FIGURE 2.

Comparison of results obtained from each modality. Top‐left: Connectivity probabilities as obtained from the Avalanche Transition Matrices (ATM). Source ROIs are in rows, and target ROIs are in columns. This convention remains valid for the remaining presented connectivity matrices. Top‐center: The matrix contains transition probabilities as obtained from the F‐TRACT dataset. Top‐right: Each dot of the scatterplot corresponds to a connection between two cortical parcels, the x‐axis informs about probabilities obtained using the ATMs, and the y‐axis informs about probabilities as obtained using F‐TRACT. The least‐squares fit line is also reported. To the far right, the distribution of the correlations was obtained by shuffling the temporal course of the ATMs (while preserving their spatial properties—see Section 4 for details). The green dashed line corresponds to the empirically observed correlation. Bottom‐left: The matrix contains the delays as obtained from the ATM dataset. Bottom‐center: The matrix contains the delays as obtained from F‐TRACT. Bottom‐right: Similarly as above, each dot of the scatterplot corresponds to a connection between two cortical ROIs, the x‐axis shows the delays obtained using the ATMs, and the y‐axis shows the delays obtained using F‐TRACT. The least‐squares line is also reported. To the far right, the distribution corresponds to the correlations obtained with the surrogate data, and the green dashed line marks the empirically observed correlation. Note that the F‐TRACT matrices shown in the second column were not masked for at least 50 trials per connection (see Section 4), but this mask was applied to obtain scatter plots shown in the right.