Table 1.
The pros and cons of typhoid vaccine approaches
| Vaccine type | Brands | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live attenuated Salmonella Typhi strain Ty21a | Vivotif oral | • Relatively low cost | • Requires 3 doses • Only indicated in children aged >6 years • Contraindicated in primary and acquired immunodeficiency • Cannot be given at the same time as antibiotics • Frequent gastrointestinal side effects • Contains bovine-derived material • May have weak or no efficacy • Cannot be adjuvanted because it is a live vaccine |
| Pure Vi polysaccharide vaccine | Typhim Vi®, Typherix®, and Typbar® | • High safety • Only a single dose is required |
• Weak efficacy at ~50% • Only indicated in infants aged >2 years of age • Short duration of protection (<2 years) • Unable to boost response • Cannot be adjuvanted as it is T-cell independent |
| Vi polysaccharide conjugate vaccine | Typbar-TCV™ | • High safety • More durable protection • Effective in children aged >3 months • 3- to 6-fold higher peak anti-Vi responses • Can potentially be adjuvanted |
• More expensive • Protection would wane after 5 years |
| Protein capsular matrix vaccine | Typhax/Advax-CpG™ | • High safety • Up to 1000-fold higher peak anti-Vi responses, suggesting the possibility of long-term protection • Inclusion of Advax-CpG adjuvant overcomes polysaccharide-associated immune suppression • Anti-Vi antibodies able to be strongly boosted with repeated doses • Induces serum bactericidal antibodies • Low cost |
• None |