Abstract
The clinical and radiographic outcomes of direct pulp capping using visible light cure calcium hydroxide, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, and Platelet-Rich Fibrin, with and without pre-treatment with a low-level diode laser is of interest to dentist. One hundred and twenty patients (18-48 years) with accidental minimal pulp exposures less than 1 mm2 were randomized into two primary groups: laser pre-treatment and no laser pre-treatment, each further divided into three sub-groups based on the capping material. Clinical and radiographic assessments were conducted at 7th day, 1st, 6th and 12th months. The combination of low-level diode laser and mineral trioxide aggregate with platelet-rich fibrin demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared to other groups. Radiographic analysis showed significant differences in dentin bridge thickness among groups. While all tested materials exhibited promising results, further research is necessary to optimize treatment protocols and ensure long-term clinical success with a specific focus on dentin bridge formation and the potential influence of laser pre-treatment.
Keywords: Laser, Direct Pulp Capping, Mineral Trioxide Aggregate, Platelet Rich Fibrin, Calcium Hydroxide
Background:
The preservation of pulp vitality is a fundamental objective in dentistry, as healthy pulp tissue possesses inherent regenerative capabilities that allow for healing even after carious exposure, provided the inflammation is reversible [1]. Maintaining vital pulp is crucial as it offers superior protection against masticatory forces compared to endodontically treated teeth, which exhibit lower survival rates, especially in molars [1, 2]. The first documented pulp capping procedure, performed in 1756 by Phillip Pfaff, involved placing a small piece of gold over an exposed vital pulp to stimulate healing [3]. Historically, the success rates of pulp capping have been low, with one retrospective study reporting a 37% success rate at 5 years, decreasing to 13% at 10 years, and another study showing success rates of only 32% and 35% for direct pulp capping and partial pulpotomy, respectively, after one year [4, 5]. Due to these unpredictable outcomes, Vital Pulp Therapy (VPT) was traditionally recommended only for immature teeth and those with accidental traumatic pulp exposures [5]. However, recent studies and systematic reviews have reported improved outcomes for VPT when performed with bioceramic materials [6]. Pulp exposure can result from dental caries, mechanical injury, or traumatic events. According to the American Association of Endodontics (2003), direct pulp capping (DPC) is defined as the treatment of mechanical or traumatic pulp exposure by sealing the wound with a biomaterial placed directly on the exposed pulp to facilitate reparative dentin formation and maintain pulp vitality [7]. The European Society of Endodontology has emphasized the need for research in pulpitis control and conservative pulp management to reduce root canal treatments and promote biomimetic approaches [8]. Various materials have been used for direct pulp capping, with calcium hydroxide being a consistent choice due to its clinical success [9]. A novel light-cured calcium hydroxide formulation has recently been introduced, offering favorable viscosity and precise application, with controllable setting time through light activation [9]. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA), bioactive, biocompatible calcium silicate cement, has also gained prominence due to its ability to stimulate human dental pulp cell proliferation, differentiation, and rapid dentin bridge formation [10]. Additionally, platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), introduced by Choukroun in 2001, offers a three-dimensional fibrin network enriched with components that facilitate soft and hard tissue regeneration [11]. Laser therapy is emerging as a promising non-pharmacological approach for DPC, with studies indicating its antibacterial, biostimulatory, hemostatic, and wound-healing properties. For instance, a clinical study by Yazdanfar et al. reported a 100% success rate with diode low-level laser therapy in DPC after one year, compared to a 60% success rate in the control group [12]. This study aims to compare the efficacy of various direct pulp capping materials-light-cured calcium hydroxide, mineral trioxide aggregate and platelet-rich fibrin-in stimulating dentin bridge formation, evaluated through radiographic assessment and clinical pulp testing during follow-up appointments.
Materials and Methods:
This research was conducted in the Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics at New Horizon Dental College and Research Institute, Sakri, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, India. The study received approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee and informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study included 120 teeth with accidental pulp exposures in patients aged 18 to 48 years, selected from the department's outpatient clinic and dental camps organized by the Department of Public Health Dentistry.
Inclusion criteria were:
Pulp exposure less than 1 mm2 within 24 hours, systematically healthy and cooperative patients, permanent teeth with deep carious lesions, vital pulp with positive response to thermal and electric pulp tests, sensitivity to cold food or food lodgement and no radiographic evidence of periapical pathology. Exclusion criteria included: symptomatic teeth, inability to isolate with a rubber dam, teeth with irreversible pulpitis, large exposures, uncontrolled bleeding, non-restorable teeth and allergies to capping materials, pathologic mobility, radiolucency in periapical or furcation areas, external or internal resorption and canal obliteration.
Following a comprehensive patient history and pulp vitality tests, teeth were cleaned and prepared. Cavity preparation involved caries excavation using a sterile round bur (Mani, India) under water coolant, with the deepest carious tissue adjacent to the pulp removed last under magnification loupes (x3.5). Rubber dam isolation was used to minimize bacterial contamination. The cavity was disinfected with 3% sodium hypochlorite and hemostasis was achieved with a dry cotton pellet.
