Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2024 Dec 27;16(2):e02054-24. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02054-24

Sharing of cmeRABC alleles between C. coli and C. jejuni associated with extensive drug resistance in Campylobacter isolates from infants and poultry in the Peruvian Amazon

Kerry K Cooper 1,, Evangelos Mourkas 2, Francesca Schiaffino 3,4, Craig T Parker 5, Tackeshy N Pinedo Vasquez 6, Paul F Garcia Bardales 6, Pablo Peñataro Yori 3,6, Maribel Paredes Olortegui 6, Katia Manzanares Villanueva 6, Lucero Romaina Cachique 6, Hermann Silva Delgado 7, Matthew D Hitchings 8, Steven Huynh 5, Samuel K Sheppard 9, Ben Pascoe 9, Margaret N Kosek 3,6,
Editor: Sebastian Suerbaum10
PMCID: PMC11796421  PMID: 39727415

ABSTRACT

Campylobacter is a serious health threat because of the rapid progressive evolution of antimicrobial resistance and efficient transmission from zoonotic as well as human sources. Resistance to fluoroquinolones and macrolides is particularly concerning as this compromises the two most effective oral antibiotic agents currently available for human campylobacteriosis. Here, we report on the prevalence and worldwide distribution of the operon cmeRABC, which encodes an efflux pump conferring high levels of combined resistance to fluoroquinolones and macrolides in Campylobacter strains isolated from poultry (n = 75) and children (n = 177). These mutations were found to be highly prevalent in isolates from poultry (62.7%) and children (29.4%) in Iquitos, Peru. We investigated the population structure of genes in the cmeRABC operon and identified a potential genetic bottleneck for the cmeA and cmeB genes. While most cmeB alleles segregate by species, alleles associated with high resistance to fluoroquinolones and macrolides were found in both Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. We inferred that the likely ancestry of these alleles was from C. jejuni and was later acquired by C. coli through recombination. Publicly accessible global genomic data from 16,120 Campylobacter genomes identified these mutations in approximately 6% of C. jejuni and C. coli isolates globally, with higher prevalence in samples from poultry in many countries, including Peru. Our findings suggest that these extensively drug-resistant Campylobacter strains originated from C. jejuni in poultry.

IMPORTANCE

Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter is a growing public health concern, driven by the rapid evolution and zoonotic transmission of resistant strains. This study focuses on mutations in the cmeABC efflux pump, which confer high resistance to fluoroquinolones and macrolides, the two most effective oral antibiotics for human campylobacteriosis. By analyzing genomes from poultry and children in Iquitos, Peru, as well as global genomic data sets, we identified a significant prevalence of these resistance-associated mutations, particularly in poultry and children. Our findings suggest that these mutations originated in Campylobacter jejuni and spread to C. coli through recombination. Globally, these mutations are found in approximately 6% of isolates, with higher prevalence in poultry in multiple countries. This research underscores the critical role of genomic epidemiology in understanding the origins, evolution, and dissemination of antimicrobial resistance and highlights the need to address poultry as a reservoir for resistant Campylobacter.

KEYWORDS: Campylobacter, efflux pump, antibiotic resistance, recombination, Iquitos

INTRODUCTION

Campylobacter is the leading cause of bacterial gastroenteritis worldwide (13). Rising global trends in multidrug-resistant (MDR) Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli coli represent a serious public health risk (4). Fluoroquinolone-resistant strains are identified as a serious threat by both the United States Centers for Disease Control (5) and the World Health Organization (6). Consequently, azithromycin (a macrolide) has become the primary treatment for acute gastroenteritis caused by Campylobacter (79).

Increased antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Campylobacter is posited as the consequence of the extensive use of antimicrobials in livestock animals (10, 11), particularly in countries where antibiotics are commonly employed as growth promoters (12). In Campylobacter, resistances to fluoroquinolones and macrolides primarily arise from specific chromosomal mutations. Quinolone resistance results from a mutation in the gyrA gene (13) with no associated fitness costs. Macrolide resistance is typically due to mutations in the 23S rRNA gene or the acquisition of the ermB gene (1417). Additionally, the CmeABC efflux system, a tripartite drug efflux pump, has been demonstrated to play a pivotal role in transporting antimicrobials out of Campylobacter cells, resulting in high-level resistance to diverse classes of antimicrobials (1820).

Resistance–nodulation–cell division (RND) efflux systems, such as CmeABC, enhance resistance to bile salts and synergize with other resistance determinants, contributing to increased resistance to various antimicrobials (1922). The system is encoded by the cmeABC operon located in the chromosome of the bacteria. It encodes a periplasmic fusion protein (CmeA), an inner membrane transporter (CmeB), and an outer membrane protein (CmeC) (20, 22, 23). The cmeABC operon is regulated by the transcriptional repressor CmeR, which binds to the inverted repeats on the promoter region of the operon, where even single-base changes can alter CmeR binding, resulting in overexpression of the cmeABC operon (24). In Campylobacter, the expression of the cmeABC efflux pump genes is elevated in the presence of bile salts, making it crucial for bacterial intestinal colonization and survival (25, 26). This efflux system is also linked to resistance to heavy metals and disinfectants (20, 26). A multidrug-resistant variant of the cmeABC operon, known as RE-cmeABC, has been identified in C. jejuni isolates globally, including in Peru, where it is strongly associated with multidrug-resistant profiles (19, 21, 27, 28).

Given the widespread resistance across antibiotic classes (27, 29) and enhanced resistance associated with RE-cmeABC (27), we conducted a study to (i) further characterize the RE-cmeABC genotype in Peruvian isolates derived from both poultry and humans; (ii) determine the distribution and composition of cmeB alleles among C. jejuni and C. coli strains in Peru; and (iii) determine the distribution of RE-cmeABC alleles in a publicly available global collection of Campylobacter genomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection and processing

Human C. jejuni and C. coli isolates were derived from three studies conducted in Iquitos, Peru. Two of these were birth cohorts occurring between 2009 and 2024. Sampling criteria for both cohorts have been described previously (30, 31). Specifically, children were enrolled within 17 days of birth and followed up continuously for up to 5 years for the first cohort (study A) and 2 years for the second (study B). Stool samples were collected every time a child experienced diarrhea, and monthly specimens were collected for surveillance purposes. For study B, in case Campylobacter was detected by standard microbiology during an episode of diarrhea, children were enrolled into a nested case–control study enrolling an age-matched child. All children and adults who provided consent, as well as all animals living within the household premise of the case and control households, were also sampled for Campylobacter within 5 days of culture positivity of the index child. The third study (study C) was conducted between 2019 and 2022 and enrolled children under the age of 2 years who sought care for an episode of diarrhea at local primary and tertiary care centers in Iquitos, Peru. All fecal samples were collected using a sterile cotton swab directly from a diaper or a plastic container and placed directly in a Cary Blair transport medium. Samples were processed and cultured within 12 h of collection.

Poultry fecal samples were obtained from two distinct sampling events. The first one (study D) took place between August and December 2019. Households in Santa Clara de Nanay (a periurban community in Iquitos, Loreto, Peru) were surveyed for the presence of chickens by local field workers. Specifically, households that had chickens in their backyards (“chacras”) or inside the living domain of the household were identified by asking the household owner. Of these, a random sample was selected, and between three and five fecal samples from backyard poultry (crossbreed, Gallus gallus) were collected per household. Additionally, fecal samples from commercially raised broilers (White Leghorn or Cornish, Gallus gallus) were collected from two live poultry markets located at Iquitos city center within the same time range. The second sampling event was part of the nested case–control study described previously (study B), in which all animals from case and control households were sampled. All poultry fecal samples were collected using a sterile cotton swab as soon as the bird voided and placed directly in a Cary Blair transport medium. Samples were processed and cultured within 12 h of collection.

