Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 27;122(5):e2416984122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2416984122

Table 5.

No effects for maximum age limit (β2 and β3) or gender differences, women ≤40 sample

Dependent measure Partner age (slope below limit) β1 Age limit (threshold) β2 Partner age (change above limit) β3 Gender differences p
All Ps Men Women All Ps Men Women All Ps Men Women β1 β2 β3
Romantic attraction −0.10*** −0.14*** −0.13*** 0.08 0.10 0.03 −0.07 −0.10 0.00 0.770 0.692 0.338
Overall rating −0.05** −0.09** −0.08*** −0.05 0.00 −0.14 0.03 −0.01 0.11 0.769 0.877 0.202
Second date decision −0.05** −0.05*** −0.08*** 0.04 0.02 0.06 −0.04 −0.04 −0.03 0.528 0.388 0.805

Romantic desire

(3-DV average)

−0.09*** −0.12*** −0.12*** 0.04 0.06 −0.02 −0.04 −0.07 0.03 0.677 0.718 0.336

Note: βs (Eq. 2) are standardized and can be interpreted like r (0.10 = small, 0.30 = medium, 0.50 = large; Cohen, 1992). Second-date decision odds ratios were converted to r using the tool provided by Lenhard and Lenhard (2022). P values for the gender differences refer to the interaction terms between the parameter and gender when all gender interactions were added (along with the gender main effect) to Eq. 2. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.