Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 27;122(5):e2416984122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2416984122

Table 2.

No effects for maximum age limit (β2 and β3) or gender differences, full sample

Dependent measure Partner age (slope below limit) β1 Age limit (threshold) β2 Partner age (change above limit) β3 Gender differences p
All Ps Men Women All Ps Men Women All Ps Men Women β1 β2 β3
Romantic attraction −0.07*** −0.12*** −0.08*** −0.01 0.00 −0.06 −0.01 0.00 0.02 0.134 0.228 0.717
Overall rating −0.03** −0.09*** −0.05*** −0.02 0.02 −0.09 0.00 −0.02 0.05 0.534 0.147 0.165
Second date decision −0.04*** −0.05*** −0.04*** −0.02 −0.03 −0.02 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.277 0.863 0.844
Romantic desire (3-DV average) −0.06*** −0.11*** −0.07*** −0.02 −0.01 −0.07 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.242 0.299 0.513

Note: βs (Eq. 2) are standardized and can be interpreted like r (0.10 = small, 0.30 = medium, 0.50 = large; Cohen, 1992). Second date decision odds ratios were converted to r using the tool provided by Lenhard and Lenhard (2022). P values for the gender differences refer to the interaction terms between the parameter and gender when all gender interactions were added (along with the gender main effect) to Eq. 2. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.