For Group I (laser group):
[1] Group I (a): The exposed pulp was treated with a low-level diode laser, followed by a 2 mm layer of light-cured calcium hydroxide, a 2 mm layer of chemically-cured glass-ionomer cement (Fuji II GC, Tokyo, Japan) and a composite resin restoration (Tetric N-Ceram, IvoclarVivadent, Liechtenstein).
[2] Group I (b): A 2 mm layer of MTA, covered with a moist cotton pellet, and a temporary restoration (Orafil-G) was placed. After 24 hours, the restoration was completed as in Group Ia.
[3] Group I (c): PRF, prepared according to Choukroun's technique, was applied to the pulpal wound, followed by a 2 mm layer of MTA, and restored as in Group Ib.
For Group II (non-laser group), the procedure was identical to Group I but without laser irradiation.
Radiographs were taken to evaluate reparative dentin formation. Clinical success was defined by normal pulp sensitivity, absence of pain, tenderness, swelling, sinus tracts, pathological mobility, and, in anterior teeth, no discoloration. Follow-up was conducted at 7 days, 1 month, 6 months and 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, Friedman, and Chi-square tests.
Results:
Data were collected through clinical examinations (cold, heat, and electric pulp tests) and radiographic assessment of dentin bridge thickness at 7-day, 1-month, 6-month, and 1-year follow-ups (100% patient recall). Data were entered into Microsoft Excel 365 from Word for Office 365 and analyzed using SPSS Statistics 23.0 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA).To compare the six groups, Kruskal-Wallis and Friedman tests were employed. A statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) was observed among the treatment groups. The chi-square test was used to assess radiographic outcomes, with a p-value of <0.001 indicating significant differences in dentin bridge thickness among groups over time. The overall success rate of direct pulp capping was 80.83% (97/120 cases). Table 1 presents the success rates of the two primary groups after one year. Table 2 details the success rates of individual groups after one year. Figure 1 illustrates total failure outcomes by capping material. Table 3 compares dentin bridge thickness (DBT) among treatment groups. The laser group demonstrated statistically significantly higher success rates than the non-laser group based on mean rank analysis. Statistical analysis of clinical and radiographic variables revealed significant differences among groups.
Table 1. Presents the success rates of the two primary groups after one year.
Group | Group - I: with laser | Group - II: without laser |
Cases: | (56/60) | (41/100) |
Success rate: | 93.33% | 68.33% |
Table 2. Details the success rates of individual groups after one year.
Group - I(a) LLDL + VLCCH | Group - I(b) LLDL + MTA | Group - I(c) LLDL + (MTA+PRF) | Group - II(a) VLCCH | Group - II(b) MTA | Group - II(c) MTA +PRF | |
Cases: | (17/20) | (19/20) | (20/20) | (10/20) | (15/20) | (16/20) |
Success rate: | 85% | 95% | 100% | 50% | 75% | 80% |
Figure 1.
Total failure outcomes in terms of capping material
Table 3. Compares dentin bridge thickness (DBT) among treatment groups.
No hard tissue formation | Partial hard tissue formation | Complete hard tissue formation | |
Group - I(a) | 15% | 55% | 30% |
Group - I(b) | 5% | 10% | 85% |
Group - I(c) | 0% | 10% | 90% |
Group - II(a) | 50% | 40% | 10% |
Group - II(b) | 30% | 35% | 35% |
Group - II(c) | 25% | 10% | 65% |
Discussion:
Advances in understanding the healing and regenerative capacity of irreversibly inflamed pulp have stimulated research into minimally invasive treatments for mildly inflamed pulp [22]. Inclusion criteria for this In vivo study were designed to mimic routine clinical practice. Given the conflicting literature regarding the impact of age on pulp-capped tooth success, with some studies reporting higher healing potential in younger patients and others finding no correlation with age [25], this study included eligible patients aged 18-48 years. Teeth with proximal caries were also included provided optimal isolation and coronal sealing were achieved [14]. While limited data exists on the success of direct pulp capping (DPC) for proximally exposed caries, based on prior research [12] and considering the minimal pulpal exposure of less than 1 mm2, a one-year clinical follow-up was deemed sufficient for provisional prognosis of final restorations. This timeframe also allowed for the evaluation of DPC efficacy using different materials. A standardized protocol, encompassing clinical and radiographic parameters (CT, HT, EPT and DBT)was established prior to follow-up analysis.
A variety of conventional and newer materials used for DPC have been recommended for use in DPT [15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 and 23]. Calcium hydroxide (CH) is the gold standard for pulp capping due to its beneficial properties. To address CH's limitations, light-cured calcium hydroxide (LCH) was introduced, offering improved handling, strength, and durability. LCH exhibits comparable antimicrobial efficacy to CH and demonstrates superior physical properties. Additionally, LCH materials have shown high bioactivity due to their porous structure, facilitating ion release [1-10, 12, 17]. PRF, an autologous material, is biocompatible and increasingly used in pulp capping due to favorable outcomes. Combined with MTA, it enhances pulp capping success. PRF's platelet concentrate promotes pulp cell regeneration and dentin genesis, acting as a bio-scaffold for revascularization and growth factor reservoir [24, 25]. Recently, MTA has become an alternative material for direct pulp capping. A previous clinical trial by Marques et al reported that MTA and Endocem, which is an MTA-derived Portland cement, showed 95.5% and 90.5% success rates, respectively [18, 26,].