Campylobacter culture and identification

Human fecal samples from the first cohort, as well as poultry fecal samples, were cultured using Campylobacter Blood-Free Selective Agar Base (Oxoid; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) with CCDA Selective Supplement (Oxoid, Thermo Fisher Scientific), at 42°C in microaerophilic (1% O2 + 10% CO2 + 10% H2 + balance N2) conditions. All other human fecal samples were cultured using Columbia Blood Agar Base (Oxoid, Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 5% lysed horse blood and an S-pack filter of 0.45 μM and 47 mm in diameter (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA), in microaerophilic conditions at 37°C. Colonies with compatible Campylobacter morphology were further confirmed as Campylobacter spp. or C. jejuni/C. coli using a duplex quantitative PCR targeting the 16S rRNA and the Campylobacter adhesion to fibronectin (cadF) genes (32). Phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using standard disk-diffusion testing (29) against the following antibiotics: ciprofloxacin (CIP), erythromycin (ERY), azithromycin (AZM), tetracycline (TET), gentamicin (GEN), amoxicillin and clavulanic acid (AMC), ampicillin (AMP), chloramphenicol (CHL), and imipenem (IMP). Zone diameter breakpoints (in millimeter) for Campylobacter spp. from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (CLSI M45) were applied to assess CIP, ERY, AZM, and TET resistance. The CLSI zone diameter breakpoints (mm) for Enterobacteriaceae were used for GEN, AMC, AMP, CHL, and IMP,.

Whole-genome sequencing and genome archiving

Sequencing of genomic DNA from Campylobacter isolates from the first pediatric cohort was described previously (27, 33). For additional samples, libraries were prepared using the Illumina DNA Prep Tagmentation kit following the manufacturer’s instructions with the following changes to increase insert length: decreasing the first and second volumes of sample purification beads to 40 and 11 µL, respectively, and a final elution in 10 µL Illumina resuspension buffer. Illumina-DNA/RNA UD Plates A, B, C, and D dual index adapters were ordered from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA) and used at 1 µM final concentration. Individual libraries were quantified using the KAPA Library Quantification Kit (Roche) in 10 µL volume reactions and 90 s annealing/extension PCR, pooled and normalized to 4 nM. Pooled libraries were requantified by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) on a QX200 system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), using the Illumina TruSeq ddPCR Library Quantification Kit following the manufacturer’s protocols. Libraries were sequenced using a MiSeq Reagent Kit (v.2) (500 cycles) on a MiSeq instrument (Illumina) at 16 pM, following the manufacturer’s protocols. Short-read data are available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Sequence Read Archive with the accession numbers SRR28536576 through SRR28536596 and are also associated with BioProject PRJNA912682.

All genomes were assembled using the Spades assembler plugin for Geneious Prime (v.2023.2.1) (https://www.geneious.com) (34, 35). All assembled genomes were assessed using CheckM software (v.1.1.3) for completeness, contamination, and heterogeneity (36). All samples with contamination greater than 4% and heterogeneity greater than 50% were further analyzed using the Kraken taxonomic sequence classification System (37, 38). Samples in which bacterial genomes other than Campylobacter spp. were detected, and samples in which more than one Campylobacter spp. were detected were excluded from the analysis as definitive high-resolution typing was unable to be done. All strain metadata and sequencing statistics are available in Table S1.

Core genome characterization

Multilocus sequence types (STs) and associated clonal complexes (CCs) were automatically determined using the PubMLST database (39, 40). The entire genome was submitted for the seven-gene multilocus sequence typing profiling for each of the isolates (41). The core, accessory, and pangenome were characterized using Roary (v.3.12.0) (42) at 90% identity. The total pangenome of the 252 Campylobacter strains used in this study was composed of 4,672 genes including 468 core genes (present in >99% of strains), 180 soft core genes (present in 95%–99% of strains), and 4,024 accessory genes. The 468 core genes were aligned using MAFFT (v.7.475) (43), and the best fit model for the alignment was determined using ModelTest-NG software (44, 45). A maximum likelihood tree was generated using RAxML (v.8.2.12) (46) with the general time reversible model with optimization of substitution rates, gamma distributed rates, and estimate of proportion of invariable sites with 1,000 bootstraps. The majority rule tree was visualized and C. jejuni (https://microreact.org/project/cYFcfdwgWY4JbH36B7NsGG-cooper-et-al-2024-cmerabc-jejuni-view) and C. coli (https://microreact.org/project/grEwxG5A7vv5kAeJRtJFyu-cooperetal-2024-cmerabc-coliview) phylogenies were displayed separately using Microreact (47).

To assess how each of the Campylobacter strains was related to each other based on the genes of the pangenome and the presence of either RE-CmeB or CmeB, a principal component analysis (PCA) plot based on a panmatrix was generated. To measure the distance between all the protein sequences in the pangenome and to generate the panmatrix, all the protein sequences of the strains were compared against each other using the blastAllAll, bDist, and panMatrix commands in the program Micropan (v.2.1) (48) in R. Finally, the PCA plot was generated using the panPCA command in the program and visualized using ggplot2.

AMR genotyping

Genomes were mined for antimicrobial resistance chromosomal point mutations and antibiotic resistance genes using the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database, ResFinder and PointFinder, and NCBI AMRFinder databases (4952). A positive match was determined when a gene had more than 80% nucleotide identity and more than 60% coverage. Mutations in the cmeABC efflux system operon were determined using BLASTN plugin in Geneious Prime (v.2022.2.2) (https://www.geneious.com). cmeB alleles that were below 84% nucleotide identity to cmeB of C. jejuni strain NCTC 11168 (accession number AL111168.1) and greater than 90% nucleotide identity to cmeB of C. coli strain DH161 (accession number KT778508.1) are hereby termed RE-cmeB.

Genetic ancestry comparison of cmeRABC operon with other core genes

Single-gene phylogenies were constructed for each protein of the cmeRABC locus. The translated amino acid sequence was extracted from the genome of each isolate, for each gene individually, using Geneious Prime (v.2022.2.2, https://www.geneious.com). The 252 protein sequences for each gene were aligned against each other using MUSCLE (v.5.1) (53) with the default parameters and using ModelTest-NG software to determine the best-fit model for each of the four protein alignments. Maximum likelihood trees for the protein sequences for CmeR, CmeA, CmeB, and CmeC were generated using RAxML with an amino acid-specified matrix with a gamma model rate of heterogeneity, the estimated proportion of invariable sites, and the CPREV protein substitution model including 1,000 bootstraps. The majority rule tree for each of the proteins was visualized, and branches were colored in iTOL (v.6.6) (54).

The consistency of the phylogenetic tree with patterns of variation in sequence alignments for each gene of interest was calculated (55, 56). Consistency indices (CIs) were constructed for each single-gene alignment of cmeABC operon genes to a phylogeny using an alignment of 468 core genes shared by all isolates using the CI function of the R Phangorn package (57). The relative number of substitutions introduced by recombination and mutation was calculated as the ratio of recombination to mutation (r/m) for every branch and tip on the phylogeny reconstructed from the core genome using Gubbins (v.2.4.1) (58).

