Table 2.
Effects of different dietary treatments on growth performance of broilers
| Diets | 1 to 10 d | 11 to 21 d | 22 to 42 d | 1 to 42 d | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BW (g) | FI (g) | FCR | BW (g) | FI (g) | FCR | BW (g) | FI (g) | FCR | BW (g) | FI (g) | FCR | |
| CON | 99 | 146.85 | 1.49 | 514.60b | 766.37abc | 1.48a | 1795.30c | 3656.67a | 2.03a | 2408.67c | 4642.30a | 1.92a |
| VM | 102.14 | 147.85 | 1.45 | 622.60a | 801.43a | 1.28bc | 1962.40a | 3649.47a | 1.86b | 2687.14a | 4598.76a | 1.71cd |
| SS | 102.14 | 144.97 | 1.42 | 594.33a | 720.90bc | 1.21dc | 1943.00ab | 3481.17bc | 1.76b | 2639.48a | 4347.04c | 1.64d |
| B1 | 100.42 | 146.57 | 1.46 | 609.23a | 818.83a | 1.34bc | 1733.37c | 3554.18abc | 2.05a | 2443.03bc | 4519.58ab | 1.85ab |
| B2 | 105.08 | 148.29 | 1.41 | 585.77a | 815.70a | 1.39ab | 1776.17c | 3440.00c | 1.93ab | 2467.02bc | 4403.99bc | 1.78bc |
| S1 | 97.85 | 138.20 | 1.41 | 585.87a | 787.97ab | 1.34bc | 1779.30c | 3666.83a | 2.06a | 2465.02bc | 4593.00a | 1.86ab |
| S2 | 102.57 | 149.42 | 1.46 | 579.87a | 764.37abc | 1.32bc | 1802.14c | 3497.33bc | 1.95ab | 2484.58bc | 4411.13cb | 1.78bc |
| B1+S1 | 102.85 | 147.85 | 1.44 | 623.33a | 704.17c | 1.12d | 1841.28bc | 3579.00ab | 1.94ab | 2567.47ab | 4431.02cb | 1.72cd |
| SEM | 3.441 | 3.502 | 0.043 | 14.924 | 21.367 | 0.044 | 38.946 | 41.902 | 0.052 | 42.989 | 42.493 | 0.037 |
| P-value | 0.86 | 0.45 | 0.89 | 0.0006 | 0.0043 | 0.002 | 0.0020 | 0.0023 | 0.0124 | 0.0005 | 0.0001 | 0.0003 |
a, b Means within same column with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05), the number of observations n=48 in each group. CON: Control diet, VM: 0.2 g/kg virginiamycin, SS: Synbioti, B1: 1 and B2: 2 g/kg barberry powdered seeds, S1: 1 and S2: 2 g/kg sumac powdered seeds, and B1+S1: Mixture of barberry 1 g/kg + sumac 1 g/kg. BW: Body weight, FI: Feed intake, and FCR: Feed conversation ratio