Conclusion:
This study provides valuable insights into the potential of different materials and approaches for direct pulp capping. While all three materials investigated demonstrated promising success rates, further research is required to optimize treatments and ensure long-term success for patients. By incorporating various recent advancements, future research in DPC can improve treatment efficacy, provide more predictable outcomes, and offer personalized solutions for preserving pulp vitality in teeth with minimal exposures like considering advancements in materials, techniques, and assessment methods.
Limitations of the study:
Limitations of this study include a single LLLT application, small sample size, and reliance on less definitive diagnostic methods such as traditional pulp vitality tests. Pulse oximetry, a more reliable vitality assessment tool, could have enhanced the study's outcomes. Future research should explore intermittent LLLT, larger sample sizes, and advanced imaging techniques like CBCT. Additionally, longer follow-up periods and standardized regenerative DPC protocols are essential for drawing definitive conclusions.
Edited by Vini Mehta
Citation: Agrawal et al. Bioinformation 20(9):1111-1115(2024)
Declaration on Publication Ethics: The author's state that they adhere with COPE guidelines on publishing ethics as described elsewhere at https://publicationethics.org/. The authors also undertake that they are not associated with any other third party (governmental or non-governmental agencies) linking with any form of unethical issues connecting to this publication. The authors also declare that they are not withholding any information that is misleading to the publisher in regard to this article.
Declaration on official E-mail: The corresponding author declares that official e-mail from their institution is not available for all authors.
License statement: This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. This is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
Comments from readers: Articles published in BIOINFORMATION are open for relevant post publication comments and criticisms, which will be published immediately linking to the original article without open access charges. Comments should be concise, coherent and critical in less than 1000 words.
Bioinformation Impact Factor:Impact Factor (Clarivate Inc 2023 release) for BIOINFORMATION is 1.9 with 2,198 citations from 2020 to 2022 taken for IF calculations.
Disclaimer:The views and opinions expressed are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the views or opinions of Bioinformation and (or) its publisher Biomedical Informatics. Biomedical Informatics remains neutral and allows authors to specify their address and affiliation details including territory where required. Bioinformation provides a platform for scholarly communication of data and information to create knowledge in the Biological/Biomedical domain.
References
- 1.Islam R, et al. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. . 2023;59:48. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2023.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Komabayashi T, et al. Dent Mater J. . 2016;35:1. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2015-013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Miron R.J, et al. Clin Oral Investig. . 2017;21:1913. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2133-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Torabinejad M. Mineral Trioxide Aggregate: Properties and Clinical Applications. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2014. 16 pp. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chandani R, et al. Indian Journal of Conservative and Endodontics. . 2023;8:123. doi: 10.18231/j.ijce.2023.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Islam R, et al. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. . 2023;59:48. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2023.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Duncan H.F, et al. Bioact Mater. . 2023;27:574. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2023.04.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jose J, et al. Int. J. Adv. Res. . 2019;7:121. doi: 10.21474/IJAR01/8304. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bolenwar A, et al. J Res Med Dent Sci, . 2022;10:92. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Widbiller M, Galler KM. Int J Mol Sci. . 2023;24:11453. doi: 10.3390/ijms241411453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Parameswaran M, et al. Eur Endod J. . 2023;8:253. doi: 10.14744/eej.2023.83007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cunha D, et al. Clin Oral Investig. . 2023;27:1215. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04735-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Islam R, et al. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. . 2023;59:48. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2023.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zou Y, et al. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023;47:88. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2023.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Attia N, et al. Egyptian Dental Journal. . 2023;69:2555. doi: 10.21608/EDJ.2023.209106.2535. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Drouri S, et al. Cureus. . 2023;15:e39374.. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Selvendran K.E, et al. J Conserv Dent. . 2022;25:68. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_551_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chen J, et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27:5287. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05148-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Priya M.S, et al. J Conserv Dent Endod. . 2023;26:494. doi: 10.4103/jcd.jcd_344_23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Aanchal M.A, et al. World J Dent. . 2021;12:381. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1862. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Alsofi L, et al. BMC Oral Health. . 2022;22:57. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02099-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ahlawat M, et al. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. . 2022;14:S983.. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_837_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Iaculli F, et al. J Clin Med. . 2022;11:4016. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shobana S, et al. Eur Endod J. . 2022;7:114. doi: 10.14744/eej.2021.04834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kirilova J.N, Kosturkov D. Medicina (Kaunas). . 2023;59:225. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cushley S, et al. Int Endod J. . 2021;54:556. doi: 10.1111/iej.13449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Paula A, et al. Materials (Basel). . 2019;12:3382. [Google Scholar]