Table 3.
Associations of partner’s age difference with romantic desire, full sample
Dependent measure | Partner age (slope below own age) β1 | Partner older (threshold) β2 | Partner age (change above own age) β3 | Gender differences p | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All Ps | Men | Women | All Ps | Men | Women | All Ps | Men | Women | β1 | β2 | β3 | |
Romantic attraction | −0.11*** | −0.05*** | −0.03 | −0.03 | −0.05 | 0.00 | 0.04* | 0.05* | 0.03 | 0.968 | 0.869 | 0.456 |
Overall rating | −0.08*** | −0.04* | 0.00 | −0.03 | −0.01 | −0.01 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.862 | 0.265 | 0.940 |
Second date decision | −0.03*** | −0.03*** | −0.02* | 0.01 | −0.03 | 0.02 | 0.04*** | 0.04* | 0.03 | 0.615 | 0.860 | 0.743 |
Romantic desire (3-DV average) | −0.09*** | −0.05*** | −0.02 | −0.02 | −0.04 | 0.00 | 0.05** | 0.05* | 0.04 | 0.982 | 0.692 | 0.577 |
Note: βs (Eq. 3) are standardized and can be interpreted like r (0.10 = small, 0.30 = medium, 0.50 = large; Cohen, 1992). Second date decision odds ratios were converted to r using the tool provided by Lenhard and Lenhard (2022). P values for the gender differences refer to the interaction terms between the parameter and gender when all gender interactions were added (along with the gender main effect) to Eq. 3. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.