, vomiting and diarrhea [3]. Timely recognition and response to these signs are crucial for reducing neonatal morbidity and mortality[4]. Mother's health care seeking behavior plays a pivotal role in the timely management of neonatal illnesses. Understanding the level of knowledge and the determinants influencing this behavior is essential for designing effective interventions. Factors such as socio-economic status, educational level, cultural beliefs, and access to health services significantly impact a mother's ability to recognize and act upon these danger signs [5]. Research indicates that a lack of awareness and delays in seeking health care are major contributors to neonatal deaths [6]. In India, disparities in health care access and quality further exacerbate neonatal health outcomes. Rural areas often suffer from inadequate health infrastructure and limited availability of skilled health professionals, while urban centers face challenges related to overcrowding and unequal resource distribution. These disparities highlight the importance of targeted educational programs that address specific needs and barriers within different communities. Therefore, it is of interest to evaluate the level of knowledge and health care seeking behavior related to neonatal danger signs among mothers attending the Immunization Centre at KMCH Hospital.

Methodology:

Research design:

The study employed a quantitative research approach with a descriptive design [7, 8].

Setting and population:

The study was conducted at the Immunization Centre of KMCH Hospital, a 1,000-bed super-speciality hospital in Coimbatore, India. The study population included mothers with newborns and infants aged between birth and one year who visited the center for immunization.

Sample size and sampling technique:

A sample size of 50 mothers was selected for the study using a convenient sampling method.

Data collection tool:

A structured questionnaire was developed, consisting of two sections: socio-demographic and obstetric characteristics and a 30-item knowledge assessment focused on health care seeking behavior for neonatal danger signs. The tool was validated by pediatric nursing experts and pilot-tested for reliability.

Data collection procedure:

Formal permission for data collection was obtained from the chairman and the Head of the Pediatric Department at KMCH Hospital. The investigator introduced herself to the mothers and established rapport. The purpose of the study was explained and verbal consent was obtained from the mothers and their family members. Data were collected over two days using the structured knowledge questionnaire. Each participant was given approximately 15 minutes to complete the questionnaire.

Data analysis:

The collected data were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. Descriptive statistics, such as frequencies and percentages, were used to summarize the demographic and obstetric characteristics of the participants (Table 1). Inferential statistics, including chi-square tests, were used to identify associations between socio-demographic variables and the mothers' knowledge of health care seeking behavior for neonatal danger signs (Table 2).

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of mothers (n=50).

S. No Demographic Variable No. of Samples Percentage (%)
1 Age in years
≤20 3 6
21-25 40 80
26-30 7 14
≥31 0 0
2 Education Status of Mother
Illiterate 0 0
Primary 3 6
Secondary 2 4
Graduate 37 74
Post Graduate 8 16
3 Education Status of Father
Illiterate 0 0
Primary 4 8
Secondary 4 8
Graduate 25 50
Post Graduate 17 34
4 Occupation of Mother
Homemaker 25 50
Self-employed 13 26
Government 5 10
Private 7 14
5 Occupation of Father
Government 10 20
Private 22 44
Business 10 20
Farmer 8 16
6 Religion
Hindu 36 72
Christian 10 20
Muslim 4 8
Others 0 0
7 Family Income
<5000 28 56
5000-10000 13 26
10000-20000 6 12
>20000 3 6
8 Area of Residence
Urban 36 72
Rural 14 28
9 Type of Family
Nuclear Family 30 60
Joint Family 20 40
10 Place of Previous Delivery
Hospital 48 96
Home 2 4
11 Source of Information
Family Members 10 20
Friends 5 10
Relatives 5 10
Mass Media 12 24
Health Workers 18 36
Others 0 0
12 Presence of Medical Personnel in Family
Yes 28 56
No 22 44

Table 2. Obstetric characteristics of mothers (n=50).

S. No Obstetric Characteristics No. of Samples Percentage (%)
1 Age at First Pregnancy
<20 15 30
20-29 30 60
≥30 5 10
2 Number of Deliveries
1 17 34
2 25 50
3 8 16
3 History of Abortion
1 5 10
02-Apr 0 0
≥5 0 0
No 45 90
4 History of Stillbirth
Yes 2 4
No 48 96
5 Total Number of Children
1 18 36
2 28 56
3 4 8

Ethical considerations:

Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the institutional review board of KMCH Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all participants, and confidentiality of the information provided was maintained throughout the study.

