Table 2.
No effects for maximum age limit (β2 and β3) or gender differences, full sample
Dependent measure | Partner age (slope below limit) β1 | Age limit (threshold) β2 | Partner age (change above limit) β3 | Gender differences p | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All Ps | Men | Women | All Ps | Men | Women | All Ps | Men | Women | β1 | β2 | β3 | |
Romantic attraction | −0.07*** | −0.12*** | −0.08*** | −0.01 | 0.00 | −0.06 | −0.01 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.134 | 0.228 | 0.717 |
Overall rating | −0.03** | −0.09*** | −0.05*** | −0.02 | 0.02 | −0.09 | 0.00 | −0.02 | 0.05 | 0.534 | 0.147 | 0.165 |
Second date decision | −0.04*** | −0.05*** | −0.04*** | −0.02 | −0.03 | −0.02 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.277 | 0.863 | 0.844 |
Romantic desire (3-DV average) | −0.06*** | −0.11*** | −0.07*** | −0.02 | −0.01 | −0.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.242 | 0.299 | 0.513 |
Note: βs (Eq. 2) are standardized and can be interpreted like r (0.10 = small, 0.30 = medium, 0.50 = large; Cohen, 1992). Second date decision odds ratios were converted to r using the tool provided by Lenhard and Lenhard (2022). P values for the gender differences refer to the interaction terms between the parameter and gender when all gender interactions were added (along with the gender main effect) to Eq. 2. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.