Skip to main content
. 2025 Feb 6;25:83. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05685-3

Table 2.

Summary of effect size and quality of evidence for each power, RTD, or RFD parameter in identifying prospective falls/history

Study design Lower-limb power, RTD, or RFD parameter Effect measure and size
[95% CI]
No. of studies Study design Factors downgrading quality Factors upgrading quality Overall quality of evidence
Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Publication bias
Prospective cohort studies Average leg-press powera

Pooled SMD:

−0.17 [−0.23, −0.12]

Pooled OR:

0.84 [0.79, 0.89]

RR:

Quartile 1: 1.00 Reference

Quartile 2: 0.88 [0.81, 0.97]

Quartile 3: 0.86 [0.77, 0.95]

Quartile 4: 0.82 [0.73, 0.92]

3 −2 (No RCT) No No No No NA  + 1 (Dose–response gradient)

 ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ 

Moderate

Peak sit-to-stand powera

Minimum sit-to-stand powera

Average sit-to-stand power

Normalized peak sit-to-stand powera

Peak stand-to-sit power

Minimum stand-to-sit power

Average stand-to-sit power

Normalized peak stand-to-sit power

Cohen’s d:

0.41

0.40

0.08

0.38

0.28

0.19

0.07

0.25

1 −2 (No RCT) No No No No NA  + 1 (Dose–response gradient)

 ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ ○

Moderate

Peak jumping powera

OR:

0.91 [0.85, 0.98]

1 −2 (No RCT) No No No −1 (Sample size < 400) NA  + 1 (Dose–response gradient)

 ⊕ ⊕ ○○

Low

RFD of entire lower limbs

during the sit-to-stand task

SMD:

−0.33 [−0.75, 0.09]

1 −2 (No RCT) No No No No NA None

 ⊕ ⊕ ○○

Low

RTD of hip flexors during the MVIC task

RTD of hip extensors during the MVIC task

RTD of hip abductors during the MVIC task

RTD of hip adductors during the MVIC task

RTD of knee flexors during the MVIC task

RTD of knee extensors during the MVIC task

RTD of ankle dorsiflexors during the MVIC task

RTD of ankle plantarflexors during the MVIC task

OR:

0.80 [0.40, 1.58]

0.77 [0.33, 1.82]

1.00 [0.26, 3.80]

1.15 [0.34, 3.94]

0.41 [0.07, 2.22]

0.99 [0.59, 1.68]

1.35 [0.34, 5.25]

0.82 [0.13, 4.90]

1 −2 (No RCT) No No No −1 (Sample size < 400) NA  + 1 (Dose–response gradient)

 ⊕ ⊕ ○○

Low

Minimum hip joint power

during the favored-paced walking test

Minimum knee joint power

during the favored-paced walking test

Peak ankle joint power

during the favored-paced walking test

Median Difference 1 −2 (No RCT) No No No −1 (Sample size < 400) NA None

 ⊕ ○○○

Very low

Cross-sectional studies Peak sit-to-stand powera

Pooled SMD:

−0.58 [−0.96, −0.20]

3 −2 (No RCT) No No No No NA None

 ⊕ ⊕ ○○

Low

Average leg-press powera

Pooled SMD:

−0.49 [−0.87, −0.11]

2 −2 (No RCT) No No No −1 (Sample size < 400) NA None

 ⊕ ○○○

Very low

RTD of knee flexors during the MVIC taska

RTD of ankle dorsiflexors during the MVIC task

RTD of ankle plantarflexors during the MVIC task

Pooled SMD:

−0.57 [−0.98, −0.16]

−0.23 [−0.63, 0.18]

−0.25 [−0.65, 0.15]

3 −2 (No RCT) No No No −1 (Sample size < 400) NA None

 ⊕ ○○○

Very low

RTD of knee extensors during the MVIC task

Pooled SMD:

−0.18 [−0.46, 0.11]

4 −2 (No RCT) No No No −1 (Sample size < 400) NA None

 ⊕ ○○○

Very low

RTD of hip extensors during the MVIC task

Pooled SMD:

−0.75 [−1.98, 0.49]

2 −2 (No RCT) No No No −1 (Sample size < 400) NA None

 ⊕ ○○○

Very low

RTD of hip flexors during the MVIC task

RTD of hip abductors during the MVIC task

RTD of hip adductors during the MVIC task

SMD:

−0.04 [−0.75, 0.67]

−0.34 [−1.06, 0.38]

−0.24 [−0.95, 0.48]

1 −2 (No RCT) No No No −1 (Sample size < 400) NA None

 ⊕ ○○○

Very low

Peak jumping power (a in female participants)

SMD:

−0.47 [−0.78, −0.15]

1 −2 (No RCT) No No No −1 (Sample size < 400) NA None

 ⊕ ○○○

Very low

Average power of knee flexors

during the isokinetic contraction task at 90°/sa

Average power of knee flexors

during the isokinetic contraction task at 120°/s

Average power of knee extensors

during the isokinetic contraction task at 90°/sa

Average power of knee extensors

during the isokinetic contraction task at 120°/sa

Average power of ankle dorsiflexors

during the isokinetic contraction task at 90°/sa

Average power of ankle dorsiflexors

during the isokinetic contraction task at 120°/s

Average power of ankle plantarflexors

during the isokinetic contraction task at 90°/s

Average power of ankle plantarflexors

during the isokinetic contraction task at 120°/s

SMD:

−0.82 [−1.44, −0.21]

−0.56 [−1.15, 0.04]

−0.80 [−1.41, −0.19]

−0.73 [−1.33, −0.12]

−0.65 [−1.26, −0.05]

−0.08 [−0.67, 0.50]

−0.22 [−0.81, 0.36]

−0.31 [−0.90, 0.28]

1 −2 (No RCT) No No No −1 (Sample size < 400) NA None

 ⊕ ○○○

Very low

Power of knee extensors

during the concentric contraction task at 70% 1-RM

SMD:

0.13 [−0.65, 0.91]

1 −2 (No RCT) No No No −1 (Sample size < 400) NA None

 ⊕ ○○○

Very low

The quality of evidence was rated based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria

RTD rate of torque development, RFD rate of ground reaction force development; SMD standardized mean difference, OR odds ratio, RR risk ratio, MVIC maximal voluntary isometric contraction, RM repetition maximum, RCT randomized controlled trial, NA not applicable

aIndicates the parameter could significantly predict the prospective falls or identify the different fall histories