Identification of populations of cmeB alleles using STRUCTURE

Most alleles in the cmeRABC operon are segregated by Campylobacter spp., of which some alleles are associated with high resistance to fluoroquinolones and macrolides. To quantify the segregation by population, a training data set was used to assign resistant alleles to the two Campylobacter spp., and the probability of predicting the correct species for each isolate (self-attribution) was recorded. Allele attribution was performed using STRUCTURE (59, 60), a Bayesian model-based clustering tool developed to infer population structure and attribute individuals to populations using genotype data. Probabilistic assignment was carried out using the “no admixture” model with uncorrelated allele frequency, assuming that each locus originated from one of the putative source populations, each with its own set of allelic frequencies. Analyses were performed with 50,000 burn-in cycles to ensure model stability, followed by 50,000 iterations with the parameters using source population information (USEPOPINFO), and test isolates were distinguished from the training data set using POPFLAG. For the training data, we chose random subsets of 18 isolates from each species and performed self-attribution 10 times to ensure consistency. The average probability of allele assignment to the correct Campylobacter spp. was used as a quantifiable measure of cmeB allele segregation by species.

Global comparison of cmeRABC operon

PubMLST is a curated database (40) that contains >83,000 Campylobacter genomes from 9 Campylobacter spp., collected from more than 80 countries since 1970 (database accessed on 15 November 2023). Results were filtered for genomes that had metadata that included country, year of isolation, and host species. To determine which of the filtered genomes contained the RE-cmeB gene, BLAST searches were conducted to identify cmeB gene sequences as described above in the AMR Genotyping section. In total, 16,120 genomes with either the RE-cmeB gene or the normal cmeB gene were used for global distribution analysis. Barplots analyzing the frequency of the RE-cmeB gene based on C. coli clonal complex, C. jejuni clonal complex, year of isolation, poultry versus human, or other sources were generated using R (v.4.1.2) with the plyr and ggplot packages. The global distribution map of RE-cmeB gene by country was created using the chloroplethr package in R.

RESULTS

A total of 252 Campylobacter isolates were sequenced, of which 160 were C. jejuni (105 human isolates and 55 poultry isolates) and 92 were C. coli (72 human isolates and 20 poultry isolates). Genome sequences were typed using the scheme from PubMLST (https://pubmlst.org/organisms/campylobacter-jejunicoli) (40, 41). The sizes of C. jejuni and C. coli genomes ranged between 1.58 and 1.94 Mb, with an average size of 1.74 Mb. The number of contigs ranged between 14 and 295, with a mean contig size of 30,378 bp per genome assembly. Details of the isolates, genomes, antibiotic resistance phenotypes, antibiotic resistance determinants, and genome quality are presented in Table S1. In total, 62.7% (47 of 75) of the poultry-associated Campylobacter genomes contained a gyrA mutation for ciprofloxacin resistance; 22.7% (17 of 75) had the 23S rRNA mutation for macrolide resistance; and 62.7% (47 of 75) had the RE-cmeB genotype, compared to 65.0% (115 of 177) of human-associated Campylobacter genomes that had the gyrA mutation, 22.0% (39 of 177) with the 23S rRNA mutation, and 29.4% (52 of 177) with the RE-cmeB genotype (Table S1).

The high-resistance RE-cmeB genotype is dispersed among multiple Campylobacter lineages

We constructed a phylogeny by aligning nucleotide sequences from all core genome genes (n = 468, present in 99% of isolates). C. jejuni (Fig. 1A) and C. coli (Fig. 1B) populations were visualized separately and displayed a highly structured population, as previously described (61, 62). We identified 92 different STs (58 C. jejuni and 34 C. coli) from 16 different CCs (14 C. jejuni and 2 C. coli). Consistent with other studies, the ST-353 CC was not monophyletic, with two main clusters of isolates (63, 64). Isolates that caused gastroenteritis were distributed across the tree, with isolates from human infection or colonization belonging to many of the same CCs as those from chickens (Fig. 1A and B).

Fig 1.

Phylogenetic tree illustrates relationships between various clonal complexes of bacterial isolates. Two bar charts illustrate distribution of bacterial isolates with and without the RE-cmeB gene.

Spread of high resistance RE-cmeRABC genotypes among Campylobacter isolates from children and chicken in Peru. Maximum likelihood phylogeny based on the 468 core genes shared among all 252 isolates, visualized separately for C. jejuni (A) and C. coli (B). Major lineages are labeled (ST-clonal complexes). Leaves colored by source; isolates from asymptomatic human carriage (gray), gastroenteritis cases (red), commercial poultry (orange), and home-reared poultry (yellow). Tree scale indicated as percentage of total alignment (412,566 bp), and all branches are supported by more than 1,000 bootstraps. Dotted lines indicate the threshold between clonal complexes for C. jejuni and C. coli. Distribution of susceptible and high-resistance cmeB alleles (RE-cmeRABC-associated alleles are shaded in yellow) among clonal complexes (C) and isolate source (D).

Despite clear clustering of lineages in both species, there was little clustering of the RE-cmeB genotype, with isolates containing alleles associated with high resistance spread across the tree and not limited to any specific clonal complex (Fig. 1C). A greater proportion of C. jejuni isolates carried the RE-cmeB genotype (51.9%, 83 of 160), including a high proportion of isolates from CC ST-353 and ST-607. However, none of the 15 isolates from CC ST-354 carried the RE-cmeB genotype. Overall, fewer C. coli isolates carried the RE-cmeABC locus (17.4%, 16 of 92), compared to C. jejuni (X2 [1, n = 252] = 29.12; P value of <0.001). Most C. coli isolates that carried the RE-cmeABC genotype were from the highly introgressed ST-1150 CC (43.8%, 7 of 16) (62, 65). Isolates collected from commercial poultry were much more likely to have the RE-cmeB genotype (77.8%, 42 of 54) compared to backyard poultry (23.8%, 5 of 21) (X2 [1, n = 75] = 18.8, P value of <0.001) (Fig. 1D).

cmeB has co-evolved differently from other cme genes

A comparison of the isolates (n = 252) predicted protein content (protein-by-protein comparison for each predicted protein in the genome of all isolates) using a PCA did not identify any clustering by species or presence of the RE-cmeB allele (Fig. 2A). To better understand the ancestry of each individual component of the cmeRABC operon, we analyzed each gene independently. There were significantly more alleles (per locus) for cmeA and cmeB. Calculation of the mean CI, which measures the similarity between the single-gene tree and the tree constructed from the core genome, suggested that cmeA and cmeB varied most from the core genome phylogeny. Significantly lower CI values were observed among genes in the cmeRABC operon (CI 0.202 [±0.193] compared to CI 0.456 [±0.178]; Mann–Whitney test, U = 115, P value = 0.013) compared with those among 189 published core genes (Fig. 2B). Specifically, the phylogenies constructed from cmeA and cmeB genes deviated considerably from the core genome phylogeny (CI for cmeA: 0.113 and CI for cmeB: 0.103, where one is identical to the core genome phylogeny). This is indicative of enhanced horizontal gene transfer–recombination facilitating the movement of these genes in multiple genetic backgrounds.

Fig 2.

PCA plot illustrates clustering of C. coli and C. jejuni isolates. Line graph displays consistency index of core genes versus cmeABC-R genes along with phylogenetic trees for the cmeR, cmeA, cmeB, and cmeC genes.