Results:

In the study of maternal and child health services (n=50), it was found that all participants (100%) had followed up with antenatal care (ANC). The frequency of ANC visits was higher in the group with four or more visits (54%) compared to those with fewer than four visits (46%) as shown in Figure 1. The majority of deliveries occurred in hospitals (56%), followed by health centers (40%), and only a small fraction at home (4%). Postnatal care (PNC) follow-up was very high, with 96% of participants adhering to it. Spousal accompaniment during ANC was noted in 90% of cases. Birth preparedness practices varied, with 50% saving money, 28% buying delivery materials, 12% arranging transportation, and 10% identifying a skilled birth attendant. None of the participants were unprepared for birth.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Bar graph showing distribution of sample as per their knowledge category

Discussion:

In present study, we found that 80% (48) of mothers demonstrated moderate knowledge levels regarding neonatal danger signs, with only 16%(10) exhibiting adequate knowledge. This suggests a crucial gap in awareness that could impact early intervention and care-seeking behaviors for neonatal health issues. Strengthening educational initiatives targeting these specific danger signs is imperative to improve maternal responsiveness and ultimately neonatal health outcomes. Our findings align with studies conducted by Leta et al. (2022) and Ayele et al. (2022), highlighting similar patterns of moderate knowledge prevalence among mothers regarding newborn care [9, 10]. Our study's findings underscore the need for targeted educational campaigns focused on neonatal danger signs to bridge existing knowledge gaps and enhance maternal healthcare-seeking behaviors. This is consistent with Lassi ZS et al.'s (2019) findings, where educational interventions significantly improved maternal awareness and actions related to neonatal care. Furthermore, Emmanuel et al. (2021) demonstrated that socio-economic disparities can impact healthcare access, reinforcing the importance of inclusive healthcare policies to mitigate these barriers [11, 12]. The level of knowledge and health care seeking behavior regarding neonatal danger signs among mothers varies significantly across different regions and is influenced by several factors. Studies indicate that knowledge of neonatal danger signs is generally low, with only 34.3% of mothers in southwest Ethiopia and 45.78% in Gondar, Ethiopia, demonstrating good knowledge[13]. Factors such as maternal age, education, occupation, and antenatal care (ANC) attendance are significantly associated with better knowledge and health-seeking behavior. For instance, mothers aged 35-49, those with primary education, and those who received information on neonatal danger signs during ANC visits were more likely to have good knowledge [14, 15] In conclusion, while our study aligns with previous literature in confirming the influence of education and culture on maternal knowledge of neonatal danger signs, it enriches the understanding by highlighting the dual influences of occupation and income on healthcare-seeking behaviors. These comparative insights underscore the complexity of socio-demographic factors in shaping maternal healthcare decisions and advocate for tailored interventions that address both educational and economic disparities to improve maternal and neonatal health outcomes effectively.

Edited by P Kangueane

Citation: Mahalakshmi et al. Bioinformation 20(9):1022-1025(2024)

Declaration on Publication Ethics: The author's state that they adhere with COPE guidelines on publishing ethics as described elsewhere at https://publicationethics.org/. The authors also undertake that they are not associated with any other third party (governmental or non-governmental agencies) linking with any form of unethical issues connecting to this publication. The authors also declare that they are not withholding any information that is misleading to the publisher in regard to this article.

Declaration on official E-mail: The corresponding author declares that official e-mail from their institution is not available for all authors.

License statement: This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License

Comments from readers: Articles published in BIOINFORMATION are open for relevant post publication comments and criticisms, which will be published immediately linking to the original article without open access charges. Comments should be concise, coherent and critical in less than 1000 words.

Bioinformation Impact Factor:Impact Factor (Clarivate Inc 2023 release) for BIOINFORMATION is 1.9 with 2,198 citations from 2020 to 2022 taken for IF calculations.

Disclaimer:The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the views or opinions of Bioinformation and (or) its publisher Biomedical Informatics. Biomedical Informatics remains neutral and allows authors to specify their address and affiliation details including territory where required. Bioinformation provides a platform for scholarly communication of data and information to create knowledge in the Biological/Biomedical domain.

References


Articles from Bioinformation are provided here courtesy of Biomedical Informatics Publishing Group

RESOURCES