Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 13;1(2):e12006. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12006
graphic file with name CESM-1-e12006-g014.jpg Representative quotes
When it comes to sort of following, for example, patient‐important outcomes and so on, it can be important to make sure to consider that you really are addressing the patient‐important outcomes that are relevant for this patient group and not just listen to those asking the question that might not have the full picture. (Statistician #1)
I would definitely limit the number of potential applications, but also the number of outcomes and actually, if you think about a rapid review on a diagnostic test, then for me the most. A useful outcome would be just simply diagnostic accuracy. And then if that sort of is promising, then you can move on to the next stage where you would either do a full, not rapid review or you would expand to other outcomes such as costs or impact of the test. But I guess for a rapid review, and a diagnostic test is limited to diagnostic accuracy. (Methodologist #6)