Individual phylogenies of genes from the cmeRABC locus are different. (A) Principal component analysis (PCA) of 252 Campylobacter isolates, demonstrating the diversity of the strains based on protein versus protein comparison between each strain. PCA plot generated using the micropan software in R (48). (B) Phylogenies of cmeA and cmeB showed less congruence with phylogenies of 189 strict core genes. (C–F) Locus map and phylogeneis based on individual protein sequences of the cmeRABC locus of Campylobacter (C) CmeR, (D) CmeA, (E) CmeB, and (F) CmeC. In all trees, blue coloring of leaf labels indicates that the strain contains a high resistance-associated RE-cmeB gene, and orange coloring indicates susceptible-associated cmeB genes. The outer ring indicates species designation, with coloring representative of C. coli (blue) and C. jejuni (yellow) isolates.

Single-gene phylogenies were constructed based on the protein sequence of the product for each gene independently (Fig. 2C). CmeR protein coding sequences demonstrated the most sharing between species (Fig. 2D), with the three other proteins rarely shared between the two species. CmeA forms the periplasmic subunit of the pump, and isolates clustered almost completely by species, with subclusters of isolates from poultry and human sources (Fig. 2E). CmeB is the inner membrane subunit, and protein sequences segregated completely by their source (human or poultry), with subclusters of isolates from each species (Fig. 2F). CmeC is the outer membrane subunit of the efflux pump, and a comparison of isolates based on CmeC protein sequences showed segregation almost entirely between species, with some mixing between poultry and clinical isolates (Fig. 2F). Both groups of isolates (RE-cmeB and cmeB) contain C. jejuni and C. coli isolates. However, this sharing of alleles between species is more commonly observed in the cmeB group (ratio 1:1), compared to the RE-cmeB group (ratio 21:4, C. jejuni to C. coli) (Table S1). Figure S1 is a phylogenetic tree based on the core genome of the 253 strains from the study but also includes those isolates with the RE-cmeB genotype and the presence/absence of other major antibiotic resistance genes and/or mutations, including gyrA gene mutation, 23S rRNA gene mutation, and tetO gene.

We also compared the amino acid sequences of the CmeB and RE-CmeB variants. CmeB proteins had amino acid identities between 95% and 100% with other CmeB variants. The difference between C. jejuni and C. coli was closer to 95%. Protein identities between different RE-CmeB variants were approximately 98%. The sequence identity between CmeB variants and RE-CmeB variants ranged from 80.6% to 82.4% (Fig. S2). The percentage of charged amino acids among CmeB was above 18.2%, and the percentage among RE-CmeB was less than 18% (Fig. S3). Although this difference is slight, examination of the aligned protein sequences demonstrates that the positions of charged amino acids are altered between the two groups.

Macrolide resistance-associated genotypes originate in C. jejuni

We further analyzed the cmeRABC operon using STRUCTURE, which assigns individuals to source populations. We trained a data set of 136 isolates (71 C. jejuni and 65 C. coli, Table S2) to assign species based on the allelic profile of the four genes contained in the cmeRABC operon. This included 56 different cmeB alleles that segregated completely between C. jejuni (n = 32) and C. coli (n = 24) populations. By masking the origin species of a third of isolates in the training data set, we achieved a self-test accuracy of 95.6%. Using this model, we assigned species to isolates demonstrating macrolide resistance to putative source species populations (21 RE-cmeB alleles, representing 86 isolates). Most cmeB loci could be assigned to populations in C. jejuni (Fig. 3A and B). By comparing the inferred species with the observed distribution of isolates from which each RE-cmeB allele was found, we can see that most alleles have likely evolved separately in each species; i.e., they were found exclusively in isolates from a single species and had more than 60% inferred ancestry based on the cmeRABC locus (14 C. jejuni and 4 C.coli, Fig. 3C). The remaining three alleles were found in both C. jejuni and C. coli isolates, and one allele (allele #1640) was found in an equal number of C. jejuni and C. coli isolates yet is inferred to originate from C. jejuni.

Fig 3.

Stacked and box plots compare the probability distributions for C. jejuni and C. coli. Line graph displays C. jejuni proportions across cmeB alleles with inferred cmeABC ancestry. Bar graph compares recombination to mutation ratio.

Assigning high resistance-associated RE-cmeB alleles to Campylobacter spp. (A) Inferred ancestor species of 21 RE-cmeB alleles (representing 86 isolates) based on an evolutionary model trained on the four genes of the cmeRABC locus, including 56 different cmeB alleles that segregated completely between C. jejuni (n = 32) and C. coli (n = 24) populations. Self-test accuracy over 95%. (B) Box plot summary of inferred ancestry for all 21 RE-cmeB alleles. (C) Comparison of inferred ancestry with the observed origin of all RE-cmeB alleles. Three alleles with mixed ancestry, including cmeB allele 1640, which was found in an equal number of C. jejuni and C. coli isolates. (D) Box plot summary of the ratio between recombination and mutation sites, with increased recombination observed in C. coli; ****,P value <0.0001.

Introgression across the species boundary between C. jejuni and C. coli has previously been observed, with up to ~20% of the genome able to be shared between species (66). The distribution of RE-cmeB genotypes around the tree, among divergent lineages, suggests a role for horizontal gene transfer (HGT) in the emergence of this multidrug phenotype. Estimates of recombination demonstrated higher rates of recombination in C. coli compared to C. jejuni (Fig. 3D). Per branch estimations of recombination identified not only significant differences between Campylobacter spp. (C. jejuni mean r/m = 8.23, C. coli mean r/m = 22.90; Mann–Whitney test, U = 19,752, P value of <0.001) but also a trend toward elevated rates of recombination in commercial poultry (commercial poultry isolates mean r/m = 10.60, backyard poultry isolates mean r/m = 4.13; Mann–Whitney test, U = 487, P value of 0.426 not significant).

Global distribution of RE-cmeB genotypes

To provide context to our observation that RE-cmeB genotypes were found in 39.3% (99 of 252) of all our Peruvian isolates (Table S1), we searched PubMLST database for genomes containing putative RE-cmeB genotypes identifying that 6.11% were RE-cmeB (986 of 16,120). It should be noted that available strains were biased toward United Kingdom, New Zealand, and the United States, which together made up 82.6% (13,311 of 16,120) of the available genomes. Matches to the RE-cmeB genes (90% similarity over 90% gene length) in isolates from 20 countries and 6 continents identified the highest proportion identified of RE-cmeB from China (43.3%, 20 of 46), followed by Peru (18.8%, 79 of 420), Vietnam (16.8%, 104 of 618), Luxembourg (14.9%, 26 of 175), and Egypt (13.7%, 16 of 117). RE-cmeB genotypes were not common in the two countries represented by the most genomes in PubMLST, United States (0.8% of 1,046 isolates) and the United Kingdom (5.8% of 11,846 isolates). Additionally, the high percentage of RE-cmeB genotype found in Peru was not common in the two neighboring South American countries of Brazil (0.9%, 1 of 113) and Chile (1.2%, 1 of 83; Fig. 4A) that also had significant genomes available. We also explored how common RE-cmeB genotypes were in isolates from human clinical cases (6.2%, 743 of 12,044) and possible source hosts, including the most common cause of human infections, chicken (8.6%, 199 of 2,307; Fig. 4B), dogs (50%, 3 of 6), turkeys (18.8%, 6 of 32), ducks (10.8%, 13 of 120), dairy cattle (10.5%, 4 of 38), and sheep (6.6%, 11 of 166; Fig. 4C).

Fig 4.

World map displays geographical distribution of cmeB gene prevalence. Bar graphs compare cmeB and RE-cmeB strains across sources, features, and clonal complexes along with the additional detail of cmeB distribution across complexes and categories.

Global, source, sequence type, and time distribution of the high-resistance cmeB gene from Campylobacter strains in the PubMLST database. (A) Percentage of Campylobacter strains from various countries around the world with the RE-cmeB high-resistance gene (minimum 40 genomes). (B) Number of Campylobacter strains isolated from either chickens or human clinical cases with or without the RE-cmeB gene. (C) Number of Campylobacter strains isolated from sources other than chickens or human clinical cases with or without the RE-cmeB gene. (D) Number of Campylobacter coli strains based on clonal complex with or without the RE-cmeB gene. (E) Number of Campylobacter jejuni strains based on clonal complex with or without the RE-cmeB gene. (F) Number of strains based on year of isolation with or without the RE-cmeB gene.

As we observed in our Peruvian data set, C. coli RE-cmeB genotypes were most common in the highly introgressed ST-1150 CC (18.2%, 4 of 26) compared to the large generalist ST-828 CC (0.3%, 6 of 1,866) (Fig. 4D). The RE-cmeB genotype was identified in several C. jejuni CCs, especially those with a close relationship with either poultry or human hosts: a high proportion of isolates from host specialist lineages ST-661 CC (44 of 46 isolates, 95.7%; poultry-associated lineage), ST-446 CC (13 of 17 isolates, 43.3%; human-associated lineage), ST-206 CC (123 of 746 isolates, 16.5%; generalist lineage), ST-464 CC (63 of 776 isolates, 8.1%; poultry-associated lineage), and ST-353 CC (66 of 993 isolates, 6.6%; poultry-associated lineage; Fig. 4E). The RE-cmeB genotype was not identified in ruminant-associated lineages, such as ST-42 CC and ST-22 CC, or the wild bird-associated lineage, such as ST-658. The earliest identifiable isolate date in the PubMLST database was 1997 and 5.6% of isolates (21 of 376) collected that year contained the RE-cmeB genotype (Fig. 4F). RE-cmeB genotypes have become increasingly common in isolates collected more recently. There was limited identification of RE-cmeB genotypes in isolates from 1998 to 2003 (0%–6.3%), but between 2003 and 2018, prevalence increased slowly to 10.1%. There is a sharp spike in prevalence to 19.0% (68 of 358) in 2019, which may be biased by the low number of genome submissions.

DISCUSSION

Despite the global predominance of Campylobacter as a cause of bacterial enteritis, genomic epidemiology has been highly focused in high-income countries. We studied a highly resistant strain from the Peruvian Amazon derived from children under the age of 5, industrial poultry, and backyard poultry. Through whole-genome sequencing, we characterized individual genes within the cmeRABC locus, which is often associated with increased resistance to multiple antibiotics through changes in an RND efflux pump. Livestock animals are hypothesized to be the primary source of human Campylobacter infection in most epidemiological contexts (33, 67), and isolates from both symptomatic and asymptotic human infections clustered alongside isolates from poultry in our phylogeny. Isolates with high resistance-associated genotypes (RE-cmeB) were found across multiple genetic backgrounds, and high-resistance genotypes were identified in both human and poultry isolates, although they were significantly more frequent in commercial poultry than in backyard chickens.

Several cmeB alleles are shared between C. jejuni and C. coli. Previous studies have noted extensive introgression from C. jejuni to specific clades of C. coli, including alleles of the cmeB gene (62). Shared cmeB alleles in isolates located from distant genetic backgrounds or lineages are consistent with HGT, and we find evidence of increased recombination rates in both C. coli isolates and C. jejuni isolates from commercial poultry. Recent niche expansion, resulting from industrialization of agricultural methods, may have reduced the barriers to recombination between species (61). While incongruous use of antibiotics in agriculture may have contributed to the selection of high-resistance cmeB alleles, relatively few isolates from backyard poultry also carried this genotype. Small-scale breeders and individual chicken owners also have unrestricted access to antimicrobials in the settling from which our samples were collected, and an alternative explanation for the local spread of these resistance phenotypes may be a consequence of bystander resistance. Additionally, small-scale breeders might not use antibiotics as systematically as commercial agriculture, ameliorating the effects of consistent exposure on isolates from backyard poultry compared to commercial poultry. Genes or genotypes can contribute to more than one phenotype, and changes in the cmeRABC locus have also been shown to affect resistance to cleaning detergents (that may be used in commercial poultry production) or bile acids during chicken colonization (6870). Phenotypic cross-resistance may be an indirect consequence of genome evolution in this locus, in which evidence comes from the variability of genes and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs that contribute to changes in resistance. Stepwise increases in the level of resistance conferred by changes in the network of genome elements, including nucleotide changes in the cmeB gene, upstream regulator sequence, and additional linked changes in gyrA or 23S rRNA genes, suggest that antimicrobial resistance is not the primary phenotype under selection (27). The highly heterogenous prevalence of this important genomic determinant of resistance warrants further investigation. It should be noted that unlike gyrA mutations, which are neutral to Campylobacter fitness, the retention of RE-cmeABC in populations is likely to be very costly in terms of fitness as this is an ATP-dependent pump.

Our findings hint at a broader, widespread acquisition of MDR elements that can compromise oral antibiotic treatment, particularly in low-resource settings where there is the greatest need for effective antimicrobial treatment. We also highlight the need to incorporate more subtle gene mutations into in silico databases for identification (and prediction) of AMR profiles, as allele variation in the cmeRABC locus is not currently incorporated into in silico AMR determinant identification methods (49, 50, 71). Understanding the mutations that can affect phenotypic resistance is fundamental to a better understanding of the spread of resistance. Mutations in gyrA and 23S rRNA echo concerns about the impact of poultry reservoirs on human health and the association between poultry consumption and increased Campylobacter-related infections (72, 73). This study provides a snapshot of the distribution of AMR and RE-cmeB alleles in Peru. However, by leveraging global collections of Campylobacter genomes (via PubMLST), our genomic analysis identifies similar resistance-related profiles in other poultry-associated Campylobacter genomes. Providing a global perspective on the prevalence of RE-cmeB alleles emphasizes differences in regional dynamics, showcasing substantial variability across countries. Clonal complex associations, particularly with ST-353 and ST-661, underline the role of specific complexes in driving AMR dissemination (64, 74, 75).

While our work provides a snapshot of the current spread of AMR in Peru, improved global sampling efforts help provide context to our findings. Improved genomic epidemiology and pathogen surveillance from a broader range of countries and continents will provide a greater understanding of the evolution and spread of AMR in Campylobacter. While recent drives to expand sampling efforts may be contributing to this perceived increase, the lack of genomes deposited from high-income countries, with active pathogen surveillance programs for Campylobacter, is striking. There is a lack of current studies that evaluate global genome collections alongside phenotypic antimicrobial resistance profiles. Collections of concomitantly isolated Campylobacter isolates from humans, farm-raised and household-raised poultry, as well as other animal sources, are severely limited. This type of study will be essential in efforts to better understand disease transmission dynamics and the spread of AMR, and/or virulence genes. Despite these limitations, we identify enhanced resistance-associated alleles in genomes deposited in PubMLST from around the world, more frequently in recently sampled poultry C. jejuni isolates from Peru.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This publication made use of the PubMLST website (http://pubmlst.org/) developed by Keith Jolley and Martin Maiden and hosted at the University of Oxford.

Funding for this study was provided by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1066146 and OPP1152146 to M.N.K.) and the National Institutes of Health of the United States (R01AI158576 and R21AI163801 to M.N.K. and C.T.P.; D43TW010913 to M.N.K.; K43TW012298 to F.S.). This research was also supported in part by United States Department of Agriculture–Agricultural Research Service Current Research Information System, project 2030–42000-055-00D (to C.T.P.).

Contributor Information

Kerry K. Cooper, Email: kcooper@arizona.edu.

Margaret N. Kosek, Email: mkosek@virginia.edu.

Sebastian Suerbaum, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

ETHICS APPROVAL

The studies from which biological samples were obtained were approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Asociacion Benefica Prisma (Lima, Peru) and Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (Baltimore, MD, USA) (studies A, C, and D), and Asociacion Benefica Prisma (Lima, Peru) and the University of Virginia (study B). Written informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from the parents or legal guardians of children. Participants of studies consented to the further use of biological specimens.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.02054-24.

Figure S1. mbio.02054-24-s0001.pdf.

Maximum-likelihood tree based on the core genomes of the 253 Campylobacter isolates.

mbio.02054-24-s0001.pdf (850.8KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02054-24.SuF1
Figure S2. mbio.02054-24-s0002.pdf.

Amino acid identity.

mbio.02054-24-s0002.pdf (12.9KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02054-24.SuF2
Figure S3. mbio.02054-24-s0003.pdf.

Charged amino acids.

mbio.02054-24-s0003.pdf (966.7KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02054-24.SuF3
Table S1. mbio.02054-24-s0004.xlsx.

Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli genome information, antimicrobial resistance phenotypes, genes, and mutations.

mbio.02054-24-s0004.xlsx (70.3KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02054-24.SuF4
Table S2. mbio.02054-24-s0005.xlsx.

Training data set used for STRUCTURE analysis.

mbio.02054-24-s0005.xlsx (15.2KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02054-24.SuF5
Table S3. mbio.02054-24-s0006.xlsx.

Recombination parameters as calculated by Gubbins.

mbio.02054-24-s0006.xlsx (73.5KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02054-24.SuF6

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Amour C, Gratz J, Mduma E, Svensen E, Rogawski ET, McGrath M, Seidman JC, McCormick BJJ, Shrestha S, Samie A, et al. 2016. Epidemiology and impact of Campylobacter infection in children in 8 low-resource settings: results from the MAL-ED study. Clin Infect Dis 63:1171–1179. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw542 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Ashbaugh HR, Early JM, Johnson ME, Simons MP, Graf PCF, Riddle MS, Swierczewski BE, For The Gtd Study Team . 2020. A multisite network assessment of the epidemiology and etiology of acquired diarrhea among U.S. military and western travelers (Global Travelers’ Diarrhea Study): a principal role of Norovirus among travelers with gastrointestinal illness. Am J Trop Med Hyg 103:1855–1863. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Tisdale MD, Tribble DR, Mitra I, Telu K, Kuo HC, Fraser JA, Liu J, Houpt ER, Riddle MS, Tilley DH, Kunz AN, Yun HC, Geist CC, Lalani T. 2022. TaqMan Array Card testing of participant-collected stool smears to determine the pathogen-specific epidemiology of travellers’ diarrhoea†. J Travel Med 29:taab138. doi: 10.1093/jtm/taab138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. van Vliet AHM, Thakur S, Prada JM, Mehat JW, La Ragione RM. 2022. Genomic screening of antimicrobial resistance markers in UK and US Campylobacter isolates highlights stability of resistance over an 18-year period. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 66:e0168721. doi: 10.1128/aac.01687-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. CDC . 2019. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. Department of Health and Human Services C, Atlanta, GA. [Google Scholar]
  • 6. WHO . 2017. WHO publishes list of bacteria for which new antibiotics are urgently needed, on World Health Organization. Available from: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/detail/27-02-2017-who-publishes-list-of-bacteria-for-which-new-antibiotics-are-urgently-needed. Retrieved 05 Apr 2024.
  • 7. Riddle MS, DuPont HL, Connor BA. 2016. ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of acute diarrheal infections in adults. Am J Gastroenterol 111:602–622. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2016.126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Riddle MS, Martin GJ, Murray CK, Burgess TH, Connor P, Mancuso JD, Schnaubelt ER, Ballard TP, Fraser J, Tribble DR. 2017. Management of acute diarrheal illness during deployment: a deployment health guideline and expert panel report. Mil Med 182:34–52. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-17-00077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Taylor DN, Hamer DH, Shlim DR. 2017. Medications for the prevention and treatment of travellers’ diarrhea. J Travel Med 24:S17–S22. doi: 10.1093/jtm/taw097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Padungton P, Kaneene JB. 2003. Campylobacter spp in human, chickens, pigs and their antimicrobial resistance. J Vet Med Sci 65:161–170. doi: 10.1292/jvms.65.161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ruiz-Palacios GM. 2007. The health burden of Campylobacter infection and the impact of antimicrobial resistance: playing chicken. Clin Infect Dis 44:701–703. doi: 10.1086/509936 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Iovine NM. 2013. Resistance mechanisms in Campylobacter jejuni. Virulence 4:230–240. doi: 10.4161/viru.23753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Changkwanyeun R, Usui M, Kongsoi S, Yokoyama K, Kim H, Suthienkul O, Changkaew K, Nakajima C, Tamura Y, Suzuki Y. 2015. Characterization of Campylobacter jejuni DNA gyrase as the target of quinolones. J Infect Chemother 21:604–609. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2015.05.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Gibreel A, Kos VN, Keelan M, Trieber CA, Levesque S, Michaud S, Taylor DE. 2005. Macrolide resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli: molecular mechanism and stability of the resistance phenotype. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:2753–2759. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.7.2753-2759.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Gibreel A, Taylor DE. 2006. Macrolide resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. J Antimicrob Chemother 58:243–255. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Lehtopolku M, Kotilainen P, Haanperä-Heikkinen M, Nakari U-M, Hänninen M-L, Huovinen P, Siitonen A, Eerola E, Jalava J, Hakanen AJ. 2011. Ribosomal mutations as the main cause of macrolide resistance in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:5939–5941. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00314-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Pérez-Boto D, López-Portolés JA, Simón C, Valdezate S, Echeita MA. 2010. Study of the molecular mechanisms involved in high-level macrolide resistance of Spanish Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli strains. J Antimicrob Chemother 65:2083–2088. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq268 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Su C-C, Yin L, Kumar N, Dai L, Radhakrishnan A, Bolla JR, Lei H-T, Chou T-H, Delmar JA, Rajashankar KR, Zhang Q, Shin Y-K, Yu EW. 2017. Structures and transport dynamics of a Campylobacter jejuni multidrug efflux pump. Nat Commun 8:171. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00217-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Yao H, Shen Z, Wang Y, Deng F, Liu D, Naren G, Dai L, Su CC, Wang B, Wang S, Wu C, Yu EW, Zhang Q, Shen J. 2016. Emergence of a potent multidrug efflux pump variant that enhances Campylobacter resistance to multiple antibiotics. MBio 7:e01543-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01543-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Lin J, Michel LO, Zhang Q. 2002. CmeABC functions as a multidrug efflux system in Campylobacter jejuni. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:2124–2131. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.7.2124-2131.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Cagliero C, Cloix L, Cloeckaert A, Payot S. 2006. High genetic variation in the multidrug transporter cmeB gene in Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. J Antimicrob Chemother 58:168–172. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl212 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Lin J, Sahin O, Michel LO, Zhang Q. 2003. Critical role of multidrug efflux pump CmeABC in bile resistance and in vivo colonization of Campylobacter jejuni. Infect Immun 71:4250–4259. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.8.4250-4259.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Gibreel A, Wetsch NM, Taylor DE. 2007. Contribution of the CmeABC efflux pump to macrolide and tetracycline resistance in Campylobacter jejuni. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:3212–3216. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01592-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Lin J, Akiba M, Sahin O, Zhang Q. 2005. CmeR functions as a transcriptional repressor for the multidrug efflux pump CmeABC in Campylobacter jejuni. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:1067–1075. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.3.1067-1075.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Lin J, Cagliero C, Guo B, Barton YW, Maurel MC, Payot S, Zhang Q. 2005. Bile salts modulate expression of the CmeABC multidrug efflux pump in Campylobacter jejuni. J Bacteriol 187:7417–7424. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.21.7417-7424.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Vieira A, Ramesh A, Seddon AM, Karlyshev AV. 2017. CmeABC multidrug efflux pump contributes to antibiotic resistance and promotes Campylobacter jejuni survival and multiplication in acanthamoeba polyphaga. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e01600-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01600-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Schiaffino F, Parker CT, Paredes Olortegui M, Pascoe B, Manzanares Villanueva K, Garcia Bardales PF, Mourkas E, Huynh S, Peñataro Yori P, Romaina Cachique L, Gray HK, Salvatierra G, Silva Delgado H, Sheppard SK, Cooper KK, Kosek MN. 2024. Genomic resistant determinants of multidrug-resistant Campylobacter spp. isolates in Peru. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 36:309–318. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2024.01.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Yao H, Zhao W, Jiao D, Schwarz S, Zhang R, Li XS, Du XD. 2021. Global distribution, dissemination and overexpression of potent multidrug efflux pump RE-CmeABC in Campylobacter jejuni. J Antimicrob Chemother 76:596–600. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Schiaffino F, Colston JM, Paredes-Olortegui M, François R, Pisanic N, Burga R, Peñataro-Yori P, Kosek MN. 2019. Antibiotic resistance of Campylobacter species in a pediatric cohort study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e01911-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01911-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Richard SA, Barrett LJ, Guerrant RL, Checkley W, Miller MA, Investigators M-EN. 2014. Disease surveillance methods used in the 8-site MAL-ED cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 59 Suppl 4:S220–S224. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu435 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Yori PP, Lee G, Olórtegui MP, Chávez CB, Flores JT, Vasquez AO, Burga R, Pinedo SR, Asayag CR, Black RE, Caulfield LE, Kosek M. 2014. Santa Clara de Nanay: the MAL-ED cohort in Peru. Clin Infect Dis 59 Suppl 4:S310–S316. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu460 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. François R, Yori PP, Rouhani S, Siguas Salas M, Paredes Olortegui M, Rengifo Trigoso D, Pisanic N, Burga R, Meza R, Meza Sanchez G, Gregory MJ, Houpt ER, Platts-Mills JA, Kosek MN. 2018. The other Campylobacters: not innocent bystanders in endemic diarrhea and dysentery in children in low-income settings. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 12:e0006200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Pascoe B, Schiaffino F, Murray S, Méric G, Bayliss SC, Hitchings MD, Mourkas E, Calland JK, Burga R, Yori PP, Jolley KA, Cooper KK, Parker CT, Olortegui MP, Kosek MN, Sheppard SK. 2020. Genomic epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni associated with asymptomatic pediatric infection in the Peruvian Amazon. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 14:e0008533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008533 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, Lesin VM, Nikolenko SI, Pham S, Prjibelski AD, Pyshkin AV, Sirotkin AV, Vyahhi N, Tesler G, Alekseyev MA, Pevzner PA. 2012. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol 19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Meintjes P, Drummond A. 2012. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. 2015. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res 25:1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Wood DE, Lu J, Langmead B. 2019. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol 20:257. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1891-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Wood DE, Salzberg SL. 2014. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol 15:R46. doi: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Cody AJ, Bray JE, Jolley KA, McCarthy ND, Maiden MCJ. 2017. Core genome multilocus sequence typing scheme for stable, comparative analyses of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli human disease isolates. J Clin Microbiol 55:2086–2097. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00080-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Jolley KA, Bray JE, Maiden MCJ. 2018. Open-access bacterial population genomics: BIGSdb software, the PubMLST.org website and their applications. Wellcome Open Res 3:124. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14826.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Dingle KE, Colles FM, Wareing DR, Ure R, Fox AJ, Bolton FE, Bootsma HJ, Willems RJ, Urwin R, Maiden MC. 2001. Multilocus sequence typing system for Campylobacter jejuni. J Clin Microbiol 39:14–23. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.14-23.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MTG, Fookes M, Falush D, Keane JA, Parkhill J. 2015. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31:3691–3693. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. 2002. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res 30:3059–3066. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkf436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Darriba D, Posada D, Kozlov AM, Stamatakis A, Morel B, Flouri T. 2020. ModelTest-NG: a new and scalable tool for the selection of DNA and protein evolutionary models. Mol Biol Evol 37:291–294. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msz189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Flouri T, Izquierdo-Carrasco F, Darriba D, Aberer AJ, Nguyen L-T, Minh BQ, Von Haeseler A, Stamatakis A. 2015. The phylogenetic likelihood library. Syst Biol 64:356–362. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syu084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312–1313. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Argimón S, Abudahab K, Goater RJE, Fedosejev A, Bhai J, Glasner C, Feil EJ, Holden MTG, Yeats CA, Grundmann H, Spratt BG, Aanensen DM. 2016. Microreact: visualizing and sharing data for genomic epidemiology and phylogeography. Microb Genom 2:e000093. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Snipen L, Liland KH. 2015. Micropan: an R-package for microbial pan-genomics. BMC Bioinformatics 16:79. doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0517-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Alcock BP, Raphenya AR, Lau TTY, Tsang KK, Bouchard M, Edalatmand A, Huynh W, Nguyen A-LV, Cheng AA, Liu S, et al. 2020. CARD 2020: antibiotic resistome surveillance with the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 48:D517–D525. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz935 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Bortolaia V, Kaas RS, Ruppe E, Roberts MC, Schwarz S, Cattoir V, Philippon A, Allesoe RL, Rebelo AR, Florensa AF, et al. 2020. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother 75:3491–3500. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Feldgarden M, Brover V, Haft DH, Prasad AB, Slotta DJ, Tolstoy I, Tyson GH, Zhao S, Hsu CH, McDermott PF, Tadesse DA, Morales C, Simmons M, Tillman G, Wasilenko J, Folster JP, Klimke W. 2019. Validating the AMRFinder tool and resistance gene database by using antimicrobial resistance genotype-phenotype correlations in a collection of isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e00483-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00483-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Zankari E, Allesøe R, Joensen KG, Cavaco LM, Lund O, Aarestrup FM. 2017. PointFinder: a novel web tool for WGS-based detection of antimicrobial resistance associated with chromosomal point mutations in bacterial pathogens. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:2764–2768. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkx217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Letunic I, Bork P. 2021. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 49:W293–W296. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Mageiros L, Méric G, Bayliss SC, Pensar J, Pascoe B, Mourkas E, Calland JK, Yahara K, Murray S, Wilkinson TS, Williams LK, Hitchings MD, Porter J, Kemmett K, Feil EJ, Jolley KA, Williams NJ, Corander J, Sheppard SK. 2021. Genome evolution and the emergence of pathogenicity in avian Escherichia coli. Nat Commun 12:765. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-20988-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Mourkas E, Florez-Cuadrado D, Pascoe B, Calland JK, Bayliss SC, Mageiros L, Méric G, Hitchings MD, Quesada A, Porrero C, Ugarte-Ruiz M, Gutiérrez-Fernández J, Domínguez L, Sheppard SK. 2019. Gene pool transmission of multidrug resistance among Campylobacter from livestock, sewage and human disease. Environ Microbiol 21:4597–4613. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.14760 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Schliep KP. 2011. Phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27:592–593. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Croucher NJ, Page AJ, Connor TR, Delaney AJ, Keane JA, Bentley SD, Parkhill J, Harris SR. 2015. Rapid phylogenetic analysis of large samples of recombinant bacterial whole genome sequences using Gubbins. Nucleic Acids Res 43:e15. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. 2007. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Mol Ecol Notes 7:574–578. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01758.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Mourkas E, Taylor AJ, Méric G, Bayliss SC, Pascoe B, Mageiros L, Calland JK, Hitchings MD, Ridley A, Vidal A, Forbes KJ, Strachan NJC, Parker CT, Parkhill J, Jolley KA, Cody AJ, Maiden MCJ, Kelly DJ, Sheppard SK. 2020. Agricultural intensification and the evolution of host specialism in the enteric pathogen Campylobacter jejuni. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 117:11018–11028. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1917168117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Mourkas E, Yahara K, Bayliss SC, Calland JK, Johansson H, Mageiros L, Muñoz-Ramirez ZY, Futcher G, Méric G, Hitchings MD, Sandoval-Motta S, Torres J, Jolley KA, Maiden MCJ, Ellström P, Waldenström J, Pascoe B, Sheppard SK. 2022. Host ecology regulates interspecies recombination in bacteria of the genus Campylobacter. Elife 11:e73552. doi: 10.7554/eLife.73552 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Méric G, McNally A, Pessia A, Mourkas E, Pascoe B, Mageiros L, Vehkala M, Corander J, Sheppard SK. 2018. Convergent amino acid signatures in polyphyletic Campylobacter jejuni subpopulations suggest human niche tropism. Genome Biol Evol 10:763–774. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evy026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Veltcheva D, Colles FM, Varga M, Maiden MCJ, Bonsall MB. 2022. Emerging patterns of fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter jejuni in the UK [1998–2018]. Microb Genom 8. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000875 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Sheppard SK, Didelot X, Jolley KA, Darling AE, Pascoe B, Meric G, Kelly DJ, Cody A, Colles FM, Strachan NJC, Ogden ID, Forbes K, French NP, Carter P, Miller WG, McCarthy ND, Owen R, Litrup E, Egholm M, Affourtit JP, Bentley SD, Parkhill J, Maiden MCJ, Falush D. 2013. Progressive genome-wide introgression in agricultural Campylobacter coli. Mol Ecol 22:1051–1064. doi: 10.1111/mec.12162 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Sheppard SK, McCarthy ND, Jolley KA, Maiden MCJ. 2011. Introgression in the genus Campylobacter: generation and spread of mosaic alleles. Microbiology (Reading) 157:1066–1074. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.045153-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Cody AJ, Maiden MC, Strachan NJ, McCarthy ND. 2019. A systematic review of source attribution of human campylobacteriosis using multilocus sequence typing. Euro Surveill 24:1800696. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2019.24.43.1800696 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Hadjirin NF, Miller EL, Murray GGR, Yen PLK, Phuc HD, Wileman TM, Hernandez-Garcia J, Williamson SM, Parkhill J, Maskell DJ, Zhou R, Fittipaldi N, Gottschalk M, Tucker AWD, Hoa NT, Welch JJ, Weinert LA. 2021. Large-scale genomic analysis of antimicrobial resistance in the zoonotic pathogen Streptococcus suis. BMC Biol 19:191. doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-01094-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Kittiwan N, Calland JK, Mourkas E, Hitchings MD, Murray S, Tadee P, Tadee P, Duangsonk K, Meric G, Sheppard SK, Patchanee P, Pascoe B. 2022. Genetic diversity and variation in antimicrobial-resistance determinants of non-serotype 2 Streptococcus suis isolates from healthy pigs. Microb Genom 8:mgen000882. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000882 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Tedijanto C, Olesen SW, Grad YH, Lipsitch M. 2018. Estimating the proportion of bystander selection for antibiotic resistance among potentially pathogenic bacterial flora. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:E11988–E11995. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1810840115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Feldgarden M, Brover V, Fedorov B, Haft DH, Prasad AB, Klimke W. 2022. Curation of the AMRFinderPlus databases: applications, functionality and impact. Microb Genom 8:mgen000832. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000832 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Mughini-Gras L, Pijnacker R, Coipan C, Mulder AC, Fernandes Veludo A, de Rijk S, van Hoek AHAM, Buij R, Muskens G, Koene M, Veldman K, Duim B, van der Graaf-van Bloois L, van der Weijden C, Kuiling S, Verbruggen A, van der Giessen J, Opsteegh M, van der Voort M, Castelijn GAA, Schets FM, Blaak H, Wagenaar JA, Zomer AL, Franz E. 2021. Sources and transmission routes of campylobacteriosis: a combined analysis of genome and exposure data. J Infect 82:216–226. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.09.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Skarp CPA, Hänninen M-L, Rautelin HIK. 2016. Campylobacteriosis: the role of poultry meat. Clin Microbiol Infect 22:103–109. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.11.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Luangtongkum T, Jeon B, Han J, Plummer P, Logue CM, Zhang Q. 2009. Antibiotic resistance in Campylobacter: emergence, transmission and persistence. Future Microbiol 4:189–200. doi: 10.2217/17460913.4.2.189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Sproston EL, Wimalarathna HML, Sheppard SK. 2018. Trends in fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter. Microb Genom 4:e000198. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1. mbio.02054-24-s0001.pdf.

Maximum-likelihood tree based on the core genomes of the 253 Campylobacter isolates.

mbio.02054-24-s0001.pdf (850.8KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02054-24.SuF1
Figure S2. mbio.02054-24-s0002.pdf.

Amino acid identity.

mbio.02054-24-s0002.pdf (12.9KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02054-24.SuF2
Figure S3. mbio.02054-24-s0003.pdf.

Charged amino acids.

mbio.02054-24-s0003.pdf (966.7KB, pdf)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02054-24.SuF3
Table S1. mbio.02054-24-s0004.xlsx.

Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli genome information, antimicrobial resistance phenotypes, genes, and mutations.

mbio.02054-24-s0004.xlsx (70.3KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02054-24.SuF4
Table S2. mbio.02054-24-s0005.xlsx.

Training data set used for STRUCTURE analysis.

mbio.02054-24-s0005.xlsx (15.2KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02054-24.SuF5
Table S3. mbio.02054-24-s0006.xlsx.

Recombination parameters as calculated by Gubbins.

mbio.02054-24-s0006.xlsx (73.5KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/mbio.02054-24.SuF6

Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES